Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 52

  1. #1

    Does anyone still make the 1/2A SST?

    Found one I flew many years ago in the attic. Had on OS 15 on it and it was a little rocket & a blast to fly. Looking for a kit hopefully.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Murray, KY
    Posts
    3,127
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by funnotcrazy View Post
    ............Had on OS 15 on it and it was a little rocket & a blast to fly. Looking for a kit hopefully.
    I'll bet it was a rocket.

    I don't think anyone is kitting it any longer. With the slow down in the small glow market, it's just not feasible for many manufacturers to kit the 1/2A planes. Here's a .pdf if you're inclined to scratch one out.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    the "other" andrew
    I'm not older than dirt, but I can remember when it was patent pending

  3. #3
    Hey thanks for the plans Andrew. It is a pretty easy build, but don't know about the foam core wings. That little plane flew great, I put hundreds of flights on it.

  4. #4
    aspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Ruthven, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    1,747
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Someone is still making the Ace foam wings. Probably would be similar.

  5. #5
    combatpigg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    arlington, WA
    Posts
    17,914
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sst.gif 
Views:	163 
Size:	85.2 KB 
ID:	1930451

    A .15 has plenty of room if the firewall is moved back enough to keep the spinner backplate in it's same relative position.
    Building a wing from scratch for it is not a big deal. People tend to think that these planes have "magical" airfoils that had Divine inspiration. Just anything that is close will do. The ribs themselves do not need to be knifed out all that perfectly, either. Mine always look like a drunk did them once I stack them together for a "group sanding"
    I think it is just a matter of desire to build a little plane like this.....It's just a few steps up from building a napkin holder.
    WHO GUNNA FEED MAW KEEEIDS..???

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Murray, KY
    Posts
    3,127
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by aspeed View Post
    Someone is still making the Ace foam wings. Probably would be similar.
    Select Hobbies -- Kits and ARFs

    Both straight and tapered cores are available from Select Hobbies --- down near the bottom of the page.
    the "other" andrew
    I'm not older than dirt, but I can remember when it was patent pending

  7. #7
    Great-I will call & see what size these wings are. Been out of the hobby for a number of years. Have a 90" span Super Decathlon on the building table now & will add this little tyke next to it.
    It was a blast to fly!

  8. #8
    MJD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Orangeville, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    6,823
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I think that if I drew those plans and stood back looking at the size of the TD relative to the nose and fuselage bulk, the first reaction would be to erase it and draw in a .10 or a .15. My early overpowering venture was a Sterling Mini Fledgling with an OS Max .15... ooh the power . No carb, so it was start and toss. Eventually the elevator ripped off with predictable results.
    Sorry I'm late dear, I had to help my uncle Jack off his horse.

    Revver Bro #231

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Murray, KY
    Posts
    3,127
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by MJD View Post
    ..................My early overpowering venture was a Sterling Mini Fledgling with an OS Max .15... ooh the power . No carb, so it was start and toss.
    Now, now ..... not everyone is an adrenalin junkie. But, I think I've got a .15 or two around here somewhere.
    the "other" andrew
    I'm not older than dirt, but I can remember when it was patent pending

  10. #10
    aspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Ruthven, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    1,747
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I think a lot of the older .049 stuff was underpowered, mostly because the Cox stuff had no throttle, and the designers didn't want things to be too fast for the masses. Most of them now can use an 06 or .10 or so with a throttle and be just about right. OK a .15 too if you strengthen the wing - and stab.

  11. #11
    Yeah - strengthen the wing. I recall after I got used to flying the overpowered little monster I started getting brave. Adjusted control surfaces to maximum throw. After one particularly crazy high speed maneuver the wing snapped right at the center line. Foam core made for easy repair. Had an incredible roll rate, probably 2 or 3 rolls per second.

  12. #12
    MJD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Orangeville, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    6,823
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Are the new "ACE" foam cores hot wire cut regular foam? The original ACE wings were molded from fairly dense foam, and could take a reasonable amount of gee loading stock. I still ended up laying in 1/4" carbon unidirectional CF laminate top and bottom over the high point (by sanding in a shallow depression) on recent projects, and light glass over the center on my Simple 400 as well. On that model I could pull full deflection maneuvers at >100mph without issue.

    Part of the underpower problem was the state of radio gear at the time as well. You needed a large enough airframe to hold it, enough wing area to support it at reasonable speed, and had an .049 to pull it along. Also on some designs the habit of laminating the front of the fuselage with slabs of heavy balsa a la larger models didn't help matters.
    Sorry I'm late dear, I had to help my uncle Jack off his horse.

    Revver Bro #231

  13. #13
    aspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Ruthven, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    1,747
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I folded up a wing recently, and think it may have been ok with just smaller servos and receiver. It only had a .10 on the front. There was a lot of extra weight stressing the wing. I think the new wings are cut with a hot wire and would need strengthening. It says original Ace wings coming soon though. I finally flew my Simple 400 with the Norvel .06. Not bad, was a slower rich run, but not too hard to fly. Almost lost it when it got a bit far away, it is pretty small on the side view.
    Last edited by aspeed; 10-17-2013 at 10:54 AM.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,012
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by combatpigg View Post

    People tend to think that these planes have "magical" airfoils that had Divine inspiration. Just anything that is close will do. The ribs themselves do not need to be knifed out all that perfectly, either.
    Not only are the foam wing airfoils not "magical", we frequently sanded the daylights out of them to make them more symmetrical. I always liked the 1/2A Pacer and my buddy always had the 1/2A SST.

    Dave

  15. #15
    MJD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Orangeville, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    6,823
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    The thickness was not always consistent, but they match up very closely to a plotted NACA 2415 or 2416 (with the trailing edge truncated). No surprise there, pretty typical and risk-free choice as a good all-round airfoil for sport aerobatic models.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Boerne, TX
    Posts
    28
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Funnotcrasy, I have Ace R/C wing kits for the Pacer and GHLII. The plans have been attacked by silver fish but the foam cores and wood seems to be OK. If you have a use for them then they are yours. I would like reimbursement for packing and shipping. George in Texas

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Corinth, MS
    Posts
    86
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I have a SST .40 with a OS .61 four-stroke on it. I have had lots of fun with it but I'm ready to sell it now.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SST40_LF.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	53.9 KB 
ID:	1930682
    Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Murray, KY
    Posts
    3,127
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by MJD View Post
    The thickness was not always consistent, but they match up very closely to a plotted NACA 2415 or 2416 (with the trailing edge truncated). No surprise there, pretty typical and risk-free choice as a good all-round airfoil for sport aerobatic models.
    The box says 17%. I don't think the ACE core can be used on the SST --- given the specs on the SST plans, 242 sq.in. and 33" span, the chord works out to about 7 3/8". The ACE cores are 5 1/2" max.

    I agree with Mike on the foil, although I probably would use either a built-up 2413 or a 2412 and put the SST on a diet.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Ace Tapered Foam Core.JPG 
Views:	58 
Size:	645.6 KB 
ID:	1930683  
    Last edited by Andrew; 10-17-2013 at 04:56 PM.
    the "other" andrew
    I'm not older than dirt, but I can remember when it was patent pending

  19. #19
    MJD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Orangeville, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    6,823
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew View Post
    The box says 17%. I don't think the ACE core can be used on the SST --- given the specs on the SST plans, 242 sq.in. and 33" span, the chord works out to about 7 3/8". The ACE cores are 5 1/2" max.

    I agree with Mike on the foil, although I probably would use either a built-up 2413 or a 2412 and put the SST on a diet.
    Could easily be 17% I measured - it has been 4-5 years since I checked it out I think. I didn't have a box so didn't know what the nominal thickness was, and I recall plotting it in AutoCAD to get the cutout right on a fuselage side for something or other - likely the Squirt. I plotted a few samples in Compufoil to the right chord length, and whichever thickness 241x matched the thickness of the samples I had, it followed the profile pretty much perfectly so I was convinced that was the basis.

    The reason for the thickness is clear I think - enough cross section to use in stock form as cantilevered foam wing panels. So really no reason for all that thickness in a built up or otherwise reinforced structure, especially with the lightweight radio gear we have available (and knowing how not to build 12 ounce 1/2A fuselages).
    Sorry I'm late dear, I had to help my uncle Jack off his horse.

    Revver Bro #231

  20. #20
    skaliwag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    santa cruz, CA
    Posts
    2,377
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    MJD... Do you still have the CAD file for the Ace wings?

    Andrew.. I think you get the 7 3/8". with the added T/E and Aileron stock
    Real Airplanes have Round Engines and Two Wings.

  21. #21
    aspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Ruthven, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    1,747
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    My tapered Ace wing is 34 1/2" span, 5 1/4" root, and 3 7/8" tip. Add 1" for the ailerons. I don't know if things were trimmed, I picked it up at a swap meet in Perry Ga. prebuilt and receiver ready.

  22. #22
    MJD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Orangeville, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    6,823
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by skaliwag View Post
    MJD... Do you still have the CAD file for the Ace wings?
    Yes, once I get my home PC to the geek squad - big blue error screen on boot up, I'm told it is not terminal and just needs some TLC, related to a full hard drive I think. So realistically I could get them to you within a week, if that works Skaliwag?
    Sorry I'm late dear, I had to help my uncle Jack off his horse.

    Revver Bro #231

  23. #23
    skaliwag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    santa cruz, CA
    Posts
    2,377
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Curiosity got the better of me.. Had to brave the elements in my attic and drag out the SST kit.
    The foam wings are certainly not Ace. Cores are 5.7/8" X 15.3/4 X 7/8. Plan says 1/8" T/E, 1/4" L/E. Aileron stock is 5/8". 242 Sq.in is an untruth. Must be including the Mahogany Horizontal Stab.

    MJD... Works for me waiting for a week.
    Last edited by skaliwag; 10-17-2013 at 10:44 PM.
    Real Airplanes have Round Engines and Two Wings.

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Murray, KY
    Posts
    3,127
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by MJD View Post
    ...............The reason for the thickness is clear I think - enough cross section to use in stock form as cantilevered foam wing panels. So really no reason for all that thickness in a built up or otherwise reinforced structure, especially with the lightweight radio gear we have available.........
    I agree --- a lot of the wings were flown without covering and with only a strip of strapping tape as external reinforcement. I've also done an overlay of one of the 241x foils and found the match to be very close. IIRC, I had guessed the thickness at about 15%, so the box top information was a bit different.

    Either way, as you noted, with a built-up wing, modern gear and some weight watching, this little plane does have some potential. Shaving a little depth off the fuselage wouldn't hurt either.

    skaliwag --

    The 7 3/8" was the full chord including T/E and was based on the area/span calculation and on a measurement pulled from the plan. I don't think the ACE core has enough chord, even with a T/E added.

    Here's a PDF of a similar design, albeit smaller and a mid-wing.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Andrew; 10-17-2013 at 10:50 PM.
    the "other" andrew
    I'm not older than dirt, but I can remember when it was patent pending

  25. #25
    Hey skaliwag - would you be interested in selling that kit?


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:00 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.