Andrew

For you COXists, there is a NIB COX .074 included in a group of engines on theBay, item #5909864152. I have no association; just ran across in a search.

the "other" Andrew

Tim Wiltse-RCU

Thanks for the pointer. Too bad the Queen Bee was such a pig...over weight and under powered.


Later,
Tim

Andrew

Hey Tim --

I didn't know if it had any collector interest or not as a NIB, but knew you COX guys would be a lot more knowledgeable than me in evaluating it.

a --

ptulmer

My Feedback: (5)

OHNO!!! Did anybody look at the fourth pic?[X(]

Tim Wiltse-RCU

Oh GROSS....put a darn shirt on for goodness sake!!!


Later,
Tim

DualdudE

LOL

Andrew

Never saw it until now. Guess engine fixation CAN be a good thing.

the "other" Andrew

combatpigg

My Feedback: (3)

If I remember correctly, CHRIS CHIANELLI gave the QUEEN BEE a rave review! I bought one, ran it, sent it back to COX and told them to keep it.

ZAGNUT

My Feedback: (1)

i'm guessing that randy randolph didn't like it much either. no other explanation for that UGLY "spirit of 74" plane he designed around it.
maybe MAN forced him to do it??


dave

combatpigg

My Feedback: (3)

HI DAVE, I think you're right. I've never been more thouroughly disgusted with any model engine purchase[:'(]. I think of myself as a stupid moth, and COX as the light bulb that I keep going back to and getting repeatedly burned by!!

fritzke

My Feedback: (1)

EEEEUUUUUUU!
Big ol' "harry belly"!
EEEUUUUU!
The QB was not a shining moment in Cox R&D history.
And I have 4 of the dumb things! Gotta figgre out how
to re-cycle the carbs onto TeeDee .09's I suppose. Hmmm...
Could a TeeDee run on reed rear induction somehow??
Dave

mclintock

My Feedback: (3)

Do the queen bees still bite with the rjl diesel head on? There is a pic of one in the diesel forum, but no mention of it running or not..