Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > "1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes
Reload this Page >

V versus Conventional Tail

Community
Search
Notices
"1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes These are the small ones...more popular now than ever.

V versus Conventional Tail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2005, 10:12 AM
  #1  
flyswatter
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
flyswatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Simons Island, GA
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default V versus Conventional Tail

Alright guys, because of my great respect (seriously) for the many participants of the 1/2 Forum, I got a question. What, if any, are the advantages or disadvantages of using a V-tail versus conventional?[sm=confused.gif]

I actually went out and bought a kit - the Lanier Dominator 200. As is the case for all the Dominator series, it can be built both ways. I may use it for racing or combat. Power will be supplied by either a product engine, Killer Bee, or a Blackwidow (most likely choice). Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.[8D]
Old 08-07-2005, 10:31 AM
  #2  
combatpigg
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
combatpigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: arlington, WA
Posts: 20,388
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default RE: V versus Conventional Tail

HI FS! The VTAIL is specialized for racing. I had to buy a radio that had ruddervator mixing [channels 2 and 4] to fly my PREDATOR. It works beautifully, and I intend to use the VTAIL on a future SWR. I suppose that for a 1/2A racer, the tail can be hooked up elevator only. The linkage will be more difficult to conceal, so if you can't accomplish that, then the VTAIL has MORE drag than a conventional tail with hidden linkage. I still think that a fixed vertical fin with a stabilator for pitch is the lowest drag tail. The VTAIL has that MASERATI look to it though.
Old 08-07-2005, 11:47 AM
  #3  
dieFluggeister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New London, MN
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: V versus Conventional Tail

Hey flyswatter, could you give me the angle between the tail fins on the Dominator?
Old 08-07-2005, 11:57 AM
  #4  
mikegordon10
 
mikegordon10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Provo, UT
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: V versus Conventional Tail

Most racers with v-tails use 110 degrees
Old 08-07-2005, 10:14 PM
  #5  
flyswatter
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
flyswatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Simons Island, GA
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: V versus Conventional Tail

df:
The plans don't include a nose-on (or tail-on) view. However, the instructions state the v-tail is 110 degrees just as mg10 says.

cp:
You are right, the v-tail is the sportier look. A fellow at the field today said he had flown both styles of Dominators and could not tell a great deal of difference between them. I think you are right though about the drag. The key is to keep the horns and the pushrods out of the flow. If I can pretty much do that (i.e., run it out the rear), then I will opt for the v-tail.
Old 08-07-2005, 11:09 PM
  #6  
combatpigg
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
combatpigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: arlington, WA
Posts: 20,388
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default RE: V versus Conventional Tail

FS, let me know how you did it, if you can conceal the linkage! I haven't tried to yet. I foresee the need to get some 2 -56 ball links though.......

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.