Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > "1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes
Reload this Page >

Cox Cub Trainer .020

Notices
"1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes These are the small ones...more popular now than ever.

Cox Cub Trainer .020

Old 10-24-2012, 06:18 AM
  #1  
pspring
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Andover, MN
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cox Cub Trainer .020

Anyone know the frequency that the single channel Cox Cub from the late 70's operates on? I'm considering buying one for park flying if it's 27Mhz so I don't have to worry about the 1991 narrow band rule. Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Hf98819.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	27.1 KB
ID:	1814425  
Old 10-25-2012, 08:33 AM
  #2  
GallopingGhostler
 
GallopingGhostler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 2,301
Received 79 Likes on 62 Posts
Default RE: Cox Cub Trainer .020

I am not sure but I think those simple R/C systems were on 40 MHz. However, HobbyKing.com and other sites have the modern 2.4 GHz receiver and transmitter for under $30, those would probably take you further for park flyer type aircraft along with some of the inexpensive RTF's and gear.
Old 10-25-2012, 09:24 AM
  #3  
coriolan
 
coriolan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 886
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Cub Trainer .020

Most likely 27 Mhz as this was used a lot back then(40 Mhz has never been legal to use in US). If on 72 Mhz it would be on the pre-1991 frequencies which are no longer legal to use for FCC and AMA purpose. Would be difficult to convert to 2.4 Ghz as the Rx is a brick type with the servo part of the Rx, if on 27 Mhz better to leave it as such as it is much safer to use now that the CB craze of the 70's is over.
Old 10-25-2012, 11:21 AM
  #4  
pspring
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Andover, MN
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Cub Trainer .020

That's what my thought was too. There is some vintage stuff out there that is going cheap that Id like to try. Plus if your single channel airplane did get glitched it would not be to eventful.
Old 10-26-2012, 01:39 PM
  #5  
GallopingGhostler
 
GallopingGhostler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 2,301
Received 79 Likes on 62 Posts
Default RE: Cox Cub Trainer .020


ORIGINAL: coriolan

Would be difficult to convert to 2.4 Ghz as the Rx is a brick type with the servo part of the Rx, if on 27 Mhz better to leave it as such as it is much safer to use now that the CB craze of the 70's is over.
No, the 2.4 GHz conversions were for transmitter only. It requires a new flight pack, receiver included. Basically one takes the signal off the encoder side of the transmitter and replaces the RF section. It is not a user function and requires someone with electronics knowledge to do it. Overall given the recent lower costs on 2.4 GHz gear, one is just better off starting afresh unless they have a premium legacy transmitter they want to retain.

There are a few who are rolling their own 2.4 GHz systems using the 2.4 GHz transmitter RF (radio frequency) sections and programmable logic arrays (PLC's) to mimic the actions of vintage R/C escapements, galloping ghost, quick blip sequential throttle, etc., in some cases even driving the vintage actuation components. However this is an advanced topic for the dedicated few who want to relive or demonstrate how R/C flight was done in the past.
Old 10-26-2012, 05:24 PM
  #6  
fritzke
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Crystal, MN
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Cox Cub Trainer .020

49mhz, single channel proportional system.
Dave
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Pn35579.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	83.5 KB
ID:	1815117  
Old 10-27-2012, 08:31 AM
  #7  
GallopingGhostler
 
GallopingGhostler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 2,301
Received 79 Likes on 62 Posts
Default RE: Cox Cub Trainer .020

Thanks for the clarification, Dave. I thought it was somewhere in the 40 MHz band.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.