Hornet .09 any good?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hornet .09 any good?
What do ya'll think of the AP hornet .09? I'm thinking about building H.O.B
Decathelon. Also, I'm starting a Herr Star Cruiser Project this weekend,
I'm considering Tail dragger and a four channel wing mods.
Decathelon. Also, I'm starting a Herr Star Cruiser Project this weekend,
I'm considering Tail dragger and a four channel wing mods.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ashland city, TN
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
I don't own one, but I think the majority of people that do wish they had gotten the 15. It is almost the same weight, although still somewhat anemic for a 15.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (35)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minneapolis,
MN
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
I've got one and I like it. I haven't used it in a while now, but once broken in, it runs great. It does take a while to break in however. Given the choice, I'd get the 15 since they're the same size/weight.
#4
Senior Member
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
Typically it seems most .09-.10 engines like this one weigh pretty close to what most typical .15s weigh but produce less power as you can understand.
.15 size engines are a much better choice. This has been based on a power to weight ratio comparison. However I do not have the figures on this to back it up.
Opinions of course may vary!
Add to this there are some really good .15 size engines that can really walk the dog!
It seems that in past years more attention has been given to the .15 size as compared to the smaller .09-.10 CID or the larger .19-.29 engines.
Robert
.15 size engines are a much better choice. This has been based on a power to weight ratio comparison. However I do not have the figures on this to back it up.
Opinions of course may vary!
Add to this there are some really good .15 size engines that can really walk the dog!
It seems that in past years more attention has been given to the .15 size as compared to the smaller .09-.10 CID or the larger .19-.29 engines.
Robert
#5
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
ORIGINAL: build light
It seems that in past years more attention has been given to the .15 size as compared to the smaller .09-.10 CID or the larger .19-.29 engines.
Robert
It seems that in past years more attention has been given to the .15 size as compared to the smaller .09-.10 CID or the larger .19-.29 engines.
Robert
It would be nice if there was indeed a "small block" 1.5-1.8cc engine, and if it was an affordable "full-feature" R/C engine, i.e. good speed range, power:weight ratio, effective muffling, muffler pressure, no weird fuel requirements, general manners. But, what company would spend the R&D money these days for a fringe product? Unless perhaps the turnkey ARF trainer and second-airplane manufacturers decided there was a market in that size range.
I guess a pertinent question to throw up in the air is, what is the basis of a desire for engines in this class? To power lekkie ARF conversions, or to hop-up 1/2A size aircraft, or... what?
MJD
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
The ratio of value to production costs must be what is really why the .10 plays 2nd fiddle to the .15.
2/3 the power but 90% of the cost.
The range of models that the .15 is well suited for has to be at least twice what the .10 can handle.
The .15 can handle a 8 inch prop with authority and the difference in thrust between 7 inches and 8 is huge.
I think alot of value minded shoppers who are working with next weeks' paycheck see the slight price difference and see the choice to go with the .15 a no-brainer.
If the CG is adjusted correctly to accomodate a .15, most 1/2A commercial kits will fly just fine. The complaints about the .15 conversions sinking like rocks, falling out of the sky, etc. have alot to do with being nose heavy.
2/3 the power but 90% of the cost.
The range of models that the .15 is well suited for has to be at least twice what the .10 can handle.
The .15 can handle a 8 inch prop with authority and the difference in thrust between 7 inches and 8 is huge.
I think alot of value minded shoppers who are working with next weeks' paycheck see the slight price difference and see the choice to go with the .15 a no-brainer.
If the CG is adjusted correctly to accomodate a .15, most 1/2A commercial kits will fly just fine. The complaints about the .15 conversions sinking like rocks, falling out of the sky, etc. have alot to do with being nose heavy.
#7
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
ORIGINAL: combatpigg
The ratio of value to production costs must be what is really why the .10 plays 2nd fiddle to the .15.
2/3 the power but 90% of the cost.
The range of models that the .15 is well suited for has to be at least twice what the .10 can handle.
The .15 can handle a 8 inch prop with authority and the difference in thrust between 7 inches and 8 is huge.
I think alot of value minded shoppers who are working with next weeks' paycheck see the slight price difference and see the choice to go with the .15 a no-brainer.
If the CG is adjusted correctly to accomodate a .15, most 1/2A commercial kits will fly just fine. The complaints about the .15 conversions sinking like rocks, falling out of the sky, etc. have alot to do with being nose heavy.
The ratio of value to production costs must be what is really why the .10 plays 2nd fiddle to the .15.
2/3 the power but 90% of the cost.
The range of models that the .15 is well suited for has to be at least twice what the .10 can handle.
The .15 can handle a 8 inch prop with authority and the difference in thrust between 7 inches and 8 is huge.
I think alot of value minded shoppers who are working with next weeks' paycheck see the slight price difference and see the choice to go with the .15 a no-brainer.
If the CG is adjusted correctly to accomodate a .15, most 1/2A commercial kits will fly just fine. The complaints about the .15 conversions sinking like rocks, falling out of the sky, etc. have alot to do with being nose heavy.
Anyhow.. it would be cool if there was an engine a bit smaller and lighter lighter than current .10/.15's, that acted nicely and had a high power to weight ratio.
MJD
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
Good point, I love my O.S. .46 AX's The first engine I ever bought twice! Instead of spending
$80. on a chance, I spent $110. on a sure thing. I'm sure O.S. .15 just as good!
$80. on a chance, I spent $110. on a sure thing. I'm sure O.S. .15 just as good!
#13
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
That would be about as good a match for a .15 as you can get. It will end up very sporty at 2 pounds or less. The product review I read looked impressive, but I would not cut lightening holes anywhere. I'm not sure, but it might require moving the firewall back slightly to get the spinner backplate lined up correctly in the side view.....no big deal.
#14
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
The Cloud Ranger I'm flying is now tipping the scales at close to 30oz now with a .10LA (yeah, it's a led sled). I imagine a .15 in that Spacewalker should do very well.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
Sounds like my kit backlog just got longer!
My club thinks anything smaller than .40 size has to be electric.
Phoey on that!
Starting Star cruiser tonight. I'll post pix when done.
My club thinks anything smaller than .40 size has to be electric.
Phoey on that!
Starting Star cruiser tonight. I'll post pix when done.
#16
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
I just got back from flying some 3D with a 28 oz plane powered by a OS LA .15.
8x4 MAS and 30% helicopter fuel. It is going to take the rest of the summer to find out all that this plane is capable of. It has even done some [ugly] knife edge loops. Let your friends have fun their own way...but I'm here to say that you can have a lot of fun with .15s.
Yes, the equivalent electric plane with a 11 inch prop will be easier to 3D and more impressive, but so what?
8x4 MAS and 30% helicopter fuel. It is going to take the rest of the summer to find out all that this plane is capable of. It has even done some [ugly] knife edge loops. Let your friends have fun their own way...but I'm here to say that you can have a lot of fun with .15s.
Yes, the equivalent electric plane with a 11 inch prop will be easier to 3D and more impressive, but so what?
#19
My Feedback: (66)
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
he HOB Decathelon is a big kit for 1/2a i have one still in the box and I will use a OS 15 in it. i even thought about putting a OS30 four stroke in it.
BUY the OS 15 for it and then send me an email or PM and i will help you pick up 1000 rpm in that engine with no grinding on the sleeve at all. just some carb mods and stuff.
BUY the OS 15 for it and then send me an email or PM and i will help you pick up 1000 rpm in that engine with no grinding on the sleeve at all. just some carb mods and stuff.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
I sold my Norvel .074 n.i.b. 5 years ago, big mistake! I'm taking everyones' input into
consideration. I'm glad to find out small engine modeling is still alive! O.S. .15 with
either on of those kits seems to be great combo. It will fit my budget,work shop,and
vehicle perfectly.
consideration. I'm glad to find out small engine modeling is still alive! O.S. .15 with
either on of those kits seems to be great combo. It will fit my budget,work shop,and
vehicle perfectly.
#21
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: augusta, SC
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hornet .09 any good?
I started with a brand new AP 09 on my Herr lil extra and although it did fly, it was very under powered. Anything more than a slight positve climb and it stalled. I installed the AP 15 since it was exactly the same bolt pattern and this made all the difference. It will fly straight up verticle, barely. Im using a small 2/3aaa battery pack and five 9 gram servos. My all up weight less fuel is excatly 28.2 oz. Using 15 percent fuel in the stock tank gives me 5 1/2 minutes. Mine is more tail heavy than most people would like but it slows down to a crawl while landing. My friend had an o.s. la 15 on his Carl Goldberg Laser and the AP turns 1500 rpms more using the same 8/4 prop and fuel.
Forget what you've heard about drilling out the carb barrel on the AP engines as this will leave you with an engine that WILL NOT idle. The thing is that the AP engine does not have a low speed idle adjustment at all. Not even an air bleed. Therefore you high speed adjustment also affects you idle. Drilling out the barrel means you have to close the barrel more to acheive the same idle RPM which throws off the whole mixture. You can enlarge the barrel but ONLY by egg shaping the hole. The egg shape or oval must be from side to side while looking straight down the carb. Precise use of a dremel will net you about 1800 RPM increase when using a 8/4 prop. M
Forget what you've heard about drilling out the carb barrel on the AP engines as this will leave you with an engine that WILL NOT idle. The thing is that the AP engine does not have a low speed idle adjustment at all. Not even an air bleed. Therefore you high speed adjustment also affects you idle. Drilling out the barrel means you have to close the barrel more to acheive the same idle RPM which throws off the whole mixture. You can enlarge the barrel but ONLY by egg shaping the hole. The egg shape or oval must be from side to side while looking straight down the carb. Precise use of a dremel will net you about 1800 RPM increase when using a 8/4 prop. M