And we thought we were good!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Collierville,
TN
Posts: 2,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And we thought we were good!
I was doing a little shop cleaning this morning and came across this little gem. I've been looking for it for a while.
Shows you how good the pioneers in our hobby really were. Electronically, aerodynamically - you name it - they were awesome! This article was from 45 years ago.[X(]
Shows you how good the pioneers in our hobby really were. Electronically, aerodynamically - you name it - they were awesome! This article was from 45 years ago.[X(]
#3
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Posts: 12,425
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
Heh, heh.... I also built one years ago using an Albin reciever, a home made actuator and a borrowed .010. It was actually not a bad plane to fly while under power but when the engine quite it had the glide of a greased manhole cover. It survived these "arrivals" for around 6 flights before finding some pavement and that was all she wrote. Dinged up the prop screw and spinner on the engine and the plane behind the engine shattered like cheap stemware. Didn't try it anymore.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BARNWELL,
SC
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
I built one 3 years ago and powered it (sacrilige I know) with a Feigao 12mm motor on 2S250 LiPo, so I had rudder and throttle. I flew it at SMALL 3 years ago and up at Mammoth Spring with Tom Anderson and George Smith. I might spray some butyrate on it and hang an .010 on the nose.
#6
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
ORIGINAL: combatpigg
Back then it was a marvelous acheivement. It still is now if you can duplicate how it was done.
Too bad [in some ways] that the technology has made RC seem routine.
Back then it was a marvelous acheivement. It still is now if you can duplicate how it was done.
Too bad [in some ways] that the technology has made RC seem routine.
MJD
#7
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
Thinking of mystery and resourcefulness, all my first memories of modelling are from my big brother, who was brilliant at electronics and studying engineering in university in the late '60's - early '70's when I was a kid progressing into my teens. He built several radio systems from scratch in the early-mid '60's including a reed multi system, though all I am old enough to recall seeing on RC were Tomboys he flew at our cottage (hence my soft spot for that model). Thinking about how much I grumble at installing a flight pack, I should humble myself a little and think of people who were only a few steps from digging for ore to cast pistons. It was actually his free flight antics, with myriad sheet balse this-n-thats that I recall best - and I was excited to find the Early RC website, where I spotted the Page Boy and realized that this was the little red model I remember vividly as a kid of 6-7, that he flew FF on an .010. I clearly remember the loop over our heads into the grass on the first launch.. but eventually he got it trimmed out to spiral up madly on a part tank of fuel - the image of holding a whining .010-.049 on something ready for launch in the right hand while tracking the run time on a wrist watch on the left is burned into my retina - good kid memories. Or hastily cobbling together a boxy sheet foam cabin high wing thing on proportional R/O and an .049 model - while I was building my first RC, a Falcon 56, so that I could get a taste of this RC thing (1974 as I recall, I was 13 then, first summer job).. and the darn thing flew just fine! Ugly as sin, it should have been shot on sight, but it had the right stuff to get the blood boiling.
Sleepy eyed morning rambles.. [sm=redface.gif]
MJD
Sleepy eyed morning rambles.. [sm=redface.gif]
MJD
#8
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Posts: 12,425
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
Hmmm..... I'm tempted to try one again for electric. Just so I can land it without the arrival being cryptically vertical ! ! ! ! ! After all it would take like 2hours and $2 of wood to build?
#9
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
ORIGINAL: BMatthews
Hmmm..... I'm tempted to try one again for electric. Just so I can land it without the arrival being cryptically vertical ! ! ! ! ! After all it would take like 2hours and $2 of wood to build?
Hmmm..... I'm tempted to try one again for electric. Just so I can land it without the arrival being cryptically vertical ! ! ! ! ! After all it would take like 2hours and $2 of wood to build?
MJD
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BARNWELL,
SC
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: And we thought we were good!
ORIGINAL: BMatthews
Hmmm..... I'm tempted to try one again for electric. Just so I can land it without the arrival being cryptically vertical ! ! ! ! ! After all it would take like 2hours and $2 of wood to build?
Hmmm..... I'm tempted to try one again for electric. Just so I can land it without the arrival being cryptically vertical ! ! ! ! ! After all it would take like 2hours and $2 of wood to build?