View Single Post
Old 09-19-2017, 12:07 AM
  #47  
David Gladwin
 
David Gladwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CookhamBerkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,383
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Looping31 View Post
I would have preferred RCJI choose a more impartial and objective contributor. In my point of view (intensive flyer), Weatronic BAT60 was not technically successful.
Read my post above and previous threads from others concerning BAT60/64 problems.
Please don't be blind...

Arnaud
Far, very far, from blind, it will be VERY objective.

The most objective, and constructive, approach I can consider is to FLY the system in my most complex and expensive jets and sailplanes. I will be doing just that.

Perhaps you should buy a Core and give us YOUR opinions !

I have done one quite a few reviews for RCJI. Almost all of the subjects I have reviewed were purchased by myself because of, after careful consideration, their quality and suitability for purpose. So far as Jeti is concerned, I hold it in very high regard after a demo from Harry C. and after the demise of Weatronic I would have moved to it to compliment my 28x

I have already started to use Jeti Lithium Ions in most of my fleet.

Emmerich is is going to keep me updated on progress so I will report later FACTS, not hearsay or baseless opinions.

Delivery before next Jet. Power.

D .

Last edited by David Gladwin; 09-19-2017 at 08:09 AM.
David Gladwin is offline  
Reply With Quote