Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 82

  1. #51
    jonkoppisch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    2,520
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: ira d


    ORIGINAL: GraemeEllis

    It makes no sense. If someone's life is at risk, wether or not it is their own fault, the RC pilot should forget about his toy airplane. There is absolutely no comparison. I agree the full scale pilot messed up, but what I do not understand is why the RC pilot should be pitied. How he reacted was completely inappropriate seeing the possible consequences. When someone could have potentially died, you do not put your material items before it.Β*
    I believe there was a complete breakdown in control when the accident happened. The full scale should notΒ*have buzzed the runway without permission. The air boss should not Β*have allowed the maneuver to take place. The model pilot should not have flown without a spotter at a private airstrip. The model pilot should not have continued to hover the model when it was apparent an accident was inevitable. He should have dumped it. Plain and simple.Β*


    It has been said that the rc pilot thought the air boss was his spotter, AlsoΒ*I read somewhere that the air boss shouted to the rc pilot to get out of the way andΒ*in trying to pull out of hisΒ*hover it appearsΒ*he pulled in front of the full scale.

    The thought has occured to me that maybe the reason the NTSB came up with what it did is because maybe the full scale pilot along with the air boss replacedΒ*
    the rc pilots plane inΒ*order to get him to play ball with them. im sure 5to6K is a lot cheaper than loosin your pilot license and all of the potential problems that may
    come with it
    ? I never heard that they replaced his plane??? or are you just speculating?
    "Washington in their infinite wisdom has lost their marbles"
    Pappy Boyington

  2. #52
    Frank Ts Stuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    LAKELAND, FL
    Posts
    94
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    Just an FYI as I am not interested in getting too involved in this debate but...
    At Top Gun, FL Jets, Monster Planes and the Warbird event (future event slated for December 8-10) Frank Tiano holds at Lakeland Linder airport we are fully coordinated with the FAA on all flying activities. The events are held in a corner of the massive airport (10,000+ foot main runway which we are no where near). The crosswind runway which we are closest too, but not over, is closed with a NOTAM. There is a paid tower man on site at all times who is in communication with the tower at all times. We don't start flying in the morning until he is there and has given us the OK. We stand down when we are asked to do so by the tower immediately and everyone is grounded at the end of the day when the tower person leaves the field.

    Glad noone was hurt here and hope we all come away with a little more knowledge than we had before the "incident"
    Sean Curry
    FTE Inc.
    863-607-6611

  3. #53

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,311
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: jonkoppisch


    ORIGINAL: ira d


    ORIGINAL: GraemeEllis

    It makes no sense. If someone's life is at risk, wether or not it is their own fault, the RC pilot should forget about his toy airplane. There is absolutely no comparison. I agree the full scale pilot messed up, but what I do not understand is why the RC pilot should be pitied. How he reacted was completely inappropriate seeing the possible consequences. When someone could have potentially died, you do not put your material items before it.
    I believe there was a complete breakdown in control when the accident happened. The full scale should nothave buzzed the runway without permission. The air boss should not have allowed the maneuver to take place. The model pilot should not have flown without a spotter at a private airstrip. The model pilot should not have continued to hover the model when it was apparent an accident was inevitable. He should have dumped it. Plain and simple.


    It has been said that the rc pilot thought the air boss was his spotter, AlsoI read somewhere that the air boss shouted to the rc pilot to get out of the way andin trying to pull out of hishover it appearshe pulled in front of the full scale.

    The thought has occured to me that maybe the reason the NTSB came up with what it did is because maybe the full scale pilot along with the air boss replaced
    the rc pilots plane inorder to get him to play ball with them. im sure 5to6K is a lot cheaper than loosin your pilot license and all of the potential problems that may
    come with it
    ? I never heard that they replaced his plane??? or are you just speculating?
    Yes I am
    Ira d

  4. #54

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,311
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: GraemeEllis

    I still don't understand why the RC pilot tried to maneuver out of the way.
    Chop the throttle.
    It is just a natural reaction to try to recover from the maneuver you are in plus I dont think the rc pilot had the full scale in sight.
    Ira d

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    somewhere, SD
    Posts
    198
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    I don't know about you but when I am flying I keep eyes on the model at all times. If he was doing this the spotter was his only way of getting warning about the oncoming plane.
    If you have RC as a hobby and you are ever bored than it is YOUR OWN FAULT
    AMA# 964821

  6. #56

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Tipp City, OH
    Posts
    239
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: zacharyR

    if you have the right of way can you just run down something that is sitting there basicly not moveing


    take for example if a honda civic has issues and is dead on the road in a turning lane and you have a green light ?

    can you go full power turn on the smoke run into the civic . and clame you had the right to be there ?
    Depends..... if it's an r/c Civic.... YOU BET!!


  7. #57

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    10
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    ira d has it right. There is a general prudential rule that says if a collision is imminent even the party with the right of way is required to take evasive action.

    There is a possibility that this was an unavoidable accident, but since we don't know all the facts, we do not know which, if any, of the parties acted in a prudent manner. What would the ordinarily reasonable and prudent man do under the same or similar circumstances?

    I don't know if the FAA has any administrative law rules that might be different. Agencies can be weird. It looks like this investigation is not moving forward very rapidly.

    Since we have not heard about any civil actions, and I have not been able to read any administrative decisions thus far, I think an out of court settlement would be best, and has probably happened, as ira d speculates.

    If anybody has some active links on this case and others like it, let's see them. I have seen videos of the crash, but NTSB findings and others are bad links.

  8. #58
    scubajohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    johnsoncity tx, TX
    Posts
    165
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    looks like the full scale pilot was doing a low pass for the show and the rc was doing a hover for the show and there was a lack of comunication

    watch this is often followed by o s++t
    John Travis waco brotherhood #178
    BUILDING WHAT I FLY AND FLYING WHAT I BUILD

  9. #59

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Loxahatchee, FL
    Posts
    177
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    Again,
    Common sence out the window. Either full scale fly by's at one time or RC models, you cant have both as you can see its a recipy for a dissarter waiting to happen. Whom ever thought about this brilliant idea (sarcasm) should get the idiot of the year award. And why is NTSB blaming the RC pilot, what video where they watching?
    Joe

    ARSON EDF, 1/5th Scale SU-34,Y/A Twin F/A-18
    www.ARSONEDF.com

  10. #60
    jonkoppisch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    2,520
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    All I can figure is someone threw the rc pilot under the bus, ie all of a sudden there's a 'box' to fly in. I think it was everyone's fault btw! The ntsb seem to be basing their opinion on the 'fact' that the rc pilot flew out of the 'box'. What I would like to know is, what was the box? Evidently the box was on the camera side of the runway? If so, why was the airboss walking out with the rc pilot and why didn't he tell him that he needed to fly where he was told or land?? Sounds like the ntsb was miss informed..
    "Washington in their infinite wisdom has lost their marbles"
    Pappy Boyington

  11. #61

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    1,653
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    based on facts of the incident;

    1. The RC pilot voilated the boundries set for its operation
    2. The MC of the event did not perform his duties effectively;
    a. by not establishing a reasonable separation distance between the runway (full scale) and the designated RC flying area ( a no fly zone between the two types of flying).
    b. by not effectively observing and communicating to both the full scale and Radio Controlled aircraft pilots.
    3. No matter what maneuver the full scale pilot was performing, he was within his designated operating area.
    Note; Its not easy to see an RC plane when traveling at the speed he was, the number of things the full scale pilot had to observe at such an event would be tough to spot. I doubt most, (not all) but most people making comments have not spent a lot of time in full scale and understand how tough it would have been to spot the RC plane hovering. I seriously doubt the full scale pilot would not avoid an impact knowing it could kill him.
    Live to Love and laugh, anything else is rubbish!
    A citizen of the universe

  12. #62
    jonkoppisch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    2,520
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    I basically agree with you except I don't think that we can call #1 a fact? What were the boundaries set for the rc pilot? If he did, why didn't the airboss shut him down immediately? Not walk with him. If I remember right, after the incident the airboss even said that it wasn't his fault.. In all of the threads and vids, nothing was ever said about a boundary.

    I've flown a lot of shows/fly ins and the airboss is always quick to let you know where to fly and to let who ever know if they're in the wrong airspace..
    There's only been a couple of times that I've been told to fly on the crowd side of the main runway and that has been when there's a taxiway and a main runway, to fly between the 2. In this case, there was only the main runway
    "Washington in their infinite wisdom has lost their marbles"
    Pappy Boyington

  13. #63
    franklin_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    247
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: BarracudaHockey

    The whole thing was a Charlie Foxtrot from the get-go.

    The R/C was asked to be there and put on a demo.

    The R/C didn't have an adaquate spotter.

    The FS was showing off.

    The ''air boss'' didn't seem to have a handle on much.

    Break any link in the chain and there wouldn't have been a mishap.

    I said it before but it bears repeating, we have a duty to see and avoid manned aircraft.

    Sounds like you've attended one of the military aviation safety schools....I went to the Navy one. They use two models, either the "Swiss Cheese" or "Links in a chain". Point is, an accident is a series of events/decisions that all have to happen in a specific order to cause a mishap.
    " If at first you don't succeed....
    then carrier landings are not for you! "
    ........FLY NAVY

  14. #64
    franklin_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    247
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: ira d

    So if a jet and glider find they are in the same airspace but the jet does not see the glider does the
    glider have any resonsibility to try to avoid the jet? What do you think would happen if they had a
    collison and it could be proven in court the the glider had seen the jet in time to take evasive
    action but did not because he had the right of way.
    In short, YES. Each aircraft has a responsibility to avoid other aircraft, even if those other aircraft have the right of way.

    Per FAR Part 91.113, Right of Way rules: "(b) General. When weather conditions permit, regardless of whether an operation is conducted under instrument flight rules or visual flight rules, vigilance shall be maintained by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft."
    " If at first you don't succeed....
    then carrier landings are not for you! "
    ........FLY NAVY

  15. #65
    Radical Departure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    481
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    Am guessing the NTSB has either moved the finding or pulled the page, it was active when it was posted. I have a copy of the pdf but its on my office PC, if anyone else has a copy maybe they can post it sooner than I'd be able to.
    Radical Departure..
    ..from controlled flight

  16. #66
    Moderator daveopam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    ELK CITY, OK
    Posts
    6,999
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    "I have even seen people actually go out on the run way and wave of full scale planes when
    they were trying to land at the wrong time or place. " - Ira d

    Ira, you make your point and then put this like it is a safe practice???? Not trying to start a fight, but this is terrible.

    In my specific case it was lack of control that could have gotten someone killed. I was doing a demo with a friends 1/3 scale Laser. A local guy started doing touch and gos on the grass area we were assigned to fly in. Why? Cause he did not want us there and he was trying to make a point. My point? The Laser I was flying would have made a huge hole in the Cub he was flying. Possibly causing him to crash. Who would have been blamed? ME!! As it was, I got over the top of a hanger and did slow circles for 15 minutes and landed when he was done. After the fact I packed up my stuff and that was the last full scale event I ever flew at. I am not saying that there can't be a peaceful coexistence between RC and full scale. But how do you know which kind of event you are going to?


    David
    I never want to see a crash. But I don't want to miss one either.

  17. #67

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Collinsville, IL
    Posts
    2
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    I kept reading where someone doesn't understand the right of way idea.

    They decide this by
    1. Is there a person in the aircraft (In other words, Is there someones life on the line?)
    2. What control does that person have over the aircraft.
    A balloon has priority over a sail plane because a sailplane can control all axis over the aircraft and a balloon has to ride the wind. But a sailplane takes priority over a powered aircraft because no matter what, the sailplanes going down. And if you're about to say well a balloon can just go up real fast. No they can't. when they are going down it doesn't react fast enough to just climb out, and they have to ride where the wind takes them so if they are heading towards something and they bolt towards the last minute, they will probably hit it. A sailplane can maneuver to land in a different place on the same field.

    Now this being said, IMO the air boss is responsible.

    If there is a full scale aircraft, in the air, especially in the area of an airport private or not, you know that there is a possibility the aircraft is going to be flying low whether they are landing, taking off or bolting on a landing or just doing a fly by. There could even be an emergency that brings that plane down.

    As someone stated earlier, it is VERY hard to see any small aircraft in the air flying. You have to watch your instruments and where you are flying. You see a Lot of green and gray, and believe it or not, unless something is lime green and HUGE it will blend a lot of times with the environment.

    Now this being said the air boss or person who was running the show, should have had every r/c pilot or other aircraft wait until the previous plane or inbound plane landed or has flown away so that he knew the airspace was clear.

    Now someone mentioned why didn't the r/c pilot just cut the throttle? He was in the middle of flying his plane, the person told him at the last second to get out of the way. Now if you are flying your plane on any day and someone says you need to get your plane out of the way, do you just cut the throttle? Probably not. More and likely you will power up and fly away especially if you are in a hover. Should he have cut the power? Probably, but most times you don't think to do that. You just power up and fly on.

    Unfortunately given the rules of the FAA and whomever else, you are pitting a private individual against a Federal agency. The federal agency sees that there was an individual, flying in his real plane, so there is a life on the line, at a full scale airport, even if it was a private field, against a radio controlled aircraft not at an r/c field, no life form in the aircraft. Now I realize that some airports allow r/c pilots to fly, I have flown at 4 different ones, but no matter where I fly I was always told that if there was a full scale airplane in the area to land quickly, even if the plane is just flying past because you never know when they will have an emergency.

    The Federal agents are going to side with the Pilot of the full scale aircraft.

    Now the poor r/c pilot was just doing what he was told. Go ahead and fly. Having been told he was cleared to fly by the air boss, he shouldn't be held responsible.
    This is big one because this tells the r/c pilot he is clear in the airspace.

    What I am trying to say I guess is unfortunately given the rules I can see how the pilot of the full scale plane was not held responsible, but the r/c pilot shouldn't be held responsible for this incident either. It should be the responsibility of the the air boss or the field he is a part of. Especially if there are any funds to be distributed for replacement of expensive aircraft.

    I just hope this was an AMA sanctioned demonstration.

  18. #68

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    1,653
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    ORIGINAL: jonkoppisch

    I basically agree with you except I don't think that we can call #1 a fact? What were the boundaries set for the rc pilot? If he did, why didn't the airboss shut him down immediately? Not walk with him. If I remember right, after the incident the airboss even said that it wasn't his fault.. In all of the threads and vids, nothing was ever said about a boundary.

    I've flown a lot of shows/fly ins and the airboss is always quick to let you know where to fly and to let who ever know if they're in the wrong airspace..
    There's only been a couple of times that I've been told to fly on the crowd side of the main runway and that has been when there's a taxiway and a main runway, to fly between the 2. In this case, there was only the main runway
    In the NTSB report it was stated that the RC pilot was not to fly past the edge of the runway. This line of demarcation is not much of a safety margin, a microscopicly thin line of separation, not very managable or safe. Based on that fact, the CD of the event who was serving as spotter for the RC pilot and who accepted the responsibility of coordinating full scale and RC aircraft did not assure proper adherence to this previously agreed zone. The RC pilot voilated the zone and the CD failed to ensure the zone was not violated. No matter what manouver the fulls cale was performing, he did not violate anyones airspace and stayed within his zone so it really didnt matter what he was doing, it was his zone.
    Live to Love and laugh, anything else is rubbish!
    A citizen of the universe

  19. #69
    jonkoppisch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    2,520
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    A little more to it than that.. According to the link that still works, http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._204696-1.html

    "The NTSB said the model was getting out of a vertical prop thrust hover when it strayed over the active runway and outside the RC box"

    "The report says the organizer of the event briefed the RC pilots before the show and warned them to stay east of the active runway but it questions whether the separation between the two zones was policed effectively"

    So, according to this the rc plane wasn't even to be over the active runway but yet the airboss is walking right beside him all over the active runway..... Can we say that something just doesn't add up? How sad of an airboss is it that right from the start allows not only the rc plane BUT the pilot and the airboss HIMSELF on the active runway when according to the ntsb report it was to remain clear...
    "Washington in their infinite wisdom has lost their marbles"
    Pappy Boyington

  20. #70

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,311
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: daveopam

    "I have even seen people actually go out on the run way and wave of full scale planes when
    they were trying to land at the wrong time or place. " - Ira d

    Ira, you make your point and then put this like it is a safe practice???? Not trying to start a fight, but this is terrible.




    David

    Im not quite sure what you are trying to say. I dont see any thing wrong with waving off a aircraft if need be.
    Ira d

  21. #71

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    1,653
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    Its the "out on the runway" part thats disturbing.
    Live to Love and laugh, anything else is rubbish!
    A citizen of the universe

  22. #72
    exeter_acres's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Johns Creek, GA
    Posts
    7,457
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    ya think?
    Extreme Flight RC tech support
    IMAC Vice President|IMAC Sequence Committee|IMAC National Judging Instructor|Team Futaba|Extreme Flight R/C|2014 IMAC World Championships Contest Director

  23. #73

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,311
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft


    ORIGINAL: tenacious101010

    Its the "out on the runway" part thats disturbing.
    Let me take a little time and explain, I was at rc event maybe 12 or so years ago I dont know who organized the event or much else about it. The event
    was held at a small airstrip that appeared at times to be used by full scale planes a full scale piper cub flew by and at the time there were no rc planes
    in the air next the piper lined up with the runway droped his flaps and was going to land one of the guys ran out on the runway and waved him off and
    the piper flew off dont know where he went. After seeing this I just assumed that the rc guys had exclusive use of the air strip that day and the piperwas
    not supposed to be there but apparentlyhe didnt know it I dont remember if there were a X at the ends of runway or not. Another time I was at a rc field
    that did have X's on the runway and a full scale tried to land there and had to be waved off twice I think he was lost and must have been looking for the
    airport a couple of miles away. In this case the rc runway was maybe 600 ft long so I dont what the pilot was thinking he may have got down ok but would
    have had a hard time taking off again, I also remember this plane had a canadian tail number dont know if that had anything to do with the incedent or
    not.
    Ira d

  24. #74

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    oshawaOntario, CANADA
    Posts
    214

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

    Was it a full scale plane event or an rc plane event. If it was a full scale event there shouldn't have been a rc plane in 3 miles, if it was an rc event there shouldn't have been any full scale planes... flying both in an airport at the same time is a stupid idea at best and down right retarded on everyones count at the worst. Things happen and people make mistakes.

  25. #75
    Sport_Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    13,392
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft

     How he reacted was completely inappropriate seeing the possible consequences.
    Thye first thing he said was, "that could have killed somebody", or something similar.  Then he complained about his plane.  I did not consider that inappropriate at all.
    Glow Head Brotherhood #15


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.