RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas AR
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
Not sure of the best place to post this, so thought would drop it here. Some of you may recall the video where the biplane struck and RC plane at an event. The NTSB has determined the pilot of the RC plane to be at fault.
You can read the basics of it here; [link=http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/RC_Pilot_Blamed_In_Collision_204696-1.html]AVWEB[/link]
The NTSB report is here in pdf format; [link=http://dms.ntsb.gov/aviation/AccidentReports/hou5ixm0bgrdn1ajidbskjmx/P05212011120000.pdf]NTSB Finding[/link]
And a video of the incident here; [link=http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/exclusivevids/Biplane_RemoteControlledAirplane_MidairCollision_2 03157-1.html]AVWeb Video[/link]
Not sure I personally agree with the finding, but not my call either.
UPDATE: It appears the NTSB has moved the pdf, and cant seem to locate a copy of it any longer. For those interested, here is a copy of the text contained in the pdf;
During a local fly-in event, a radio controlled airplane collided with a bi-plane while the bi-plane was performing a go-around.
The radio controlled airplane was performing a hover maneuver just prior to the collision and initiated an escape maneuver which
placed the radio controlled airplane right into the flight path of the bi-plane. The bi-plane sustained substantial damage, but was able to land without further incident. The radio controlled airplane was destroyed. Prior to the event, the event coordinator briefed the participants that they were to operate their radio controlled airplanes to the east of the runway, and not directly in the runway environment. While the event coordinator was monitoring the radio for traffic, it was not clearly communicated who, if anyone, was providing spotter duties for the radio controlled airplane operator prior to the collision.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows. The radio-controlled airplane operators decision to maneuver his airplane outside of the designated operating area, resulting in a collision with a bi-plane. Contributing to the accident was the lack of a formally designated spotter.
You can read the basics of it here; [link=http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/RC_Pilot_Blamed_In_Collision_204696-1.html]AVWEB[/link]
The NTSB report is here in pdf format; [link=http://dms.ntsb.gov/aviation/AccidentReports/hou5ixm0bgrdn1ajidbskjmx/P05212011120000.pdf]NTSB Finding[/link]
And a video of the incident here; [link=http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/exclusivevids/Biplane_RemoteControlledAirplane_MidairCollision_2 03157-1.html]AVWeb Video[/link]
Not sure I personally agree with the finding, but not my call either.
UPDATE: It appears the NTSB has moved the pdf, and cant seem to locate a copy of it any longer. For those interested, here is a copy of the text contained in the pdf;
During a local fly-in event, a radio controlled airplane collided with a bi-plane while the bi-plane was performing a go-around.
The radio controlled airplane was performing a hover maneuver just prior to the collision and initiated an escape maneuver which
placed the radio controlled airplane right into the flight path of the bi-plane. The bi-plane sustained substantial damage, but was able to land without further incident. The radio controlled airplane was destroyed. Prior to the event, the event coordinator briefed the participants that they were to operate their radio controlled airplanes to the east of the runway, and not directly in the runway environment. While the event coordinator was monitoring the radio for traffic, it was not clearly communicated who, if anyone, was providing spotter duties for the radio controlled airplane operator prior to the collision.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows. The radio-controlled airplane operators decision to maneuver his airplane outside of the designated operating area, resulting in a collision with a bi-plane. Contributing to the accident was the lack of a formally designated spotter.
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (57)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greenwood,
IN
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
Full scale runway? yes
Spotter on duty? no
RC pilot flying over the runway? yes
To me it looks bad for the RC pilot but I don't have 100% of the situational facts.
Spotter on duty? no
RC pilot flying over the runway? yes
To me it looks bad for the RC pilot but I don't have 100% of the situational facts.
#5
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tampa,
FL
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
"the biplane's maneuver as a go-around but video shows it was done at high speed and low altitude with airshow smoke on. An earlier report by the FAA says the biplane pilot reported he turned his smoke on to increase his visibility while he did the go-around"
srsly ? a go around ? smoke to increase his visibility ?[:-]
the video looks likes like the full scale commenit to his movie ADDED power and put the smoke on with clearling seeing the RC plane stationary there . looks attentional
Maybe it was a stunt gone wrong , looks vary attentional and doesn't even make sense how could you miss such a large rc plane that you know is flying in the area ?
way i see it something went wrong we might never know but it's is what it is , RC is always going to be the bad guy from onlookers eyes.
srsly ? a go around ? smoke to increase his visibility ?[:-]
the video looks likes like the full scale commenit to his movie ADDED power and put the smoke on with clearling seeing the RC plane stationary there . looks attentional
Maybe it was a stunt gone wrong , looks vary attentional and doesn't even make sense how could you miss such a large rc plane that you know is flying in the area ?
way i see it something went wrong we might never know but it's is what it is , RC is always going to be the bad guy from onlookers eyes.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern Occupied Mexico,
CA
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
We all knew the outcome before the NTSB made their decision.
So......Who is paying to fix the full scale?
I bet its already been repaired and his lawyer has the bill and soon the RC pilot will have it!
So......Who is paying to fix the full scale?
I bet its already been repaired and his lawyer has the bill and soon the RC pilot will have it!
#7
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: las vegas,
NV
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
i would hold the rc pilot responsible because well the biplane can be heard a mile away btw what was the other guy doing why didnt he say something to the rc pilot its called right of way imo i mean does a semi swerve to avoid hitting a honda NO! honda should have waited
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: , ON, CANADA
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
He should have dumped the model. What really ruined his rep was that he immediately goes on about ruining his model and rants to everyone in sight. His post on the giant scale forum (couldn't tell you where...) confirms this. Extremely immature and downright dangerous attitude.
Sorry, but wether or not the full scale pilot was doing something illegal, the lives of those onboard come first. His model is a toy. An expensive toy, but not even close to the value of someone's life.
#9
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
IMO the full scale pilot and the air boss got togather and threw the RC guy under the bus. As I
understand it the air boss had given the rc guy permission to fly where he was and the rc guy
thought the air boss was also spotter for him. Also the air boss was in radio contact with the
full scale and told him there was model in the air the fullscale apparently told the air boss
he was going around but instead made a low high speed pass down the runway or just to
left of the runway.
understand it the air boss had given the rc guy permission to fly where he was and the rc guy
thought the air boss was also spotter for him. Also the air boss was in radio contact with the
full scale and told him there was model in the air the fullscale apparently told the air boss
he was going around but instead made a low high speed pass down the runway or just to
left of the runway.
#12
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indio, CA
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
You can argue all day long that the R/C guy was at fault or the full scale pilot was at fault or anyone else but it doesn't mean diddly squat. The only voice with teeth is the NTSB and they have spoken whether you like their decision or not. It's over and done with. Move on. Your opinion or mine means nothing as to who is liable.
#15
Junior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Deer Park, TX
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
ORIGINAL: ira d
IMO the full scale pilot and the air boss got togather and threw the RC guy under the bus. As I
understand it the air boss had given the rc guy permission to fly where he was and the rc guy
thought the air boss was also spotter for him. Also the air boss was in radio contact with the
full scale and told him there was model in the air the fullscale apparently told the air boss
he was going around but instead made a low high speed pass down the runway or just to
left of the runway.
IMO the full scale pilot and the air boss got togather and threw the RC guy under the bus. As I
understand it the air boss had given the rc guy permission to fly where he was and the rc guy
thought the air boss was also spotter for him. Also the air boss was in radio contact with the
full scale and told him there was model in the air the fullscale apparently told the air boss
he was going around but instead made a low high speed pass down the runway or just to
left of the runway.
In my opinion you are spot on. Back when it happened I saw several videos from different perspectives.
This was part of an RC flying event that also included full scale exhibition. The RC pilot was doing what was requested of him. He had an event rep with a radio right next to him. The RC pilot had been flying for a while. Throughout it all you could hear the event rep communicating via radio with coordinators. IMO it sounded to me like the RC pilot was following the plan and instructions exactly.
Probably more than anything it was a bad idea on the part of the event coordinators. They should possibly consider if a fly by of this nature was even a good concept to begin with.
But after the fact, heck yes the RC pilot had every right to be upset, dumfounded, and emotional. I would have been as well. IMO
Also IMO the RC pilot was thrown under the bus such that the full scale pilot wouldn't feel the full legal ramifications.
#16
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
#18
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Johns Creek,
GA
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
ORIGINAL: ira d
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
wow...
Full scale ALWAYS has the right of way... Period..
There was no NOTAM and it is an uncontrolled airport. The full scale pilot isn't even required to have a radio.....
#19
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
The only voice with teeth is the NTSB and they have spoken whether you like their decision or not. It's over and done with. Move on. Your opinion or mine means nothing as to who is liable.
#20
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
What is the right or wrong airspace on a private airfield? If you have a really big backyard you can pave a runway on it and it is sometimes listed on the air charts. But you can use your airstrip for a dragstrip, backyard barbeque, or whatever. To me the NTSB investigator just didn't dig enough.
#21
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
Full scale ALWAYS has the right of way... Period..
There was no NOTAM and it is an uncontrolled airport. The full scale pilot isn't even required to have a radio.....
#22
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
ORIGINAL: exeter_acres
wow...
Full scale ALWAYS has the right of way... Period..
There was no NOTAM and it is an uncontrolled airport. The full scale pilot isn't even required to have a radio.....
ORIGINAL: ira d
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
wow...
Full scale ALWAYS has the right of way... Period..
There was no NOTAM and it is an uncontrolled airport. The full scale pilot isn't even required to have a radio.....
think you have the right of way. The full scale had just as much responsiblty to avoid the collison
as the rc guy in light of the fact he was told the rc plane was in the air.
At my club we have several members that also fly full scale, occasionally they will do fly by's
maybe even fly over the runway but they never do so with out doing a fly by at a distance and
or making contact with someone on the ground by phone so they can alert everyone of their
intentions and see if is safe. You never hear these guys talking about when I fly full scale
I can do what I want because I have the right of way It just dont make good sense to
think that way.
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Johns Creek,
GA
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RC Pilot blamed for Collision w/ Aircraft
ORIGINAL: ira d
. The full scale had just as much responsiblty to avoid the collison
as the rc guy in light of the fact he was told the rc plane was in the air.
ORIGINAL: exeter_acres
wow...
Full scale ALWAYS has the right of way... Period..
There was no NOTAM and it is an uncontrolled airport. The full scale pilot isn't even required to have a radio.....
ORIGINAL: ira d
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
Also I might add the reason why I see the full scale as having the most blame is because the rc plane
was in the air space first be it the wrong air space or not and the full scale invaded the air space not
knowing for sure where the rc was or what his intentions were, Also the full scale apparently did not
tell the air boss he was going to make a low pass. If the full scale had stayed out of the area untill
he was told the runway was clear this collision would not have happened.
wow...
Full scale ALWAYS has the right of way... Period..
There was no NOTAM and it is an uncontrolled airport. The full scale pilot isn't even required to have a radio.....
as the rc guy in light of the fact he was told the rc plane was in the air.
most Certainly the full scale has right of way.....