Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
Reload this Page >

Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2005, 03:08 PM
  #1501  
Scott Dilley
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Scott Dilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

I think there might be an ***** whuppin in the works. Especially since the wing kit is over $100
Old 09-14-2005, 03:29 PM
  #1502  
STG
Senior Member
My Feedback: (26)
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Richmond, WI
Posts: 3,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er


ORIGINAL: lockjaw-express
Then, someone at the field landed in the pit area and ran his plane into my New 260 and destroyed the left wing and put a hole in the side of the fuse, then would not pay for the damage. What a day :-((
[X(] What the [:@]

Sorry for your loss.[:'(]
Old 09-14-2005, 03:34 PM
  #1503  
pherchris
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, ON, CANADA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Hi guys,

This may have been brought up already in this lengthy thread but here goes:

I'm setting mine up with Hitec 5945MGs all around except for one 8611A on rudder; my question was, can I use the included 1" blue anodized aluminum servo arms on my elevator and ailerons?
3D throw is not my goal, I'll be flying it primarily for IMAC.


Thanks in advance,


Chris R.
Old 09-14-2005, 03:35 PM
  #1504  
thedak
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

I would seriously consider a fight. That sucks. I finished Pimpin' My Ride this afternoon. I received my new prop as well. I am going to check it out 2morrow at the field. My cowl should be in Monday and I am going to put in the Saito 220. I am still not sure what prop to run on this engine. I am going to try my APC 18x8W first.

Matt
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Vt58655.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	55.0 KB
ID:	324096   Click image for larger version

Name:	Mh19307.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	71.9 KB
ID:	324097  
Old 09-14-2005, 03:58 PM
  #1505  
STG
Senior Member
My Feedback: (26)
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Richmond, WI
Posts: 3,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

ORIGINAL: pherchris
Hi guys,

This may have been brought up already in this lengthy thread but here goes:

I'm setting mine up with Hitec 5945MGs all around except for one 8611A on rudder; my question was, can I use the included 1" blue anodized aluminum servo arms on my elevator and ailerons?
3D throw is not my goal, I'll be flying it primarily for IMAC.
Thanks in advance,
Chris R.
Sure, you will have more than enough throw with those arms for IMAC. Make sure to use blue loctite.


Old 09-14-2005, 04:05 PM
  #1506  
pherchris
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, ON, CANADA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Thanks for the quick reply STG!

That's great news, I'll get this beauty in the air quicker than I thought!


Chris.
Old 09-14-2005, 06:02 PM
  #1507  
BoneDoc
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
BoneDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Mark, I would personally get his info and pursue this. This is no different than your typical fender bender. He could've really injured someone.
Old 09-15-2005, 07:25 AM
  #1508  
FBaity
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

I would take him to small claims court with H9 invoices and labor charges. No way can someone cause you $$ losses and not be libal to make you hole again. I'll bet a letter from a legal begal would shake the coins out of him.
Old 09-15-2005, 08:19 AM
  #1509  
LSP972
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zachary, LA
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Matt,

What size spinner is that in your pic in post #1484 just above this one?

I ask because I scored a 3", and am wondering if it will lork dorky since 3.25" is called for. I just can't see an eight of an inch making THAT much difference???
Old 09-15-2005, 09:08 AM
  #1510  
lockjaw-express
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

All,

Thanks for your input, but the person that ran into my plane is going to repair the wing, but if I do not think it will work, I will not use it. I have seen some of his work and it looks real nice, but I would rather have a new wing. If I was the person who missed the runway and caused the damage, I would have just wrote a check for the damage. Much easier, and you keep a good relationship.

I just got the usual, "well things like this happen in this hobby". Now if I crash/damage my own plane, it does not bother me that much, because it was my fault.

BR, Mark
Old 09-15-2005, 09:10 AM
  #1511  
lockjaw-express
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Steve,

I am using a 3.5" Ultimate Spinner, and it looks great.

BR, Mark
Old 09-15-2005, 09:26 AM
  #1512  
kolarshooter
My Feedback: (1)
 
kolarshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Paso Robles, CA
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

ORIGINAL: Steve Campbell

I ask because I scored a 3", and am wondering if it will lork dorky since 3.25" is called for. I just can't see an eight of an inch making THAT much difference???
Mine's a 3" (with a Saito 180) and it looks fine.

I'm putting a Brison 2.4 in the plane soon and it has a 3.25". I'm sure there won't be much difference.

The full-scale pics I've seen show a monster spinner, so both the 3 & 3.25 are too small for "scale" purposes, but look great on the model. Use it and don't worry about it!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Da83389.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	16.0 KB
ID:	324399  
Old 09-15-2005, 09:39 AM
  #1513  
JAkridge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: , CA
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

CF 3.5" seem's a tad large, But I had it so, it's on it.
Old 09-15-2005, 11:34 AM
  #1514  
thedak
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

That is a Tru Turn 3" APC Wide Cut.

Matt
Old 09-15-2005, 01:12 PM
  #1515  
LSP972
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zachary, LA
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Thanks, Matt. That's the exact same spinner I have. Looks fine.
Old 09-15-2005, 05:16 PM
  #1516  
thedak
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Had the day off today. The Mejzlik 18x8" doesn't have the pull that the APC 18x6W. I only flies a tick faster. It spools up much better on the ground. As far as the APC 18x8W and the Mejzlik 18x8" I really couldn't tell a difference besides one is $20 and one is $45.

APC 18x6W--------9100 RPM
APC 18x8W--------8200 RPM
Mejzlik 18x8-------8400 RPM

Later
Old 09-15-2005, 08:27 PM
  #1517  
cleonard
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

thedak, what engine are you running the 18 X 8W on? I have an OS 160 that is going on mine. Just wondering what prop will be a good place to start.

Thanks,

Craig
Old 09-15-2005, 09:06 PM
  #1518  
kolarshooter
My Feedback: (1)
 
kolarshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Paso Robles, CA
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

[8D]
Old 09-15-2005, 09:35 PM
  #1519  
ics
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Thanks for the tip. Been in Dallas got back today.
Old 09-15-2005, 11:12 PM
  #1520  
thedak
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

That was on my OS 1.6 FX. I am going to get the Saito 220 in this weekend. The 1.6 FX is going in the UL Giles that I ordered from OMP. With the 1.6 FX I would start off with the APC 18x6W.


Matt
Old 09-16-2005, 10:21 AM
  #1521  
shag555
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berlin Center, OH
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Matt:

Wondering what your thoughts are on a prop for this 220? I bought an APC 18X10 to run the engine in and am planning on sticking a 20X6 (as recommended) on to fly with... Any specific brands though?

MPB
Old 09-16-2005, 12:10 PM
  #1522  
thedak
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

Guy at the field was using a 20x6" on his 220 and it did not fly fast enough. I am looking for a prop in the 19x7" or 19x8". There are some threads on this engine. I am going to start with an APC 18x10" as you are and go from there. Some of these props aren't cheap so I hope I see one at the field that I like before I buy it.
Old 09-16-2005, 08:55 PM
  #1523  
FlyguyXII
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
FlyguyXII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

It flies really really good with a brison 3.2 3ds quit well too!!
Old 09-17-2005, 09:14 AM
  #1524  
shag555
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berlin Center, OH
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

How many of you have noticed how much flexure there is in the STAB??? Vertically it's rock solid, but nose to tail there's quite a bit, as much as 1/4 inch at the tip of the Stab. Throughout this post, there have been a couple of guys that have had probs with the stab abutting against the Fuse, but there isn't a problem here. It seems that the Stab Tube is placed 3/4 from leading edge (entire width of the stab), and the positioning dowels are 1/4 back, which causes the flexure.

Mine will get epoxied in place. I also remember a couple of crashes due to unexpected snaps. Just wonder if this flexure would contribute to an unstable airframe.

Also, Matt... I know you indicated that you replaced the main wing tube with a CF unit. Have you replaced the Stab tube also? I've also been looking in to extracting the dowels from the main wing and stab and replacing them with CF units for lighter weight. Not that it's going to matter with this Saito 220, but I'm an extremeist when it comes to lugging around extra fat.


MPB
Old 09-18-2005, 08:04 PM
  #1525  
shag555
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berlin Center, OH
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Extra 260 27% Hangar 9er

For those of you that went with the Saito 220 mill, Fly RC has a feature article testing this engine. It's in the November 2005 issue.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.