RCU Forums - View Single Post - Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model
View Single Post
Old 12-14-2007, 12:47 PM
  #7  
Roadster
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: W.R.,
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Composite ARF Vs. Krill Model


ORIGINAL: RBACONS

Does anyone know how the 33% Krill Velox II compares with the 33% Katana for IMAC? I like the looks of the Velox and the fact that it seems a good match for a DA-85 at 22 lbs. If I read the Krill site correctly, it looks like the 33% Katana may need a DA-100 due to its weight of 26 lbs. Nonetheless, I'd prefer to get which ever is better suited to IMAC flying.

Tony
Tony... I've owed both. Not sure an 85 cc would work. The altitude you fly at will make a differance. Either models will be awsume for IMAC. They build light, There is a little work work to a Krill than a stick plane but I think it is worth it.
I put DA 100's in both because we fly at 6000 ft. above sea level.
Greg