Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 19 of 19

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    extra 260 maiden

    I flew my 27% 260 extra today
    and i wanted to slow plane down,
    so i used receiver and plugged right wing aileron to "AIL" and the left wing was connected to Aux 2.
    I was able to program FLAPERONS

    and wow, did they work:


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ66FHxURFg


    really helped to slow down plane for landing, it just floated in

    the flaps i used were half only, and upon doing so, plane wanted to pitch up, so i had to manually give plane down elevator, to get plane to not flare up as much, once engine speed was decreased further, then it just touched down.

    what i need to do next is program in some down elevator with the flaps, so it does not pitch up as much.

    enjoy video, tell me what you think.
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  2. #2
    Moderator BMatthews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
    Posts
    11,972
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Watch out for any increase towards tip stalling with flaperons. Especially with such a strongly tapered wing and what appears to be constant width strip ailerons.

    With strip ailerons the increase in the camber and locak angle of incidence caused by drooping the flaperons will result in a washed in wing at the tips compared to the root. Yes, you're getting more lift to work with but if you slow the model down to really use the extra lift you could easily find that the model is more prone to tip stalling.

    As per usual with such things do all the practicing the classic 3.5 mistakes high to get a feel for it.

    It was a great landing at the end but it's hard to say if it was faster than no flaperons or not without being there or seeing some no flap landings to compare.
    Witty saying to be plagarized shortly.....

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    thanks

    you are right

    i am certain i could lane plane without,

    i will try next time to land without them.

    also, i set the flaperons to be minimal, and there are two setting, 1/2 and full, and on this landing, they were on 1/2

    i will reduce the movement further, but i will still try to land without them.

    best regards,
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  4. #4
    cfircav8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hampton, IA
    Posts
    1,186
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Doesn't that plane have full span ailerons? If it does you are increasing the incidence of the entire wing and will not change the washout by adding flaperons. I do agree to practice with it at a safe altitude to get accustomed to any unforseen quirks that may arise. Unless your A/C is excessivly nose heavy, or has a high wing loading, that design can slow down well for landing without the use of flaps. They do tend to hold their energy well and you have to learn how to slow it down for landing and keep the descent shallow. Getting the idle low enough also makes a huge difference.
    The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    surrey, BC, CANADA
    Posts
    3,754
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Mine lands like a trainer, predictable all the way down to a 3 pointer, but its likely 2-3 pounds lighter too.
    Carefull with Flutter and rudder problems when running 50cc

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    been there already:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CqjQZ-alpQ


    after servo was replaced with JR 8411, and other damage was repaired

    here is next flight:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ66FHxURFg
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    124
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Ah, you found out why you need stiff ailerons, stiff hinges, stiff linkages, and counter balanced ailerons eh. If the previous statement were true a miniscule servo with no gear slop would be sufficient. Effectively by adding a larger servo, you are damping the system with its resistance due to its torque needed to move it off its assigned "spot".

    To help eliminate flutter, do NOT place your servo linkage at the aerodynamic center of the aileron. If its a kit, most likely, they predetermined this for you already. Place it at a prime integer value of the AC. 1/3, 3/7, etc.

    Enjoy your introduction into vibrations.

    Cheers


  8. #8
    speedracerntrixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    3,807
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden


    ORIGINAL: BFoote

    Ah, you found out why you need stiff ailerons, stiff hinges, stiff linkages, and counter balanced ailerons eh. If the previous statement were true a miniscule servo with no gear slop would be sufficient. Effectively by adding a larger servo, you are damping the system with its resistance due to its torque needed to move it off its assigned "spot".

    To help eliminate flutter, do NOT place your servo linkage at the aerodynamic center of the aileron. If its a kit, most likely, they predetermined this for you already. Place it at a prime integer value of the AC. 1/3, 3/7, etc.

    Enjoy your introduction into vibrations.

    Cheers


    Can you give a more in depth explanation of this?


  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    i second this motion
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    surrey, BC, CANADA
    Posts
    3,754
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Yes , many will disagree, but this is no 50cc plane at all
    Nitro OS 160. Moki 1.8, maybe 2.10, 4 stroke 1.40 - 2.20 or 30-35cc gasoline.

    When going 50cc gas, things get a bit complex and tight and the added weight just makes it a fast sport model, that struggles with slower flight envelopes alot, including landing and other airframe issues.. sure it will rocket out of a hover and across the sky.

    The limited 3D it was designed around, is lost with the added burden of bigger gassers.
    Other actual 50cc airframes are quite a bit larger then the H9 260.

    I am sure the life span is cut rather short, when using a 50cc up front.

    Sure it can be beefed up to handle it, if you dont mind flying a fat..


  11. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    that sure would explain for a lot.

    Horizon hobby sold that plane with that engine as a combo.

    on the 1st flight, the tach on engine read 6500 rpm swinging a 23 x 8 prop right before flight. that plane rocketed out and the aileron servos were stripped.

    on my second flight,

    i had made the engine rich, since it is still breaking in, which i had not done for 1st flight.

    i got 5500 rpm on tach right before flight,
    so that would explain why it flew better. top speed was 90 mph on 2nd flight.

    i did not use the forerunner on the 1st flight, so don't know what speed it was going.

    HH has discontinued the plane, either them or H9.
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    124
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Simple answer is that structrures 1st Nodal point in a vibrating structure will be 1/2 its length.

    So, your aileron is fluttering. Actually everyones ailerons and all moving structures are fluttering.

    What is Flutter?

    The ends of the aileron, tip/root, are moving up and down, up and down, up and down due to slack in hinges, slack in servo linkage, slack in servo gears, vortex bubble shedding due to high angle of attack, vortex shedding due to drag which increases by the velocity squared and with the difference in drag between the bottom and top of the airfoil at the trailing edge creates a pressure up/down depending on flight profile. Your tip/root of your aileron will always be flexing as they are a structure under said load. The only question is really how much.

    Your servo is trying to dampen out all of these vibrations. If you place your servo linkage at the most common node point the structure at this point is actually NOT moving until a third harmonic or greater is introduced. Therefore your servo is not able to dampen the structural response and the flutter, while not noticeable under most conditions is free to either get LARGER, or SMALLER. Well, obviously you never notice when it gets smaller, but when the vibration/flutter becomes large enough, the dynamic force of structure is large enough to force the servo to move. Generally this strips the gears and your plane just lost aileron authority and probably went into a spin unless you are VERY quick on the sticks and know to apply opposite aileron throw, which may or may not help depending on how much you use.

    Placement of linkage.
    1) Higher pressure air under the wing is pusing aileron up
    2) You do not want to tip stall
    3) Pushed up aileron decreases angle of attack
    4) Linkage placemtn along lenght of aileron will increase/decrease this flexing of the tip of the aileron
    5) If one is trying for VERY snappy barrel rolls on a lightly wing loaded plane where stalling is not an issue, then place linkage at some prime number integer of the length of the aileron towards the tip.

    FOREX: 18" Aileron. Ribs every 2" 5th rib is centered on center of aileron. Prime integers of 18/2 will be 1/9, 2/9, 4/9, 5/9, 7,9, 8/9 just to be VERY thorough. Obviously 1/9 and 8/9 are essentially useless as the flexing of the aileron will mean one end is fully functional while the other essentially sits in place. 3/9 and 6/9 are NOT good as the next most common harmonic ossilation of a structure is its length divided by 3. 2/9 and 7/9 length essentially fall under the same problem of 1/9 and 8/9. This leave 4/9 and 5/9 length. This position along the aileron will mean that any flutter of the most common harmonic 1/2, will be trying to move the servo arm back and forth as well. Servos do not like this as their "brain" told them to HOLD @ 'X'. The flutter is trying to move said servo OFF its HOLD spot. Therefore said servo PUSHES back against this flutter canceling the flutter and keeping your airplane in the air.

    There is another component to this in that the servo in question has to be able to ACT quick enough to PUSH BACK. This gets into latency, torque curves. Why digital servos are superior essentially. A standard pot(resitor) servo will not Push back with its maximum current(POWER) until said resitor(position sensor) moves by a LARGE margin. So, yes, said servo will be able to bring 'y' torque to bear, it only does so when its position sensor tells it that it has a LARGE movment to under go in a simplifed explanation. A digital servo does not have this limitation as it can bring its FULL current to bear on even a minute needed change. Well, nearly its full current anyways.

    Hope that is sorta clear. Others on here can probably do so in a clearer fashion. Gotta go. Questions can get to them tomorrow maybe.

    ORIGINAL: speedracerntrixie


    ORIGINAL: BFoote

    Ah, you found out why you need stiff ailerons, stiff hinges, stiff linkages, and counter balanced ailerons eh. If the previous statement were true a miniscule servo with no gear slop would be sufficient. Effectively by adding a larger servo, you are damping the system with its resistance due to its torque needed to move it off its assigned ''spot''.

    To help eliminate flutter, do NOT place your servo linkage at the aerodynamic center of the aileron. If its a kit, most likely, they predetermined this for you already. Place it at a prime integer value of the AC. 1/3, 3/7, etc.

    Enjoy your introduction into vibrations.

    Cheers


    Can you give a more in depth explanation of this?


  13. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    i just reread your post, as to understand what you are saying, now i know what you said.  i may have to clarify what happened, and more than likely, what i think happened, since it is very much possible that i am wrong.

    What i believed to have seen, while plane completely lost control of ailerons, was that the wings were "flexing" or vibrating up and down, and making a terrible noise, as the ailerons were "flapping" up and down.

    but now, it makes sense to me:

    what happened was that when servos were stripped, the ailerons were not "attached" to a servo, so they began the up and down movement.  since they were doing this, this was then transmitted, via hinges, to wings, and then the wings were doing it as well.

    this is what i referred to "flutter" of the wing, as this is what i saw, which was way strange.  but in reality, after understanding it, the ailerons had way too excessive unopposed "flutter" that was then transmitted to the wing. 

    kind of like if you placed a streamer on the side mirror of your car, and at low speed, maybe the streamer would fluctuate around, but at high speed, then the mirror will begin to "shake"
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  14. #14
    rmh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    , UT
    Posts
    12,597
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Flutter is caused by the ailerons CG being too far aft - it should be somewhere between the hinge line and 20% of chord
    Good servos and tight linkages may overcome incorrect setups byt ther is no mystery about this and no fixes other than to get the balance located correctly.
    IF the balance is wrong - a resonant swing can take place- sometimes quite easily and it is destructive
    This is not just an "idea " It has been tested and shown to work.
    also full scale practice is to balance ailerons .,This done not to change stick pressure but to prevent flutter.
    Pulling out of a dive at speed - can reduce unequal pressures on wing/stab which at some point will allow the control surface (aileron or elevator) to "hunt" -at some point this can become a resonant swing -
    play with hinge gap if you want to- that is just a patch and or acts as a movement restriction.
    Libby is still watching you

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    White Oak, TX
    Posts
    2,108
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Saw what you described Sat morning at a big bird event. Something happened with the left aileron, that in turn caused the wing to flutter (oscillate) perhaps 8-10 cycles before the wing ripped apart. You were more fortunate than the owner of that plane as it won't fly again.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    when it happened to me, i immediately cut engine down as much as possible and landed plane. the damage on landing was broken landing gear, broken prop (80$), muffler broke, firewall broke. i was able to repair and upgrade servos. have flown place since then ,two more times, last time was today.
    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    124
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    Yup, have 10lbs of tungsten carbide(Old broken milling cutters) as counter weights on each aileron on the COZY(4 person Long EZ) I helped build as he was a family friend. Its normal CG of said aileron was about 40%. Moved it forward to 12%. Most worthless airplane ever. Can't take off quickly, nor land quickly, can't sight see out of it as its low speed handling properties suck, can't do acrobatics with it, effectively can only take off from a paved LONG runway and can get you somewhere else to ANOTHER LONG paved runway, at which time you have to somehow procure transportation to somewhere useful. Now he is building an RV-7 so he can actually go somewhere fun and interesting. He didn't like my brother and I's design for flaps on the COZY. We proved via testing wind tunnel and RC demonstrator that we could place flaps on the rear and the front stabilizer canard improving takeoff distance by over 50% and total load lifted by 25% at the same time while maintaining canard proper stall characteristics. Couldn't add leading edge slats as the rear propeller would have smacked the ground. Actually propeller smacking the ground(FOD) is a common occurrence on COZY/Long EZ on unimproved airfields. Yet another reason NOT to build a cozy or Long EZ.

    ORIGINAL: rmh

    Flutter is caused by the ailerons CG being too far aft - it should be somewhere between the hinge line and 20% of chord
    Good servos and tight linkages may overcome incorrect setups byt ther is no mystery about this and no fixes other than to get the balance located correctly.
    IF the balance is wrong - a resonant swing can take place- sometimes quite easily and it is destructive
    This is not just an ''idea '' It has been tested and shown to work.
    also full scale practice is to balance ailerons .,This done not to change stick pressure but to prevent flutter.
    Pulling out of a dive at speed - can reduce unequal pressures on wing/stab which at some point will allow the control surface (aileron or elevator) to ''hunt'' -at some point this can become a resonant swing -
    play with hinge gap if you want to- that is just a patch and or acts as a movement restriction.

  18. #18
    cfircav8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hampton, IA
    Posts
    1,186
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    That and their cross wind handling sucks. I have seen many in the grass on the sides of runways.
    The three most useless things to a pilot, the sky above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel on the ground.

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    shreveport, LA
    Posts
    655
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: extra 260 maiden

    update

    just flew extra again with no flaperons this time


    the wind was 14 mph

    landed into wind with 3 point landing

    no flaperons this time.


    AMA # 982277
    3DHS Extra 330 SC 119" DA 170
    Bill Hempel Yak 40% DA 170
    Extreme Flight Extra 300 91" DA 60 MTW RE2
    Great Planes Matt Chapman Eagle Cap DA 120
    Extreme FLight Extra 300 78" DA35 (Soon)
    Hangar 9 Extra 260 DA50
    GP Revolver 70 Saito FA1.25


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.