35% 260 V's 35% 300???
06-01-2009, 06:26 AM
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: derbyshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
35% 260 V's 35% 300???
Hi there,
I'm a very proud owner of a few of your models. I presently have a 40% edge 540T the 35% 260 and now I'm considering one of your 35% 300's. I think the 260 is a fantastic alrounder and I also love the look of your new 300 but I'm trying to convince myself that I really do need another aw 35%'r???...lol. So can you tell me why I should treat myself to the new 300...how do they compare to each other...what are the good points and the bad points???
Cheers!
I'm a very proud owner of a few of your models. I presently have a 40% edge 540T the 35% 260 and now I'm considering one of your 35% 300's. I think the 260 is a fantastic alrounder and I also love the look of your new 300 but I'm trying to convince myself that I really do need another aw 35%'r???...lol. So can you tell me why I should treat myself to the new 300...how do they compare to each other...what are the good points and the bad points???
Cheers!
06-03-2009, 05:38 PM
#2
RE: 35% 260 V's 35% 300???
The 300 is a little bigger with more wing area, has a two place canopy, looks cool, and is available in different schemes. I have a 35% 260 for 3D and a 42% 260 for precision. I love them both but have been considering downsizing my IMAC bird. If I did I would be looking pretty seriously at this 300 - it's a nice plane for both 3D and precision.
06-03-2009, 06:11 PM
#3
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: derbyshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 35% 260 V's 35% 300???
Hi Bodywerks,
Thankyou for your reply. Yes the 300 looks very nice but I know that my 260 is such a bonny model and does precision and 3D so well. I know that getting a new model is always a gamble when you already have a good performer but nothing ventured nothing gained!! It'sa shame there doesnt seem tobe many posts where these models a compared???
Cheersagain
Thankyou for your reply. Yes the 300 looks very nice but I know that my 260 is such a bonny model and does precision and 3D so well. I know that getting a new model is always a gamble when you already have a good performer but nothing ventured nothing gained!! It'sa shame there doesnt seem tobe many posts where these models a compared???
Cheersagain
06-04-2009, 05:18 PM
#7
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: derbyshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 35% 260 V's 35% 300???
well I cant agree with you more...I have the edge 39%, 260 35% and they both look and fly superb but these are getting older every day and the 300 looks fresh and I quess the performance will be to match. Though I do like the look of my 260 and she's all blinged up to boot.lol
