Go Back  RCU Forums > Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more > Full Scale planes, cars, helis, boats > Airplanes - Full Scale
Reload this Page >

Percy Pilcher: Could he have beaten the Wright brothers?

Community
Search
Notices
Airplanes - Full Scale Discuss full scale airplanes here

Percy Pilcher: Could he have beaten the Wright brothers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2017, 11:01 AM
  #1  
flyboy2610
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
flyboy2610's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 702
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default Percy Pilcher: Could he have beaten the Wright brothers?

The video is 48 minutes long, but it's quite interesting and doesn't seem that long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efCMbwdhXjM
Old 12-15-2017, 05:44 AM
  #2  
buzzard bait
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

At the time of his death, Pilcher had zero experience flying a glider with movable control surfaces. He was still using weight shifting just like Lilienthal did for five years.

The problem is that weight shifting limits the size of a machine, which limits how it can be powered and what can be done with it. It was also very dangerous. Aerodynamic force is proportional to the square of the air speed, a fact known even before Newton. If you learn to handle, say, a 5 knot gust, what happens when you get hit with 10? The upsetting force is not double the force of the 5 knot gust, it is quadruple. But the ability to shift weight doesn't change at all. Lilienthal died when he got hit with a gust he couldn't handle. It was not his first crash.

The Wrights never built a hang glider; they used movable control surfaces, starting with a kite in 1899. Their big breakthough came in 1902, when they solved the problems of adverse yaw and spiral mode instability. Pilcher never even knew such things existed. He preceded the Wrights, but he followed Lilienthal. Instead of rejecting weight shifting for control, he tried to extend it.

Wilbur said, "It is possible to fly without a motor, but it is not possible to fly without knowledge and skill." He praised Lilienthal for "taking the flying problem into the open air where it belongs", but he rejected Lilienthal's use of weight shifting. He believed that the necessary skill would come from flying with movable control surfaces. It doesn't matter what Pilcher put on paper. One can speculate on what he might have done had he lived longer, but speculation is all it is. Pilcher was on the wrong track.

Jim

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.