Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Morell, PE, CANADA
    Posts
    157
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    The deadstick landing a British Airways Boeing 777 pulled off a few days ago,
    makes one wonder if they shouldnt put Flight Engineers back in these birds,
    and take out 50% of the computers.
    An Air Canada Boeing 757 that ran out of gas in 1983, and the Transat Airbus
    that deadsticked into the Azores come to mind.

  2. #2
    Chris Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Leesburg, VA
    Posts
    1,366
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    We do not know the reason for the crash, so a flight engineer may or may not have helped. If it was something that happened abruptly at low altitude, then a flight engineer would be of no help. Plus, the flight you mention was coming from Beijing, so it would have had an augmented crew, so there were probably 3 pilots in the cockpit anyways. I was a DC-10 flight engineer for a while, and there is nothing that an engineer can do with a loss of all engines at low altitude. Today's computers offer a huge benefit of taking the loads off the flying pilots and monitoring the systems and letting them fly the plane. Plus, an engineer is an added expense for the airline, and we all know how likely they are to do that.
    F3A Unlimited

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks. Norm

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Brockton, MA
    Posts
    3,945

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Who was monitoring the fuel totalizer? Or, was it malfunctioning and giving them false readings?

    From my military flying days, the FE would plan for the fuel load (allowing for winds en route etc.,) then add fuel for 3 missed approaches and then a divert to an alternate field. Was there any fuel in the tanks that just didn't make it to the engines? Or were the tanks bone dry?

    Something here is not adding up, and I will admit that I have not been able to follow the story to find out any behind-the-scenes details. Has anyone else come up with any new news since this happened?

    Bob
    Club Saito #61 Cub Brotherhood #107
    Spitfire Brotherhood #143
    Kadet Brotherhood #3

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    News reports indicate that there was plenty of fuel. The problem appears to be that the computer for some reason would not advance the throttles. The crew tried every trick they knew to advance them manually but all failed. The Captain then made the wise decision to "fly the plane" and he got it on the ground very hard but no one was killed. He did his job very well. Norm

  6. #6
    Rotorwrench's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Abbeville, LA
    Posts
    50
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Following an uneventful flight from Beijing, China, the aircraft was established on an ILS approach to Runway 27L at London Heathrow. Initially the approach progressed normally, with the Autopilot and Autothrottle engaged, until the aircraft was at a height of approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down. The aircraft then descended rapidly and struck the ground, some 1,000 ft short of the paved runway surface, just inside the airfield boundary fence. The aircraft stopped on the very beginning of the paved surface of Runway 27L. During the short ground roll the right main landing gear separated from the wing and the left main landing gear was pushed up through the wing root. A significant amount of fuel leaked from the aircraft but there was no fire. An emergency evacuation via the slides was supervised by the cabin crew and all occupants left the aircraft, some receiving minor injuries.
    Initial indications from the interviews and Flight Recorder analyses show the flight and approach to have progressed normally until the aircraft was established on late finals for Runway 27L. At approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down, the Autothrottle demanded an increase in thrust from the two engines but the engines did not respond. Following further demands for increased thrust from the Autothrottle, and subsequently the flight crew moving the throttle levers, the engines similarly failed to respond. The aircraft speed reduced and the aircraft descended onto the grass short of the paved runway surface.


  7. #7
    FLYBOY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    9,035
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Looks to me like the pilot did an incredible job! 3 hurt but not bad, no fatalities and no fire. Nice job.
    Fly it till the wings come off.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Brockton, MA
    Posts
    3,945

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Yeah, thank God for no fatalities... that was unreal.

    Thanks for updating me. It's going to be very interesting to find out what combination of factors caused this system to fail.

    I appreciate the updates, guys.

    Bob
    Club Saito #61 Cub Brotherhood #107
    Spitfire Brotherhood #143
    Kadet Brotherhood #3

  9. #9
    pilotpete2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lyndonville, VT
    Posts
    2,990
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    These are all very different scenarios.
    The "Gimly Glider" incident was primarily due to to a refueling mess up, ground crew pumped the requested units of fuel in pounds rather than Kilograms, add in a situation where the fuel gauges also were inoperative.
    I watched the TV recreation of the Transat incident with great interest, as a non pilot (well some hours of flight training and 20 years of R/C), my take on it was that the captain handled the situation poorly, it seemed as though he didn't want to believe the computers and as the Airbus was a twin, shutting down an engine would be an immediate in flight emergency situation and a divert to the nearest suitable airport, if I'm not mistaken.
    In the case of BA038, it looks as though the pilots had absolutely no choice but to glide her in as best they could. I sincerely hope that nothing they did or didn't do prior to the problem on approach is found to be a factor in the accident.
    Pete
    \"If the woman don\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy\"

    [Red Green]

  10. #10
    pilotpete2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lyndonville, VT
    Posts
    2,990
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Sorry, double post[]
    Pete
    \"If the woman don\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy\"

    [Red Green]

  11. #11
    Wayne22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Strathcona county, AB, CANADA
    Posts
    5,389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks.
    Y'know.....I read that back in 1964. .......I can't remember which magazine though.......



    All I ask is for a chance to prove that money can\'t make me happy......

  12. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    Posts
    18,233
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow


    ORIGINAL: normgoyer

    The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks. Norm

    And then the pilot's announcement will be: "Thank you for flying ABC Airways. You are traveling in the finest airliner on the market with the latest in autocontrol software. The triply-redundant computers will insure that nothing can go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong........."

    Bill Baxter, Manager Hobby Services/Futaba Service/North America
    3002 N. Apollo Dr. Ste. 1 Champaign, IL 61822 USA
    Service Phone: 217 398-0007
    Email: hobbyservices@hobbico.com

  13. #13

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Whoa Bill, it is your company I understand that is building the 2.4 FASST auto pilot system for the airlines!! Norm

  14. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    Posts
    18,233
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Low, Norm, Low.
    Bill Baxter, Manager Hobby Services/Futaba Service/North America
    3002 N. Apollo Dr. Ste. 1 Champaign, IL 61822 USA
    Service Phone: 217 398-0007
    Email: hobbyservices@hobbico.com

  15. #15

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Sorry Bill, it gets boting up here in the High Desert in the winter time. I have been using Futaba exclusively for about 30years now, now fly the your new 2.4rigs. Norm

  16. #16
    pilotpete2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lyndonville, VT
    Posts
    2,990
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow


    ORIGINAL: Bax


    ORIGINAL: normgoyer

    The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks. Norm

    And then the pilot's announcement will be: "Thank you for flying ABC Airways. You are traveling in the finest airliner on the market with the latest in autocontrol software. The triply-redundant computers will insure that nothing can go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong........."

    Yeah, it's one thing to have unmanned people movers, as some airports have, such as the monorail at EWR and the subway (I think it is unmanned) at DIA[8D]
    But I'm not going, if that Boeing doesn't have two pilots up front

    Bax,
    Are you going to be at the WRAM show this month?
    Cheers,
    Pete
    \"If the woman don\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy\"

    [Red Green]

  17. #17

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    If possible my rules are even stricter, I look in the cockpit at the left seat and the Captain better have gray hair and bifocals or I am not going. And....if there are props on the wings and the young pilot is texting his copilot asking him or her how to start this damn thing, I'm really not going. Norm

  18. #18
    pilotpete2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lyndonville, VT
    Posts
    2,990
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Experience counts
    Hey, I have a pilot neighbor that is pushing seventy and owns 2 planes, one is an EAA design with floats and skis, his cross country plane is over 70, a real classic, like him.
    Hint, the plane has a big round engine, a four place cabin, 2 wings and oh yeah, retracts[8D]
    Cheers,
    Pete
    \"If the woman don\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy\"

    [Red Green]

  19. #19

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Staggerwing, Beech D-17, Norm

  20. #20
    pilotpete2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lyndonville, VT
    Posts
    2,990
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Howd'ya guess
    Pete
    \"If the woman don\'\'\'\'\'\'\'\'t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy\"

    [Red Green]

  21. #21

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Not a guess, not very many biplanes with retracts and round engines. Norm

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Callahan, FL
    Posts
    6
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Just my 2 cents. [sm=75_75.gif] Did the crew turn off the PMC's (power management computer). It is hard to beleive that both engines failed to respond at the same time considering that they are independent systems.

    This is one of the reasons why I prefer to Fly By Cables, Torque Tubes, and Push Rods.

    Propknut

  23. #23

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Better book a flight in an airline flying DC-3s as those types of controls are history. Norm

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Callahan, FL
    Posts
    6
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Well, those kind of contols are still in use today. DC-4's, DC-6's. DC-7's, DC-8's, and DC-9's all use mechanical systems.

    Propknut

  25. #25

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Apple Valley, CA
    Posts
    854
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow

    Not many of those left either that haven't been rebuilt into MD-80s etc. Control feel is so important to the joy of flying. I always preferred the very short direct response of the J-3 compared to the squishy quality of the Champ. The many SNJs (AT-6s) that I owned had about the best control feel/reaction of any airplane I ever flown. Norm


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.