AMA's Forum now
02-04-2011, 07:57 AM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio,
TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
Yep, pretty soon you will be called, "KidCisco" and you will have to change your avatar
I was getting the Cisco treatment long before Cisco showed up.
02-04-2011, 01:48 PM
#28
My Feedback: (4)
RE: AMA's Forum now
ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
if you consider the Paintball thread, the Conflict Of Interest thread, the Lawnmower thread, and the annual KickOut KE threads,
I was getting the Cisco treatment long before Cisco showed up.
Yep, pretty soon you will be called, ''KidCisco'' and you will have to change your avatar
I was getting the Cisco treatment long before Cisco showed up.
02-04-2011, 05:58 PM
#31
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
You first need to get kicked off this board, the AMA board, and RC Groups. You will need a cease and desist letter from at least two of the three. Then we can move on to the finer points.
02-04-2011, 06:20 PM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Ozarks,
MO
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
I've built up some points there, but just not enough to get suspended yet. I guess I could go over an insult muroc a few times. One time I got 5 points for "Widespread Trolling" I insulted the same guy, the same way in 2 threads one day. They have a strange way of giving points there.
02-04-2011, 06:27 PM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio,
TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
2 threads?
I'm not gonna mention any names,
but over at our AMA board a guy once spammed every thread I had a post in
nagging me to make a post in some thread of his that I wasnt interested in reading (no less posting)
I'm not gonna mention any names,
but over at our AMA board a guy once spammed every thread I had a post in
nagging me to make a post in some thread of his that I wasnt interested in reading (no less posting)
02-07-2011, 04:54 AM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
well, looks like I just had another post get deleted over at the AMA board, in the FAA-ARC section.
Who deleted it? The secret police I guess.
Why did they delete it? Well, thats a secret, isnt it.
So, again I can only assume
had I been breaking some rule I would be told not to do (whatever it was) again.
Unsupported tangent RA from MrP gets to stay (since it was against KidEpoxy), while me shooting holes in his attack on me gets deleted. RA operating with support of the authorities over there.
well, looks like I just had another post get deleted over at the AMA board, in the FAA-ARC section.
Who deleted it? The secret police I guess.
Why did they delete it? Well, thats a secret, isnt it.
So, again I can only assume
had I been breaking some rule I would be told not to do (whatever it was) again.
Unsupported tangent RA from MrP gets to stay (since it was against KidEpoxy), while me shooting holes in his attack on me gets deleted. RA operating with support of the authorities over there.
Would you kindly provide a link to substantiate that accusation or a retraction.
MrP
02-07-2011, 06:41 AM
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Ozarks,
MO
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
I believe him, everybody here knows whats going on over there. Look who they got moding the forum, its like putting the Fox in charge of the Chicken house.
02-07-2011, 08:03 AM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
ORIGINAL: The Toolman
I believe him, everybody here knows whats going on over there. Look who they got moding the forum, its like putting the Fox in charge of the Chicken house.
I believe him, everybody here knows whats going on over there. Look who they got moding the forum, its like putting the Fox in charge of the Chicken house.
Regards
Frank
02-07-2011, 08:28 AM
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio,
TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
MrP
You dont get a retraction, you get an Update
What I wrote on Feb3 was accurate, I will not retract it:
My response was deleted while the RA tangent CBO definition was left in place when I wrote that on Feb3.
What I will do is recognizes that SINCE my Feb3 post was written, the RA cbo definition has been taken down.
See, no problems.. I'm happy to accept new information and changes.
Its like whan PrezDM let us know there WAS indeed a Conflict Of Interest... all the naysayers accepted that new info, right?
Having attacks and lies deleted DONT mean folks never attacked or lied
... I point to the Muroc slanderous lie against USAMA on the AMA board.... just cause he deleted it later dont mean he didnt say it,
but then months latter when someone went around and deleted the whole thread along with other threads that referred to the incident.... well, the term Coverup comes to mind.
Kid,
Would you kindly provide a link to substantiate that accusation or a retraction.
Would you kindly provide a link to substantiate that accusation or a retraction.
What I wrote on Feb3 was accurate, I will not retract it:
My response was deleted while the RA tangent CBO definition was left in place when I wrote that on Feb3.
What I will do is recognizes that SINCE my Feb3 post was written, the RA cbo definition has been taken down.
See, no problems.. I'm happy to accept new information and changes.
Its like whan PrezDM let us know there WAS indeed a Conflict Of Interest... all the naysayers accepted that new info, right?
Having attacks and lies deleted DONT mean folks never attacked or lied
... I point to the Muroc slanderous lie against USAMA on the AMA board.... just cause he deleted it later dont mean he didnt say it,
but then months latter when someone went around and deleted the whole thread along with other threads that referred to the incident.... well, the term Coverup comes to mind.
02-07-2011, 09:58 AM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
MrP
You dont get a retraction, you get an Update
What I wrote on Feb3 was accurate, I will not retract it:
My response was deleted while the RA tangent CBO definition was left in place when I wrote that on Feb3.
What I will do is recognizes that SINCE my Feb3 post was written, the RA cbo definition has been taken down.
See, no problems.. I'm happy to accept new information and changes.
Its like whan PrezDM let us know there WAS indeed a Conflict Of Interest... all the naysayers accepted that new info, right?
Having attacks and lies deleted DONT mean folks never attacked or lied
... I point to the Muroc slanderous lie against USAMA on the AMA board.... just cause he deleted it later dont mean he didnt say it,
but then months latter when someone went around and deleted the whole thread along with other threads that referred to the incident.... well, the term Coverup comes to mind.
MrP
Kid,
Would you kindly provide a link to substantiate that accusation or a retraction.
Would you kindly provide a link to substantiate that accusation or a retraction.
What I wrote on Feb3 was accurate, I will not retract it:
My response was deleted while the RA tangent CBO definition was left in place when I wrote that on Feb3.
What I will do is recognizes that SINCE my Feb3 post was written, the RA cbo definition has been taken down.
See, no problems.. I'm happy to accept new information and changes.
Its like whan PrezDM let us know there WAS indeed a Conflict Of Interest... all the naysayers accepted that new info, right?
Having attacks and lies deleted DONT mean folks never attacked or lied
... I point to the Muroc slanderous lie against USAMA on the AMA board.... just cause he deleted it later dont mean he didnt say it,
but then months latter when someone went around and deleted the whole thread along with other threads that referred to the incident.... well, the term Coverup comes to mind.
Regards
Frank or MrP if you prefer
02-07-2011, 12:08 PM
#42
RE: AMA's Forum now
Calling one's self Mr. anything is somewhat presumptious. That is something normally reserved for someone much older than you, or someone who has demonstrably earned that accolade. I normally tell people who call me Mr. Hurt, that this name was my Father's. I'm just Bill. This is normally met with a smile, followed by a growing friendship. I have met people who demanded that they be called Mr. Normally I find that they are more like the departing end of a horse than anything else. What do I know though? I'm just a bottom feeder.
Bill, AMA 4720
Bottom Feeder #1
Bill, AMA 4720
Bottom Feeder #1
02-07-2011, 01:04 PM
#44
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: sheridan,
IN
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
ORIGINAL: Stickbuilder
Calling one's self Mr. anything is somewhat presumptious. That is something normally reserved for someone much older than you, or someone who has demonstrably earned that accolade. I normally tell people who call me Mr. Hurt, that this name was my Father's. I'm just Bill. This is normally met with a smile, followed by a growing friendship. I have met people who demanded that they be called Mr. Normally I find that they are more like the departing end of a horse than anything else. What do I know though? I'm just a bottom feeder.
Bill, AMA 4720
Bottom Feeder #1
Calling one's self Mr. anything is somewhat presumptious. That is something normally reserved for someone much older than you, or someone who has demonstrably earned that accolade. I normally tell people who call me Mr. Hurt, that this name was my Father's. I'm just Bill. This is normally met with a smile, followed by a growing friendship. I have met people who demanded that they be called Mr. Normally I find that they are more like the departing end of a horse than anything else. What do I know though? I'm just a bottom feeder.
Bill, AMA 4720
Bottom Feeder #1
KE has been calling phlpsfrnk Mr. P for awhile.
I certainly don't remember phlpsfrnk asking for him to do so.
02-07-2011, 01:08 PM
#45
RE: AMA's Forum now
ORIGINAL: 804
Excuse me there, Bill, since Mr. P has left the bldg., I'll clue you into something.
KE has been calling phlpsfrnk Mr. P for awhile.
I certainly don't remember phlpsfrnk asking for him to do so.
Excuse me there, Bill, since Mr. P has left the bldg., I'll clue you into something.
KE has been calling phlpsfrnk Mr. P for awhile.
I certainly don't remember phlpsfrnk asking for him to do so.
Bill, AMA 4720
Bottom Feeder #1
02-07-2011, 04:54 PM
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio,
TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
Just to bring folks up to speed,
a good while ago there were threads with both Muroc & Phelps posting, so the use of Frank was not clear,
so I started typing MrP for FrankPhelps, as both a tip of the hat to Mission Impossible, and cause I'm a lazy typer
a good while ago there were threads with both Muroc & Phelps posting, so the use of Frank was not clear,
so I started typing MrP for FrankPhelps, as both a tip of the hat to Mission Impossible, and cause I'm a lazy typer
02-07-2011, 05:15 PM
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio,
TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA's Forum now
MrP
but the question,
that was repeated over and over while folks danced around without providin the requested data, was
just what current FAA text definitions/requirements is the AMA now meeting,
such that folks are saying AMA is already a p107/suAS standards'able CBO
prior to the sUAS CBO definitions being even a NPRM yet.
like the prancy answers before yours,
you too failed to provide the mythical current FAA CBO requirements folks are claiming AMA is meeting.
You provided some lefthand cbo definition that puts AMA on par with my community minded bowling team... does the EC bowl that much?
...
All the RA slung at me is over what?
Cause instead of focusing the suas chat on what kind standards AMA might or might not get as a cbo,
I made the scary comment that AMA might not even be a cbo when the regs come out
You had not accepted any of the responses from anyone without further questions. I provided a definition that I believe most people (not you apparently) will accept as what a CBO is.
that was repeated over and over while folks danced around without providin the requested data, was
just what current FAA text definitions/requirements is the AMA now meeting,
such that folks are saying AMA is already a p107/suAS standards'able CBO
prior to the sUAS CBO definitions being even a NPRM yet.
like the prancy answers before yours,
you too failed to provide the mythical current FAA CBO requirements folks are claiming AMA is meeting.
You provided some lefthand cbo definition that puts AMA on par with my community minded bowling team... does the EC bowl that much?
...
All the RA slung at me is over what?
Cause instead of focusing the suas chat on what kind standards AMA might or might not get as a cbo,
I made the scary comment that AMA might not even be a cbo when the regs come out
