what 2.4 article
#5
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lacona, NY
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: cloudancer03
I didnt get an article about 2.4 frequency.Is there something going on that I should know about???
I didnt get an article about 2.4 frequency.Is there something going on that I should know about???
http://www.modelairplanenews.com/blo...he-discussion/
The AMA is well aware of all the 2.4 problems. I don't doubt that it won't be long when the 2.4 radio's will be replaced again by the mHz band.
Pete
#9
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lacona, NY
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: cloudancer03
no disrespect just respectfully disagree.
no disrespect just respectfully disagree.
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
#10
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: Oberst
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
ORIGINAL: cloudancer03
no disrespect just respectfully disagree.
no disrespect just respectfully disagree.
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
Isn't this a popular ruse on 3rd grade playgrounds? "I know something you don't know!!"
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: grand rapids, MI
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: Oberst
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
#12
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: palm harbor,
FL
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
lol.yeah it does remind me of kindergarten days.I dont let things like this get to me...I got shot down more than a few times using my old 72..,the 2.4 is a vast improvement and whatever the issue I am sure it will be addressed.I dont see us going back to edsels and model T fords either.
#13
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: palm harbor,
FL
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
I get the same nonsense when I started flying electric planes a few years back and now our club president has several of them and to add insult tries to give me advice .really .?
#14
Moderator
RE: what 2.4 article
The conversations about 2.4 remind me of the same discussion about fuel injection 20+ years ago. The traditionalists weren't ever going to buy a car with all that "computer controlled junk" on it!
#15
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
Despite the impressive looking references, the blog was pretty sophomoric. For example comparison of signal path loss between 72 MHz and 2.4 GHz is made as if the signaling design were the same. No consideration given to the gain due to SS, which pretty much nullifies everything else.
You don't need to be involved in the RF comms industry to spot bogus facts cited. An example is the discussion regarding latency where he states "A seven millisecond latency or a fourteen millisecond latency claim is irrelevant since the human being, the RC pilot, has a painfully slow 200 millisecond latency and can not differentiate between seven or fourteen milliseconds." Anybody that has been to drag race knows that's bunk. Even a lapse of 7-14 ms in responding to the green light is only a 'fair' performance. A 200 ms lag will earn you a loss to a hole shot every time down the track.
You don't need to be involved in the RF comms industry to spot bogus facts cited. An example is the discussion regarding latency where he states "A seven millisecond latency or a fourteen millisecond latency claim is irrelevant since the human being, the RC pilot, has a painfully slow 200 millisecond latency and can not differentiate between seven or fourteen milliseconds." Anybody that has been to drag race knows that's bunk. Even a lapse of 7-14 ms in responding to the green light is only a 'fair' performance. A 200 ms lag will earn you a loss to a hole shot every time down the track.
#16
RE: what 2.4 article
Some interesting info:
Info -
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/...time/stats.php
Test Yourself -
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/...time/index.php
Drag Racing -
http://www.staginglight.com/guide/react.html
Drag racing is unique since you have a standardized means (time between lights) to anticipate the green light. Imagine what would happen if you simply sat there and waited a random amount of time until the light turned green!!
Swimmers are a little closer to what we deal with:
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJF...D200501043.htm
Info -
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/...time/stats.php
Test Yourself -
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/...time/index.php
Drag Racing -
http://www.staginglight.com/guide/react.html
Drag racing is unique since you have a standardized means (time between lights) to anticipate the green light. Imagine what would happen if you simply sat there and waited a random amount of time until the light turned green!!
Swimmers are a little closer to what we deal with:
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJF...D200501043.htm
#17
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R
Drag racing is unique since you have a standardized means (time between lights) to anticipate the green light. Imagine what would happen if you simply sat there and waited a random amount of time until the light turned green!!
Drag racing is unique since you have a standardized means (time between lights) to anticipate the green light. Imagine what would happen if you simply sat there and waited a random amount of time until the light turned green!!
#18
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: Oberst
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
ORIGINAL: cloudancer03
no disrespect just respectfully disagree.
no disrespect just respectfully disagree.
I have inside info that I can't talk about. Lets just say I know something that the public doesn't know and we'll leave it at that. Just save your money and don't buy any more 2.4 radios.
Pete
#19
RE: what 2.4 article
I think the AMA needs to lobby the FCC for those unused beeper frequencies or some frequency band and use the spread spectrum and/or ffrequecy hopping system on that. In fact you can use the frequency hopping system on 72 but I am not sure there are enough channels to do that with enough aircraft at one time, or without interferance to ajacent non R/C channels.
#21
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lacona, NY
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
Call it what you want. I had a long private conversation with Dave Mathewson and he asked me not to write or tell anyone what the 2.4 will be replaced with.
The article is from Dave Horvath, one of the people who scientifically proved that the 72mhz is more dependable and reliable in a lot of ways and warned people right in the beginning about the 2.4.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/forums/...e=1&print=true
His articles have been featured in all the model aviation magazines internationally warning people everywhere about the risks. I joined his cause shortly after seeing people having mysterious crashes losing multi thousand dollar aircraft. Because of the strict rules regarding the 72mhz and enforcing impound I've seen more brown out and black outs more than the famous 72mhz shoot downs.
Spectrum isn't the only one with problems. Futaba this year surpassed JR with the mysterious black outs. Joe Nall is a great example that there's a problem with the 2.4 and they are considering impounding the 2.4 along with the 72mhz.
I don't have the latest November issue of Model Aviation, but Dave Horvath has informed me that the AMA as a whole finally admits that there are issues with the 2.4 in this issue. It's about time! And I can hardly wait for the new replacement, I hate carrying secrets. But I am a man of my word, if someone high up tells me not let something out in the public, I don't. Only a few need to know and they know it already.
All the insults don't work with me folks. I'm married and I'm used to it. You all can't hold a torch to what the wife can come up with when she's on the warpath.
Pete
The article is from Dave Horvath, one of the people who scientifically proved that the 72mhz is more dependable and reliable in a lot of ways and warned people right in the beginning about the 2.4.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/forums/...e=1&print=true
His articles have been featured in all the model aviation magazines internationally warning people everywhere about the risks. I joined his cause shortly after seeing people having mysterious crashes losing multi thousand dollar aircraft. Because of the strict rules regarding the 72mhz and enforcing impound I've seen more brown out and black outs more than the famous 72mhz shoot downs.
Spectrum isn't the only one with problems. Futaba this year surpassed JR with the mysterious black outs. Joe Nall is a great example that there's a problem with the 2.4 and they are considering impounding the 2.4 along with the 72mhz.
I don't have the latest November issue of Model Aviation, but Dave Horvath has informed me that the AMA as a whole finally admits that there are issues with the 2.4 in this issue. It's about time! And I can hardly wait for the new replacement, I hate carrying secrets. But I am a man of my word, if someone high up tells me not let something out in the public, I don't. Only a few need to know and they know it already.
All the insults don't work with me folks. I'm married and I'm used to it. You all can't hold a torch to what the wife can come up with when she's on the warpath.
Pete
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Anytown
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: Oberst
Spectrum isn't the only one with problems. Futaba this year surpassed JR with the mysterious black outs. Joe Nall is a great example that there's a problem with the 2.4 and they are considering impounding the 2.4 along with the 72mhz.
Pete
Spectrum isn't the only one with problems. Futaba this year surpassed JR with the mysterious black outs. Joe Nall is a great example that there's a problem with the 2.4 and they are considering impounding the 2.4 along with the 72mhz.
Pete
Wait, I think the sky is falling.
#23
RE: what 2.4 article
"Call it what you want. I had a long private conversation with Dave Mathewson and he asked me not to write or tell anyone what the 2.4 will be replaced with."
You might even wish to pick up your November issue of AMA's Model Aviation and read AMA Technical Director', Greg Hahn's full page "informational" concerning what is happening with 2.4 Ghz, right now.
Kick that in with the fact that the main 3 individuals on the AMA's "Marketing Committee" are the CEOs of Great Planes, Horizon, and I believe Hobby People.
I suspect the radio suppliers have found another way to market something to get your RC $$$, HA! Don't be too quick to dump your 72Mhz stuff. Not my original idea, however that is what Greg alludes to. I will never give mine up.
BTW, for those that do not know him, Grehg Hahn is one nice guy, extremely talanted RC pilot, and full of knowledge in all model aviation disciplines. He and I had some minor disagreements way back when, however he was more right than me. I have every respect for him in every way pertaining to us aeromodelers.
#24
RE: what 2.4 article
ORIGINAL: Hossfly
BTW, for those that do not know him, Grehg Hahn is one nice guy, extremely talanted RC pilot, and full of knowledge in all model aviation disciplines.
BTW, for those that do not know him, Grehg Hahn is one nice guy, extremely talanted RC pilot, and full of knowledge in all model aviation disciplines.
#25
Moderator
RE: what 2.4 article
When I see an independent study done by a group led by someone with at least a Master's degree in electronics or electrical engineering (preferably a doctorate) that shows a flaw in the 2.4 technology, I'll believe it. Some guy Googling a few pieces of information and drawing big conclusions based on logical fallacies (the article) isn't worth the time it took to read it. Read some real research or don't read anything! Sure, our radios are not 100% reliable. They never have been. But the widespread use of 2.4 has shown that it does work and does have some advantages that 72mhz cannot provide.