Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

View Poll Results: A poll

Voters
520. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, our self-policing efforts (i.e. AMA Safety Codes) aren''t working.

    25 4.81%
  • Yes, the world has changed considerably since 9/11.

    83 15.96%
  • I''m not sure.

    29 5.58%
  • No, the FAA has no business regulating "hobby" airplanes.

    180 34.62%
  • No, we are fully capable of policing ourselves.

    66 12.69%
  • No, the perceived threat to society doesn't exist!

    72 13.85%
  • I hate polls like this!

    65 12.50%
Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 502

  1. #101

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, GA
    Posts
    914
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    Given the current state of things, the FAA has no choice but to issue regulations. I'd like to see model specifically aviation exempted. The problem is that currently, UAVs are basically outlawed for commercial use in the US, and the result is that other countries are far ahead of us, since they do permit commercial use.

    Where to draw the line is the big question. Weight has long been one of the factors considered. Another is "line of sight". Altitude is another.
    I believe that 1500 AGL or so is a reasonable limit, not 400 AGL. After all even birds fly higher than 400 AGL.
    Another area that I don't care for (even though I do hold a private pilot's license) is any requirement that a modeler/pilot carry any sort of license or medical certificate.
    Many of the RC modelers are older, and likely would not pass any FAA medical requirements for a certificate. (The devil is in the details, believe me!)

    I can remember when those "flying dope" into the US, using light planes, were actually better off legally (when caught) if they were totally unlicensed.


  2. #102

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    sheridan, IN
    Posts
    1,110
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487

    ORIGINAL: 804
    Earilier, as I quoted before, you said this:

    'Much like in an armed conflict, the ''enemy'' (in this case, the FAA) knows that it will enjoy an easy victory when it sees that its opposition is spending all of its energy fighting among themselves. ''

    Then, you go and start a thread that promises just that.
    I don't get it.
    To be honest with you, I started the thread to see what the sentiment was amongst the modelers here. I had no idea that there were two strongly-opinionated sides who were ready to come out fighting. That being said, I am pleased that the responses/arguements have been mostly civil.

    At least for me, this thread has been both informative and entertaining.

    Harvey
    You're right, it has been civil, and that's unusual and good.
    One thing for sure, when the rules finallycome out,
    we'll all really have something to talk about.

  3. #103
    warningshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hobby King front door OK
    Posts
    390
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487

    ORIGINAL: 804
    ...In one breath you are saying we should be open-minded and stick together as modelers (flyers), and in the next you (and others) are racking a guy over something you know nothing about as far as how he did it, where he did it.
    My definition of open-minded doesn't include ignoring someone who has just bragged about doing something illegal, right in the middle of a discussion about how some modelers' flagrant disregard for the Safety Code are possibly responsible for bringing the FAA's eyes upon all of us. I don't have to know the details of how or why he did it, what color his aircraft was, or what type of clouds were in the sky that day. Dropping explosives (even if just a harmless little firecracker) from a model airplane is expressly forbidden by the AMA. There's no grey area here. He self-confessed that he did it so there's nothing that I, or the rest of us need to prove. He pronounced himself guilty. I see no reason to appologize for disapproving of an illegal act that he bragged about doing in a public forum.

    It's no wonder that the FAA is proposing legislation for tighter controls on us!

    Harvey
    What he did is not illegal. May be against the AMA safety code which only applies to AMA members to keep their insurance in force.
    Freedom Isn\'\'t Free
    USAF (Ret) 1961-1981
    Tiger Club #61

  4. #104
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    905
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: 804
    One thing for sure, when the rules finallycome out,
    we'll all really have something to talk about.
    And I'm sitting on the edge of my seat waiting for that as well. Hopefully, the new rules won't be terribly restrictive to any of us. However, I think this should be a wake-up call for all of us in that our carefree-do-anything-that-we-want days are over. We are being watched closely and anything that we do that threatens full scale aviation or folks on the ground may very easily result in further legislation. We need to understand that WE are directly responsible for our own future!

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  5. #105
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    905
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: warningshot
    What he did is not illegal.
    Okay, I'll tell you what. Get caught with your model loaded with fireworks (also known as Class C explosives) and let us know how they couldn't find anything to charge you with.

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  6. #106

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LaGrange, KY
    Posts
    231
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    The reason that 400 ft agl is the limit is because full scale is limited to 500 ft agl over sparsely populated areas, 1000 ft agl over populated areas. Think about how far 1500 ft is. A model airplane at 1500 ft would look like a dot in the sky. Also, model airplane sights/fields are not shown on any aviation maps. Full scale aircraft have no way of knowing where model aircraft are being flown. It's hard enough to spot another full size aircraft at times, much less a model airplane.

    By the way I fly both model & full scale.

  7. #107

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LaGrange, KY
    Posts
    231
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    Think again, it's a federal offense to drop explosives from any aircraft, model or full scale.

  8. #108
    KidEpoxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    6,681
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    Wow, has this really gotten to a discussion of pyro on models?

    Cause I think I recall hearing how we regular AMA memebers were not allowd to load a model with pyro,
    because only the AMA showteam could load models with pyro.
    Am I rememberin right about Muncie allowed the show team to have models with pyro?

    Cause if thats the case,
    it would stand to reason that it was either
    not a violation of fed law to do what muncie did,
    or that it was
    .... cant be that pyro was a fed law violation AND muncie did it legally... gotta be one or the other right?

  9. #109
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    905
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy

    Wow, has this really gotten to a discussion of pyro on models?

    Cause I think I recall hearing how we regular AMA memebers were not allowd to load a model with pyro,
    because only the AMA showteam could load models with pyro.
    Am I rememberin right about Muncie allowed the show team to have models with pyro?

    Cause if thats the case,
    it would stand to reason that it was either
    not a violation of fed law to do what muncie did,
    or that it was
    .... cant be that pyro was a fed law violation AND muncie did it legally... gotta be one or the other right?
    Kid,

    Without knowing the exact details of the event, I can only guess that the AMA was able to get waivers for the show from both the FAA and AMA's insurance underwriter. I'm pretty certain that AMA wouldn't risk such an event without insurance coverage.

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  10. #110

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,267
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    Models have been flying in the range of 300- 500 ft for years with no problems andvirtually no conflict with full scale planes, The main reason for there
    being almost contact between the two is full scale rarely flys below 2,000 ft unless taking off or landings and models rarely go above 500 ft due to
    visibllity. I know some sail planes and rockets also balloons can on ocassion exceed 500ft and maybe the FAA needs to make some rules specific
    for models that fly at high alititude.
    Ira d

  11. #111

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    1,451
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: chuckk2

    Where to draw the line is the big question. Weight has long been one of the factors considered. Another is ''line of sight''. Altitude is another.
    I believe that 1500 AGL or so is a reasonable limit, not 400 AGL. After all even birds fly higher than 400 AGL.
    Another area that I don't care for (even though I do hold a private pilot's license) is any requirement that a modeler/pilot carry any sort of license or medical certificate.
    Many of the RC modelers are older, and likely would not pass any FAA medical requirements for a certificate.
    (The devil is in the details, believe me!)

    A medical certificate to fly a model plane? Where did you get that idea? How embarrassing it's gonna be for some folks when this thing finally unwinds. It's gonna be very hard to get most of us to stop laughing!

    NS

  12. #112
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: NorfolkSouthern

    A medical certificate to fly a model plane? Where did you get that idea?
    It is very likely according to what the commercial sUAS guys say and think that 2nd class FAA medicals will be required for most sUAS operations. I have not seen anything hinting that they will be required for models.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  13. #113
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Speedy-Gonzales

    Ever try to collect on AMA's insurance?
    Have you? While not primary for those who have other insurance the AMA insurance works as advertised. In the member's only area of the website they have the information about the number of claims filed, paid, etc.

    I'll turn it around, I've never heard of a valid claim being denied.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  14. #114
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487
    right in the middle of a discussion about how some modelers' flagrant disregard for the Safety Code are possibly responsible for bringing the FAA's eyes upon all of us.
    The FAA people have stated repeatedly that the modeling community has done absolutely nothing to cause the writing of the sUAS rules. It is motivated solely by the increasing demand for commercial and public agency sUAS operations. We are just getting swept up in the rule since we are sUAS by their definition, so they need to address us in the rule. But again, they are not "coming after us", we are only a tiny slice of what the rule is about. Like I said, the ARC document had 76 pages. Only 6 concerned models, the other 70 were for the guys they are really targeting.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  15. #115
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf

    You do know AMA rules aren’t law...don’t you?
    Not right now they are not. But if the FAA accepts the AMA Standards for use they will have the force of law for those people using them to operate under.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  16. #116

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    1,451
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R


    ORIGINAL: NorfolkSouthern

    A medical certificate to fly a model plane? Where did you get that idea?
    It is very likely according to what the commercial sUAS guys say and think that 2nd class FAA medicals will be required for most sUAS operations. I have not seen anything hinting that they will be required for models.
    Yes, that's for the sUAS guys. You know, the ones who fly something made by Northrop-Grumman, that weighs 300 pounds, with a video camera, a zillion miles out of the line of sight to sniff out drugs and illegal aliens. Something like that. But the notion sounds a bit silly for someone who goes to the field to play with their toy airplanes on a Sunday afternoon.

    NS

  17. #117

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Levittown, PA
    Posts
    1,842
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: jkpape

    The reason that 400 ft agl is the limit is because full scale is limited to 500 ft agl over sparsely populated areas, 1000 ft agl over populated areas. Think about how far 1500 ft is. A model airplane at 1500 ft would look like a dot in the sky. Also, model airplane sights/fields are not shown on any aviation maps. Full scale aircraft have no way of knowing where model aircraft are being flown. It's hard enough to spot another full size aircraft at times, much less a model airplane.

    By the way I fly both model & full scale.

    I fully agree with you.

    Gerry

  18. #118

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Levittown, PA
    Posts
    1,842
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: NorfolkSouthern


    ORIGINAL: chuckk2

    Where to draw the line is the big question. Weight has long been one of the factors considered. Another is ''line of sight''. Altitude is another.
    I believe that 1500 AGL or so is a reasonable limit, not 400 AGL. After all even birds fly higher than 400 AGL.
    Another area that I don't care for (even though I do hold a private pilot's license) is any requirement that a modeler/pilot carry any sort of license or medical certificate.
    Many of the RC modelers are older, and likely would not pass any FAA medical requirements for a certificate.
    (The devil is in the details, believe me!)

    A medical certificate to fly a model plane? Where did you get that idea? How embarrassing it's gonna be for some folks when this thing finally unwinds. It's gonna be very hard to get most of us to stop laughing!

    NS

    That is a silly idea. Do you need a medical to fly a full size glider? Do you need a medical to fly a Skycatcher? (in case you do not know the answer: Of course not!)

    Asking for a medical to fly a heavy sUAS over populated areas, and COMMERCIALLY, yes is a good idea. They would also need to prove proficiency somehow... and use certified platforms.

    Gerry

  19. #119

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Ft. Collins , CO
    Posts
    121
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    KE, all:

    The AMA show teams have no dispensation for loading models with pyro. The teams actually follow rules that are more restrictive that the typical modeler. However, the teams may use ground based pyro provided that a strict set of guidelines are followed. See AMA doc #718

    Mike
    Safety Director
    TEAM AMA
    H. Michael Harrington
    AMA 20640, Leader Member, CD

  20. #120
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: NorfolkSouthern
    Yes, that's for the sUAS guys. You know, the ones who fly something made by Northrop-Grumman, that weighs 300 pounds, with a video camera, a zillion miles out of the line of sight to sniff out drugs and illegal aliens. Something like that. But the notion sounds a bit silly for someone who goes to the field to play with their toy airplanes on a Sunday afternoon.

    NS

    Not just for the large UAS, even the small ones. I have several friends who work for AeroVirnoment, the leader in smaller UAS, and they all hold 2nd Class medicals and they have all taken and passed the FAA Private Pilot written test.

    And again, the only place that medical for modelers is being discussed is in the fantasy and that is the Internet.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  21. #121
    littlecrankshaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    here
    Posts
    4,699
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R




    I'll turn it around, I've never heard of a valid claim being denied.
    That line works on most people...of course, all insurers say they never deny "valid claims”...
    It is very important to understand that Jesus not only died for our sins but died because of our sins...even harder to understand now, exactly what were those sins???

  22. #122
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R




    I'll turn it around, I've never heard of a valid claim being denied.
    That line works on most people...of course, all insurers say they never deny ''valid claims”...

    Can you list the claims you know have been denied along with the circumstances so we can determine the validity of AMA insurance? Also, are you implying that the AMA policy, or any other insurance policy, should pay invalid claims??
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  23. #123

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    I absolutely think the government should regulate our hobby.  Just like they've done such a great job with homeland security, social security, medicare and unemployment benefits.  This way, any one who can not afford that new model everyone wants, the government will supply this for you.  You will probably have to be unemployed for at least one year to qualify for the "model plane stamp" and probably have to show no initiation towards getting a job.  I can't wait for them to regulate us!

  24. #124
    littlecrankshaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    here
    Posts
    4,699
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R





    Can you list the claims you know have been denied along with the circumstances so we can determine the validity of AMA insurance? Also, are you implying that the AMA policy, or any other insurance policy, should pay invalid claims??
    I think you could do a better job of that since your are the one paid as an expert witness, while being an AMA AVP, against those seriously injured, that try to prove "valid claims" in a court of law...
    It is very important to understand that Jesus not only died for our sins but died because of our sins...even harder to understand now, exactly what were those sins???

  25. #125
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,837
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R





    Can you list the claims you know have been denied along with the circumstances so we can determine the validity of AMA insurance? Also, are you implying that the AMA policy, or any other insurance policy, should pay invalid claims??
    I think you could do a better job of that since your are the one paid as an expert witness, while being an AMA AVP, against those seriously injured, that try to prove ''valid claims'' in a court of law...
    Actually, I was the one who helped defend a fellow AMA member against a baseless claim by a person who was injured as a direct result of his own documented and continued negligence. As far as being an AVP at the time the Superior Court judge nor the opposing counsel had an issue with it, but you do. Is this based on your wide and extensive legal training and experience, or something else?

    But back on the (off) topic. Can you provide evidence to support your point that the AMA has denied valid claims?
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com


Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.