Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

View Poll Results: A poll

Voters
520. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, our self-policing efforts (i.e. AMA Safety Codes) aren''t working.

    25 4.81%
  • Yes, the world has changed considerably since 9/11.

    83 15.96%
  • I''m not sure.

    29 5.58%
  • No, the FAA has no business regulating "hobby" airplanes.

    180 34.62%
  • No, we are fully capable of policing ourselves.

    66 12.69%
  • No, the perceived threat to society doesn't exist!

    72 13.85%
  • I hate polls like this!

    65 12.50%
Page 8 of 21 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 502

  1. #176
    HoundDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Oconomowoc WI
    Posts
    2,559
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R


    ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

    Unless the aircraft is actually taking a child or animal up I see no reason that it must be certified. Though the AMA should, and does have special rules for such aircraft. Why allow the FAA to control even large models when there has been very few issues in the past?
    I have not seen or heard of the FAA wanting to certify airframes for models. I have heard of them wanting to do that for the commercial/public agency sUAS.


    Also just want to point out that some airports have pattern altitudes less than 1000 feet, unless that has changed since I flew full scale.
    Minor point, while this is certainly true, the airspace classifications are not necessarily based on traffic patterns, per se. Class C airspace generally extends to the ground for 5NM around the main airport. Class B can extend to the ground farther out than that. Most aircraft are not in the traffic pattern that far out from the airport.
    Look up the STARS and the VFR Arival routes for PHX Sky Harbor in Phoenix
    http://www.airnav.com/airport/KPHX

    STARs - Standard Terminal Arrivals
    ARLIN THREE download (370KB)
    BLYTHE FOUR download (313KB)
    BUNTR TWO 2 pages: [1] [2] (369KB)
    COYOT TWO 2 pages: [1] [2] (420KB)
    EAGUL FIVE (RNAV)**NEW** 2 pages: [1] [2] (406KB)
    EAGUL FIVE (RNAV), CONT.2**NEW** download (482KB)
    GEELA FIVE (RNAV)**NEW** 2 pages: [1] [2] (373KB)
    GEELA FIVE (RNAV), CONT.2**NEW** download (485KB)
    JESSE ONE 2 pages: [1] [2] (290KB)
    KOOLY FOUR (RNAV)**NEW** 2 pages: [1] [2] (658KB)
    MAIER FIVE (RNAV)**NEW** 2 pages: [1] [2] (430KB)
    MAIER FIVE (RNAV), CONT.2**NEW** download (501KB)
    SUNSS SEVEN download (320KB)

    IAPs - Instrument Approach Procedures
    ILS OR LOC RWY 07R download (354KB)
    ILS OR LOC RWY 08 download (361KB)
    ILS OR LOC RWY 25L download (340KB)
    ILS OR LOC RWY 26 download (360KB)
    ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 07L download (295KB)
    RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 07L download (267KB)
    RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 07R download (272KB)
    RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 08 download (289KB)
    RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 25L download (292KB)
    RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 25R download (269KB)
    RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 26 download (279KB)
    RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 07L download (295KB)
    RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 07R download (296KB)
    RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 08 download (275KB)
    RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 25L download (303KB)
    RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 25R download (287KB)
    RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26 download (291KB)
    FREEWAY VISUAL RWY 07L download (211KB)
    POWER PLANT VISUAL RWY 25R download (220KB)
    RIVER VISUAL RWY 25L download (220KB)
    NOTE: Special Alternate Minimums apply download (21KB)


    Remember ... Every one of these Things we fly Comes with a Number, When the R/C Gods call that Number, it's going in a Garbage Bag, No Sniveling Allowed.
    P-47 Thunderbolt Brotherhood #24 & #43

  2. #177
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    955
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    HoundDog,

    You're argueing apples and oranges here. Comparing our little VFR model operations to full scale IFR procedures does nothing but confuse the issue.

    Unless, of course, your intent is to impress us with your knowledge/experience with full scale operations. If that's the case, I suggest that you proceed conservatively because there are several of us here who can easily trump your level of full scale experience.

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  3. #178

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lacona, NY
    Posts
    1,840
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: HoundDog


    again U are willing to throw one segment of our hobby/sport to the wolvs. There are many large Models flowen only at sanctioned AMA fields. Few are flowen very far from the pilot and not many are ever flowen very high ... they are just large scale replicas with a scale of 10 to 20 foot wing span. Where they are nomaly flowen poses no danger to general or comercal aviation. In Fact flying them below 1000 feet with in 5 miles of a towered air port is safer than farther out because except for an instrument approach path, aircraft in an airport traffic aera or just approaching to land are required to be at pattern altitude 1000 feet AGL .Now what the FAA is worried about is the UAV / sUAS that do pose a danger to maned aircraft.

    Of coarse you are expressing your opinion rather than fact.

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znCa-oCfacg[/youtube]

    Any R/C plane bigger than the one shown in this video would have caused worse damage to the aircraft and could have resulted in injury or death. All broad classification of aircraft has the "right of way" over any R/C aircraft. Drones are usually cleared of airspace while being deployed, and usually fly higher than commercial airspace. All other info is Classified.

    So if this happened to let's say, 20' wingspan model- what do you think would have happened?

    So yes, some sections I'll give to the "so called" wolves. The FAA has done some good in keeping aviation safe. I know because I'm a pilot myself. If you don't believe me, go to a Country that has no regulations. Most all of them have a not so safe record, and as a pilot I wouldn't want to fly any of their aircraft.

    All it takes is one death from a irresponsible R/C pilot with a responsible pilot and you don't have to worry about partial rulings coming down to us from the FAA. That's not opinion- it is fact. So lets regulate what needs regulating and leave others alone.

    The FAA feel they have a mandate from congress to control every thing that Flys in the NAS and protect man carring aircraft from each other and anything that flys
    Again that is not fact, but based on biased paranoia. Many FAA members are in this hobby and don't want to see their agency involved. I talk to them on a regular basis and you can find some at any large or well known R/C events. I had a nice chat with a inspector at my last clubs airshow event last year. However, if need be depending on us they can and will crack down on us if rules are continously broken.

    The FAA does want to start regulating 107 ultralights because of so many people with little or no flying experience has gotten into these things and gotten themselves killed. We lost a guy up here this year because he was flying too low and a down draft knocked him in the trees. But that's another topic for a different place. But I think it should be mandated that all 107 pilots have at least a solo permit and it should be enforced.

    again the FAR's are mearly a set of laws governing who what where and how, one is allowed to fly in the NAS, National Air Spase . The FAA only inforces after the infaction is commited, just like any traffic law that is broken. If we as AMA members fly under the "Special" created to be an alternet to the FAR's I don't believe much will change for us
    True. But it is up to us to stop the infraction before it happens if we can. Because I am a AMA member, therefore I am responsible when it comes to R/C aircraft infractions. If I see a infraction at my club, I tell the guy what he's doing is not cool. If he continues the infractions then I will warn him or her that if they didn't stop I'd fill out a grievance, then the club committee would decide his or her fate. It's the non-AMA members I'm more worried about. There's nothing out there that can keep them in line. We have to wait for a accident to happen in order something can be done about it.

    Let me reiterate- it's about stopping the infraction before it happens.

    Oberst

    Last but not least, law enforcement has better things to do.
    HoundDog

    "Last but not least, law enforcement has better things to do." Don't bet on it.
    So you can show me anywhere that law enforcement got involved with any R/C aircraft infractions? Again they have better things to do and I stand by that statement. However when someone gets seriously hurt or killed from any type negligence by the R/C pilot, only then will law enforcement get involved and will have their own investigation.


    Pete

  4. #179
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,963
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Oberst

    So you can show me anywhere that law enforcement got involved with any R/C aircraft infractions?

    The Van Nuys airport police show up regularly at the Sepulveda Basin field whenever the Tower gets reports from aircraft operating out of VNY.

    The Costa Mesa police used to come out to the RC field at Fairview park. Their helicopter used to come over the field and orbit at 400 feet agl. The aviation unit has been suspended due to budget cuts so they are less of an issue now.

    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  5. #180
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    955
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot
    Private airports are not required to follow rules.Â*
    HOLY CRAP, where did you come up with this? There is NOTHING in the FARs that says such a thing!

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  6. #181
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,963
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    Regarding the FAA mission:

    Birth of Federal Aviation Agency

    On May 21, 1958, Senator A. S. "Mike" Monroney (D-OK) introduced a bill to create an independent Federal Aviation Agency to provide for the safe and efficient use of national airspace.

    http://www.faa.gov/about/history/brief_history/
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  7. #182
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    955
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R
    The Van Nuys airport police show up regularly at the Sepulveda Basin field whenever the Tower gets reports from aircraft operating out of VNY.

    The Costa Mesa police used to come out to the RC field at Fairview park. Their helicopter used to come over the field and orbit at 400 feet agl. The aviation unit has been suspended due to budget cuts so they are less of an issue now.
    I suspect that the non-FAA police (a.k.a the "airport police") are enforcing county or city laws since they would have no jurisdiction in enforcing the FARs. However, they would have the authority to stop and cite somebody who is violating a local ordinance. While the local police would have the authority to stop any person or activity that clearly poses a threat, only the FAA could bring charges against that person for violating any FARs.

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  8. #183
    littlecrankshaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,413
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R




    The Costa Mesa police used to come out to the RC field at Fairview park. Their helicopter used to come over the field and orbit at 400 feet agl. The aviation unit has been suspended due to budget cuts so they are less of an issue now.

    Sounds like we need more budget cuts!!!!
    It is very important to understand that Jesus not only died for our sins but died because of our sins...even harder to understand now, exactly what were those sins???

  9. #184

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lacona, NY
    Posts
    1,840
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R




    The Costa Mesa police used to come out to the RC field at Fairview park. Their helicopter used to come over the field and orbit at 400 feet agl. The aviation unit has been suspended due to budget cuts so they are less of an issue now.

    Sounds like we need more budget cuts!!!!

    Yes, it would have been cheaper just to send a squad car. No wonder California is broke.

    Pete

  10. #185
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    955
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R

    Regarding the FAA mission:

    Birth of Federal Aviation Agency

    On May 21, 1958, Senator A. S. ''Mike'' Monroney (D-OK) introduced a bill to create an independent Federal Aviation Agency to provide for the safe and efficient use of national airspace.

    http://www.faa.gov/about/history/brief_history/
    Hmmm, that's true but somewhat deceiving. The 1958 FAA was actually the reformation (not a new agency) of the old CAA, which was initially formed to PROMOTE aviation AND improve its safety. The CAA was renamed the FAA in 1958 in order to improve its credibility (by changing its name from "Civil" to "Federal") and to reflect its increasing role in governing the rapidly expanding nationwide commercial air travel industry. "Agency" was then changed to "Administration" by the Johnson administration when all federal agencies were upgraded to "administrations" to improve their legal clout.

    In its role of promoting aviation, the CAA did a lot of research and experimentation during aviation's infancy. That part of the CAA eventually became NASA.

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  11. #186

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,703
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487


    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R
    The Van Nuys airport police show up regularly at the Sepulveda Basin field whenever the Tower gets reports from aircraft operating out of VNY.

    The Costa Mesa police used to come out to the RC field at Fairview park. Their helicopter used to come over the field and orbit at 400 feet agl. The aviation unit has been suspended due to budget cuts so they are less of an issue now.
    I suspect that the non-FAA police (a.k.a the "airport police") are enforcing county or city laws since they would have no jurisdiction in enforcing the FARs. However, they would have the authority to stop and cite somebody who is violating a local ordinance. However, only the FAA could bring charges against that person for violating any FARs.

    Harvey
    Any officer can enforce any laws be it local state federal dont believe it just rob a bank the local cops will pick you up but the feds will prosecute
    same goes if you interfere with a flight crew on a airplane.
    Ira d

  12. #187
    HoundDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Oconomowoc WI
    Posts
    2,559
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487

    HoundDog,

    You're argueing apples and oranges here. Comparing our little VFR model operations to full scale IFR procedures does nothing but confuse the issue.

    Unless, of course, your intent is to impress us with your knowledge/experience with full scale operations. If that's the case, I suggest that you proceed conservatively because there are several of us here who can easily trump your level of full scale experience.

    Harvey
    Not really just expressing that it is safer to fly closer to towered airports and smaller ones to if the FAR's are observed by the full scale pilots and do what they are supposed to. Where I fly in Apache junction 25 miles from Skyh Harbor the bace of the class B is 5000' msl ground 1710 msl and the loewst leagle altitude is 500' above the highest obstical person or dwelling with in 2000' horizontal distance. This because it's considered sparsely populated area. this allows private and military and law inforcement and medical aircraft to fly right over our field at 500 AGL. There are 2 RC fields in northern Phoenix that have all ready been limited to 400' because of their proxmity to Deer Vally Airport. Any way Those who plan not fly under the AMA Special better learn how to read and understand the new FAR's concerning sUAS's, or suffer the rath of the FAA. is that enough said? Sorry if I offend anyone but facts are facts. Let's all come back to these fourms a year or so from now and see who had the best predictions. Won't mean much then, but might be interesting though
    Remember ... Every one of these Things we fly Comes with a Number, When the R/C Gods call that Number, it's going in a Garbage Bag, No Sniveling Allowed.
    P-47 Thunderbolt Brotherhood #24 & #43

  13. #188
    Sport_Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    14,198
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    Yes but Kalifornia is a totalitarian state!
    Glow Head Brotherhood #15

  14. #189
    Sport_Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    14,198
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487


    ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot
    Private airports are not required to follow rules.
    HOLY CRAP, where did you come up with this? There is NOTHING in the FARs that says such a thing!

    Harvey
    Find a FAR on airport requirements and show me where it says that private airports must follow the rules. Sorry, that should have been private airports not open to the public.
    Glow Head Brotherhood #15

  15. #190

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Aguanga, CA
    Posts
    1,243
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487

    I suspect that the non-FAA police (a.k.a the "airport police") are enforcing county or city laws since they would have no jurisdiction in enforcing the FARs. However, they would have the authority to stop and cite somebody who is violating a local ordinance. However, only the FAA could bring charges against that person for violating any FARs.

    Harvey
    The City laws regulating use of Fairview Park placed a limit on altitude of models flown there. Why? Because FAAasked them to. There were/are no FARs regulating MA. FAAs 'enforcement' against those that endanger public safety in the airways (like one Hugh 'Bromo-seltzer' did flying gliders from Fairview) is limited to what is implied in AC91-57 ("If you modelers continue to behave yourselves, we won't need to regulate you") FAA has tried twice to make AC91-57 enforcible by incorporating it by reference in interim UASguidance regulatory material. I think it would be good for FAAto have the means to take action against modelers that can't respect safety of others - AMAdidn't ("the ACis voluntary"), so it follows that FAAhas been been pushed to impose regulation on all of us.


  16. #191
    HoundDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Oconomowoc WI
    Posts
    2,559
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487

    HoundDog,

    You're argueing apples and oranges here. Comparing our little VFR model operations to full scale IFR procedures does nothing but confuse the issue.

    Unless, of course, your intent is to impress us with your knowledge/experience with full scale operations. If that's the case, I suggest that you proceed conservatively because there are several of us here who can easily trump your level of full scale experience.

    Harvey
    H5487 ... Have you drawen the 5.75 statuted mile circle around your R/C facility yet.
    Remember ... Every one of these Things we fly Comes with a Number, When the R/C Gods call that Number, it's going in a Garbage Bag, No Sniveling Allowed.
    P-47 Thunderbolt Brotherhood #24 & #43

  17. #192
    HoundDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Oconomowoc WI
    Posts
    2,559
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487


    ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot
    Private airports are not required to follow rules.
    HOLY CRAP, where did you come up with this? There is NOTHING in the FARs that says such a thing!

    Harvey
    WHAT ??? Flying under a sport pilot certification has more restrictions by FAR's than regular pilots certification and all airports are governed by the same FAR's ... I'd like to talk to your instructor if you are certified under Sport pilot or trying to be.
    Remember ... Every one of these Things we fly Comes with a Number, When the R/C Gods call that Number, it's going in a Garbage Bag, No Sniveling Allowed.
    P-47 Thunderbolt Brotherhood #24 & #43

  18. #193
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    955
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: ira d
    Any officer can enforce any laws be it local state federal dont believe it just rob a bank the local cops will pick you up but the feds will prosecute
    same goes if you interfere with a flight crew on a airplane.
    Hi Ira,

    I agree and I was in the process of changing the wording of my original post while you were responding to it. ANY law enforcement officer (or private citizen, for that matter) can intervene in an activity that is clearly illegal or life threatening to others. However, if those officers are out of their jurisdiction, they can only stop/detain the perpetrator until a representative of the agency that has jurisdiction can take over. In the case of aviation, only the FAA can enforce the FARs (and it vigoriously defends its sole authority to do so on a regular basis.)

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  19. #194
    bradpaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Apopka, FL
    Posts
    1,365
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    BTW....... you all realise that the AMA Headquarters and International Flying Center borders on Reese Airport in Muncie,IN........

    http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=200717360595310567090.000463afe4cb50 b745530&hl=en&ie=UTF8&vpsrc=0&ll=40.167723,-85.322742&spn=0.022038,0.023517&source=embed

    Brad

    BALSA USA Brotherhood #93
    1/4 scale Nieuport 11 (elec)
    1/4 scale Fokker Dr1. (elec)

  20. #195
    HoundDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Oconomowoc WI
    Posts
    2,559
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487


    ORIGINAL: ira d
    Any officer can enforce any laws be it local state federal dont believe it just rob a bank the local cops will pick you up but the feds will prosecute
    same goes if you interfere with a flight crew on a airplane.
    Hi Ira,

    I agree and I was in the process of changing the wording of my original post while you were responding to it. ANY law enforcement officer (or private citizen, for that matter) can intervene in an activity that is clearly illegal or life threatening to others. However, if those officers are out of their jurisdiction, thy can only stop/detain the perpetrator until a representative of the agency that has jurisdiction can take over. In the case of aviation, only the FAA can enforce the FARs (and it vigoriously defends its sole authority to do so on a regular basis.)Not So As a liscenced pilot one must show their ID to any leagle law inforcment officer, including city, state, or federal law inforcment. Just fly too low over a housing aera and see who shows up to talk to you after you land at your local airport.

    Not here in Arizona ... The Feds took away Sheriff Joe's right to enforce federal imagration law .... the one of the few in the USA doing so. But then that has nothing to do with this fourm Sorry ......


    Harvey
    Remember ... Every one of these Things we fly Comes with a Number, When the R/C Gods call that Number, it's going in a Garbage Bag, No Sniveling Allowed.
    P-47 Thunderbolt Brotherhood #24 & #43

  21. #196
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,963
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: bradpaul

    BTW....... you all realise that the AMA Headquarters and International Flying Center borders on Reese Airport in Muncie,IN........

    http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=200717360595310567090.000463afe4cb50b745530&hl=en&ie=UTF8&vpsrc=0&ll=40.167723,-85.322742&spn=0.022038,0.023517&source=embed

    Brad


    Now wouldn't that be a twist!! Hopefully any restrictions will only be around busy airports with at least an active control tower.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  22. #197
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,963
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: cj_rumley
    AMAÂ*didn't (''the ACÂ*is voluntary''), so it follows that FAAÂ*has been been pushed to impose regulation on all of us.

    It is simply wrong to imply that anything the FAA is doing with respect to sUAS regulations has anything to do with what the AMA has done.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  23. #198
    Silent-AV8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    4,963
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?


    ORIGINAL: H5487

    ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R

    Regarding the FAA mission:

    Birth of Federal Aviation Agency

    On May 21, 1958, Senator A. S. ''Mike'' Monroney (D-OK) introduced a bill to create an independent Federal Aviation Agency to provide for the safe and efficient use of national airspace.

    http://www.faa.gov/about/history/brief_history/
    Hmmm, that's true but somewhat deceiving. The 1958 FAA was actually the reformation (not a new agency) of the old CAA, which was initially formed to PROMOTE aviation AND improve its safety. The CAA was renamed the FAA in 1958 in order to improve its credibility (by changing its name from ''Civil'' to ''Federal'') and to reflect its increasing role in governing the rapidly expanding nationwide commercial air travel industry. ''Agency'' was then changed to ''Administration'' by the Johnson administration when all federal agencies were upgraded to ''administrations'' to improve their legal clout.

    In its role of promoting aviation, the CAA did a lot of research and experimentation during aviation's infancy. That part of the CAA eventually became NASA.

    Harvey

    I excerpted one small line but included the entire link for those that want the full history. The point is that the FAA is charged with air safety.
    Team Futaba - RClipos.com

  24. #199
    H5487's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    955
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot


    ORIGINAL: H5487


    ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot
    Private airports are not required to follow rules.Â*
    HOLY CRAP, where did you come up with this? There is NOTHING in the FARs that says such a thing!

    Harvey
    Find a FAR on airport requirements and show me where it says that private airports must follow the rules.Â* Sorry, that should have been private airports not open to the public.
    "...private airports not open to the public." That would be Restricted airports (useable only by prior permission or for a bonafide emergency) but they would still have to abide by the FARs.

    Sport, we are likely talking about two different things here. When you said that "Private airports are not required to follow the rules", that left too much open for debate. The FAA has jurisdiction over privately-owned airports served by Part 121 air carrier ops. However, it can only advise other airports. (Please note that many airports served by Part 121 ops are actually "privately" owned. By definition, "privately owned" includes those airports owned by corporations, as opposed to being owned by the governing body in which they're located.)

    Of course, I am hesitant to use such words as "all" or "every" since exceptions do occur.

    Harvey
    Weather Geek

  25. #200

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    grand rapids, MI
    Posts
    306
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Do you think the FAA should be sticking its nose into our hobby?

    But looky how we can help the EPA, TDEQ, FDA, LMNOP!


    And, as the article points out, it was a legal flight
    Urge Congress to keep common sense in the skies


Page 8 of 21 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.