AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.

Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Reply
Old 01-31-2012, 04:12 PM
  #1
skyblue
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: X, PA
Posts: 111
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Just came on the news today 1/31/12 movie promoters uses model airplanes which resemble men to announce the new movie Chronical. The pilots all AMA members were recruited to fly these planes around NYC. I'm really discusted by this stunt and wish homeland security would throw the whole bunch in jail. AMA members do not need this kind of attention to be drawn to our hobby. We are already laddened with enough restrictions from our regulated flying sites. If the general public deside they would like to mimic this foolhardy stunt we might see the end to our hobby as we know and enjoy it.
skyblue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2012, 04:59 PM
  #2
cj_rumley
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga, CA
Posts: 1,758
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Fun stuff............no animals were harmed in the making of this vid clip.

Where's the beef? ..........or are you just mocking the wet blankets that are bound to whine ..........
cj_rumley is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 06:31 AM
  #3
Michael R.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 38
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

I've seen the video you're talking about but I seemed to miss the part where they fly over New York city.

See for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcDN409ZBv4

They appear to be flying from a wide open park over a river with the city buildings in the distant background. Even the footage showing the ground shows the public well within safety. They are well under 400 feet in altitude and had ground crew numbers large enough to serve as safety spotters. Did they do everything right? Did they get the proper permits and notify all the FBOs in the vicinity? I hope that they did.

The video is to me a welcome promotion for the RC hobby.
Michael R. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 06:45 AM
  #4
littlecrankshaf
 
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 5,413
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Michael R.

The idea, is to have fun!?
+1000


Finally...someone gets it!

Please stick around...you are very much needed here!
littlecrankshaf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 07:17 AM
  #5
Michael R.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 38
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Thank you!

Glad to help where I can.
Michael R. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 07:22 AM
  #6
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: cj_rumley

Fun stuff............no animals were harmed in the making of this vid clip.

Where's the beef? ..........or are you just mocking the wet blankets that are bound to whine ..........

The models were well below the restricted area, and appeared to be below 400 feet. I think he is a wet blanket.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 07:27 AM
  #7
Silent-AV8R
 
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,308
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Michael R.
Did they get the proper permits and notify all the FBOs in the vicinity? I hope that they did.

The video is to me a welcome promotion for the RC hobby.

Not sure there is any requirement to notify FBOs.

This was done for a commercial enterprise and according to the FAA they needed a Special Airworthiness Certificate to do it legally. I doubt the FAA will do anything about this and I doubt anyone who sees it will relate it to our hobby.

I've seen these things in banner ads on some sites. Seem cool and fun.
Silent-AV8R is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 07:53 AM
  #8
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Michael R.
Did they get the proper permits and notify all the FBOs in the vicinity? I hope that they did.

The video is to me a welcome promotion for the RC hobby.

Not sure there is any requirement to notify FBOs.

This was done for a commercial enterprise and according to the FAA they needed a Special Airworthiness Certificate to do it legally. I doubt the FAA will do anything about this and I doubt anyone who sees it will relate it to our hobby.

I've seen these things in banner ads on some sites. Seem cool and fun.
This is not commercial. The planes did not take cargo and did not take pictures. Instead they were paid to take pictures of the planes. Just as it is legal for a private pilot to take money to transport himself or report what he sees from the air, but not legal for him to take pictures from the air.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 07:55 AM
  #9
Michael R.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 38
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

RC Super Hero: http://www.rcsuperhero.com/
Michael R. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 08:15 AM
  #10
Silent-AV8R
 
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,308
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot


This is not commercial. The planes did not take cargo and did not take pictures. Instead they were paid to take pictures of the planes. Just as it is legal for a private pilot to take money to transport himself or report what he sees from the air, but not legal for him to take pictures from the air.
If they guys doing the flying were compensated then it is a commercial enterprise. In addition, it was done in the furtherance of a commercial activity, promoting a movie. You do not have to carry cargo or take pictures to be classified as a commercial activity. For instance, banner towing carries no cargo, passengers or takes pictures, but it is still considered a commercial activity.
Silent-AV8R is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 08:28 AM
  #11
Michael R.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 38
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

I've been kicked out of a public park for taking pictures of my airplane there. And I had no intention of even flying and really didn't know the local laws the way I should have. According to the park ranger with the very big badge; because the photos were intended for publication, my intentions were therefore commercial, and I needed to file the proper permit/s. I'm sure that proof of insurance would have been required also.
Michael R. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 08:32 AM
  #12
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Quote:
If they guys doing the flying were compensated then it is a commercial enterprise.
That has never been their definition of commercialit is rather to carry passengers, or goods for hire. Some parts extend it to services, but the service must be directly tied to the flying of the aircraft. This is directly tied to a video of the aircraft and is not commercial.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 08:33 AM
  #13
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Quote:
According to the park ranger with the very big badge; because the photos were intended for publication, my intentions were therefore commercial, and I needed to file the proper permit/s. I'm sure that proof of insurance would have been required also.
We are talking about what the FAA considers commercial, not what your local park considers commercial.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 08:59 AM
  #14
Silent-AV8R
 
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,308
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Deleted by me.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Mj24539.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	105.0 KB
ID:	1721981   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hc93551.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	149.0 KB
ID:	1721982   Click image for larger version

Name:	Kh17424.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	147.9 KB
ID:	1721983   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ql35480.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	149.0 KB
ID:	1721984   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sq46593.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	98.6 KB
ID:	1721985  

Silent-AV8R is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 09:02 AM
  #15
AugerDawger
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 154
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: skyblue

The pilots all AMA members were recruited to fly these planes around NYC. I'm really discusted by this stunt and wish homeland security would throw the whole bunch in jail.
Da Comrade. Da.
AugerDawger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 09:22 AM
  #16
crustychief
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: san diego, CA
Posts: 155
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

It looks like the quad copter was tethered. I am going to call safe.

crustychief is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 09:28 AM
  #17
Silent-AV8R
 
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,308
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

Quote:
According to the park ranger with the very big badge; because the photos were intended for publication, my intentions were therefore commercial, and I needed to file the proper permit/s. I'm sure that proof of insurance would have been required also.
We are talking about what the FAA considers commercial, not what your local park considers commercial.

To be more precise, we are talking about the types of sUAS operations permitted by the FAA. Recreational/Civil/Public Agency. If this was done for any type of use other than recreational then they needed to either have a Special Airworthiness Certificate or a COA. Since they are clearly not a public agency operation that eliminates the COA. Is your position that this was purely recreational and the camera crew jut happened upon the three guys flying ?
Silent-AV8R is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 11:18 AM
  #18
rgburrill
 
rgburrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Trumbull, CT
Posts: 1,698
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

As I understand it permits were proscessed, hours of test flying was done in Long Island and all was done with permission. It has nothing to do with having fun, guys. Commercial use, flying over the city, etc, all have to be approved! And as far as I know it was.
rgburrill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 11:22 AM
  #19
rgburrill
 
rgburrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Trumbull, CT
Posts: 1,698
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

Quote:
If they guys doing the flying were compensated then it is a commercial enterprise.
That has never been their definition of commercialit is rather to carry passengers, or goods for hire. Some parts extend it to services, but the service must be directly tied to the flying of the aircraft. This is directly tied to a video of the aircraft and is not commercial.
You are very wrong - for AMA and the FAA commercial is making money. That meakes selling photos, doing real estate ads, and doing movie scenes.
rgburrill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 11:23 AM
  #20
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.



It has to be approved, or it does if they are flying in restricted airspace, and they probably needed permission from the park.  But it does not make it a commercial flight per the FAA.  They have said that promotion does not make the RC commercial requiring an SAC or COA.  Nor is getting paid to train, nor is getting paid to test RC models.

Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 11:28 AM
  #21
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: rgburrill


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

Quote:
If they guys doing the flying were compensated then it is a commercial enterprise.
That has never been their definition of commercialit is rather to carry passengers, or goods for hire. Some parts extend it to services, but the service must be directly tied to the flying of the aircraft. This is directly tied to a video of the aircraft and is not commercial.
You are very wrong - for AMA and the FAA commercial is making money. That meakes selling photos, doing real estate ads, and doing movie scenes.
.

Selling photo's, and real estate, yes. Movie scenes perhaps not sure about that one, but this was promotion of a hobby and the FAA has said you can get paid to do promotions without triggering sUAS regulations.

BTW commercial goes back to the constitution, under regulating interstate commerce. So prior court rulings on full scale do count and in no way can this be interstate, only its proximity to interstate commerce routes makes this relevent..
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 11:38 AM
  #22
cj_rumley
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga, CA
Posts: 1,758
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

Andrew Jesky is flying commercially every time he takes off, according to some folks.   I wonder if he has fun doing it......
cj_rumley is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 11:38 AM
  #23
speedracerntrixie
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,340
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.

I guess I just don't understand what the big deal is. They were promoting a movie and it all seemed like positive exposure to the general public. Between '95 and 2005, I flew blimps up to 28' in length for 2 sports teams and in 2000 a country band. I traveled with the band eventually flying thier blimp in 83 different locations. To the best of my knowledge, no special arrangements or paperworkwere required.
speedracerntrixie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 12:14 PM
  #24
cj_rumley
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga, CA
Posts: 1,758
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Michael R.

I've been kicked out of a public park for taking pictures of my airplane there. And I had no intention of even flying and really didn't know the local laws the way I should have. According to the park ranger with the very big badge; because the photos were intended for publication, my intentions were therefore commercial, and I needed to file the proper permit/s. I'm sure that proof of insurance would have been required also.
I remember when that happened to tailskid, except that it was the Deputy Fife type at an AMAchartered club site that hassled him. It's all about poultry droppings of course.
cj_rumley is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 12:17 PM
  #25
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,889
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Model airplanes over NYC bad idea.


Quote:
ORIGINAL: cj_rumley

Andrew Jesky is flying commercially every time he takes off, according to some folks. I wonder if he has fun doing it......
Getting paid for RC air shows or competitive flying is also not commercial flying. He is not hiring his plane out when he does this. There used to be a document on the FAA site that explained cvommercial activities, but I can not find it right now.
Sport_Pilot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM.