Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 53 of 57 FirstFirst ... 3435152535455 ... LastLast
Results 1,301 to 1,325 of 1404

  1. #1301
    mongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Midland, TX
    Posts
    2,017
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    the real story here, is, the guy was totally owned and whipped by a beach mom.
    he sure has a lot to be proud of.
    Bottom Feeder Brother #13
    when they outlaw R/C, only outlaws will have R/C
    13 of 27

  2. #1302

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    joliet, IL
    Posts
    1,303
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by mongo View Post
    the real story here, is, the guy was totally owned and whipped by a beach mom.
    he sure has a lot to be proud of.
    Ha Ha your correct on that but i wish she would have shoved his girl watching toy up somewhere else on him. Do these guys realy need to be flying over people at the beech ,if so lets take our rc planes down there and fly away ! lol This is going to be stopped soon and not soon enough for me. joe

  3. #1303

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Round Hill, VA
    Posts
    1,047
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by ira d View Post
    What is wrong with people these days? If she didn't like him taking pictures move to another part of the beach. As for me I could care less if I was at a beach
    and someone was flying a rc as long as it was not directly over me and if someone was and I asked them to stop and they didn't I would either move or call
    the police.
    Right, she called the cops. Her mistake was her impatience. She couldn't wait. As for the drone operator. It sounds like a clear case of "stand your ground". He should be a bullet riddled corpse.

  4. #1304

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,395
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    He may have been flying in a reckless manner we don't know, But her trying to stop him was totally wrong and she should have been arrested.
    Ira d

  5. #1305

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,395
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Right, she called the cops. Her mistake was her impatience. She couldn't wait. As for the drone operator. It sounds like a clear case of "stand your ground". He should be a bullet riddled corpse.
    And she would be going to the gas chamber.
    Ira d

  6. #1306

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Round Hill, VA
    Posts
    1,047
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by ira d View Post
    And she would be going to the gas chamber.
    Not in a "stand your ground" state. Shooting someone for any reason is perfectly legal. It has stood the test of the courts.

  7. #1307
    bradpaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Apopka, FL
    Posts
    1,117
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Not in a "stand your ground" state. Shooting someone for any reason is perfectly legal. It has stood the test of the courts.
    Actually if that had happened in Florida and the pilot felt that he was:

    (3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

    It would be the fat A** beach whale that would be in danger of taking a dirt nap. Having the assault on video would make it a slam dunk.....................

  8. #1308

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,395
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Not in a "stand your ground" state. Shooting someone for any reason is perfectly legal. It has stood the test of the courts.
    Sadly some may think so but it's not the truth. The lady would not have had a legal ground to stand on because she approached him first and he did not fight her.
    Ira d

  9. #1309
    bradpaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Apopka, FL
    Posts
    1,117
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by mongo View Post
    the real story here, is, the guy was totally owned and whipped by a beach mom.
    he sure has a lot to be proud of.
    So in TEXAS it is OK for a man to punch a "woman".......... Yeah that would be something to be proud of.

  10. #1310

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Round Hill, VA
    Posts
    1,047
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by bradpaul View Post
    So in TEXAS it is OK for a man to punch a "woman".......... Yeah that would be something to be proud of.
    Whatever... The guy was a jerk and she overreacted and paid the penalty. While he got away with being a jerk. Go figure?

  11. #1311

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,395
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Whatever... The guy was a jerk and she overreacted and paid the penalty. While he got away with being a jerk. Go figure?
    Maybe I missed something but I did not see anything that would say the guy was a jerk. How come he could not have just been minding his own business when
    she attacked him.
    Ira d

  12. #1312

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    1,473
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Right, she called the cops. Her mistake was her impatience. She couldn't wait. As for the drone operator. It sounds like a clear case of "stand your ground". He should be a bullet riddled corpse.
    You would advocate shooting the photographer dead, just for taking some videos at a place that's open to the public? A totally, completely unarmed photographer, who was only enjoying a hobby, with no compensation received or expected? Wouldn't it have been better for her to just call the law, leaving it in their hands thereafter? I would think the latter makes a bit more sense.

  13. #1313

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Round Hill, VA
    Posts
    1,047
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by NorfolkSouthern View Post
    You would advocate shooting the photographer dead, just for taking some videos at a place that's open to the public? A totally, completely unarmed photographer, who was only enjoying a hobby, with no compensation received or expected? Wouldn't it have been better for her to just call the law, leaving it in their hands thereafter? I would think the latter makes a bit more sense.
    Isn't that what "stand your ground" permits?

  14. #1314

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Round Hill, VA
    Posts
    1,047
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by ira d View Post
    Maybe I missed something but I did not see anything that would say the guy was a jerk. How come he could not have just been minding his own business when
    she attacked him.
    Go back and read the story, he behaved like a jerk. No one ever has tacit permission to phatograph another person unawares. That is a violation of privacy.

  15. #1315

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,395
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Go back and read the story, he behaved like a jerk. No one ever has tacit permission to phatograph another person unawares. That is a violation of privacy.
    You mean the story crazed woman attacked man on the beach. Ha Ha give me a break, The story gives no detail as to what was being photographed or if in fact he was
    photographing anything. In any case people are photographed all the time just watch the news and it's not illegal in most cases.
    Ira d

  16. #1316

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA
    Posts
    2,395
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Isn't that what "stand your ground" permits?
    No it does not, You should read up on the various stand your ground laws. You can't shoot someone just because they are doing something you don't like or even something illegal in most cases.
    Ira d

  17. #1317

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
    Posts
    2,472
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Go back and read the story, he behaved like a jerk. No one ever has tacit permission to phatograph another person unawares. That is a violation of privacy.

    Ummm..not right under most circumstances. Right if it is an individual being photographed, but not if it the crowds (as are seen on the beach). If she did not want to be photographed, she COULD/and SHOULD have asked him not to take pictures of her and then called the law. As soon as she touched his equipment, she was in violation of common decency and getting physical elevated it into a criminal assault charge that will stick. The video insures that. Most LEO's tend to take a dim view of males that strike females, so I do understand his unwillingness to reply in kind, even though it does make him look like a wimp.

    I hope he has the intestinal fortitude to file a civil suit along with pressing the criminal charges.

    Some women...
    Jim Branaum AMA 1428
    Sig Brotherhood 30 Sig Kadet Brotherhood 99
    P-51 Brotherhood 53 P-38 Brotherhood 18 Club Saito 806
    Spitfire Brotherhood 204 P-40 Brotherhood 95

  18. #1318
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Branaum View Post
    Ummm..not right under most circumstances. Right if it is an individual being photographed, but not if it the crowds (as are seen on the beach). If she did not want to be photographed, she COULD/and SHOULD have asked him not to take pictures of her and then called the law. As soon as she touched his equipment, she was in violation of common decency and getting physical elevated it into a criminal assault charge that will stick. The video insures that. Most LEO's tend to take a dim view of males that strike females, so I do understand his unwillingness to reply in kind, even though it does make him look like a wimp.

    I hope he has the intestinal fortitude to file a civil suit along with pressing the criminal charges.

    Some women...
    I think she should be prosecuted for even trying to touch his junk... I guess JohnShe doesn't have any worry about that tho...
    It is very important to understand that Jesus not only died for our sins but died because of our sins...even harder to understand now, exactly what were those sins???

  19. #1319
    bradpaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Apopka, FL
    Posts
    1,117
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Branaum View Post
    Ummm..not right under most circumstances. Right if it is an individual being photographed, but not if it the crowds (as are seen on the beach). If she did not want to be photographed, she COULD/and SHOULD have asked him not to take pictures of her and then called the law. As soon as she touched his equipment, she was in violation of common decency and getting physical elevated it into a criminal assault charge that will stick. The video insures that. Most LEO's tend to take a dim view of males that strike females, so I do understand his unwillingness to reply in kind, even though it does make him look like a wimp.

    I hope he has the intestinal fortitude to file a civil suit along with pressing the criminal charges.

    Some women...
    Just to be precise:

    You can photograph anyone and anything you see in public where people have no expectations of privacy. Images taken this way belong to you. What you can do with these photos is quite restricted because the image in the photo belongs to someone else. Because of this you cannot use such images for most commercial purposes, including licensing such images, selling prints of it or making advertisement from them. You can use these images for editorial use.

    And of course there may be certain "public sites" where photography is restricted by law, military bases, public restrooms, etc. so be aware of local laws. But with all of that said, it is just good manners to ask permission of an individual before taking their picture.




  20. #1320
    Quote Originally Posted by bradpaul View Post
    Just to be precise:

    You can photograph anyone and anything you see in public where people have no expectations of privacy. Images taken this way belong to you. What you can do with these photos is quite restricted because the image in the photo belongs to someone else. Because of this you cannot use such images for most commercial purposes, including licensing such images, selling prints of it or making advertisement from them. You can use these images for editorial use.

    And of course there may be certain "public sites" where photography is restricted by law, military bases, public restrooms, etc. so be aware of local laws. But with all of that said, it is just good manners to ask permission of an individual before taking their picture.



    What??? Sanity in this thread!!! You got to be kidding us...
    It is very important to understand that Jesus not only died for our sins but died because of our sins...even harder to understand now, exactly what were those sins???

  21. #1321
    Sport_Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    13,662
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    No one ever has tacit permission to phatograph another person unawares.
    That is totally incorrect. Unless he sells the video it is completely legal. In fact that was the point of the site that hosted the video.
    Glow Head Brotherhood #15

  22. #1322
    Sport_Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    13,662
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    People have already used "stand your ground" to commit murder and gotten away with it
    No matter how you feel about it, it is not murder when it is legal. Murder is an illegal killing. So if self defense under "stand your ground" it is a legal homicide, not murder.

    But I understand your need for hyperbole since you never have any facts to back up your claims.
    Glow Head Brotherhood #15

  23. #1323
    RCU Forum Manager/Admin RCKen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Lawton, OK
    Posts
    25,839
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Ok guys, talks of Stand your ground and riddling corpse with bullets is really getting the conversation out of control. Let's reign in it a big and get back to a modicum of sanity.

    Ken
    The take off is optional, but the landing is MANDATORY!!
    RCU Forum Manager
    www.gettingairborne.com
    RCKen Publications
    Brotherhood's
    Ultra Sport Brother #1
    Sig Brotherhood #4
    Balsa USA #4

  24. #1324
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnShe View Post
    Right, she called the cops. Her mistake was her impatience. She couldn't wait. As for the drone operator. It sounds like a clear case of "stand your ground". He should be a bullet riddled corpse.
    Interesting to say the least!
    It is very important to understand that Jesus not only died for our sins but died because of our sins...even harder to understand now, exactly what were those sins???

  25. #1325

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Round Hill, VA
    Posts
    1,047
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by littlecrankshaf View Post
    Interesting to say the least!
    Ha, Ha! You have misunderstood my snide sarcasm.

    I still think that what he did was wrong. keeping the video for his own use is a perversion. Posting it on a public forum is a violation of her privacy and a perversion.


Page 53 of 57 FirstFirst ... 3435152535455 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:38 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.