Be Worried Now. NTSB Says RC=aircraft
#101
Got some here advocating banning some model types based on apperance, now you are asking for a national regestration database. Whats next a background check and a three day waiting period to purchase?
Where have I heard all of this before???
#104
My Feedback: (28)
Those wishing for more government intervention, like being alright with checking for an AMA license, while complaining about the current government intervention, while no one is talking about melting down the phone lines of their respective Congressional representatives, is what is truly indicative of the problem we face in every aspect of American life, not just our hobby.
#105
I would rather AMA created the rules for this, not government. Then one simple rule for Government, Fly outside AMA rules, unless a registered permit to fly outside those rules for a commercial purpose(like a documentary film, or movie) is obtained, get caught and pay a hefty fine, or jail time depending on how extreme the offense.
Then again, nothing in the government is simple.
Then again, nothing in the government is simple.
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would rather AMA created the rules for this, not government. Then one simple rule for Government, Fly outside AMA rules, unless a registered permit to fly outside those rules for a commercial purpose(like a documentary film, or movie) is obtained, get caught and pay a hefty fine, or jail time depending on how extreme the offense.
Then again, nothing in the government is simple.
Then again, nothing in the government is simple.
#108
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no issues with the NTSB. The NTSB ruling only effects the idiots who don't follow reasonable safety guidelines, as well as commercial and public service drone flyers. Yes, there seem to be a lot of people crying wolf or at least overreacting to poorly understood government actions.
#109
My Feedback: (1)
Maybe more the FAA. Issuing NOTAMS, that effect RC activities, with very little notice, that have an incredibly large area covered unnecessarily. That is why.
What if your club, has an event that they have worked to organize all year, that is needed to help pay their bills, and 2 day before the event a NOTAM is declared that shuts the event down? Where I live, the closest airport is 20 miles away from my flying site. It has been shut down before. How is a line of sight model a threat from 20 miles away? Very unreasonable IMO.
#110
My Feedback: (58)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe more the FAA. Issuing NOTAMS, that effect RC activities, with very little notice, that have an incredibly large area covered unnecessarily. That is why.
What if your club, has an event that they have worked to organize all year, that is needed to help pay their bills, and 2 day before the event a NOTAM is declared that shuts the event down? Where I live, the closest airport is 20 miles away from my flying site. It has been shut down before. How is a line of sight model a threat from 20 miles away? Very unreasonable IMO.
What if your club, has an event that they have worked to organize all year, that is needed to help pay their bills, and 2 day before the event a NOTAM is declared that shuts the event down? Where I live, the closest airport is 20 miles away from my flying site. It has been shut down before. How is a line of sight model a threat from 20 miles away? Very unreasonable IMO.
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe more the FAA. Issuing NOTAMS, that effect RC activities, with very little notice, that have an incredibly large area covered unnecessarily. That is why.
What if your club, has an event that they have worked to organize all year, that is needed to help pay their bills, and 2 day before the event a NOTAM is declared that shuts the event down? Where I live, the closest airport is 20 miles away from my flying site. It has been shut down before. How is a line of sight model a threat from 20 miles away? Very unreasonable IMO.
What if your club, has an event that they have worked to organize all year, that is needed to help pay their bills, and 2 day before the event a NOTAM is declared that shuts the event down? Where I live, the closest airport is 20 miles away from my flying site. It has been shut down before. How is a line of sight model a threat from 20 miles away? Very unreasonable IMO.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#116
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as commercial and public use of drones (or sUAS and UAS) goes, the regulations are still in the planning stage, but that should not matter to us safe recreational flyers.
#117
My Feedback: (58)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed. AMA created and lobbied for the rules, and Congress enacted them in 336. Truly very simple, yet many folks are demonizing the US government in general and particularly FAA for interpreting the rules, as they must by law do in order to apply them as Congress intended and as your post appears to confirm they correctly did ("...says the exact same thing"). FAA did not create these rules, nor any rules regulating model aircraft other than the advisory AC91-57. It is most unlikely that FAA would have made such rules. If FAA were to make any such rules, they would be well off in the future as model airplanes are far off the critical path to incorporating UAS in the NAS. We as a group seem to currently be in the weird predicament of urging AMA on to free us from onerous government regulation designed and hastened through the lawmaking process by AMA.
Agreed again, recreational modelers should not be affected......but we are and will be. The savior needed something to save us from.
Agreed again, recreational modelers should not be affected......but we are and will be. The savior needed something to save us from.
#118
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speaking of opposite viewpoints. I cannot think of a single experience with the government that I had that was in any way unfair. I suppose I could make a log list of my beneficial government experiences. Let's see: VA Benefits, Social; Security, Medicare, Roads & Bridges, safe air travel, protection from murderers, thieves and other malefactors, the internet, safe prescription drugs, safe food, safe toys (for children)...
#119
My Feedback: (58)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speaking of opposite viewpoints. I cannot think of a single experience with the government that I had that was in any way unfair. I suppose I could make a log list of my beneficial government experiences. Let's see: VA Benefits, Social; Security, Medicare, Roads & Bridges, safe air travel, protection from murderers, thieves and other malefactors, the internet, safe prescription drugs, safe food, safe toys (for children)...
#120
My Feedback: (1)
Speaking of opposite viewpoints. I cannot think of a single experience with the government that I had that was in any way unfair. I suppose I could make a log list of my beneficial government experiences. Let's see: VA Benefits, Social; Security, Medicare, Roads & Bridges, safe air travel, protection from murderers, thieves and other malefactors, the internet, safe prescription drugs, safe food, safe toys (for children)...
#123
Come on now, lets talk about something serious. Like pony abuse at the circus.Well put JohnShe, the key word overreacting.Hundreds of ideas and views on the subject are just more logs on the fire.The (system) will work it all out.I read that on the internet.
#124
I have no issues with the NTSB. The NTSB ruling only effects the idiots who don't follow reasonable safety guidelines, as well as commercial and public service drone flyers. Yes, there seem to be a lot of people crying wolf or at least overreacting to poorly understood government actions.
Um , , Mr She ? ....... Would you mind explaining why you say LCS is trolling you , , when he has done nothing but repeat your words pretty much exactly as you wrote them ? I see plain as day where you say only idiots and commercial users will be affected , and you know what ?
I HOPE LIKE HELL YOUR RIGHT !!!!!
Now , that we're in agreement that us boring ol circle flyers oughta be left alone , at least OWN what ya said , rather than deny it just cause you don't like the guy who repeated it