"Drone" at the White House
#201
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#203
#204
They also say they apply to:
A. THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WITHIN THE DC FRZ: FLIGHT TRAINING, AEROBATIC FLIGHT,PRACTICE INSTRUMENT APPROACHES, GLIDER OPERATIONS, PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRA LIGHT, HANG GLIDING, BALLOON OPERATIONS, TETHERED BALLOONS, AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL FLIGHT OPERATIONS, BANNER TOWING OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE TEST FLIGHTS, MODEL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS, MODEL ROCKETRY, FLOAT PLANE OPERATIONS, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) AND AIRCRAFT/HELICOPTERS OPERATING FROM A SHIP OR PRIVATE/CORPORATE YACHT.
Frank
A. THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WITHIN THE DC FRZ: FLIGHT TRAINING, AEROBATIC FLIGHT,PRACTICE INSTRUMENT APPROACHES, GLIDER OPERATIONS, PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRA LIGHT, HANG GLIDING, BALLOON OPERATIONS, TETHERED BALLOONS, AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL FLIGHT OPERATIONS, BANNER TOWING OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE TEST FLIGHTS, MODEL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS, MODEL ROCKETRY, FLOAT PLANE OPERATIONS, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) AND AIRCRAFT/HELICOPTERS OPERATING FROM A SHIP OR PRIVATE/CORPORATE YACHT.
Frank
But it is a "Notice to Airmen", not notice to drunken fed worker. I know the FAA and NTSB suport this and certianly their needs to be something in place. Certainly their is a goverment right to set up restricted airspace. But to say this is all clear to the layman, well it clearly is not.
To the layman this is a toy, and that document does not apply to them.
#205
#207
Wishful thinking by Joe........
DJI already had software in it's multi-rotors for that. It was just not very complete. So now in a reactionary fashion, DJI is just sending out an update to its customers.......Not a big deal there........
The bigotry and prejudice toward multi-rotors is ridiculous.
DJI already had software in it's multi-rotors for that. It was just not very complete. So now in a reactionary fashion, DJI is just sending out an update to its customers.......Not a big deal there........
The bigotry and prejudice toward multi-rotors is ridiculous.
This is the best explanation I have seen of why it happens. Bottom line the electronics are not reliable enough to fly over people and structures. the AMA FPV rules have it right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ge3GuhEDRM
#209
#210
#213
This is about commercial operations. I believe the AMA is only about recreational use of model airplanes and FPV, and possibly recreational use of autonomous UAV. . Or are they trying to get into the commercial operations now?
#214
#216
I have never seen anyone in the Hobby Industry advertise Multi-Rotor aircraft for use over people and structures.........
Last edited by TimJ; 01-29-2015 at 01:48 PM.
#217
My Feedback: (49)
Originally Posted by HoundDog
Of coerce he did but he was/is one of the IN CROWD he is one of them nothing is going to happen to him... it may have all been set up by the Secret Service ... What better time to start a conspiracy than when O'B is out of the country. Think about it. and ofcourse U knew he'd have to call from restrictions to be placed on aerial toys.
Well just have to wait and see won't we. Remember the Jets in Boston with Grenades no I didn't think so.
Of coerce he did but he was/is one of the IN CROWD he is one of them nothing is going to happen to him... it may have all been set up by the Secret Service ... What better time to start a conspiracy than when O'B is out of the country. Think about it. and ofcourse U knew he'd have to call from restrictions to be placed on aerial toys.
OMG, SERIOUSLY. I hope you don't believe that ...! Even if no formal charges are brought against him do you really think his superiors will look kindly on the unfavorable attention the agency he works for is getting out of this? In my opinion he will be lucky to keep his job and only get censured. I don't know where you work but most companies and gov. agencies that I'm aware of fire people for bad behavior even if it's outside the job.
Frank
Frank
#218
My Feedback: (49)
Originally Posted by bradpaul
Bottom line the electronics are not reliable enough to fly over people and structures. the AMA FPV rules have it right.
These things we fly are dangerous. But so is driving to the field. I saw another one crash in the parking lot for no reason at all Except radio failur. I won't mention that it had a Spectrum radio and an AR610 receiver though.
Bottom line the electronics are not reliable enough to fly over people and structures. the AMA FPV rules have it right.
These things we fly are dangerous. But so is driving to the field. I saw another one crash in the parking lot for no reason at all Except radio failur. I won't mention that it had a Spectrum radio and an AR610 receiver though.
#220
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: , ON, CANADA
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So we've agreed then that we need a stronger government and FAA presence in our hobby to stop the drones, and that the trend towards socialism is the worst thing since HobbyKing customer support, so it needs to be stopped?
Now I'm confused!
Now I'm confused!
#223
My Feedback: (49)
1. Formal or online Ground Instruction on FAR WEATHER Model Operation Radio Procedures ect.
2. 40 hours of Instruction at $40 per hour a recommendation from a certified Flight instructor to apply to take
3. a 60 question written test, Verbal test, Flight test and
4. retroactive For Anyone who wants to fly any Model aircraft, but Control line in the USA and it Positions.
Hope Your Fellow RC'ers agree with U.
#224
My Feedback: (1)
I'm Glad U thought of it vertical grimmace here's the agenda.
1. Formal or online Ground Instruction on FAR WEATHER Model Operation Radio Procedures ect.
2. 40 hours of Instruction at $40 per hour a recommendation from a certified Flight instructor to apply to take
3. a 60 question written test, Verbal test, Flight test and
4. retroactive For Anyone who wants to fly any Model aircraft, but Control line in the USA and it Positions.
Hope Your Fellow RC'ers agree with U.
1. Formal or online Ground Instruction on FAR WEATHER Model Operation Radio Procedures ect.
2. 40 hours of Instruction at $40 per hour a recommendation from a certified Flight instructor to apply to take
3. a 60 question written test, Verbal test, Flight test and
4. retroactive For Anyone who wants to fly any Model aircraft, but Control line in the USA and it Positions.
Hope Your Fellow RC'ers agree with U.
Instead of RC scale, I will just enter CL combat.