Dues increase coming? 1 million spent on government relations.....
#528
I love how some are so sensitive to realize how the dues increase will effect some of us. If it's no big deal, I wonder if they'd be willing to pay for my dues increase? Probably not. Oh heck, why not make A.M.A dues a $1000 a year, it will weed out all us whiny ***** old folgies types.
#529
My Feedback: (49)
I love how some are so sensitive to realize how the dues increase will effect some of us. If it's no big deal, I wonder if they'd be willing to pay for my dues increase? Probably not. Oh heck, why not make A.M.A dues a $1000 a year, it will weed out all us whiny ***** old folgies types.
#532
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are so kind and understanding!!! Lol
#533
My Feedback: (49)
#536
belonging to the AMA is mandatory if you want to fly at a field, The only 2 fields within 30 miles of me requires AMA membership or you don't fly there. most fields are like this so many don't have a choice if they want to fly.
#538
My Feedback: (3)
The reason MOST fields take that approach has to do with their leases. AMA provides insurance to the LAND OWNER in addition to whatever you are able to stick to your homeowners and AMA secondary insurance. Most reasonable folks I know of like to have protections for their stuff in place and that means insurance. Now you CAN go fly off the side of some road somewhere but if ANYTHING happens you are 100% ON YOUR OWN. So the AMA approach is reasonable for most. If you have or can get better, do so and don't troll here.
#539
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not going to take HD's approach, I will use a little Vasoline! ()
The reason MOST fields take that approach has to do with their leases. AMA provides insurance to the LAND OWNER in addition to whatever you are able to stick to your homeowners and AMA secondary insurance. Most reasonable folks I know of like to have protections for their stuff in place and that means insurance. Now you CAN go fly off the side of some road somewhere but if ANYTHING happens you are 100% ON YOUR OWN. So the AMA approach is reasonable for most. If you have or can get better, do so and don't troll here.
The reason MOST fields take that approach has to do with their leases. AMA provides insurance to the LAND OWNER in addition to whatever you are able to stick to your homeowners and AMA secondary insurance. Most reasonable folks I know of like to have protections for their stuff in place and that means insurance. Now you CAN go fly off the side of some road somewhere but if ANYTHING happens you are 100% ON YOUR OWN. So the AMA approach is reasonable for most. If you have or can get better, do so and don't troll here.
#540
And just what is wrong with that. Another Nickle a day ... Really! Like I said before.
If a nickle a day is too much maybe U/anyone doesn't belong in this hobby.
If a nickle a day is too much maybe U/anyone doesn't belong in this hobby.
#541
#542
On a side note the 2014 financial statement is up on the AMA site.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/Members...tatements.aspx
Mike
Last edited by rcmiket; 08-06-2015 at 02:46 AM.
#543
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
That's the problem most just don't care to make the effort and inquire to their AMA officers on just what's going on. As long as that trend continues we'll see no answers.
On a side note the 2014 financial statement is up on the AMA site.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/Members...tatements.aspx
Mike
On a side note the 2014 financial statement is up on the AMA site.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/Members...tatements.aspx
Mike
Now the flip side, and the "good" side of being agenda driven is that these are the folks who try to get things done. They are the club officers and people who help at events, or those that join the AMA and try to make changes they feel strongly about.
Thanks for the link!
#544
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes its attitudes like this that is going ruin RC today, clubs are losing members every year, our club used to be pushing 100 members and now there are only 20 and of that only 5 or 6 that are active. other clubs in the area are having the same problems with membership falling off, its just not cost of AMA but everything is going higher and it will soon be the hobby of a select few.
#545
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hudson Valley. New York. USA
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
You have to look at the whole AMA body of members. Many keep it simple - $$ spent on the hobby doesn't really mean an increase in pleasure/fun.
We're hearing in this thread and others that
People feel there was a bit of mismanagement of costs that lead to the rise.
The AMA is not communicative.
The AMA is not transparent.
We're sucked into the drone war.
Muncie doesn't benefit the majority.
I'm stating facts here about sentiment. If you read my other posts I am pro AMA.
I think it is a good time to trim the sails, and communicate with the members.
The AMA dues is a deterrent to new flyers to get into the hobby. Club dues + AMA can run $250, as in my case.
After getting reconnected to the hobby about 15 months ago, I am pretty much hearing what I expected to hear about the AMA. Unfortunately. Last year was the first year I ever belonged to the AMA.
I believe in doing something to improve the AMA, not just complaining. Out of collective bellyaching I think resolutions can come forward.
If you want to see one of the biggest forces bringing people into the hobby, make sure you watch the FliteFest 2015 video on FliteFest.com.
They have returned the fun to flying.
Parents + kids having really fun. KISS approach, a touch of ridiculous and you get a mob.
Family friendly.
Let's make things better.
We're hearing in this thread and others that
People feel there was a bit of mismanagement of costs that lead to the rise.
The AMA is not communicative.
The AMA is not transparent.
We're sucked into the drone war.
Muncie doesn't benefit the majority.
I'm stating facts here about sentiment. If you read my other posts I am pro AMA.
I think it is a good time to trim the sails, and communicate with the members.
The AMA dues is a deterrent to new flyers to get into the hobby. Club dues + AMA can run $250, as in my case.
After getting reconnected to the hobby about 15 months ago, I am pretty much hearing what I expected to hear about the AMA. Unfortunately. Last year was the first year I ever belonged to the AMA.
I believe in doing something to improve the AMA, not just complaining. Out of collective bellyaching I think resolutions can come forward.
If you want to see one of the biggest forces bringing people into the hobby, make sure you watch the FliteFest 2015 video on FliteFest.com.
They have returned the fun to flying.
Parents + kids having really fun. KISS approach, a touch of ridiculous and you get a mob.
Family friendly.
Let's make things better.
#547
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hudson Valley. New York. USA
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Getting re-started last year, I was in and flying for the cost of a DX6i (which is the minimum equipment I recommend to others) and $100 foamie (slowbipe.com) + electronics. That is less than the AMA + club fees.
Now, obviously you get benefits from those things. But just saying - I was out in a park flying in a couple eves of assembling plane, figuring out electronics.
The big push for me to join AMA and club was I wanted to fly slimers and around here in NY you just can't get away with flying those noisy things anywhere, unlike the way it was when I was kid. My old fields are now neighborhoods.
Now, obviously you get benefits from those things. But just saying - I was out in a park flying in a couple eves of assembling plane, figuring out electronics.
The big push for me to join AMA and club was I wanted to fly slimers and around here in NY you just can't get away with flying those noisy things anywhere, unlike the way it was when I was kid. My old fields are now neighborhoods.
#548
My Feedback: (49)
Whe'll se if the dues increase looses members for the AMa, only time will tell.
#549
My Feedback: (49)
I am not going to take HD's approach, I will use a little Vasoline! ()
The reason MOST fields take that approach has to do with their leases. AMA provides insurance to the LAND OWNER in addition to whatever you are able to stick to your homeowners and AMA secondary insurance. Most reasonable folks I know of like to have protections for their stuff in place and that means insurance. Now you CAN go fly off the side of some road somewhere but if ANYTHING happens you are 100% ON YOUR OWN. So the AMA approach is reasonable for most. If you have or can get better, do so and don't troll here.
The reason MOST fields take that approach has to do with their leases. AMA provides insurance to the LAND OWNER in addition to whatever you are able to stick to your homeowners and AMA secondary insurance. Most reasonable folks I know of like to have protections for their stuff in place and that means insurance. Now you CAN go fly off the side of some road somewhere but if ANYTHING happens you are 100% ON YOUR OWN. So the AMA approach is reasonable for most. If you have or can get better, do so and don't troll here.
#550
Mike