Are you ready to register your aircraft?
#3826
The real problem here, is that there is NO RISK TO THE OPERATOR of the drone. Therefore, safety measures are not as likely to be adhered to by the owner of a model plane, like on a full scale aircraft. People see them as toys, or as a camera platform that works wonders for their iPhone photo album. While consumer drones have limits built in (the Parrot drone can't fly over 330 feet), a typical model airplane does NOT. So with a standard 2.4 ghz radio, you can fly over 1,500 feet, and STILL see the plane. I have seen this done before MANY times at the field. When the multi-rotors start seeing the limits, I see no doubt that they will just put their cameras on regular model airplanes to get around the 5 mile geofencing radius.
And again, flying a radio controlled model airplane is NOT a right. It is a PRIVILEGE. More regulation may be the only way to keep the hobby going, because ANYTHING radio-controlled can be banned entirely if an incident ever does happen.
And again, flying a radio controlled model airplane is NOT a right. It is a PRIVILEGE. More regulation may be the only way to keep the hobby going, because ANYTHING radio-controlled can be banned entirely if an incident ever does happen.
#3827
Unable to man up and apologize getting called out on your lie?
#3828
n fairness, some (bacon most notably) would rather imply that because nothing bad has happened for 80 years, so regulation isn't required
#3829
If you actually read and my posts, you'd realize I'm one of the very few who agree with you on the importance of safety.
#3831
My Feedback: (49)
EXACTLY ... you hit the nail on the head ... the fact that there is no risk to the operator of the unmanned sUAS/UAS (or MR, or drone, or model aircraft, or traditional model, or thingamajig, or whatever tortured wording someone tries to use as justification for saying that something doesn't apply).
If folks who want to go above 1000 will put their lives at risk if there's a midair with a full scale, then go for it, they have my support because now they've got a vested interest in making sure they know when manned aircraft are in the area. I suspect there would be more spotters, more telemetry, and not a lot of headphone wearing while flying their aerobatic routine (to which I ask how would they hear an airplane approaching from behind....)
If folks who want to go above 1000 will put their lives at risk if there's a midair with a full scale, then go for it, they have my support because now they've got a vested interest in making sure they know when manned aircraft are in the area. I suspect there would be more spotters, more telemetry, and not a lot of headphone wearing while flying their aerobatic routine (to which I ask how would they hear an airplane approaching from behind....)
Next any of U are at your favorite flying field (AMA or NOT) keep a record of the number type and approximate distance and altitude from your field and the amount of time U have from when U first heard them and direction. I'll wager if U aren't under an approach with in 5 miles of a towered airport or a field that has a large flight school you'll be lucky to see 1 or 2 a day that even come close to being a problem. It's just not a problem at 99.999% of Registered AMA or other model fields.
Sorry Crispy no room to double space.
#3832
My Feedback: (3)
Change had to happen there were just too many incidences/complaints and people rubbing the authority’s noses in the lack of enforceable laws/rules or bylaws.
Ever give it any thought that you guys (including many AMA members) are the source of your own headaches? Instead of offering up help in how to best address the concerns of both sides all I hear is:
No one can tell me what to do!
I refuse to yada yada yada!
Ignore them they don’t have the resources to enforce anything.
Its my constitutional right (which is cow dung RC wasn’t around when your constitution was drawn up) ding dongs.
On an on no thought on working with the FAA or reaching an agreement of compromise. A silly all or nothing mentality that’s gotten you guys what you deserve. The FAA just sticks all of you with the harsh reality of regulation/registration and let the AMA members struggle to get some of the privileges back.
Dennis
Ever give it any thought that you guys (including many AMA members) are the source of your own headaches? Instead of offering up help in how to best address the concerns of both sides all I hear is:
No one can tell me what to do!
I refuse to yada yada yada!
Ignore them they don’t have the resources to enforce anything.
Its my constitutional right (which is cow dung RC wasn’t around when your constitution was drawn up) ding dongs.
On an on no thought on working with the FAA or reaching an agreement of compromise. A silly all or nothing mentality that’s gotten you guys what you deserve. The FAA just sticks all of you with the harsh reality of regulation/registration and let the AMA members struggle to get some of the privileges back.
Dennis
#3834
Its my constitutional right (which is cow dung RC wasn’t around when your constitution was drawn up) ding dongs.
#3835
Which is it?
#3836
My Feedback: (26)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: El Paso,
TX
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ordered these off of FleaBay...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262204258972...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/172036559611...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
They should be in today's delivery...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262204258972...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/172036559611...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
They should be in today's delivery...
#3837
Do you understand that politics are mostly made of lies? It only takes one natural born parent to be a citizen last I looked. But It depends on when he was born. IMO they should set up some board for clearing candidates for minimum qualifications. People still say Obama's birth certificate is a forgery.
#3838
Do you understand that politics are mostly made of lies? It only takes one natural born parent to be a citizen last I looked. But It depends on when he was born. IMO they should set up some board for clearing candidates for minimum qualifications. People still say Obama's birth certificate is a forgery.
#3840
My Feedback: (3)
Dennis
#3841
My Feedback: (49)
#3842
My Feedback: (49)
I ordered these off of FleaBay...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262204258972...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/172036559611...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
They should be in today's delivery..
.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262204258972...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/172036559611...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
They should be in today's delivery..
.
Wonder if I let my finger nails grow, Would they be considered TOOLS if I used them as screw drivers.
#3843
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
I ordered these off of FleaBay...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262204258972...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/172036559611...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
They should be in today's delivery...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/262204258972...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
http://www.ebay.com/itm/172036559611...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
They should be in today's delivery...
#3845
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Not at all we have all the same problems in Canada as does every country in the world. Its not just the US inundated with the proliferation of these drones and the general public flyers.. The difference being the association members are going the extra distance to work with and placate their aviation board and general public where it appears you fellows in the US have taken the adversarial road. Not very smart as you have found out. Transport Canada hasn't shut down fields because of proximity to sensitive areas. We still retain the ability to fly FPV line of sight with a spotter. We don't have height restrictions at MAAC fields. In fact as of this point things for us have not changed other than we have been asked to practice extra care and consideration while enjoying our hobby. The USA is the only country that is in direct aggressive conflict or adversarial path with its aviation body. Instead of working pro-actively with your FAA you now are in the position of damage control. Not to sharp in my opinion.
Dennis
Dennis
#3847
Ok, about the law at the time. I was recalling the McCain case, but that was bogus as well. There has been no laws changed, and the US has been accepting only one parent when born outside the US for all other matters. So it should for US President. I would say that more importantly as far as that factor fo r voting for him is how much foreign influence that is. Well, not that much. Yes he had one Canadian parent but then that is one of fhe least foreign countries. And he is politically conservative and Canada is very liberal.
#3849
#3850
I read that one parent was a natural born citizen. Or maybe it was watching news. Never heard that both were Canadian. But actually one could be a naturalized born citizen and Canadian citizen by marriage, if so that would be legal as well. There is not barrier to any elected office for dual citizenship and even less so if your parents have dual citizenship.