Notices
AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.

Are you ready to register your aircraft?

Old 10-16-2015, 05:31 PM
  #1  
TimJ
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 1,170
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default Are you ready to register your aircraft?

Looks like we may have to? Waiting for more details.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...stered-n446266
TimJ is offline  
Old 10-16-2015, 05:48 PM
  #2  
NorfolkSouthern
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,585
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

I would have no problem with it. Even if it's an OS .55AX powered Great Planes Extra 300SP. Flying a model airplane, like driving a car, is a privilege. Not a right.
NorfolkSouthern is offline  
Old 10-16-2015, 06:23 PM
  #3  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Sort of a sensational title no? The story specified "drone".....why didn't the title?
porcia83 is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 05:17 AM
  #4  
franklin_m
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 3,045
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Wall Street Journal ran a similar article which contained a quote from Hanson. Is it just me or are we seeing more comments about no flying above 400 feet? For example: "...including that the devices generally can’t fly above 400 feet or near airports."

http://www.wsj.com/articles/drone-ow...ces-1445041576
franklin_m is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 05:23 AM
  #5  
JimmyZep
Senior Member
 
JimmyZep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: N.W Indiana
Posts: 216
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

No! I will not be registering my planes, if that ever comes about.

Jimmy
JimmyZep is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 05:48 AM
  #6  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,186
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Didn't we (the AMA) spend some big bucks to prevent this?

Mike
rcmiket is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:07 AM
  #7  
TimJ
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 1,170
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

No RCMiket. The AMA spent big money to prevent the government from outright making R/C aircraft illegal of which the AMA successfully prevented that from happening.
TimJ is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:10 AM
  #8  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,186
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by TimJ View Post
No RCMiket. The AMA spent big money to prevent the government from outright making R/C aircraft illegal of which the AMA successfully prevented that from happening.
Really? A total ban on R/C? How could I have missed that.
Mike.
rcmiket is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:15 AM
  #9  
Gizmo-RCU
My Feedback: (27)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Athol, ID
Posts: 2,155
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

If it's like any other Government program it will be expensive, require a license/permit for a fee and be so screwed up it won't work but will never shut down once started. Swapmeets will be outlawed or regulated, straw purchases a crime and the cartels will control AMA!
Elect. planes will be outlawed as entry level into more serious dangerous activity threatning the population as a whole. "The sky is falling" will be on posters displayed by marchers on every street in the country!
Gizmo-RCU is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:16 AM
  #10  
mr_matt
My Feedback: (10)
 
mr_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oak Park, CA,
Posts: 10,348
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Good thing I fly a traditional RC model and not a drone.
mr_matt is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:27 AM
  #11  
TimJ
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 1,170
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by mr_matt View Post
Good thing I fly a traditional RC model and not a drone.
We can only hope that government vision can undeestand the difference.

Last edited by TimJ; 10-17-2015 at 07:30 AM.
TimJ is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:53 AM
  #12  
flycatch
Senior Member
My Feedback: (26)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Barstow, CA
Posts: 2,002
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

It is not the drone but the operator. Our hobby is composed of the; good, bad and the ugly. Just like gun owners only the ugly make it hard on the rest of us.
flycatch is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 08:31 AM
  #13  
mr_matt
My Feedback: (10)
 
mr_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Oak Park, CA,
Posts: 10,348
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by TimJ View Post
We can only hope that government vision can undeestand the difference.
Yes and if they don't understand the difference they can always post a question on this forum to help clear it up.
mr_matt is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 10:17 AM
  #14  
TimJ
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 1,170
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by mr_matt View Post
Yes and if they don't understand the difference they can always post a question on this forum to help clear it up.
Good luck with that one.

Monday, sometime we should have exacting information on what the FAA and US DOT plan to do.
TimJ is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 10:54 AM
  #15  
DeferredDefect
Senior Member
 
DeferredDefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: , ON, CANADA
Posts: 974
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Watching intently from up here in Canada.

I don't see an issue with registering model aircraft, but I almost guarantee that this won't affect the traditional R/C crowd. There's no way they can effectively police the thousands of homebuilt multirotors built every year, or even come up with a foolproof definition of a "drone" in the first place, and they know that.

I'd actually be thrilled if the regulation change was something along the lines of mandatory education and/or paperwork for buyers of multirotors over a certain weight, which I'd predict would be around that of a Phantom. We're starting to see a lot more activity up here now, and there was a rather panicked call over a unicom a few weeks ago about a quadcopter at 800 AGL, which was the first I'd actually been at risk from their improper usage.

Either way, I'm interested in following this on Monday.
DeferredDefect is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 11:45 AM
  #16  
oneaew@msn.com
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: hemet , CA
Posts: 1,164
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

everything i buy is used guns planes cars women screw all our laws>>
oneaew@msn.com is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 01:13 PM
  #17  
mike31
My Feedback: (67)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: York, ME
Posts: 724
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

We don't have a congress. We have a regress.
mike31 is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 02:10 PM
  #18  
init4fun
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,358
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by oneaew@msn.com View Post
everything i buy is used guns planes cars women screw all our laws>>
Used women , eh ?

"Experienced" ....... Maybe even "been there , done that" ...... But Used ??? Dude , I defy you to go callin your woman a used piece of tail , and then please , post up a picture of the black eye she gives ya , you know , being the Halloween season 'n all ,,,

So , on topic , Isn't that what the whole CBO thing was about ? Separating hobby model aircraft from drones ? Since we (supposedly) don't fly where real aircraft do , and drones will fly where real aircraft are , well of course the FAA will want some kind of system of keeping track of what's flying in active full scale airspace . This doesn't surprise me at all and is exactly why I thought they wanted a clear distinction between hobby VS drone use .
init4fun is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 02:27 PM
  #19  
mongo
My Feedback: (14)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 2,705
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

notice, that, this is being done by the DOT, not the FAA.
our exemption from Faa regulation does not apply to the department of transportation.
mongo is online now  
Old 10-17-2015, 02:36 PM
  #20  
NorfolkSouthern
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,585
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

I don't think there will be a way to differentiate between a traditional RC plane and a drone. Both use a transmitter and receiver, and both can be equipped with a camera. And they can have the same range. A quad would be safer in that usually, they have software that will cause them to land if they lose contact with the transmitter. That is not the case with a traditional RC plane. So one is not necessarily safer than the other. For those who feel the government can't register all the kit-built models. You are right. However, the government CAN require the registration of ANY new receiver, and even go as far as requiring a background check just as if it were a firearm. The ATF does the same with guns. You can buy a new trigger assembly for a Ruger 10/22, a new barrel, or any other part you want. But the lower receiver is the serial-numbered part, which cannot be transferred by a gun dealer without a background check and the proper paper work. Registration of the receiver on a model plane would cause that to be the serial-numbered part, thus assigning that serial number to which ever model aircraft the receiver goes into.

Don't discount the long arm of the U.S. government. It has a long reach!
NorfolkSouthern is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 02:47 PM
  #21  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket View Post
Didn't we (the AMA) spend some big bucks to prevent this?

Mike
Nope, they sure didn't.
porcia83 is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 03:30 PM
  #22  
jetmaven
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fl.
Posts: 370
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

If you didn't see this coming , you weren't looking .
You can't crash a quad into the grandstands at the U.S. Open Tennis match and expect anyone to laugh it off .
I say it's about time .
jetmaven is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 03:32 PM
  #23  
radioman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: nappanee, IN
Posts: 29
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

hell no I wont register my planes
radioman is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 03:34 PM
  #24  
cessnaflyer54
My Feedback: (68)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ.
Posts: 105
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

The difference between aircraft and a drone is.....anybody can fly a drone. These new drones, a five year old can fly one. Not everyone can fly a plane. How long did your first plane last before you learned how to fly, seconds.
cessnaflyer54 is offline  
Old 10-17-2015, 03:40 PM
  #25  
franklin_m
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 3,045
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by init4fun View Post
...So, on topic, Isn't that what the whole CBO thing was about ? Separating hobby model aircraft from drones?
So AMA, how's that CBO thing working out so far? But don't worry, I'm sure there will be tens of thousands of quad pilots joining AMA any day now.
franklin_m is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.