The single reason why drones are causing such problems for the AMA
#26
It is a problem but was made our problem by inconsistencies in AMA polies.
Appeal to the FAA?
I don't think we appeal to them at all.
The FAA is the like the complainant and we are the defendant.
You got nothing to lose go ahead appeal to the FAA I did.
I think we would be better off appealing to our senators and congressmen
Sooner rather than later
Here is a pretty good letter if you want it
Dear Senator / Congressman
I am a model aviation enthusiast and member of the Academy of Model Aeronautics ("AMA"), recognized as a national community-based organization.
I am very distraught with the recent announcement by the Federal Aviation Administration that as of December 21, 2015, AMA flyers will have to register with the FAA.
This new requirement appears to be a contradiction of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 which was passed by Congress and the Senate. By promulgating new restrictions and requirements for AMA members, the FAA appears to be overriding the existing Congressional directives.
The new registration and identification requirement is a complete redundancy of our registration with the AMA. Combine this with the recent closure of 14 AMA chartered fields and it appears that the FAA is imposing needless hardships on our membership.
We have established an 80 year record of impeccable safety, and in fact have set the standard for safe operation of our model aircraft in our national air space. AMA requirements demand that all pilots follow the AMA safety code, and we utilize training programs to ensure our members fly safely and responsibly.
I would welcome you or any member of your staff to visit our local flying site to witness first hand how we are good stewards of our land and airspace.
I’d be happy to discuss these issues with you or your staff if you have any further questions or concerns.
On behalf of all AMA members I hope that you will look into the legality and the fairness of their actions.
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter,
Appeal to the FAA?
I don't think we appeal to them at all.
The FAA is the like the complainant and we are the defendant.
You got nothing to lose go ahead appeal to the FAA I did.
I think we would be better off appealing to our senators and congressmen
Sooner rather than later
Here is a pretty good letter if you want it
Dear Senator / Congressman
I am a model aviation enthusiast and member of the Academy of Model Aeronautics ("AMA"), recognized as a national community-based organization.
I am very distraught with the recent announcement by the Federal Aviation Administration that as of December 21, 2015, AMA flyers will have to register with the FAA.
This new requirement appears to be a contradiction of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 which was passed by Congress and the Senate. By promulgating new restrictions and requirements for AMA members, the FAA appears to be overriding the existing Congressional directives.
The new registration and identification requirement is a complete redundancy of our registration with the AMA. Combine this with the recent closure of 14 AMA chartered fields and it appears that the FAA is imposing needless hardships on our membership.
We have established an 80 year record of impeccable safety, and in fact have set the standard for safe operation of our model aircraft in our national air space. AMA requirements demand that all pilots follow the AMA safety code, and we utilize training programs to ensure our members fly safely and responsibly.
I would welcome you or any member of your staff to visit our local flying site to witness first hand how we are good stewards of our land and airspace.
I’d be happy to discuss these issues with you or your staff if you have any further questions or concerns.
On behalf of all AMA members I hope that you will look into the legality and the fairness of their actions.
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter,
#27
My Feedback: (8)
Here's what everyone seems to be missing: The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 refers to "CBO's", NOT the AMA. As yet, the AMA is NOT recognized as a CBO by the FAA. Until it is, we are NOT protected from the FAA by that law. The focus of the AMA right now should be getting itself approved as a CBO. Without that, anything else is pointless.
#28
After reading about what the NCBON and CBOs are I am more confused than before,
but that is ok.
Look at this link:;https://www.sph.umich.edu/ncbon/pdf/...Procedures.pdf
I wonder why the FAA uses the term CBO at all ?
The NCBON concerns itself with chiefly education and health for all.
I guess safety could be considered a health issue but I haven't found anything in the NCBON writings that are
applicable to RC flying.
but that is ok.
Look at this link:;https://www.sph.umich.edu/ncbon/pdf/...Procedures.pdf
I wonder why the FAA uses the term CBO at all ?
The NCBON concerns itself with chiefly education and health for all.
I guess safety could be considered a health issue but I haven't found anything in the NCBON writings that are
applicable to RC flying.
#29
The single fault in the AMA's decision to 'embrace drone$' (OK, besides the $) is simple.
Multirotors/drones/tri/quad/hex/octocopters/etc all have one thing in common which allows anyone to immediately do something incredibly stupid with a high degree of confidence and success.
They simply do not require any instruction or skill to 'fly'. Period. None, nada, zero.
Sorry to all the MR "pilots" but it's an unavoidable fact.
Look at traditional RC planes and helicopters (and if you want to include the other AMA classes covered by the FAI)
The path to being able to successfully 'take off and land' was traditionally fairly long (weeks/months/a season or two). It has been this way for decades, long before I started flying in the 70's
You buy your plane at a local hobby shop, show up at a field recommended by the hobby shop or AMA website, and ask to be trained by an instructor.
You inevitably crash since YOU are responsible for controlling the plane/heli in all axes and orientations. That's OK, it's all part of the learning process.
You hardly ever see someone show up with a Kadet/Falcon/etc training and single handedly learn to fly by themselves. It just doesn't work.
Contrast this with Multirotors/drones/tri/quad/hex/octocopters/etc Complete opposite.
Self stabilizing, panic recovery modes, headless operation, fully autonomous operation, return to home.
In essence near zero skill required.
This lower 'barrier to entry' allows for completely untrained, uninformed "pilots" (and i use the term loosely) to fly anywhere, as high as they like from basically the first couple of times out.
If they were to crash a few dozen times before ever getting to altitude (way below 400'), the problem would self correct.
This is the fundamental difference between a "drone" and a "traditional AMA aircraft"....again, a loose definition of a traditional AMA aircraft would be one covered under the FAI regulations. They simply do NOT belong in the same organization, operating under the same set of rules/guidelines/regulations. They would be far better served (as would traditional AMA members) if the MR crowd formed their own CBO
Again, this is never going to happen, since no matter what the AMA states publicly to its members, since it is entirely about $.
From this point forward, it's all damage control. If the entire AMA organization resigned tomorrow and new individuals were to take charge, it would make little to no difference.
Multirotors/drones/tri/quad/hex/octocopters/etc all have one thing in common which allows anyone to immediately do something incredibly stupid with a high degree of confidence and success.
They simply do not require any instruction or skill to 'fly'. Period. None, nada, zero.
Sorry to all the MR "pilots" but it's an unavoidable fact.
Look at traditional RC planes and helicopters (and if you want to include the other AMA classes covered by the FAI)
The path to being able to successfully 'take off and land' was traditionally fairly long (weeks/months/a season or two). It has been this way for decades, long before I started flying in the 70's
You buy your plane at a local hobby shop, show up at a field recommended by the hobby shop or AMA website, and ask to be trained by an instructor.
You inevitably crash since YOU are responsible for controlling the plane/heli in all axes and orientations. That's OK, it's all part of the learning process.
You hardly ever see someone show up with a Kadet/Falcon/etc training and single handedly learn to fly by themselves. It just doesn't work.
Contrast this with Multirotors/drones/tri/quad/hex/octocopters/etc Complete opposite.
Self stabilizing, panic recovery modes, headless operation, fully autonomous operation, return to home.
In essence near zero skill required.
This lower 'barrier to entry' allows for completely untrained, uninformed "pilots" (and i use the term loosely) to fly anywhere, as high as they like from basically the first couple of times out.
If they were to crash a few dozen times before ever getting to altitude (way below 400'), the problem would self correct.
This is the fundamental difference between a "drone" and a "traditional AMA aircraft"....again, a loose definition of a traditional AMA aircraft would be one covered under the FAI regulations. They simply do NOT belong in the same organization, operating under the same set of rules/guidelines/regulations. They would be far better served (as would traditional AMA members) if the MR crowd formed their own CBO
Again, this is never going to happen, since no matter what the AMA states publicly to its members, since it is entirely about $.
From this point forward, it's all damage control. If the entire AMA organization resigned tomorrow and new individuals were to take charge, it would make little to no difference.
#30
After reading about what the NCBON and CBOs are I am more confused than before,
but that is ok.
Look at this link:;https://www.sph.umich.edu/ncbon/pdf/...Procedures.pdf
I wonder why the FAA uses the term CBO at all ?
The NCBON concerns itself with chiefly education and health for all.
I guess safety could be considered a health issue but I haven't found anything in the NCBON writings that are
applicable to RC flying.
but that is ok.
Look at this link:;https://www.sph.umich.edu/ncbon/pdf/...Procedures.pdf
I wonder why the FAA uses the term CBO at all ?
The NCBON concerns itself with chiefly education and health for all.
I guess safety could be considered a health issue but I haven't found anything in the NCBON writings that are
applicable to RC flying.
#31
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eldon, MO,
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a issue with MR pilots that some clubs are to blame since we are doing the blame game.
There are many, many RC clubs that do not permit MRs at their field. So they miss the chance to educate the new flyer.
When this happens they will fly other places with no guidance from AMA season flyers.
So how I see it you should thank those clubs members for the FAA actions that pushed these flyers out. Those club members have no room to complain about the FAA.
There are many, many RC clubs that do not permit MRs at their field. So they miss the chance to educate the new flyer.
When this happens they will fly other places with no guidance from AMA season flyers.
So how I see it you should thank those clubs members for the FAA actions that pushed these flyers out. Those club members have no room to complain about the FAA.
#32
#33
Itc, I could give you a number of electronic systems for helicopters and planes that would prove you are wrong but I won't. You basic assumption is just flat wrong. The simple, one solid reason the AMA is in trouble has nothing to do with multirotor, it is FPV. And that problem started long before multirotors existed.
#35
Come on. you only fly these things 5 to 10 minutes. If you go to an RC field you will find maybe a dozen people at the field but only one or two flying at a time. So even with intent to fly in a few minutes only about 10% are flying. And when you go home even if you fly every weekend you wait another 160 hours to fly again. I would say that is actually a lot less than 1%.
I think you need to step away from the keyboard for a while. I am doing nothing you should be angry about. Sure we may disagree, but not over anything you should get angry over.
I think you need to step away from the keyboard for a while. I am doing nothing you should be angry about. Sure we may disagree, but not over anything you should get angry over.
#36
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
If so, then that means the average Drone sees daylight 3 times in a year.
Not exactly a huge, untapped market for the AMA to capitalize on.
Like I've alluded to earlier, I'll be surprised if I just see ONE DRONE during my travels this year [that isn't being flown by an existing AMA member at a club field]
Not exactly a huge, untapped market for the AMA to capitalize on.
Like I've alluded to earlier, I'll be surprised if I just see ONE DRONE during my travels this year [that isn't being flown by an existing AMA member at a club field]
#37
I believe a lot of the drone sightings are AMA members.
So how can the AMA make money on memberships if they
are free? next year?
Unless, the memberships are subsidized by manufacturers and retailers.
Like a big lumps sum donated to the AMA by the manufacturers as an off-set against new drone members.
So maybe the AMA got us in this mess for no money.?
Great, I thought these guys had some shrewdness.
So how can the AMA make money on memberships if they
are free? next year?
Unless, the memberships are subsidized by manufacturers and retailers.
Like a big lumps sum donated to the AMA by the manufacturers as an off-set against new drone members.
So maybe the AMA got us in this mess for no money.?
Great, I thought these guys had some shrewdness.
#39
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wondered about that too. Have not gone looking for the answer, but AMA isn't Santa Claus.....existing members are in the bank, by far most likely that only new members in the fat target market of drones get the perks.
#42
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Itc, I could give you a number of electronic systems for helicopters and planes that would prove you are wrong but I won't. You basic assumption is just flat wrong. The simple, one solid reason the AMA is in trouble has nothing to do with multirotor, it is FPV. And that problem started long before multirotors existed.
or put another way...
go grab a new "pilot"
hand him a MR (headless, self stabilizing, no GPS or FPV)
ask him to take off, fly one circuit and then land
now hand him a fixed wing airplane (EDF, prop, turbine) and ask to do the same (take off, fly one circuit and land)
99% of the time I know which craft ends up in pieces
(hint: it's the one with wings)
i spent the first part of my career designing inertial sensors and systems so I know a bit about electronic systems, but welcome the discussion
Last edited by ltc; 01-05-2016 at 11:09 AM.
#44
An unknown number of AMA pilots who fly MR do not do it at their fields either by choice or prohibition,
they fly rogue, where ever they can without being seen.
I do not have a number of how many do this, but any number is too much, and in violation of the AMA safety code.
How would these AMA members caught flying at a non-approved AMA cite explain themselves if the AMA decided to pull their membership?
They knew the rules, they were educated about the rules, and at times practiced the rules but decided in this instance not
to follow the rules
That would be a hard position to defend wouldn't it?
they fly rogue, where ever they can without being seen.
I do not have a number of how many do this, but any number is too much, and in violation of the AMA safety code.
How would these AMA members caught flying at a non-approved AMA cite explain themselves if the AMA decided to pull their membership?
They knew the rules, they were educated about the rules, and at times practiced the rules but decided in this instance not
to follow the rules
That would be a hard position to defend wouldn't it?
#45
Multi rotors with cameras are here to stay, whether anybody likes it or not. Fixed-wing "line of sight" model planes got mixed in, because the AMA opened their mouths, and riled the FAA over Section 336. If the AMA wins their lawsuit, as well as that attorney who flies drones, then people will do what ever they please with their toys. It will be that way, until an act of congress puts a stop to it, probably by striking Section 336 out entirely on request from the Department of Transportation.
It's best to just keep a low profile. But, you all can do what you want to do. Raise your voices and hold picket signs if you like, and see how the FAA reacts.
It's best to just keep a low profile. But, you all can do what you want to do. Raise your voices and hold picket signs if you like, and see how the FAA reacts.
#47
Multi rotors with cameras are here to stay, whether anybody likes it or not. Fixed-wing "line of sight" model planes got mixed in, because the AMA opened their mouths, and riled the FAA over Section 336. If the AMA wins their lawsuit, as well as that attorney who flies drones, then people will do what ever they please with their toys. It will be that way, until an act of congress puts a stop to it, probably by striking Section 336 out entirely on request from the Department of Transportation.
It's best to just keep a low profile. But, you all can do what you want to do. Raise your voices and hold picket signs if you like, and see how the FAA reacts.
It's best to just keep a low profile. But, you all can do what you want to do. Raise your voices and hold picket signs if you like, and see how the FAA reacts.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Claiming that ALL MR are easy to fly is as naive as doing two circuits with an E-flite Apprentice in beginner mode and believing all RC fixed wing are that easy to fly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucTdBa6AzfY Some of the out of the box GPS equipped machines are very easy to fly - I don"t disagree with this.
But I'll throw out a friendly challenge to the OP - post a video of yourself flying an acro 3D capable multi rotor like this and I'll happily concede your point... that should be easy enough right? Because ALL multi rotors require no skill at all to fly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TktTO-ePsoc
Last edited by Rob2160; 01-06-2016 at 04:04 AM.
#49
An unknown number of AMA pilots who fly MR do not do it at their fields either by choice or prohibition,
they fly rogue, where ever they can without being seen.
I do not have a number of how many do this, but any number is too much, and in violation of the AMA safety code.
How would these AMA members caught flying at a non-approved AMA cite explain themselves if the AMA decided to pull their membership?
They knew the rules, they were educated about the rules, and at times practiced the rules but decided in this instance not
to follow the rules
That would be a hard position to defend wouldn't it?
they fly rogue, where ever they can without being seen.
I do not have a number of how many do this, but any number is too much, and in violation of the AMA safety code.
How would these AMA members caught flying at a non-approved AMA cite explain themselves if the AMA decided to pull their membership?
They knew the rules, they were educated about the rules, and at times practiced the rules but decided in this instance not
to follow the rules
That would be a hard position to defend wouldn't it?
#50
An unknown number of AMA pilots who fly MR do not do it at their fields either by choice or prohibition,
they fly rogue, where ever they can without being seen.
I do not have a number of how many do this, but any number is too much, and in violation of the AMA safety code.
How would these AMA members caught flying at a non-approved AMA cite explain themselves if the AMA decided to pull their membership?
They knew the rules, they were educated about the rules, and at times practiced the rules but decided in this instance not
to follow the rules
That would be a hard position to defend wouldn't it?
they fly rogue, where ever they can without being seen.
I do not have a number of how many do this, but any number is too much, and in violation of the AMA safety code.
How would these AMA members caught flying at a non-approved AMA cite explain themselves if the AMA decided to pull their membership?
They knew the rules, they were educated about the rules, and at times practiced the rules but decided in this instance not
to follow the rules
That would be a hard position to defend wouldn't it?