Should AMA fields require pilots to have a FAA number to be permitted to fly?
#77
Interestingly, the AMA does not view it as such. Rich Hanson has said more than once (and as recently in a direct conversation with a friend of mine) that the FAA Registration guideline page is not bonding. I am not sure I agree with that, but it appears the AMA's official line is that it is not bonding.
Of course, if AMA succeeds in getting the FAA to allow our AMA numbers to suffice for registration then this point will become moot. This is going to be an interesting weekend in Ontario!!
Of course, if AMA succeeds in getting the FAA to allow our AMA numbers to suffice for registration then this point will become moot. This is going to be an interesting weekend in Ontario!!
#79
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Interestingly, the AMA does not view it as such. Rich Hanson has said more than once (and as recently in a direct conversation with a friend of mine) that the FAA Registration guideline page is not bonding. I am not sure I agree with that, but it appears the AMA's official line is that it is not bonding.
Of course, if AMA succeeds in getting the FAA to allow our AMA numbers to suffice for registration then this point will become moot. This is going to be an interesting weekend in Ontario!!
Of course, if AMA succeeds in getting the FAA to allow our AMA numbers to suffice for registration then this point will become moot. This is going to be an interesting weekend in Ontario!!
#80
I agree. I'm certain the FAA's got lawyers by the truckload, and if they don't, the DOJ does (who's representing FAA by the way). I don't see the FAA doing what it's doing unless they feel like they're on solid ground.
#81
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Every one of these federal agencies have boatloads of young hungry attorneys cutting their teeth, waiting to jump to private practice in DC (Lobbying of course), supervised by the long term attorneys satisfied with their salary, and eventual retirement. While their rules and laws etc may eventually be overturned by one court or another, it's of little concern to them. They are almost always assured that what they do will stick, or it will take a long time to be revised. As for the AMA's posturing post the committee involvement, I wish it would have been more polished, more positive, and more generic in nature. Perhaps they felt the need to pound their chest for the members, but I'm not sure it was or is the best way to go when looking for concessions and/or special considerations for our members. Difficult position to be in.
#82
As for the AMA's posturing post the committee involvement, I wish it would have been more polished, more positive, and more generic in nature. Perhaps they felt the need to pound their chest for the members, but I'm not sure it was or is the best way to go when looking for concessions and/or special considerations for our members.
Last edited by franklin_m; 01-06-2016 at 03:46 PM. Reason: added missing "c" in "then FAA/TSA closes..."
#85
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess we'll just have to see. I'll tell you what, DOT is already talking about the medical qualifications for drone operation too. Any American over the age of 30 knows very well how "helpful" government is, and how they won't hold an innocent "club" liable!
#86
Interestingly, the AMA does not view it as such. Rich Hanson has said more than once (and as recently in a direct conversation with a friend of mine) that the FAA Registration guideline page is not bonding. I am not sure I agree with that, but it appears the AMA's official line is that it is not bonding.
Of course, if AMA succeeds in getting the FAA to allow our AMA numbers to suffice for registration then this point will become moot. This is going to be an interesting weekend in Ontario!!
Of course, if AMA succeeds in getting the FAA to allow our AMA numbers to suffice for registration then this point will become moot. This is going to be an interesting weekend in Ontario!!
#87
#88
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Ouch, you got me. Gotta come clean, they have none.
They have always been, and continue to be an utter and complete failure. For 80 years they have continued to fail in every mensurable way, that is what they are known for. When the SFA was pulled from under a rock, the AMA kicked it into overdrive and failed on an even more epic level, and the SFA went away. In fact they should change their name to AFA, the F being for failure.
LoL.
They have always been, and continue to be an utter and complete failure. For 80 years they have continued to fail in every mensurable way, that is what they are known for. When the SFA was pulled from under a rock, the AMA kicked it into overdrive and failed on an even more epic level, and the SFA went away. In fact they should change their name to AFA, the F being for failure.
LoL.
#89
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
i really think that your question is extremely relevant to the big point a lot of objectors are voicing. It is not only irresponsible, but also foolish to assume that the FAA, or any Governmental Body would simply "stop its reach" simply because it is "assumed" that all participants are complying. Now, please understand that I'm not calling you foolish, rather, I'm suggesting that given history, precedence, and quite frankly experience...(I happen to work in the field of 'Compliance and Regulation)... It's wrong to expect that big brother will not hold every single "responsible body...i.e...club..., not only liable for infractions, but also for maintaining a compliance protocol. Make no mistake about it...this is only the first of many regulations and requirements to come. I don't hate the government, but damn...thinking that they won't be obstructively "involved", is just plain being BLIND!
I guess we'll just have to see. I'll tell you what, DOT is already talking about the medical qualifications for drone operation too. Any American over the age of 30 knows very well how "helpful" government is, and how they won't hold an innocent "club" liable!
I guess we'll just have to see. I'll tell you what, DOT is already talking about the medical qualifications for drone operation too. Any American over the age of 30 knows very well how "helpful" government is, and how they won't hold an innocent "club" liable!
I hear what you saying, but I'll disagree. This feels like more doom and gloom on what might happen, when there is nothing to indicate that it will. I know it's popular to forecast the worst, but I just don't see the feds becoming that involved in this hobby. They have bigger fish to fry, and those they do catch should pay an appropriate price for whatever they do. This is a bigger issue than our hobby flying planes, and I have no problem with different government agencies getting involved if it has to do with safety. This issue most certainly involves safety, ie the thought of thousands of aircraft flying around in the airspace with no checks or balances. That our hobby got caught up in this mess is informational, but I don't see the end of the hobby on the horizon, or big brother sitting at our field checking reg numbers.
The future holds many possibilities, I choose to wait to see what they are and deal with them accordingly. Worrying about what might happen seems like wasted energy. That's just me.
#91
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree on a lot of your point Porcia. In most threads lol. I hope you're right. I really don't want my concerns to be proven true. It is a lot of gloom. Not doom!!
It's going to take a lot more than some registration and document filing to stop me from enjoying the hobby. I think my issue is on the principal of the whole thing. If they could dedicate the money and resources, with their efforts, into addressing those incidints which have led to this point, (which I don't think have been THAT significant in occurrence, except to make a doorway for them to finally push open), instead of adding obligations onto us, then it would be a matter we could all support instead of being forced.
Look....what makes the FAA think that the bozo who flys his drone over my daughters sunbathing area, or on private property, or in a fire zone is suddenly going to stop, or change their behavior, just because...well, the FAA said so. Or, if he does, why...they're gonna get him because they'll be able to see his id number. Which, of course, he will be immediately registering for, if he has t already!
They know as well as we do that this isn't going to stop anything. It's not. The only thing it will change is their revenue abilities, and the obligatory oversight that the citizens want for it. We are all still going to fly like we always have. We will all continue to abide by the rules and enjoy it reonsponsibly. Who at your club or field is going to be changed because of these new rules? But, surely the guy in the back lot of Walmart...well, we will never have that problem anymore right? It's not possible! The FAA says you can't fly that drone without a registration. It's not legal! Stop, or I'll call the FAA!!
Im being sarcastic and having fun. I don't know what the answer is. Only opinion.
It's going to take a lot more than some registration and document filing to stop me from enjoying the hobby. I think my issue is on the principal of the whole thing. If they could dedicate the money and resources, with their efforts, into addressing those incidints which have led to this point, (which I don't think have been THAT significant in occurrence, except to make a doorway for them to finally push open), instead of adding obligations onto us, then it would be a matter we could all support instead of being forced.
Look....what makes the FAA think that the bozo who flys his drone over my daughters sunbathing area, or on private property, or in a fire zone is suddenly going to stop, or change their behavior, just because...well, the FAA said so. Or, if he does, why...they're gonna get him because they'll be able to see his id number. Which, of course, he will be immediately registering for, if he has t already!
They know as well as we do that this isn't going to stop anything. It's not. The only thing it will change is their revenue abilities, and the obligatory oversight that the citizens want for it. We are all still going to fly like we always have. We will all continue to abide by the rules and enjoy it reonsponsibly. Who at your club or field is going to be changed because of these new rules? But, surely the guy in the back lot of Walmart...well, we will never have that problem anymore right? It's not possible! The FAA says you can't fly that drone without a registration. It's not legal! Stop, or I'll call the FAA!!
Im being sarcastic and having fun. I don't know what the answer is. Only opinion.
#92
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
I agree on a lot of your point Porcia. In most threads lol. I hope you're right. I really don't want my concerns to be proven true. It is a lot of gloom. Not doom!!
It's going to take a lot more than some registration and document filing to stop me from enjoying the hobby. I think my issue is on the principal of the whole thing. If they could dedicate the money and resources, with their efforts, into addressing those incidints which have led to this point, (which I don't think have been THAT significant in occurrence, except to make a doorway for them to finally push open), instead of adding obligations onto us, then it would be a matter we could all support instead of being forced.
Look....what makes the FAA think that the bozo who flys his drone over my daughters sunbathing area, or on private property, or in a fire zone is suddenly going to stop, or change their behavior, just because...well, the FAA said so. Or, if he does, why...they're gonna get him because they'll be able to see his id number. Which, of course, he will be immediately registering for, if he has t already!
They know as well as we do that this isn't going to stop anything. It's not. The only thing it will change is their revenue abilities, and the obligatory oversight that the citizens want for it. We are all still going to fly like we always have. We will all continue to abide by the rules and enjoy it reonsponsibly. Who at your club or field is going to be changed because of these new rules? But, surely the guy in the back lot of Walmart...well, we will never have that problem anymore right? It's not possible! The FAA says you can't fly that drone without a registration. It's not legal! Stop, or I'll call the FAA!!
Im being sarcastic and having fun. I don't know what the answer is. Only opinion.
It's going to take a lot more than some registration and document filing to stop me from enjoying the hobby. I think my issue is on the principal of the whole thing. If they could dedicate the money and resources, with their efforts, into addressing those incidints which have led to this point, (which I don't think have been THAT significant in occurrence, except to make a doorway for them to finally push open), instead of adding obligations onto us, then it would be a matter we could all support instead of being forced.
Look....what makes the FAA think that the bozo who flys his drone over my daughters sunbathing area, or on private property, or in a fire zone is suddenly going to stop, or change their behavior, just because...well, the FAA said so. Or, if he does, why...they're gonna get him because they'll be able to see his id number. Which, of course, he will be immediately registering for, if he has t already!
They know as well as we do that this isn't going to stop anything. It's not. The only thing it will change is their revenue abilities, and the obligatory oversight that the citizens want for it. We are all still going to fly like we always have. We will all continue to abide by the rules and enjoy it reonsponsibly. Who at your club or field is going to be changed because of these new rules? But, surely the guy in the back lot of Walmart...well, we will never have that problem anymore right? It's not possible! The FAA says you can't fly that drone without a registration. It's not legal! Stop, or I'll call the FAA!!
Im being sarcastic and having fun. I don't know what the answer is. Only opinion.
#93
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
The fact is I could list 50 great things they have done in the past 5 years and everyone of them would be shot down, so as non sarcastically as I can say, why bother? I know the first response to that will be see, you can't name one, but really........that will just be deflecting.
The fact that they have been around 80 years, and are still going strong, without anything even remotely similar to challenge them is the only example I need to give. Nobody does what they do, as well as they do. Only one group that I recall tried, and failed miserably (more than once too). Yes, the next argument will be they are a monopoly...and yup, they are. There's a reason for that though right? Nobody can do what they do, nobody. I'm not saying this in a horn tooting way, it's just fact, as they are the only game in town. And people are happy and accept that. I've said repeatedly if there was ever a time where there is more anger and division within this group it's probably now. And yet I haven't seen nor heard of anyone looking into forming their own group like the AMA. Actually, I take that back. There is a group that is slowly but surely gaining membership, using social medial to coordinate and build a coalition, and even get paperwork ready to file as a nonprofit organization, sorta like a CBO perhaps. I'll give you hint, it's not a group of fixed wing guys...
If you fly on public land, you might want to start thinking about how to deal with this group when they approach you about sharing field space. Or better yet, go right to the towns/cities that own the land and petition for rights to fly.
#94
My Feedback: (18)
An interesting approach here. Don't ask the guy who presumes the AMA has been a complete failure to validate that position, rather ask me to note the AMA"s accomplishments, and then one up that with "victories" as well, but just going back 25 years.
The fact is I could list 50 great things they have done in the past 5 years and everyone of them would be shot down, so as non sarcastically as I can say, why bother? I know the first response to that will be see, you can't name one, but really........that will just be deflecting.
The fact that they have been around 80 years, and are still going strong, without anything even remotely similar to challenge them is the only example I need to give. Nobody does what they do, as well as they do. Only one group that I recall tried, and failed miserably (more than once too). Yes, the next argument will be they are a monopoly...and yup, they are. There's a reason for that though right? Nobody can do what they do, nobody. I'm not saying this in a horn tooting way, it's just fact, as they are the only game in town. And people are happy and accept that. I've said repeatedly if there was ever a time where there is more anger and division within this group it's probably now. And yet I haven't seen nor heard of anyone looking into forming their own group like the AMA. Actually, I take that back. There is a group that is slowly but surely gaining membership, using social medial to coordinate and build a coalition, and even get paperwork ready to file as a nonprofit organization, sorta like a CBO perhaps. I'll give you hint, it's not a group of fixed wing guys...
If you fly on public land, you might want to start thinking about how to deal with this group when they approach you about sharing field space. Or better yet, go right to the towns/cities that own the land and petition for rights to fly.
The fact is I could list 50 great things they have done in the past 5 years and everyone of them would be shot down, so as non sarcastically as I can say, why bother? I know the first response to that will be see, you can't name one, but really........that will just be deflecting.
The fact that they have been around 80 years, and are still going strong, without anything even remotely similar to challenge them is the only example I need to give. Nobody does what they do, as well as they do. Only one group that I recall tried, and failed miserably (more than once too). Yes, the next argument will be they are a monopoly...and yup, they are. There's a reason for that though right? Nobody can do what they do, nobody. I'm not saying this in a horn tooting way, it's just fact, as they are the only game in town. And people are happy and accept that. I've said repeatedly if there was ever a time where there is more anger and division within this group it's probably now. And yet I haven't seen nor heard of anyone looking into forming their own group like the AMA. Actually, I take that back. There is a group that is slowly but surely gaining membership, using social medial to coordinate and build a coalition, and even get paperwork ready to file as a nonprofit organization, sorta like a CBO perhaps. I'll give you hint, it's not a group of fixed wing guys...
If you fly on public land, you might want to start thinking about how to deal with this group when they approach you about sharing field space. Or better yet, go right to the towns/cities that own the land and petition for rights to fly.
No offense intended from me. I only thought it might be helpful to enumerate some AMA successes in order to see that some good does come from Muncie. The average sport flyer sees very little benefit from AMA membership outside of a magazine subscription and a membership card that grants admission to the local club field.
I remember a similar membership uproar when we changed over from wide band radios to narrow band radios in the 1980's. Many of the same arguments we hear now were voiced then. 30 years later it seems to have worked out pretty well. The difference this time is the FAA involvement.
I profoundly hope the current problem works out as well.
#95
Ouch, you got me. Gotta come clean, they have none.
They have always been, and continue to be an utter and complete failure. For 80 years they have continued to fail in every mensurable way, that is what they are known for. When the SFA was pulled from under a rock, the AMA kicked it into overdrive and failed on an even more epic level, and the SFA went away.
They have always been, and continue to be an utter and complete failure. For 80 years they have continued to fail in every mensurable way, that is what they are known for. When the SFA was pulled from under a rock, the AMA kicked it into overdrive and failed on an even more epic level, and the SFA went away.
As for the rest, there's plenty of organizations that are successful...until they're not. Unfortunately, it's usually as a result of fundamental misreading of business environment, strategic miscalculation, etc. Also, it's sometimes not being able to work at the next level, play with the big boys, however you want to characterize it. Just because you can run the corner convenience store doesn't mean you can run Walmart. Ultimately though, past success does not in an way guarantee future success...especially in a world that's changing fast.
#96
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Porcia-
No offense intended from me. I only thought it might be helpful to enumerate some AMA successes in order to see that some good does come from Muncie. The average sport flyer sees very little benefit from AMA membership outside of a magazine subscription and a membership card that grants admission to the local club field.
I remember a similar membership uproar when we changed over from wide band radios to narrow band radios in the 1980's. Many of the same arguments we hear now were voiced then. 30 years later it seems to have worked out pretty well. The difference this time is the FAA involvement.
I profoundly hope the current problem works out as well.
No offense intended from me. I only thought it might be helpful to enumerate some AMA successes in order to see that some good does come from Muncie. The average sport flyer sees very little benefit from AMA membership outside of a magazine subscription and a membership card that grants admission to the local club field.
I remember a similar membership uproar when we changed over from wide band radios to narrow band radios in the 1980's. Many of the same arguments we hear now were voiced then. 30 years later it seems to have worked out pretty well. The difference this time is the FAA involvement.
I profoundly hope the current problem works out as well.
The card does get one admission to the local fields, and beyond in some cases. It's always cook to go to another club in a state and flash that card, most of the times it works.
The Mag is a plus too, although many here don't seem to like it. I do, I keep 'em around for a while. One thing you didn't mention that most do is the insurance coverage, yes it's excess over a h/o policy but it's excellent coverage for the price. I think many folks miss all the other benefits of the membership as they don't use them. AMA is an excellent recourse for all kinds of educational programs and information. They provide scholarships, grants for new sites (16 last year), grants for upgrades to existing sites, money for clubs who get their events in local media, and also sanctioning awards for events. My club will be working with an AMA program to partner with Civil Air Patrol Cadets and get them up and in the air with RC. There really is a whole ton of stuff that members don't avail themselves of, sometimes it just means a little digging around on the website. Leader members in the clubs, as well as local AVPs, and even your disctrict VPs should be talking about these programs and more when they attend meetings or events as well. I realize they are not a perfect organization and need to look for ways to refine what they do and continue to serve the membership as well. It can't be an easy time to be in the EC, that's for sure. They are going to be earning their salaries this week at the expo in CA.
#98
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Honestly, I'm drawing a blank on SFA.
As for the rest, there's plenty of organizations that are successful...until they're not. Unfortunately, it's usually as a result of fundamental misreading of business environment, strategic miscalculation, etc. Also, it's sometimes not being able to work at the next level, play with the big boys, however you want to characterize it. Just because you can run the corner convenience store doesn't mean you can run Walmart. Ultimately though, past success does not in an way guarantee future success...especially in a world that's changing fast.
As for the rest, there's plenty of organizations that are successful...until they're not. Unfortunately, it's usually as a result of fundamental misreading of business environment, strategic miscalculation, etc. Also, it's sometimes not being able to work at the next level, play with the big boys, however you want to characterize it. Just because you can run the corner convenience store doesn't mean you can run Walmart. Ultimately though, past success does not in an way guarantee future success...especially in a world that's changing fast.
#100
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canisteo,
NY
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would hope that the clubs would not succomb to the pettiness of many of the people on these boards, or the selfishness of the group who started this mess in the first place. recognize that the purpose of registration is to make our NAS a safer place. And for those without the mental accuity to understand how it makes the NAS safer... maybe I shouldn't say what I want to.
I cannot register anyway as I won't agree to something I cannot comply with. #'s 1, 2 and 8 on the registration are no go's for me. It's actually quite fun to rip around small, fast foamies on a nice summer night with a good buzz on! On private land of course.