Frank Tiano for AMA President
#101
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
One guy whom doesn't seem to fly or at least doesn't seem to fly at controlled fields has an issue with safety? I can't help but wonder if said person is only here to post for sport or looking for attention. Not sure which. He/She seems like a rebel without focus or ability, against model aviation as a whole. Most like that will fade away over time unless there is some sort of mental dysfunction or true conscience decision making to upset model aviation as a whole. Hints may be his feeling for voting for Frank is appealing to him? My apologies in advance if I've misjudged the situation.
#102
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Here is the FB page for Laurence Tougas, who announced in May that he would be running. His opinion on MR/Drones is quite clear, as is his discussion about "traditional" modeling. I would have thought that would be enough for the "Traditional" modelers to throw their vote to him, but I guess not. Not much in terms of specific actions he will take in dealing with the most important issue of the times, dealing with the feds. Just more generic "i'll look at the plan" and see what needs to get done. Hello...you've been a District VP for how many years now....if anyone knows what's been going on it's YOU! I like that he plays up the fact that he visits club and actively flies, big marks off for commenting that he is the only one flying each week. A bizzare tidbit that's unable to be validated, and sorta presumptuous.
He seems to fit all of the criteria for the job. I might not agree with everything he says, but kudos for his service to date, and even more so for wanting to assume more responsibility.
https://www.facebook.com/tougas4pres...30956167085721
He seems to fit all of the criteria for the job. I might not agree with everything he says, but kudos for his service to date, and even more so for wanting to assume more responsibility.
https://www.facebook.com/tougas4pres...30956167085721
#105
Per a post from another party that allegedly came from Frank, he merely noted that he wasn't selected. He certainly met the technical criteria that was noted by the EC. So probably the EC had selected three people that for whatever reasons they felt were more qualified. Two of the three announced they were running (one back in May), I would assume the AMA will be officially releasing their names shortly. Ballots due in Sept I believe.
TP
AMA 59376
#106
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
I've yet to hear from those complaining (yet again) how or why someone on the EC shouldn't be able to put their hand in the air and run for office. Who exactly should be on the nominating committee. Should anyone be able to run, unlimited candidates? The usual complaints, after the fact, but no useful suggestions or alternatives presented.
#107
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is the FB page for Laurence Tougas, who announced in May that he would be running. His opinion on MR/Drones is quite clear, as is his discussion about "traditional" modeling. I would have thought that would be enough for the "Traditional" modelers to throw their vote to him, but I guess not. Not much in terms of specific actions he will take in dealing with the most important issue of the times, dealing with the feds. Just more generic "i'll look at the plan" and see what needs to get done. Hello...you've been a District VP for how many years now....if anyone knows what's been going on it's YOU! I like that he plays up the fact that he visits club and actively flies, big marks off for commenting that he is the only one flying each week. A bizzare tidbit that's unable to be validated, and sorta presumptuous.
He seems to fit all of the criteria for the job. I might not agree with everything he says, but kudos for his service to date, and even more so for wanting to assume more responsibility.
https://www.facebook.com/tougas4pres...30956167085721
He seems to fit all of the criteria for the job. I might not agree with everything he says, but kudos for his service to date, and even more so for wanting to assume more responsibility.
https://www.facebook.com/tougas4pres...30956167085721
#108
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#110
Thanks Barracuda , were I to vote today it would be for Rich Hanson , the Government affairs guy .
We don't anyone sitting in the Presidents seat with an ill temper, or a short fuse .
Most of the time an " establishment " person will do just fine .
We don't anyone sitting in the Presidents seat with an ill temper, or a short fuse .
Most of the time an " establishment " person will do just fine .
#111
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Roger that, and WILCO.
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
#112
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Roger that, and WILCO.
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
Sure would clear a lot of questions up to hear from the candidates though...not their proxies via a whisper/grassroots campaign. I'll be asking all of them the same questions. I'd rather have all the info at my disposal rather than pick someone on one simple issue.
#113
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Roger that, and WILCO.
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
#114
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Roger that, and WILCO.
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
Just a somewhat related anecdotal event comes to mind.....
While running for D-X Laurence was the subject of a demeaning, protracted anti-campaign in this very forum, similar to what is currently been directed at Frank T. by a (very) small minority. As you well know, he won the election.
Deja vu
Interesting discussion from 7 years ago.
#116
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not going to vote against anyone in this race. I will be doing that when I vote for POTUS.
Hanson is the obvious choice of the GOB's, but I won't hold that against him, I think he's a good man. It's pro forma to have others on the ballot, pseudo democracy and all that, so they had to name some also-rans as well.
#117
Interesting, this is from Tougas's FB page (a re post from Tim J. I'm posting it due to the fact that I along with others have been saying just this since we ( the AMA) started chasing the "droners" thinking we would get a influx of new members. According to him it ain't happening.
Now is it fact or just BS to get the "traditional modeler" vote?
"Since an MRM pilot doesn’t need flight instruction and they can be flown from a small area there is no incentive to join a local club or the AMA. This is reflected in our membership numbers. Less than 10% of our members list MRM or First Person View (FPV) as their interest. Most of the current MRM and FPV pilots that are AMA members are traditional modelers who have expanded into these areas not new recruits to our fold. So if we are not seeing a large increase in membership in these areas then why is the AMA chasing people who have clearly spoken that the AMA is not for them? Like most important questions it’s a complex issue. The original decision to market to MRM and FPV modelers was made with the best intentions. The thought was the AMA would have a new stream of members to fund all of our membership programs such as flying site assistance grants, education scholarships, political outreach, etc. Now we have a much better understanding of the market and it shows that it is time to reassess our plan. Elect me and I will conduct a review of our plan and work with the Executive Council to make the needed changes."
Mike
Now is it fact or just BS to get the "traditional modeler" vote?
"Since an MRM pilot doesn’t need flight instruction and they can be flown from a small area there is no incentive to join a local club or the AMA. This is reflected in our membership numbers. Less than 10% of our members list MRM or First Person View (FPV) as their interest. Most of the current MRM and FPV pilots that are AMA members are traditional modelers who have expanded into these areas not new recruits to our fold. So if we are not seeing a large increase in membership in these areas then why is the AMA chasing people who have clearly spoken that the AMA is not for them? Like most important questions it’s a complex issue. The original decision to market to MRM and FPV modelers was made with the best intentions. The thought was the AMA would have a new stream of members to fund all of our membership programs such as flying site assistance grants, education scholarships, political outreach, etc. Now we have a much better understanding of the market and it shows that it is time to reassess our plan. Elect me and I will conduct a review of our plan and work with the Executive Council to make the needed changes."
Mike
#118
My Feedback: (10)
?
"Since an MRM pilot doesn’t need flight instruction and they can be flown from a small area there is no incentive to join a local club or the AMA. This is reflected in our membership numbers. Less than 10% of our members list MRM or First Person View (FPV) as their interest. Most of the current MRM and FPV pilots that are AMA members are traditional modelers who have expanded into these areas not new recruits to our fold. So if we are not seeing a large increase in membership in these areas then why is the AMA chasing people who have clearly spoken that the AMA is not for them? Like most important questions it’s a complex issue. The original decision to market to MRM and FPV modelers was made with the best intentions. The thought was the AMA would have a new stream of members to fund all of our membership programs such as flying site assistance grants, education scholarships, political outreach, etc. Now we have a much better understanding of the market and it shows that it is time to reassess our plan. Elect me and I will conduct a review of our plan and work with the Executive Council to make the needed changes."
"Since an MRM pilot doesn’t need flight instruction and they can be flown from a small area there is no incentive to join a local club or the AMA. This is reflected in our membership numbers. Less than 10% of our members list MRM or First Person View (FPV) as their interest. Most of the current MRM and FPV pilots that are AMA members are traditional modelers who have expanded into these areas not new recruits to our fold. So if we are not seeing a large increase in membership in these areas then why is the AMA chasing people who have clearly spoken that the AMA is not for them? Like most important questions it’s a complex issue. The original decision to market to MRM and FPV modelers was made with the best intentions. The thought was the AMA would have a new stream of members to fund all of our membership programs such as flying site assistance grants, education scholarships, political outreach, etc. Now we have a much better understanding of the market and it shows that it is time to reassess our plan. Elect me and I will conduct a review of our plan and work with the Executive Council to make the needed changes."
Yep that is basically it.....all good intentions
"Park Pilot Program" redux
#119
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Yes, I did vote for Tougas. I liked the other guy also, so it was a toss up.
I'm not going to vote against anyone in this race. I will be doing that when I vote for POTUS.
Hanson is the obvious choice of the GOB's, but I won't hold that against him, I think he's a good man. It's pro forma to have others on the ballot, pseudo democracy and all that, so they had to name some also-rans as well.
I'm not going to vote against anyone in this race. I will be doing that when I vote for POTUS.
Hanson is the obvious choice of the GOB's, but I won't hold that against him, I think he's a good man. It's pro forma to have others on the ballot, pseudo democracy and all that, so they had to name some also-rans as well.
#120
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Interesting, this is from Tougas's FB page (a re post from Tim J. I'm posting it due to the fact that I along with others have been saying just this since we ( the AMA) started chasing the "droners" thinking we would get a influx of new members. According to him it ain't happening.
Now is it fact or just BS to get the "traditional modeler" vote?
(snip)
Mike
Now is it fact or just BS to get the "traditional modeler" vote?
(snip)
Mike
So on one hand he says about 16,000 list MR as their interest....but goes right on to say "so we are not seeing a large increase in membership in this area...." Err...wait, wha? Which is it, one or the other. we already know about 700 joined just this year along with the Best Buy program. That seems to have been left out of his discussion.
And oh, both he and Tiano have given vague general answers as to what they will do, sort of like "we'll make us strong again, we'll build a wall, just don't ask how, believe me, we'll do it". Anyone who thinks anything they are going to do will change anything the FAA has already done is absolutely insane. There is no turning back the clock. There is no do over. Whats done is done, and what's been done isn't that big of a deal (registration). Reassess our plan...really, like how? Specifically. And how ill this right the ship?
And oh, let's not forget the position isn't a dictatorship...he'll have to work with ALL of the EC members.
Last edited by porcia83; 08-01-2016 at 03:18 PM.
#122
My Feedback: (15)
This has been discussed publicly so I don't think I'm releasing anything out of turn.
The candidates on the ballot for AMA president are
Eric Williams - District II Vice President
Lawrence Tougas - District X Vice President
Rich Hanson - Government Affairs consultant
The candidates on the ballot for AMA president are
Eric Williams - District II Vice President
Lawrence Tougas - District X Vice President
Rich Hanson - Government Affairs consultant
#124
My Feedback: (15)
Thank You Andy .
So , with this being the final list (the AMA does not count "write ins" , am I correct ?) the Frank Tiano candidacy would appear a dead issue ? Even if write ins were counted , I wonder , would enough folks ever write in someone whose been considered and declined by the nominating process ? I do know if I had to go on name recognition and someone whose personally treated me fine in any on line conversations I've had to date I'd have to go with Rich Hanson . I mean this as no slam against either of the other two candidates , I do not know them and I do know that the right way will be to examine the campaign statements and past performance/accomplishments of all three candidates and not to just automatically pick Rich cause he's the name I most recognize .
So , with this being the final list (the AMA does not count "write ins" , am I correct ?) the Frank Tiano candidacy would appear a dead issue ? Even if write ins were counted , I wonder , would enough folks ever write in someone whose been considered and declined by the nominating process ? I do know if I had to go on name recognition and someone whose personally treated me fine in any on line conversations I've had to date I'd have to go with Rich Hanson . I mean this as no slam against either of the other two candidates , I do not know them and I do know that the right way will be to examine the campaign statements and past performance/accomplishments of all three candidates and not to just automatically pick Rich cause he's the name I most recognize .