Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > AMA Discussions
Reload this Page >

The Poop has hit the fan !

Community
Search
Notices
AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.

The Poop has hit the fan !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2018, 12:12 PM
  #126  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by init4fun
Hi Speed ,

As it stands now the FAA's language is direct and to the point with no wiggle room , all hobby S/UAS are to not exceed 400 feet . If the AMA can get us members a CBO only exemption from that then that's great ! That will be the first crack in the 400 foot monster's armor . I do believe there then would be a court challenge from some non CBO members (Something akin to Taylor VS FAA comes to mind) and hopefully maybe a bit more of the 400 foot monster will perish . My biggest fear ? Truthfully , I honestly believe that the companies who want to have drone delivery services have already cut their deal with the FAA to have us out of the way of their commerce , and that the 400 foot limit will ultimately strangle what's left of "Traditional RC flying" . Big money ALWAYS wins ......
Except such an exception would be found Unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional to grant special privileges to members of a private group based only on that membership. It would be like AAA Members being allowed to legally drive at any speed they desire on any road.

The AMA continues to attempt to acquire a hook of some sort to force membership. Ain't gonna happen! Muncie is going to have to actually sit down and do some work to put some value other than the Good 'Ol Boys Club into the AMA. And offer up something everyone needs or wants.
Old 10-18-2018, 12:24 PM
  #127  
init4fun
Thread Starter
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,358
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Appowner
Except such an exception would be found Unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional to grant special privileges to members of a private group based only on that membership........
Yes , it most likely would . And in the process the Court it's heard in will hopefully establish that if CBO members are safe over 400 feet , all RC flyers can be safe over 400 feet by following simple "see and avoid" rules .

The war against the 400 foot limit will not be a simple one battle affair .....
Old 10-18-2018, 12:33 PM
  #128  
fliers1
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lockport, NY
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Could the limit be raised to 500 feet?
Old 10-18-2018, 12:43 PM
  #129  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fliers1
Could the limit be raised to 500 feet?

In order to accommodate all AMA events as they are done now we would need a 1,500 ‘ limit. Most events could be modified to fly lower except soaring. That’s why I really see no real harm for CBO members getting an exemption. Have CBO membership require a test and call it a license. Legal issue gone. Pay for play is no new thing. Fishing, hunting, driving, full scale flying all are illegal without a license why should model flying be any different?
Old 10-18-2018, 02:40 PM
  #130  
mongo
My Feedback: (15)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 3,504
Received 80 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

drop the cbo part and just have the license part, just like hunting, fishing and driving do.
Old 10-18-2018, 03:11 PM
  #131  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mongo
drop the cbo part and just have the license part, just like hunting, fishing and driving do.

What happens the next time the hobby gets threatened, who lobbies for us then?
Old 10-18-2018, 04:11 PM
  #132  
mongo
My Feedback: (15)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 3,504
Received 80 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

who lobbies for;
fishing, hunting, driving,and flying?

none of which have a required cbo.

an, quite honestly, the success level of the AMA's lobbying so far, we can live without.
Old 10-18-2018, 04:59 PM
  #133  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

https://www.grandviewoutdoors.com/ge...organizations/


Im fairly confident that AMA will get us an exemption, big win in my book.
Old 10-18-2018, 06:36 PM
  #134  
mongo
My Feedback: (15)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 3,504
Received 80 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

AND NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN REALLY BELIEVED THAT HIS TREATY WITH GERMANY WOULD BRING "PEACE FOR OUR TIME".

we all know how well that worked out...
Old 10-18-2018, 06:40 PM
  #135  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

LOL really, that is your idea of an accurate comparison?
Old 10-18-2018, 07:35 PM
  #136  
mongo
My Feedback: (15)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 3,504
Received 80 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

the idea is:

hope for the best, yeah sure, but prepare for the worst, because that is what occurs more often than not. our guys track record is not exactly stellar...
Old 10-18-2018, 08:56 PM
  #137  
warningshot
 
warningshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: OU-OSU OK
Posts: 548
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After looking at the list I notice that none of those listed charge as much as AMA but do a lot more good.
Old 10-18-2018, 10:05 PM
  #138  
ira d
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maricopa County AZ
Posts: 3,249
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Appowner
Except such an exception would be found Unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional to grant special privileges to members of a private group based only on that membership. It would be like AAA Members being allowed to legally drive at any speed they desire on any road.

The AMA continues to attempt to acquire a hook of some sort to force membership. Ain't gonna happen! Muncie is going to have to actually sit down and do some work to put some value other than the Good 'Ol Boys Club into the AMA. And offer up something everyone needs or wants.
Well said and I agree, IMO the reason we are at the place we are with the FAA is because the AMA did not negotiate in good faith with the FAA but instead tried to get laws passed that mandate membership.
Old 10-19-2018, 12:45 AM
  #139  
franklin_m
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
In order to accommodate all AMA events as they are done now we would need a 1,500 ‘ limit. Most events could be modified to fly lower except soaring.
What exactly drives this perceived "need?"

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
That’s why I really see no real harm for CBO members getting an exemption.
I have a real problem with it. From a Constitutional perspective, you cannot have two classes of citizens, with different privileges, based solely upon membership in a private dues collecting organization.

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
Have CBO membership require a test and call it a license. Legal issue gone. Pay for play is no new thing. Fishing, hunting, driving, full scale flying all are illegal without a license why should model flying be any different?
I can't help but note that "fishing, hunting, driving," and "full scale flying" all require licenses, GOVERNMENT issued licenses. Not one of those comes from a private dues collecting organization.
Old 10-19-2018, 12:49 AM
  #140  
franklin_m
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ira d
Well said and I agree, IMO the reason we are at the place we are with the FAA is because the AMA did not negotiate in good faith with the FAA but instead tried to get laws passed that mandate membership.
Yep. Spot on. AMA followed a #ResistEverything approach. No compromise. In short, they played hardball with the FAA and the rest of the aviation industry. And we see how that turned out.
Old 10-19-2018, 04:19 AM
  #141  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Anyone who really wants to know how things went on Capital Hill, needs to have a one on one off the record sit down with their Representative to discuss Drones, the AMA and related issues. You will be surprised as to how the AMA is viewed in DC. An Ice Cube in Heck had a better chance IMHO.
Old 10-19-2018, 06:08 AM
  #142  
init4fun
Thread Starter
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,358
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by franklin_m
..........I have a real problem with it. From a Constitutional perspective, you cannot have two classes of citizens, with different privileges, based solely upon membership in a private dues collecting organization.......
Franklin , my biggest fear in all this (outside of the 400 absolute limit) ?... My biggest AMA concerned fear is that the FAA recognizes the Constitutional difficulties you and others mention , and contracts the AMA to administer all hobby related S/UAS operations . With the AMA as a contractor of the U.S. government (FAA) the Constitutional challenge evaporates , hobby based S/UAS operations are not the FAA's day to day responsibility anymore , and the AMA finally gets that mandated by law forced membership it's wanted since the beginning of all this S/UAS business . A simple "burying of the hatchet" between AMA and FAA , and a yearly percentage of AMA money becoming FAA money , is all it'd take for something as far fetched to become reality .

Originally Posted by Appowner
Interesting the lack of chatter on this one.
That's because folks here generally tend to keep same topic discussion to the thread that originated the topic . Since "The poop has hit the fan" and "So , has the world ended yet" are both a discussion of the effect of the recent passage of HR 302 on our hobby , you have started a duplicate thread and duplicates of well established threads are usually pretty much resoundingly ignored . I know you haven't been around here very long (according to your join date , Nov. 2017) but back when the Moderators were far more active here duplicate threads were generally just deleted outright .....

Last edited by init4fun; 10-19-2018 at 06:14 AM.
Old 10-19-2018, 06:24 AM
  #143  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by franklin_m
What exactly drives this perceived "need?"


I have a real problem with it. From a Constitutional perspective, you cannot have two classes of citizens, with different privileges, based solely upon membership in a private dues collecting organization.


I can't help but note that "fishing, hunting, driving," and "full scale flying" all require licenses, GOVERNMENT issued licenses. Not one of those comes from a private dues collecting organization.

Well in all honesty, nobody " needs " to fly model airplanes at all. However is you were to look at any of the current pattern or IMAC aerobatic sequences you can easily see that there is no way they can be flown while staying below 400'. Yes the sequences can be modified however that would put us on a completely differnt playing field then the rest of the world to the point where the US would never be able to field another US F3A team again. Not a big deal to most but where does it stop?

Hunting and fishing license, do you go to a government office to obtain one? Is there any test required? Maybe for hunting. No you go to a STORE who sells you the license and makes a profit .
Old 10-19-2018, 06:28 AM
  #144  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warningshot
After looking at the list I notice that none of those listed charge as much as AMA but do a lot more good.

Agreed, but they have much much larger participation. Like I have been saying all along strength in numbers. If AMA had 2 million members as opposed to 180K I would bet they dues would be lower and they would have a bigger voice on the hill. Some people are very aware of this scenario and that is why their goal is to discourage AMA membership both here and on RCG.
Old 10-19-2018, 06:57 AM
  #145  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by init4fun
Franklin , my biggest fear in all this (outside of the 400 absolute limit) ?... My biggest AMA concerned fear is that the FAA recognizes the Constitutional difficulties you and others mention , and contracts the AMA to administer all hobby related S/UAS operations . With the AMA as a contractor of the U.S. government (FAA) the Constitutional challenge evaporates , hobby based S/UAS operations are not the FAA's day to day responsibility anymore , and the AMA finally gets that mandated by law forced membership it's wanted since the beginning of all this S/UAS business . A simple "burying of the hatchet" between AMA and FAA , and a yearly percentage of AMA money becoming FAA money , is all it'd take for something as far fetched to become reality .
....................................
Except should the FAA contract the AMA in some way, mandatory membership CAN NOT be part of it. Can you imagine the outrage? "What? I have to shell out $75 a year so my kid can play with his toy airplane?" Just will not happen.

And from my conversations with my Congressman, no chance of the AMA being anything other than another CBO.
Old 10-19-2018, 09:02 AM
  #146  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

As of right now your kid has a much reduced rate then 75.00. In your scenario he would also not have a need for a 400’ exemption. So not quite the issue you state. Just as Walmart sells a fishing license and Fish and game enforces, AMA can sell R/C license to fly at sanctioned sites with 400’ limit waived and FAA to enforce. If you don’t have a requirement to fly above 400’ then no need for the license. After all I’m fairly certain all this is simply a tool for the FAA to prosecute if and when an incident occurs.
Old 10-19-2018, 10:36 AM
  #147  
ira d
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maricopa County AZ
Posts: 3,249
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Why would the FAA wish to contract with the AMA? The AMA does not have a way to enforce anything. Do we really want a system in place where people can end up in prison for flying a model aircraft without being a AMA
member? If we go down the path of AMA members get to do thing that other modelers caint this is where we could be headed.
Old 10-19-2018, 10:50 AM
  #148  
mongo
My Feedback: (15)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 3,504
Received 80 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

dunno about your state, but, here in TEXAS, the store that sells the hunting/fishing license does not make 1 penny of profit off it. it is done as a service to customers who buy other things to utilize that license.
Old 10-19-2018, 11:02 AM
  #149  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ira d
Why would the FAA wish to contract with the AMA? The AMA does not have a way to enforce anything. Do we really want a system in place where people can end up in prison for flying a model aircraft without being a AMA
member? If we go down the path of AMA members get to do thing that other modelers caint this is where we could be headed.

AMA clubs have board of directors that do include safety officers. Infractions are discussed and the board my vote on appropriate actions. If serious enough the club can inform AMA and that persons AMA can be revoked. Yes there are offenders that get away with things but keep it in perspective, not all speeders on the freeway get popped. There have always been groups that have a higher set of rights then others. I will stick to my fishing example. Without a license it is illegal to fish and then only the fish you are licensed for and when and where you are told you can fish. I really see no difference here.

Last edited by speedracerntrixie; 10-19-2018 at 11:07 AM.
Old 10-19-2018, 11:09 AM
  #150  
ira d
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maricopa County AZ
Posts: 3,249
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie



AMA clubs have board of directors that do include safety officers. Infractions are discussed and the board my vote on appropriate actions. If serious enough the club can inform AMA and that persons AMA can be revoked. Yes there are offenders that get away with things but keep it in perspective, not all speeders on the freeway get popped.
When is the last time you have heard of someone's AMA being revoked? What field do you know of that has their safety officers on site the majority of the time?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.