Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > AMA Discussions
Reload this Page >

While AMA talks, FAA acts...

Community
Search
Notices
AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.

While AMA talks, FAA acts...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2019, 06:26 AM
  #26  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
Then time to put our money where our mouths are. Give me your email address and I will send you a video of me flying well above 400’. You can then report me and we can see what happens.
Go for it Speedy! Report yourself! Put it on Youtube if you're so sure.

I do hope your job doesn't include a security clearance. Could be bad if it did and you so foolishly reported yourself to the FAA.
Old 01-02-2019, 07:33 AM
  #27  
franklin_m
Thread Starter
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Appowner
Go for it Speedy! Report yourself! Put it on Youtube if you're so sure.

I do hope your job doesn't include a security clearance. Could be bad if it did and you so foolishly reported yourself to the FAA.
No kidding. Entire security clearance process is based on doing the right thing (i.e. following the rules) even when nobody is looking. Clearance agencies would take a dim view of someone who knew the Federal rules for flying sUAS and then knowingly broke them.

I yanked a guy's clearance for using his government credit card for reserving a hotel room for personal travel. Rules are explicit "OFFICIAL USE ONLY." Just like the law is explict: remain at or below 400 feet in Class G.
Old 01-02-2019, 08:11 AM
  #28  
BarracudaHockey
My Feedback: (11)
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 26,991
Received 351 Likes on 281 Posts
Default

Actually the FAA won't do squat if you report a video, they even tell you that when you ginny up the report.
Old 01-02-2019, 08:40 AM
  #29  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BarracudaHockey
Actually the FAA won't do squat if you report a video, they even tell you that when you ginny up the report.
Then he should have nothing to worry about. Should he?

Now it seems it's a simple matter of courage.
Old 01-02-2019, 08:44 AM
  #30  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by franklin_m
No kidding. Entire security clearance process is based on doing the right thing (i.e. following the rules) even when nobody is looking. Clearance agencies would take a dim view of someone who knew the Federal rules for flying sUAS and then knowingly broke them.

I yanked a guy's clearance for using his government credit card for reserving a hotel room for personal travel. Rules are explicit "OFFICIAL USE ONLY." Just like the law is explict: remain at or below 400 feet in Class G.
Had a guy go in for a lifestyle. A relatively minor event came up from his youth. One he had long ago dismissed and forgotten. But it busted the poly for him and they yanked the rest of his clearances as a result. Suddenly he was unemployed. And all his connections, being in the IC, were also suddenly useless.

Had a female who checked her kids school work, sports schedules, etc from work. And a little on line shopping on the side. Lost her clearance and her job. Convicted of fraud and they stopped adding it up when they figured she owed the government 300,000 in unearned wages. And they ran her husband through a fresh poly. And the company she worked for? Lost the next extension on the contract and the subsequent re-compete. Impacted some 400 employees.

Last edited by Appowner; 01-02-2019 at 08:52 AM.
Old 01-02-2019, 08:59 AM
  #31  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by franklin_m
If I report it's second hand ... especially if done from out of state. Why don't you call the local FAA office, cite what it says on the FAA website, and then tell them what you're doing? I mean you're so certain that they don't have the authority to do anything, so why not put yourself on report and test that theory?

LOL, I expected lame excuses. Offer still stands, anyone who wants the video and the AMA sanctioned feild coordinates can have them. Time to put up or shut up.
Old 01-02-2019, 09:07 AM
  #32  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie



LOL, I expected lame excuses. Offer still stands, anyone who wants the video and the AMA sanctioned feild coordinates can have them. Time to put up or shut up.
You made the claim of being able to do it. So again, post it yourself on Youtube. As you said, time to put up or shut up!
Old 01-02-2019, 10:25 AM
  #33  
init4fun
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,358
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie



This states it all, since the re authorization act has NOT gone into effect YET we are flying to section 336 which refers us to the wording in AC-91-57 that states 400' altitude is an ADVISORY. We have been flying traditional R/C since the early 1980's under AC-91-57 and well above 400'. Show me where anyone has been convicted or even sited for flying over 400'
I don't want to have to explain this again , but it appears I'm gonna have to . To the FAA , the term "Advisory Circular" does NOT imply that compliance is up to the decision of the pilot ! The FAA considers A/Cs as well as A/Ds (Airworthiness Directives) to be their official publication of how aviation is to be practiced in the skies it controls . Now , because 91-57 was written in a time when all pilots were still considered "a cut above" , it was written in a gentlemanly tone using words like "should" instead of having to resort to words like the far more direct "you will" , which appears to be what's needed and is in fact being employed in today's FAA communications . There will be no parsing of words with relation to things like "Fly at or below 400 feet when in uncontrolled (class G) airspace" , it says what it says and I don't see any loopholes .

PS , make NO mistake of thinking that I'm advocating for or are happy with a blanket 400 foot limit , I do not believe an absolute 400 foot limit is needed . Are there some areas where there should be altitude restrictions ? Sure there are , but there are also areas where RC flight over 400 feet should be able to be done safely enough that it should be allowed .
Old 01-02-2019, 12:38 PM
  #34  
franklin_m
Thread Starter
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by init4fun
I don't want to have to explain this again , but it appears I'm gonna have to . To the FAA , the term "Advisory Circular" does NOT imply that compliance is up to the decision of the pilot ! The FAA considers A/Cs as well as A/Ds (Airworthiness Directives) to be their official publication of how aviation is to be practiced in the skies it controls . Now , because 91-57 was written in a time when all pilots were still considered "a cut above" , it was written in a gentlemanly tone using words like "should" instead of having to resort to words like the far more direct "you will" , which appears to be what's needed and is in fact being employed in today's FAA communications . There will be no parsing of words with relation to things like "Fly at or below 400 feet when in uncontrolled (class G) airspace" , it says what it says and I don't see any loopholes .

PS , make NO mistake of thinking that I'm advocating for or are happy with a blanket 400 foot limit , I do not believe an absolute 400 foot limit is needed . Are there some areas where there should be altitude restrictions ? Sure there are , but there are also areas where RC flight over 400 feet should be able to be done safely enough that it should be allowed .
Amazing how specific language, that's actually part of LAW, isn't clear to some.
Old 01-02-2019, 01:11 PM
  #35  
Stickslammer
 
Stickslammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think the vast majority of pilots can be considered "a cut above", but unfortunately there are quite a few exceptions. I used to love hearing "war stories" from a forest ranger pilot who came across some of these types. Like the guy who just got his helicopter license and landed his Robinson in the parking lot of an upscale restaurant to impress his girlfriend. Many customers and the FAA were none too impressed about the sandblasted cars and breach of safety.
Old 01-02-2019, 01:57 PM
  #36  
Propworn
My Feedback: (3)
 
Propworn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,481
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

All you armchair experts make me laugh. Being Canadian and not part of the AMA I needed clarification so around 1 pm I sent an email to the AMA..

From: Prop Worn
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 12:59 PM
To: Ilona Maine
Subject: 400 ft altitude restriction
My name is Dennis Pratt MAAC 52272-L and in the past when I have visited there were no concerns about flying in access of 400 ft. Does this restriction now apply to AMA fields? If so it will change what I may bring to fly when visiting this winter.
Dennis Pratt

Received an answer the same day

Angie Martin <[email protected]>
Wed 2019-01-02, 6:49 PM
You;
Ilona Maine;
Lois Mock;
Lisa Johnson
The FAA does not intend to ground our operations that go over 400’, as long as they are done safely and in accordance with our safety guidelines. At this time, direction from the FAA website confirms you should continue to follow current guidelines and I have attached the letter the FAA sent to us in 2016, allowing flights over 400’ under the criteria of Section 336. I’ve also included a link below to a video discussing the FAA Authorization Act of 2018.
Feel free to call back with any questions or concerns.
https://amablog.modelaircraft.org/am...rization-bill/

Sincerely,
Angie Martin

Government Affairs and Public Relations Assistant

[img] tJka8AAAZgElEQVR4Xu1cCXSV1Z2/27e990ISIMgSaFErFUZBUUxIwmbForUuIzra6TjaOTrHttalrV nxYTbULsdl2mqdVqeOVai1tW4UJZANRKhUCy6ouGAQAiF5yVu+ 7d753++9l7y85CXBGnrCme+cnOR97+7/7fdfbjA6zp+8qk0lmKruweDC1uN1q/h43ZjcV15pw8mHjdxN3ImVouqCx47XvR6/RLy9eQahdL0wsr+sml0XmzWFz/w/EcfQCcwobcr9GJONQvXPw9FOe7xCr0SYisM1C/8whrYx4qUel5KoljY/YelZV6JoCBGCPs5m/MIw154hwrkuVlfcMOLTGSMNjzsi+iubvhJB+gZhhRFSdMS43TB Jc27cb/vehL+3XPJuW8m6dVe4Y4Q+I1rmcUdEpaz1fls1voMiRxAyspFi 9tyrGr5nwy7egF0bBShf2F1dtGVEpzNGGuHrH9yuPHTDWfYYWe +wy6Rlm590mf8KFAsBEXOQwu1bkWNGbdX/c4QxYk70Nqe26CfDDjRGGpxwz3o/DlQ1r+6pLr5jjKx52GVq5a0/MRXjFhTpACLmAhGtm11uMs4CP0KYINXuKbXqSu4adqAx0sAob3 oAa5Vb/uRS9m4lfu62YDDIx8jaMy4zu7JlebcSWM85mD3Vj1jPoWezGHr yiD7xN8TsRjnYKexYXbB1rO8T3fLieDpu0oOUWwwbZc2XxbKnP kVC+5sUpqyO3bng5bG8wSXBBrbFVm52qT4eIZcTLsyZyHxsL9K vIZjvi1UXPjyW94duWWtQ35TLXayW4UDeqWpo31fxfLCJr+2N7 OSBvNk4DCqIkJcJFb8dR/iGI8Hij8bahife0Tz1iI1Xu5yrSAgOdpAigQyERQ8hTDVs857w PUt3jrV9qVXbT3N49GLB8VWCabORFkBKz6HWCv3lEg+dZlVsLQ 4j/BJHQpPGHxGGsBnuJFR5FSN3K8Hsr0hYexhC7TPVCd36lKi54/r5Llq3bpTQ7UpY1TqErjh6V2BGfVPuJ13oA9fIHgeAJkEruSeC iOugbBw9/Uj14jeOmohrBfXWNIrPnN1zqIm69U9snoWJNdVE6qnCFWcKhAs F5/OQ6lORE4O9KIgI97CPo0U99QW7e4lASxv/WTDjUY6x30N2VEGIafAbSAfQHFsxjgg9jAnuFFzEEOYO8iguzS iBn9TfcqfynXzSv08/haQZTrbv6wYi1CMIbsNU3yt4bDfVs3ZYq+btGu4cWVlzg0PVJc js6WsKe6Hc2TvP8P/TjuBZkUxjzAmuVd8X+fMc0zlTUHWWEM502OpUF1NjuHn7vk/uOfkm/fPAcxHwCiPM4EB98HcO4ny8UGFKUCTy/JENxBNg5325wIx2G7GtK527ipvlSP0kyahoXWBhdr9L1QUeF9u wVxEfXnKyN6CkG6A873e/J9EOdFfasIlW8n3qlKmfB+krXxE5l5wT5gPNCGuKYcq2Y0Ie49 32/6CfLowOdrBKefMvbWb8B4p2JdYCg4H6Ya71klNffN5gfXzljVM sZlzvOs7lMNdsoehxrpL7lyDJY8ZMe04fMfUM0vedbDvIOcm5v B+Yj8N88rd8CJyB6vPOnHL3WcWxvhdbU/J+cqRB1SGp2PKf0OMGLtA8pKjACTCY5AYpfPIwPUINOcRg55RC zOS0I9mg3FSiq2QkiMJIDYEda6fm9twcq1+2OX0yraLpVpP6fx wnYqIzOP6aE/m5WVdyY3p7taL5GzZmdwumT0UW8IVkYI95k3TLZDXS95F6Jqln NMRxeIyRcg7yo2RaMGmeFgQCgmlzCWWb4P0Dbs05A+K//VbnK29e4VAl16o+53E5LatqXQxMeD5MsQAIeAoMmCtcN4DlBEd jDTMJ51B787YGCsY7SIyE5Ea5OblhsG1xQtpRxYldZd216I+pQ/lWbbkoyskzwpRaM4WIPHaTWVN0f2pbpXLztx0SeMBrJSVO7k3i oaQ0gASKJEGHXG8qMYbZWKavYR6CsQVr6QFJbCeq+jeIMm0hir LBWl3wuuxGV229VuVOV7Sm+PeDipGvquXsmFC2wS5+wzRWb1XN fzPZMP8nrUZ7WJ3KY7FcUDQGRRxOFA4z4wOH0fuktpPvk59T/+4/kCMUHHM48TPEwCL7bE5zwD5O4S4/iSB8usud00TWJJ1GQ7bhhM/ouWtZr60cX9Y4u5OLnaAzFE8tSa0MEuzDYkW4ZuGLyZn85ZvOi +oT/syhDY51H6CYA2olb2BK32eOfVAlPMRVFu02nWMTa2WKo8JKqIY 6opULP+nHbHf+ZS633NsFpVeBRimJ1sbtocfjqQ3B2Sc1sXNbn XGTz8HdBy3g/JeB+f/EGG+aMb5rz7s3XZCEe5+R1T6fbiAZWFu9YxaYyEu46vseSOO+S +buK1iXQLPjg1vHdcacNzgmM+JojgGa42ZAxaeFahbvkauYeNd bWZ1dR3ZzzdeOLfPHBrM39KwuOvj5rPDvH0UKzYFD5ixE9BJHo ItASywFpmWs++D2S89o693rACLKF77K5guiWH9OSLsgEapUY6C TMaF7CaA7BFyKMWmj2D7sOLzTR2mPgrHZYQI7Sx0+4BlM6tKld LB+ciBpgzFmBMUII4cm+0TbR2UlENlOecqez1NI7t1+5DzTWVv ydJI5WWlTo8O0Yg+hMh3UFH8vLzc898APzof0BsLjq1qvDQs8e 3rXqxXv3n9TP+YM1P0lz3KcSdy0chkWDPDASA3cIPsfQttglfg I0WKOmyWQmCAongh+YD6o85M4picCFpkp9ABGHPAI4BLMFGQ45 oWR+uLnUyca1LKxsi3lrqbXCmnkJbSVCFESNGFovQE8OwFWC+y IHAQsR3+8M0DQUxFo+hKGMJpSFUowJdwY5qIDU2UPSNUOorA/mx/t3oweuRYWiNCs6o2z3q5a+o5sLT8rZU0P24rvWx64kcjUiW101 iw6V363cuVaumnWCSe2J6QSgeRSQZcL2zoPppvHXWcmMG8WjKU Dw3r7HPr5bEZf2vwk2hepiF/aZgkkpe2XthmQKewb4r6x28z6gcH7jPBEKW+9DmKq1ZyqUz1CS sn0oHbqgj0olVDK6URKGvpUBJcJlab2TW+f+M5DbJKZJGpTJKi RAGQ3SOkDdk3hz9MPWato/b5JtXs8IspshhP9mV1X9O3Udnk3rg0cHj/9e0KQ6wQhJ3rjy3HlAXqME2fUviedWOnrHuxzsvcQSDB9nkTAR SJxD0S61h5F2FVWbfGTgzHTkBjTH9w2OcrxN4Xr+U6ng/MLo8JGpc8E/kfc3eiTyj4Tm8EF6QfgksRJ8kVSktOWJAWrdzj5N/x4zAQPA/fHc+Ktl7N57NqO2sUfJzfpK2v6WpSofxIWIFRjHNK4Bci0sBeZ KrdvnOsy3yNcMeYh2UYSLskong98NPBbzpqB+VLdhwES7akZ6J vwuxO+t8x7ggR2gP58lVG0LodEnmwPLk2JXPQn5YhXqlZtm4Ns 83SuKF8GtTMDDnMKxjjLIUTFHv4fTuWkcuRI2yZ4xAs1gIuPhe oK4QPEmQNqKEsoMqIBW4DfSiy0exziyw/XxlEdpNjmRGzxF+A1FQIEyIfM5eG6JRvkd2p54+k2VjdCEdUEz y90AcM5pgl2/xBM08WFCMMhOmBAAIIPpSWSexpsP2n+X++590mzbOGCzuQCR0C dHoYw50FM+IfCdt5S9Jzd0eDcfYNJXvq7IYk4GaB6iOElkQPGL 9FDGRLHgBQhpEjQ7k0YzV5ydNQZyQplm5ceInOmFmMdRdm7sah GdJwVc/l0yyanAmIpAhfhXJGbP511tm126ouWyC4eQo2auzjT84FA0ayA OjdUVbAnL9gQOGwbrws9ayaKdm6lWPxZYOVViOa8o2n00Hg0Jf LBHV80gTlGZy8j3bNsFwyC07H8WwrlOyKri7dn6jq0JF7/oKJPmvsrk+pF2Ik+DLHMl/yK+U5ncGnn0axltNtmlb00oZvoKwHorTKwWxG+s+DXnrYtb9ns qIFFJNr13tQT2Gn7bi2M+Sq3rDaJthwju8y5s6BhtNd2tOPnBB tywrZ2CuZoGZSZXKe4sfcmhcVl+zKEGFMVeca5JEeHbLzZyZ40 D3eAdAuxD7j/Q0JoG6iaTog1hjnBEYDKDqDGEavnvsB4cupMQWMJMDAGX8kBsN/pcNalEXYIcbONCu3D7vpzDidH8JVvn6JS67x51Hx8U3Cpo5a1/MoKTLiW9hza4NYXL58a3O4L2ZEVPcrGp4HL+xLgtzVM9Gl0BiL aVFPwCQxbkDtGORCNhnTO5yWRqfvjYBEIinDOGCYGZdjvCJoLK nwKF/wLYD3yRc40hLvb9+YJUXiwruDAUMwwokOfVvfKhE/D4reu5j8P7GIiPCWNsYTfcd3fN1DqkOkAJxXdDYb0Uvmqvy0CP yq+DxkSk1EYz4mn+2EFuwhjzymu9WSkbtH+eBtQ8XD4WnnjD8y saXcr3W2ATEsAmcL7hAtiBBvyTcd/pXDtC6DHqRBWnCL9ydTw3sDDSUXcyb2lo/D0486klSGUGF9s777iYT+AF2DjsR1p0Xn0qmgKWPts6jSll/Stnp4181YX8ZsEVfK9cJY8SBkcT6LUIcFNOnGHczcyHUain2Qg 6W5IhCojMtxuU2yr3lxT/ECvZFa2XhI1Jjythg7cZN61qBeZssqtt8GqfyioNsnzxVLdpwF x0lRipRy6N8lg7lPqujMTsLeVBGZe2k/uA4LdtnkAnPr/mvHRG/d8kPCBh1PJI5LE1EH85VtPiBJ8CTj5FwIZ5wrHng5xSQ+gAlrN MF8/32K4NfVKd6aG8aNJOUDJRJAolSgUx0L38rqFN8sWuYBCQ1jdqQ n3okhd0XMyXEcrtvyCG9nXI8eKZ2VStEnqqIPPnY44R4p9Brof kle8lKwTE8CMYKfw64C/X9Cp8zSAmLYRHFIfHxxN4/S22fWv50a6u79AmDIddHkeZJv9YCdBPAZLgiZ7D/Vd6gypyeK+PvIv00WAsVwNeBfCVSjXIcokYKqZYDpPQTn5htLV tsqqW1gdgJCcSXJbNOJeChV9u9SK1no7e1op6vgY/ArxDnD+XigoPghHfMTCGDLhrqVRxe1LTw+WsO5v2wYmxJMJcli oCzoKsALCLpUuUjJRDgbBgbBamGDSDoH2j6mKPwoFF0JtzGd7j loSP9s0x6aXtHNR2/g6wxjSNeYNEbVkp8G3PWIQ8Z2Y7ZwCCe+HAVL8UmPkj9FgwYh8 sL935bKGacco1/X+Q4k4rnLzl0wLGJ8qnl4SlNEZDH/ybrAApGKI5749mrb/U0BxXpAecCu4y1CwjwV2zjHsth2mL9tg4fyD1cv+mlex+Zo5Cn 9ypytmuY5/n0SzRrB5hogJBh0JYlA+INegak4hsz6UqHaoqWX2I9R9IB+7JB 42cjHWiO2G1ix9N7Vf7u0bsnuIdjVj1OC2a0HYb23Pj84flSzJ P4yI46pa/qUHqb8WZrgvwqwYVEfWi9HakouGJOIPGs8E5QSXRoF2qRlbRae gHlvs+pIlyf4LAFlvK1twBAy2pxvV8uZHbapdDdkNIEJi+5AiA VIemq7ZZ34QXPrpUHND/c4fXaJcgOxonIgABLBiuDpyrojULHw22XdS6eblXQSdBumwqA4 FQtRxOzvvXtabyP17JTy1/z+EiPMhiPDGhFO3W8x/OpIXX5IPUAaqCtE4bi3rHOr20g+bz4IY0atet15kDFuRFW1A1G yNzzuyepGXCU99Jtc15rWH0NsuUXNlqK03mE9VRIUdmq5psz4I LshIxEDlliVhRBoAzKXMC8PILInV0+KsKSlJujATyxsvjAg0wx EilAW6BlRNrKNu8drPk3i9xzYagw43ZnZF85Xd1HiCw9Uz7yC9 0Gsia6BDLYwdedFcU7Ii4zhVG+cjk0AYCgjnFRNJAsIYEu35cp BuRSpi9cV16f39Va1XR5D6vyLW3VvF57UBiE8x6gAizhmKiKy0 cb2j+JZ71YCpcwJHYc2HcpGzoiNRORD4bmOeCLjXcMI+oa57sk rxI6kB+uHO6Gi+P+aSuKShgTWvp9scqp3hSaGUPuBSECBNom4Z 0CZMF9nYWXQkpQSh36Y8ItJ4LFESH+pSVECaFndnxa+zWdvAuS 8ARdfPB9DLW9ZC7cNKSQSN0feh6uKL3gLANYEYKhBRz0jEnMqm JV2CNQgZ7PCkn0DMGpuwbogQwGc9CwqxzE1mffHS3rUGd6mqe+ RLVg95P1Nl3tEQK1PbY07EQEXryjBV14ooSIOUQrgvMQ7Zt4CF udom9GyvTBLyf8wKPwNJ3IsHXXg/SfRKCV2DkvvgRK8HG+QH4jkK5vOtuj6VOrN26wkfhezdkCMdDx UK7QGCHwu5/BYvSiIlUfCO6UZmIqpljS9azHe+J4WQ/mLCecvP2H1dHP0M2aCagfnANiLILi/vurPAy5Ycq+eYEnHl2rX0D69N2QrA4qxk2QQVzr7Lzvz0i8+8P u1Gi/ruE/JeIeQsMdN4FrUXhqpLXhlwGOlEVDSkuuZVLmG3QJHvAsQMpDqR SquuqDbZV6/a+q8xzH4jI0wgqS8ZCn+im+sPQ+lJQp1mlsRAVePiMFc3Ca+AF 5gGCnh1J1IXqy2qABW7CwqVZ3s5SX0cUuzoS/aakkFrW0eLqMeUiDkVTZd2Ef33IibzmyCFcBiqHamFw6486Y71 kz40jV0OJhO9MBhIo+pEn7Lqii8fnIgp6hTsEbO6lzNFXxajvl KZ4GXc3FapbSxM3vRi5c2/d6h+qdSeGo/8UBfkgy6irkWefZQ2ESQxgzpVy5peACn8KopBlYC84kBpLEDUe d01Z7+tVbZ81yTGfZDW8jSzrKrzI3dxT21R42gRLX3cY0bEYFC Q2mhzi61oBZ4UyngnIZEsap7eVXPue3JhWlnzPabq/753yxekEZCqoytu4YBcWrokan4EkrA816dHOx3SJOwojM2ccRo 6uzNYtBOQ4pQOgXZDJVeO9GdyKZltC2deiBiPJ68sUAGSOIg6z QEp7OIKSGHCFkIRMnPCTzl1izzmStz92A2VZJO9WHLcFDwHpuB rxx0RfRVNF0WxlijoBZUEJROgeh4Enw6qzePPyeACvN/N3oQQ3gTPBYADo3Z0LaSRrux3IIMSMXrx/JPeemHn3tkfQ+nWCQgI67PDqyJ1xdX+ii3XRKj6iIB4KfiR78A Bz8oqb7oOEPJ/D0fEuC30gy2UkgaMp2j2eA0VHlpVsCO5Jn950+1h5lvj1fNI5l M0HmCoKHSM7kEeE0mUgWelrLnRUfRiT31JEAC+mYJR0ILKtUQU GjQssRhyKsHGFHk2BtwGQlV7gkoXtAcX9F1HG5SI4ZXo7qW/U0qb1tqKsVK6G4pwttp1xYXgoD/lMP0yT5XakQcAQX43UNl8Qw/WfzGUOpVSGAIp5J4UgvqHkkEAQB/CODdBXb0AUATlhEIohOS73L0XmE/xbKaUVivyNPiNlx0LaTwmRJTXA6Bo6XnvP1okUz0S/MOhICBm3wMvZc1L7yPtZg4y7Mjj0brib/S+HoyITuQKtGbJOr289d9Mqj4KkSBPXU9Q2eWHLfshuNKVL8v+ soT71VDdwvV9RJQ3wMDZ91yM/n6iVtb0osmMOCLtvTMBbotieK5Q7yPrQhMI1XvnBS0Udzwl5xy q7pPY0SLoMSGiUtq4GaRjkcf1co+yjhJsImQdBuzLS/ZArjJOcJliktKoWHmqmH8gWPQ3r0O6nyhtYoKI04Jb8/dHLbB/OEsGAlSC3rY5Ogkq9Rjl9r4vGxNP3RWc09OfiBLY9EeneRUtiw 4jstmTQpk7lWkuuW65vkFTbpC2lm3lj2wE0mhAvBSYr78pGAVK jjoR4R8hnG8R9qJXOiilEA5C57FHdSJedgWBC5D9H3AuLAeJk8 McVwnpw8mIDPwDBfiHCY9a9Yv+vY+IyYgNHHAKEeX3oD7XQ/U3RFaAaWSyVeYO4VBVO9w7xkBJ7I9O9dLGF2KKRKQJSRVue0DB d4CDH3OhlqLfqpmAF4SHLfRtm6rz40EMCcwUZxxFCzqrF742Cr TrHXLUiQiXVxtcxbck6SRDIvDATI2dMlymAv4r1POWaqzwwAJI LSXUzKfOGR/WLH4zLomZiahVNN9sUt9PPdgfl32o5Q4gXVgrozVFv5NvhrKJe VWvlBx2eSP3rrgl/EK7Z3WsriQ4FDGyqloKw5w2Qz/iBREAqepO+HHo12cKRoGao0rE7Mqtl3cbOet6r5hBaMroOVgNi HHVcHuZUNG4oJPor0AFeryc3Q//zqT74FNWbeHlqGrT2Zhkw+0tqdtAukESRajtm+iupd5/UpwcbJzdbmu7uLzLKOOpII0kGurJQ+6Jn9YvapdtIItyU7cx6V 7P95M2MRZyp+PYtPGHcjp2T7Q2xwJ5hR4DyeLkWCg0PUBP2Vsx dMGSHFcva3zMzJr8DY9pJfPBuyy3o/hI9bKW4fb8Wb8fVSLmB7csiSjGidjshttpKgRFCWQY8DPvl54l b38O++Stal4B0ZcTuGOD1wCGiDv8NGo98VqMZTFNjaerAPoSpl FihTYfqFm813sFVmvy6u1fB+CYCzWpEMjRwOQ5nxy84+zecNi0 up2nWLZbxF3bq9GAMKv5hansqaz9BlA/vBKSk5CXh7GpAsbb3tMeLOi9SjbUwqGibiJUGlzgendYYACmaZ ob3rl/iLrRYQ9imAb/B8+ByB3CGHnPAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC[/img]

5161 East Memorial Drive Muncie IN 47302

www.modelaircraft.org/gov

765.287.1256 x236


Thought it prudent to go straight to the horse's mouth so to speak than rely on what I'm hearing here from another part of the horse's anatomy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 01-02-2019, 02:22 PM
  #37  
franklin_m
Thread Starter
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Propworn
All you armchair experts make me laugh. Being Canadian and not part of the AMA I needed clarification so around 1 pm I sent an email to the AMA..

From: Prop Worn
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 12:59 PM
To: Ilona Maine
Subject: 400 ft altitude restriction
My name is Dennis Pratt MAAC 52272-L and in the past when I have visited there were no concerns about flying in access of 400 ft. Does this restriction now apply to AMA fields? If so it will change what I may bring to fly when visiting this winter.
Dennis Pratt

Received an answer the same day

Angie Martin <[email protected]>
Wed 2019-01-02, 6:49 PM
You;
Ilona Maine;
Lois Mock;
Lisa Johnson
The FAA does not intend to ground our operations that go over 400’, as long as they are done safely and in accordance with our safety guidelines. At this time, direction from the FAA website confirms you should continue to follow current guidelines and I have attached the letter the FAA sent to us in 2016, allowing flights over 400’ under the criteria of Section 336. I’ve also included a link below to a video discussing the FAA Authorization Act of 2018.
Feel free to call back with any questions or concerns.
https://amablog.modelaircraft.org/am...rization-bill/

Sincerely,
Angie Martin

Government Affairs and Public Relations Assistant

( corrupted image data omitted for brevity )

Thought it prudent to go straight to the horse's mouth so to speak than rely on what I'm hearing here from another part of the horse's anatomy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guessed I missed it. In which branch of the US Federal Government does the AMA reside? Oh that's right. They don't. However, the FAA does. And they're empowered to enforce the law with respect to aviation in the US. And they've said:
"Fly at or below 400 feet when in uncontrolled airspace (Class G)"
Old 01-02-2019, 03:25 PM
  #38  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

So now you are claiming that two AMA representatives have outright lied on two separate occasions?
Old 01-02-2019, 03:44 PM
  #39  
franklin_m
Thread Starter
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
So now you are claiming that two AMA representatives have outright lied on two separate occasions?
I'm saying that they have NO authority to interpret the laws or FAA rules. The FAA does. And the FAA has said, quite clearly in plain language, that to be recreational you have to stay below 400 feet in Class G.

AMA has a financial incentive to keep up the charade that they have influence - decade plus of declining membership and all....
Old 01-02-2019, 03:48 PM
  #40  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

So quit your sniveling and take me up on my offer.
Old 01-02-2019, 03:54 PM
  #41  
Propworn
My Feedback: (3)
 
Propworn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,481
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
So now you are claiming that two AMA representatives have outright lied on two separate occasions?
We have something similar in Canada an overall general rule for all hobby flyers with specifics relating to distance from airports and altitude restrictions. However Transport Canada recognizes MAAC as the CBO and due to our rules and safety record we have a carve out that allows us to fly as we always have. Those not belonging or flying at a MAAC sanctioned field have to follow the general rules. From the letter and the interview it appears to be quite similar to the carve out we have in effect. There was a link to the letter from the FAA but it didn't copy over its on the AMA web site.

We have clubs right next to small airports and some on the end of a unused taxi way. I even think there are 4 or 5 clubs right on an Air Force base using a decommissioned taxi way or runway. These are also carved out from the general rules.

Hey for all I care let ol Franky fly around under 400 ft gnashing his teeth while the rest fly as they have been doing at AMA fields for years or until the AMA says differently. Poor boy is beginning to sound like a two stroke motorcycle NAG NAG NAG bi#ch bi#ch bi#ch LOL.

Dennis

Last edited by Propworn; 01-02-2019 at 03:58 PM.
Old 01-02-2019, 04:14 PM
  #42  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Franklin,So quit your sniveling and take me up on my offer.
Old 01-02-2019, 04:17 PM
  #43  
init4fun
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,358
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
So quit your sniveling and take me up on my offer.
Originally Posted by Propworn
Poor boy is beginning to sound like a two stroke motorcycle NAG NAG NAG bi#ch bi#ch bi#ch LOL.
Originally Posted by jester_s1
I'm going to remind everybody involved in this conversation that the forum rules require civility and respect in your posts. You can disagree without being a jerk. But if you choose not to, please don't post at all. After all, this conversation is just about enjoying toy airplanes. It's not something to get up in arms about.
The moderator has already once politely asked for restraint and decorum in these conversations , are you two THAT desperate for an internet dustup that the moderator's reasonable request means nothing to you ? Once you stop discussing the subject at hand and begin with the personal insults/taunts it becomes plainly obvious that you've lost the point of the discussion and are lashing out in an attempt to save face .

Now , once I see an FAA document dated AFTER the 2018 FAA reorganization act that says certain model aircraft operations are allowed over 400 feet , I'll take that as proof that it's allowed . Can anyone here point out where in the FAA's present hobby drone registration program the permission to fly over 400 feet is granted ? Because search it as I did , I found nothing mentioning 400 feet except for the simple sentence ;

"Fly at or below 400 feet when in unrestricted (class G) airspace"
Old 01-02-2019, 04:26 PM
  #44  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here! Here!

Last edited by Appowner; 01-02-2019 at 04:29 PM.
Old 01-02-2019, 04:31 PM
  #45  
Appowner
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
So now you are claiming that two AMA representatives have outright lied on two separate occasions?
Wouldn't be the first time!
Old 01-02-2019, 05:08 PM
  #46  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Appowner
Wouldn't be the first time!

That question was asked directly of Franklin, NOT you, please stop answering for other people and go back to minding your own business. When I want to hear from you I will direct my question/statement to YOU.
Old 01-02-2019, 05:10 PM
  #47  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by init4fun
The moderator has already once politely asked for restraint and decorum in these conversations , are you two THAT desperate for an internet dustup that the moderator's reasonable request means nothing to you ? Once you stop discussing the subject at hand and begin with the personal insults/taunts it becomes plainly obvious that you've lost the point of the discussion and are lashing out in an attempt to save face .

Now , once I see an FAA document dated AFTER the 2018 FAA reorganization act that says certain model aircraft operations are allowed over 400 feet , I'll take that as proof that it's allowed . Can anyone here point out where in the FAA's present hobby drone registration program the permission to fly over 400 feet is granted ? Because search it as I did , I found nothing mentioning 400 feet except for the simple sentence ;

"Fly at or below 400 feet when in unrestricted (class G) airspace"
Simply taking on the same disrespectful tone of others in this thread. Funny how Franklin and Appowner can do it and you remain silent.
Old 01-02-2019, 05:23 PM
  #48  
ira d
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maricopa County AZ
Posts: 3,249
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Propworn
We have something similar in Canada an overall general rule for all hobby flyers with specifics relating to distance from airports and altitude restrictions. However Transport Canada recognizes MAAC as the CBO and due to our rules and safety record we have a carve out that allows us to fly as we always have. Those not belonging or flying at a MAAC sanctioned field have to follow the general rules. From the letter and the interview it appears to be quite similar to the carve out we have in effect. There was a link to the letter from the FAA but it didn't copy over its on the AMA web site.

We have clubs right next to small airports and some on the end of a unused taxi way. I even think there are 4 or 5 clubs right on an Air Force base using a decommissioned taxi way or runway. These are also carved out from the general rules.

Hey for all I care let ol Franky fly around under 400 ft gnashing his teeth while the rest fly as they have been doing at AMA fields for years or until the AMA says differently. Poor boy is beginning to sound like a two stroke motorcycle NAG NAG NAG bi#ch bi#ch bi#ch LOL.

Dennis
I think the AMA is trying for something like this for the usa but has not been able to officially, it is possible that someone at the FAA has eluded to going along with something Canada has but only unofficially. I think the
AMA needs to be straight up on what is really the facts but I dont think flying over 400' will be a big deal in most cases unless you do something to draw attention to yourself.
Old 01-02-2019, 05:23 PM
  #49  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Appowner
You made the claim of being able to do it. So again, post it yourself on Youtube. As you said, time to put up or shut up!

Old 01-02-2019, 05:25 PM
  #50  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Location of the field.


wda Map


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.