Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > AMA Discussions
Reload this Page >

Solution to AMA frequency problems!

Community
Search
Notices
AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.

Solution to AMA frequency problems!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2006, 01:30 PM
  #1  
50%plane
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
50%plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: California
Posts: 3,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Solution to AMA frequency problems!

Here it is folks! This should solve many of the AMA's frequency problems:

http://www.xtremepowersystems.net/xtremelink.php


50%
Old 09-07-2006, 01:37 PM
  #2  
F106A
My Feedback: (2)
 
F106A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

Assuming it works as advertised.
Here's a discussion of the system in the Jets forum.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_4713742/tm.htm

Notice the real time info available, such as altitude. Wonder if the FAA will pick up on this type of system, as a way to enforce the 400' rule. In case of a problem, we can say in our defense: "I really don't know how high the model is." With this type of system, there will be no excuses or defenses.
Time will tell.
Jon
Old 09-07-2006, 01:48 PM
  #3  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

Wonder if the FAA will pick up on this type of system, as a way to enforce the 400' rule.
The FAA doesn't have a 400 foot rule. They RECCOMEND flying under 400 feet. They have no regulation requiring you to do so. If it wasn't for people in the AMA trying to make an issue of it the FAA may have never written the AC.
Old 09-07-2006, 07:42 PM
  #4  
Silent-AV8R
 
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

The FAA doesn't have a 400 foot rule. They RECCOMEND flying under 400 feet. They have no regulation requiring you to do so. If it wasn't for people in the AMA trying to make an issue of it the FAA may have never written the AC.
Given that the FAA wrote AC 91-57 in June of 1981 I am amused that you can look back in time and cast the "blame" onto the AMA. What events do you think the AMA percipitated in 1981 - 25 years ago, that made the FAA write the AC??
Old 09-07-2006, 10:11 PM
  #5  
abel_pranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL,
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

ORIGINAL: Phaedrus-MMVI

ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot

The FAA doesn't have a 400 foot rule. They RECCOMEND flying under 400 feet. They have no regulation requiring you to do so. If it wasn't for people in the AMA trying to make an issue of it the FAA may have never written the AC.
Given that the FAA wrote AC 91-57 in June of 1981 I am amused that you can look back in time and cast the "blame" onto the AMA. What events do you think the AMA percipitated in 1981 - 25 years ago, that made the FAA write the AC??
You're on the right track and I agree with your point.........but as for details, it was revised 6/81. Think about where the -57 in the document sequence number came from. As for your Q, it prolly was not precipitated by anything to do with flying RC models.

Abel
Old 09-07-2006, 10:27 PM
  #6  
mongo
My Feedback: (15)
 
mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 3,505
Received 80 Likes on 70 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

damn
some new kinda record here.
this one was completely off topic by the 2nd reply. and about 1/2 off in the 1st.
Old 09-07-2006, 10:47 PM
  #7  
KidEpoxy
Senior Member
 
KidEpoxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

wow, the topic was killed off really quick this time.

Guess we just needed a 3rd thread on AC91-57 in the first page of ama threads
along with 400' Limit, and 400' in Heavens Name How
Old 09-08-2006, 07:25 AM
  #8  
littlecrankshaf
My Feedback: (58)
 
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

So... this system will not allow control of aircraft higher than 400' ? Damn FAA![&:]
Old 09-08-2006, 08:40 AM
  #9  
KidEpoxy
Senior Member
 
KidEpoxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

I dont think is had been Alt Neutered by the FAA yet

unless you are too cheap to buy the altimiter optional sensor....
if you dont buy an altimeter, it is dumb to its alt as any other radio
Old 09-08-2006, 12:19 PM
  #10  
SoCal GliderGuider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

Love the title of this tread! Frequency conflicts are an AMA problem! They are! If the AMA didn't have their collective power only heads in the sand there would have been intense support for developing an SS system to eliminate flying field frequency conflicts.

SS is going to eliminate any further "Save The Frequencies" crusades. No more canonizing of elder AMA members. No more bowing to Muncie. No more false gods.
Old 09-08-2006, 01:25 PM
  #11  
exeter_acres
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
exeter_acres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

are you saying that there are no FCC controls over the 2.4ghz range?
Old 09-08-2006, 01:26 PM
  #12  
50%plane
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (5)
 
50%plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: California
Posts: 3,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!


ORIGINAL: SoCal GliderGuider

Love the title of this tread! Frequency conflicts are an AMA problem! They are! If the AMA didn't have their collective power only heads in the sand there would have been intense support for developing an SS system to eliminate flying field frequency conflicts.

SS is going to eliminate any further "Save The Frequencies" crusades. No more canonizing of elder AMA members. No more bowing to Muncie. No more false gods.
Great post! Exactly the point of this thread.
Old 09-08-2006, 10:04 PM
  #13  
e-sailpilot86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: *, WA
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

No more false gods! That got to my Stargate wired brain alright!

Ok, ENOUGH about the 400 ft stuff! Just talk about this ting!
Old 09-08-2006, 10:44 PM
  #14  
KidEpoxy
Senior Member
 
KidEpoxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Solution to AMA frequency problems!

With the kind of data this gizmo will send back, I wonder how far off heads down RC flying is. IR cam on the plane with instrumentation displays for night flying?

sorry, I know it must pain some folks to talk about the thread topic....
dont worry, trolls will send this thread to the dungheap all threads in the AMA forum end up

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.