AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
#1
Thread Starter
AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
OK Guys here is one close to what many have been asking for. This could really be an important change to what has been.
Here below is my first answer to the Blog. Don't let me get ahead of you. Go give Mr. President Dave some subjects that are close to your heart.
Hello Mr. President:
Reference your statement:
"If you have any additional ideas on the type of information you'd like to see in my posts here, drop me an email and let me know.
Dave"
How about some monthly news on:
(1) AMA membership numbers: Renewals, comparability to last year, anything indicating a possible trend for swing back up, How many joining PPP, etc. ?
(2) Feedback reports on last year's TAG program. How many selected clubs really do/did it? No whitewash, just real straight facts. Why the change from merchandise to cash for 08?
(3) The feasability or lack thereof of a Traveling NATs. I'm convinced that such is not feasable but there are those that think it would be the greatest thing since microwave popcorn.
(4) >>> EC Motions, AMA Web site.
"MOTION IV: Moved by G. Fitch (II) and seconded by B. Brown (III) that the Executive Council shall allow each district vice president to establish the number of AVPs in his or her district.
MOTION passed unanimously"
<<<<
Does that mean that a good liberal DVP can make each district member an AVP? [sm=49_49.gif]
To be Continued:
Horrace D. Cain
AMA L-93
The Second Amendment -- The Original and Best Homeland Security.
Founder and Sustaining Member, NRA Second Amendment Task Force.
Founder and Sustaining Member, The American Air Museum in Great Britain
Named Recognition, The National Air and Space Exploration Wall of Honor, Udvar-Hazy Center.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
Edited to rephrase a sentence.
OK Guys here is one close to what many have been asking for. This could really be an important change to what has been.
Here below is my first answer to the Blog. Don't let me get ahead of you. Go give Mr. President Dave some subjects that are close to your heart.
Hello Mr. President:
Reference your statement:
"If you have any additional ideas on the type of information you'd like to see in my posts here, drop me an email and let me know.
Dave"
How about some monthly news on:
(1) AMA membership numbers: Renewals, comparability to last year, anything indicating a possible trend for swing back up, How many joining PPP, etc. ?
(2) Feedback reports on last year's TAG program. How many selected clubs really do/did it? No whitewash, just real straight facts. Why the change from merchandise to cash for 08?
(3) The feasability or lack thereof of a Traveling NATs. I'm convinced that such is not feasable but there are those that think it would be the greatest thing since microwave popcorn.
(4) >>> EC Motions, AMA Web site.
"MOTION IV: Moved by G. Fitch (II) and seconded by B. Brown (III) that the Executive Council shall allow each district vice president to establish the number of AVPs in his or her district.
MOTION passed unanimously"
<<<<
Does that mean that a good liberal DVP can make each district member an AVP? [sm=49_49.gif]
To be Continued:
Horrace D. Cain
AMA L-93
The Second Amendment -- The Original and Best Homeland Security.
Founder and Sustaining Member, NRA Second Amendment Task Force.
Founder and Sustaining Member, The American Air Museum in Great Britain
Named Recognition, The National Air and Space Exploration Wall of Honor, Udvar-Hazy Center.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
Edited to rephrase a sentence.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MAnsfield,
MA
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
Hoss,
With all due respect whats wrong with allowing the DVP's to name as many AVP's as they believe they need to effectively manage a given district. I understand that this could get unreasonable, but frankly I dont think there are that many people willing to step up as an AVP. I htink this is a great step in the right direction. Remember now that in order to be an AVP you need to be a leader member first, so in order for a Liberal DVP to make everyone an AVP, than everyone would first have to apply to be a leader member. So, looking at the number of LEader members ina given district, weeding out the ones that havent done much in recent times then gleaning from that people who WANT to be an AVP, I do not think we are talking about a lot of people. Further, it is up to the discretion of the DVP to name a given number of people to be elevated to AVP status and then the given DVP would be responsible for managing them.
Just saying, more representation is not a bad thing.
With all due respect whats wrong with allowing the DVP's to name as many AVP's as they believe they need to effectively manage a given district. I understand that this could get unreasonable, but frankly I dont think there are that many people willing to step up as an AVP. I htink this is a great step in the right direction. Remember now that in order to be an AVP you need to be a leader member first, so in order for a Liberal DVP to make everyone an AVP, than everyone would first have to apply to be a leader member. So, looking at the number of LEader members ina given district, weeding out the ones that havent done much in recent times then gleaning from that people who WANT to be an AVP, I do not think we are talking about a lot of people. Further, it is up to the discretion of the DVP to name a given number of people to be elevated to AVP status and then the given DVP would be responsible for managing them.
Just saying, more representation is not a bad thing.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL,
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
Hoss-
Tnx for pointing that out. Imagine, an AMA prexy that wants to have a dialog with interested members! Just maybe could result in more interested members...........
Abel
Tnx for pointing that out. Imagine, an AMA prexy that wants to have a dialog with interested members! Just maybe could result in more interested members...........
Abel
#4
Thread Starter
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
ORIGINAL: SSRCCPREZ
Hoss,
With all due respect whats wrong with allowing the DVP's to name as many AVP's as they believe they need to effectively manage a given district.
Hoss,
With all due respect whats wrong with allowing the DVP's to name as many AVP's as they believe they need to effectively manage a given district.
I understand that this could get unreasonable, but frankly I dont think there are that many people willing to step up as an AVP. I htink this is a great step in the right direction. Remember now that in order to be an AVP you need to be a leader member first....
With the low voter turnout, a DVP can easily assure his position by having an AVP in each club. There will always be someone to latch on any position that promises some hint of personal power.
, so in order for a Liberal DVP to make everyone an AVP, than everyone would first have to apply to be a leader member. So, looking at the number of LEader members ina given district, weeding out the ones that havent done much in recent times then gleaning from that people who WANT to be an AVP, I do not think we are talking about a lot of people. Further, it is up to the discretion of the DVP to name a given number of people to be elevated to AVP status and then the given DVP would be responsible for managing them.
Just saying, more representation is not a bad thing.
Just saying, more representation is not a bad thing.
Who will weed them out? Don Lowe (then Pres.) and Bob Underwood (then Technical Director) tried that back in the late '80s. In phone conversation with B.U. he stated he nor Lowe knew why people were made Leader because they were active Contest Directors. Would you have any idea just who might have informed him where the written policy could be found?
Of course it did not take them long to persuade the EC to remove said policy. They did do some weeding. Unfortunately when JW sent a secreary to a school for Robert's Rules of Order, and they discovered how to use the "Standing Rules" to "explain" Bylaws, well the leader was not really of any use anymore, other than just to be one. [&o]
So the AMA Pres. is asking for feedback. I ask him a question about a motion which I did not, in this thread, either condemn or condone.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MAnsfield,
MA
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
Hoss,
I was merely pointing out some thoughts here. I will say that you tend to go back in history a little... I would prefer to allow our new President and EC to be given a chance to turn things around before we condemn them for others actions. I am in D1, Andy is a stand up statesman, I am not worried about him, however, I also do not think Andy should have his hands tied because of some potential problem with another DVP. I would love to be an AVP and maybe run for DVP someday in the future. I like these ideas, I will be watching the impact and implimintation closely.
I was merely pointing out some thoughts here. I will say that you tend to go back in history a little... I would prefer to allow our new President and EC to be given a chance to turn things around before we condemn them for others actions. I am in D1, Andy is a stand up statesman, I am not worried about him, however, I also do not think Andy should have his hands tied because of some potential problem with another DVP. I would love to be an AVP and maybe run for DVP someday in the future. I like these ideas, I will be watching the impact and implimintation closely.
#6
Thread Starter
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
(2) Feedback reports on last year's TAG program. How many selected clubs really do/did it? No whitewash, just real straight facts. Why the change from merchandise to cash for 08?
Mr. AMA President did it up extremely well on this one. Much better than even this pessimist ever expected. Very good background material.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL,
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
ORIGINAL: Hossfly
Please Check the Blog: http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
Mr. AMA President did it up extremely well on this one. Much better than even this pessimist ever expected. Very good background material.
Please Check the Blog: http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
Mr. AMA President did it up extremely well on this one. Much better than even this pessimist ever expected. Very good background material.
Abel
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: tyler,
TX
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: AMA MEMBERS: Here is another NOT-TO-MISS.
ORIGINAL: abel_pranger
Roger that, Hoss. I have long suspected I might like AMA better if we had an AMA President that used his ears to communicate with clubs/members as well as his mouth. This guy is tending to confirm that suspicion.
Abel
ORIGINAL: Hossfly
Please Check the Blog: http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
Mr. AMA President did it up extremely well on this one. Much better than even this pessimist ever expected. Very good background material.
Please Check the Blog: http://www.modelaircraft.org/blogs/pres.aspx
Mr. AMA President did it up extremely well on this one. Much better than even this pessimist ever expected. Very good background material.
Abel