RNC Restrictions
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Waseca,
MN
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RNC Restrictions
A fellow clubmember forwarded the info below to our Club Board. Our field is roughly 20 miles from the Excel Center where the Republican National Convention is being held this week. Should we have been notified?? Does this truly mean we can not fly this week?
Subject: More TFR (Temporary Flight Restriction) Info
> Area B
> Airspace Definition:
> Center: On the MINNEAPOLIS VOR/DME (MSP) 060 degree
> radial at 6 nautical miles. (Latitude: 44º56'38"N,
> Longitude: 93º06'43"W)
> Radius: 30 nautical miles
>
>
> Altitude: From the surface up to but not including
> 18000 feet MSL
>
> Effective Date(s):
> From September 01, 2008 at 1700 UTC (September 01,
> 2008 at 1200 CDT)
> To September 02, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 01,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> From September 02, 2008 at 2100 UTC (September 02,
> 2008 at 1600 CDT)
> To September 03, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 02,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> From September 03, 2008 at 2100 UTC (September 03,
> 2008 at 1600 CDT)
> To September 04, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 03,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> From September 04, 2008 at 2100 UTC (September 04,
> 2008 at 1600 CDT)
> To September 05, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 04,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> D. THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WITHIN
> THIS TFR: FLIGHT TRAINING, PRACTICE INSTRUMENT
> APPROACHES, AEROBATIC FLIGHT, GLIDER OPERATIONS,
> PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRALIGHT, HANG GLIDING,
> BALLOON OPERATIONS, TETHERED AEROSTATS,
> AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL
> FLIGHT OPERATIONS, BANNER TOWING OPERATIONS, MODEL
> AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS, MODEL ROCKETRY, AND UNMANNED
> AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS).
Subject: More TFR (Temporary Flight Restriction) Info
> Area B
> Airspace Definition:
> Center: On the MINNEAPOLIS VOR/DME (MSP) 060 degree
> radial at 6 nautical miles. (Latitude: 44º56'38"N,
> Longitude: 93º06'43"W)
> Radius: 30 nautical miles
>
>
> Altitude: From the surface up to but not including
> 18000 feet MSL
>
> Effective Date(s):
> From September 01, 2008 at 1700 UTC (September 01,
> 2008 at 1200 CDT)
> To September 02, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 01,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> From September 02, 2008 at 2100 UTC (September 02,
> 2008 at 1600 CDT)
> To September 03, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 02,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> From September 03, 2008 at 2100 UTC (September 03,
> 2008 at 1600 CDT)
> To September 04, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 03,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> From September 04, 2008 at 2100 UTC (September 04,
> 2008 at 1600 CDT)
> To September 05, 2008 at 0459 UTC (September 04,
> 2008 at 2359 CDT)
>
> D. THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WITHIN
> THIS TFR: FLIGHT TRAINING, PRACTICE INSTRUMENT
> APPROACHES, AEROBATIC FLIGHT, GLIDER OPERATIONS,
> PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRALIGHT, HANG GLIDING,
> BALLOON OPERATIONS, TETHERED AEROSTATS,
> AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL
> FLIGHT OPERATIONS, BANNER TOWING OPERATIONS, MODEL
> AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS, MODEL ROCKETRY, AND UNMANNED
> AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS).
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ignacio,
CO
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
If you're within the stated area it sounds like you're grounded. Bummer. Hard to believe that model airplanes flying 20 miles from the convention center pose much of a threat. Was there a similar TFR around Denver?
#3
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Waseca,
MN
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
Yes, just found the notice on the AMA site. Unbelievable...
http://www.modelaircraft.org/members...bs/notams.aspx
http://www.modelaircraft.org/members...bs/notams.aspx
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL,
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
Requiring you to pack it in and go home before 4 PM for a couple of days doesn't seem like a great big hairy deal. Promulgating the NOTAMs could be done better, though. AMA has club location and POC data, and an Email broadcast is simple enough.
Abel
Abel
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lexington,
KY
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: daven
A fellow clubmember forwarded the info below to our Club Board. Our field is roughly 20 miles from the Excel Center where the Republican National Convention is being held this week. Should we have been notified?? Does this truly mean we can not fly this week?
A fellow clubmember forwarded the info below to our Club Board. Our field is roughly 20 miles from the Excel Center where the Republican National Convention is being held this week. Should we have been notified?? Does this truly mean we can not fly this week?
Seems to me to be a bit of overkill.
#7
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: daven
Yes, just found the notice on the AMA site. Unbelievable...
http://www.modelaircraft.org/members...bs/notams.aspx
Yes, just found the notice on the AMA site. Unbelievable...
http://www.modelaircraft.org/members...bs/notams.aspx
#8
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Waseca,
MN
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
I just don't think a person needs to have internet access, and know where to ferret this stuff out to know.
The AMA is protecting itself by posting it on their website, but doing nothing else (that I'm aware of) to alert clubs of issues like this.
The AMA is protecting itself by posting it on their website, but doing nothing else (that I'm aware of) to alert clubs of issues like this.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lexington,
KY
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: daven
I just don't think a person needs to have internet access, and know where to ferret this stuff out to know.
The AMA is protecting itself by posting it on their website, but doing nothing else (that I'm aware of) to alert clubs of issues like this.
I just don't think a person needs to have internet access, and know where to ferret this stuff out to know.
The AMA is protecting itself by posting it on their website, but doing nothing else (that I'm aware of) to alert clubs of issues like this.
On the AMA website if you do a search on "Denver, CO" or "Minneapolis, MN", each yields 2 clubs. If you pick the zipcode of one of those and do a 50 mile range it jumps to 23 clubs for MN and 16 clubs for CO. Only the 2 clubs listed with either Denver or Minneapolis addresses show on the city search. The others list neighboring towns. My guess is that many of the other would also lie within the affected area.
I would hope that the AMA would have an active notification for those situations where a NOTAM includes model aircraft rather than a passive list on their website, but apparently not.
#12
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Waseca,
MN
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
Ok, now this gets even more confusing.
If you open this link (off the AMA Website) there are two links listed, and both have different radius's of no fly zone.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/members...bs/notams.aspx
One states 3 miles, one 10 miles, and one 30 miles. Not really sure which one effects model airplanes. I emailed the AMA first thing Tuesday morning and have yet to receive a response...
Anyone?
If you open this link (off the AMA Website) there are two links listed, and both have different radius's of no fly zone.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/members...bs/notams.aspx
One states 3 miles, one 10 miles, and one 30 miles. Not really sure which one effects model airplanes. I emailed the AMA first thing Tuesday morning and have yet to receive a response...
Anyone?
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Manhattan,
NY
Posts: 9,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: BarracudaHockey
The model flying applies to 30nm radius.
The model flying applies to 30nm radius.
So the AMA did their job ... posted the NOTAM ... and even tho they didn't send it to each and every body's email address ... which wouldn't have mattered because most wouldn't have understood it anyway, we are right back where we started. God help this organization ......
#15
Senior Member
RE: RNC Restrictions
It would appear that our Federal Gummit should do a better job of notification. They provide FAR's to whom?
BTW, why exactly would anyone assume that AMA has any responsibility in this? Commercial airline pilots are often ALPA members. Would ALPA be considered at fault for not notifying their members?
BTW, why exactly would anyone assume that AMA has any responsibility in this? Commercial airline pilots are often ALPA members. Would ALPA be considered at fault for not notifying their members?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St Augustine, FL,
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: da Rock
It would appear that our Federal Gummit should do a better job of notification. They provide FAR's to whom?
BTW, why exactly would anyone assume that AMA has any responsibility in this? Commercial airline pilots are often ALPA members. Would ALPA be considered at fault for not notifying their members?
It would appear that our Federal Gummit should do a better job of notification. They provide FAR's to whom?
BTW, why exactly would anyone assume that AMA has any responsibility in this? Commercial airline pilots are often ALPA members. Would ALPA be considered at fault for not notifying their members?
Abel
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lexington,
KY
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: da Rock
It would appear that our Federal Gummit should do a better job of notification. They provide FAR's to whom?
BTW, why exactly would anyone assume that AMA has any responsibility in this? Commercial airline pilots are often ALPA members. Would ALPA be considered at fault for not notifying their members?
It would appear that our Federal Gummit should do a better job of notification. They provide FAR's to whom?
BTW, why exactly would anyone assume that AMA has any responsibility in this? Commercial airline pilots are often ALPA members. Would ALPA be considered at fault for not notifying their members?
I don't think the AMA is responsible for such notifications, but as a service to their members should provide it. Semantics, maybe, but someone in Muncie gets the information either from the FAA directly or through some sort of search. How to make such notification is another question. Perhaps emails to club officer(s) in the affected area.
#18
RE: RNC Restrictions
Actually, this RC restriction isn't the first time something like this has happened either. On 9-11, while the towers were coming down, I just happened to be flying my Sr. Falcon and had no idea what was going on. I was almost arrested for flying during that restriction. Fortunately for me, the local sheriff deputy knows me, knows I've been flying since the early 50's - he was decent enough to fill me in.
It's called "domestic terrorism" - it's the US government terrorizing the American public with fear-mongering.
And YES - I served more than 20 years in the US military. I've earned the right to say it like it is.
Dave Wittich, USAF (Retired)
AMA 767985
It's called "domestic terrorism" - it's the US government terrorizing the American public with fear-mongering.
And YES - I served more than 20 years in the US military. I've earned the right to say it like it is.
Dave Wittich, USAF (Retired)
AMA 767985
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Ozarks,
MO
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
It shouldn't make any diff who he emailed there, Its the AMA, and this was important news. Everybody there should have known about this. If not, then it was the fault of the heads of the org. for not spreading the word among the workers. Its not like there are that many people that work there.
#22
My Feedback: (58)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: here
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: skylark-flier
It's called "domestic terrorism" - it's the US government terrorizing the American public with fear-mongering.
And YES - I served more than 20 years in the US military. I've earned the right to say it like it is.
Dave Wittich, USAF (Retired)
AMA 767985
It's called "domestic terrorism" - it's the US government terrorizing the American public with fear-mongering.
And YES - I served more than 20 years in the US military. I've earned the right to say it like it is.
Dave Wittich, USAF (Retired)
AMA 767985
#23
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: The Toolman
It shouldn't make any diff who he emailed there, Its the AMA, and this was important news. Everybody there should have known about this. If not, then it was the fault of the heads of the org. for not spreading the word among the workers. Its not like there are that many people that work there.
It shouldn't make any diff who he emailed there, Its the AMA, and this was important news. Everybody there should have known about this. If not, then it was the fault of the heads of the org. for not spreading the word among the workers. Its not like there are that many people that work there.
Well, actually it IS important to know who he contacted, because it is THAT person who failed to get back to him. But avoiding that question does make it easier to launch a generalized rant against the AMA.
But since you feel so strongly that the AMA should have communicated this to each and every member, how exactly would you propose that to be done?
#24
RE: RNC Restrictions
IMO the FAA does not veiw rc planes as being much of a threat they
just include them in the advisory to cover the bases so to speak.
When you think of it because the FAA does not regulate rc planes
they have no way to know who is flying what when and where as
they do with full scale. Of course they can contact the AMA but
thats still no guarntee that will get the word out.
just include them in the advisory to cover the bases so to speak.
When you think of it because the FAA does not regulate rc planes
they have no way to know who is flying what when and where as
they do with full scale. Of course they can contact the AMA but
thats still no guarntee that will get the word out.
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Manhattan,
NY
Posts: 9,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RNC Restrictions
ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R
Well, actually it IS important to know who he contacted, because it is THAT person who failed to get back to him. But avoiding that question does make it easier to launch a generalized rant against the AMA.
But since you feel so strongly that the AMA should have communicated this to each and every member, how exactly would you propose that to be done?
ORIGINAL: The Toolman
It shouldn't make any diff who he emailed there, Its the AMA, and this was important news. Everybody there should have known about this. If not, then it was the fault of the heads of the org. for not spreading the word among the workers. Its not like there are that many people that work there.
It shouldn't make any diff who he emailed there, Its the AMA, and this was important news. Everybody there should have known about this. If not, then it was the fault of the heads of the org. for not spreading the word among the workers. Its not like there are that many people that work there.
Well, actually it IS important to know who he contacted, because it is THAT person who failed to get back to him. But avoiding that question does make it easier to launch a generalized rant against the AMA.
But since you feel so strongly that the AMA should have communicated this to each and every member, how exactly would you propose that to be done?