$10k '81 Freq Investigation
#76
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
This thread was bumped for two reasons only , the two reasons that appear in my first post to the thread .
#1 , show the contention in these forums predates my participation here
And
#2 , show that things have been done by the AMA in the past that have raised some eyebrows at the time .
No one mentioned it as being any kinds of attempted rebuttal to any present day conversation .
Except you ....
#1 , show the contention in these forums predates my participation here
And
#2 , show that things have been done by the AMA in the past that have raised some eyebrows at the time .
No one mentioned it as being any kinds of attempted rebuttal to any present day conversation .
Except you ....
#77
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aguanga,
CA
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread was bumped for two reasons only , the two reasons that appear in my first post to the thread .
#1 , show the contention in these forums predates my participation here
And
#2 , show that things have been done by the AMA in the past that have raised some eyebrows at the time .
No one mentioned it as being any kinds of attempted rebuttal to any present day conversation .
Except you ....
#1 , show the contention in these forums predates my participation here
And
#2 , show that things have been done by the AMA in the past that have raised some eyebrows at the time .
No one mentioned it as being any kinds of attempted rebuttal to any present day conversation .
Except you ....
#80
#82
8 years give or take , dating to 2008 , one year give or take before I was a member here . The very age OF the thread is the take home point of my first reason for bringing it back , to show the contention in the AMA forums predates me .
#83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Yes that was one of your points the other was to try to tie in the more recent allegations of fraud to a non fraud related issue from 8 years ago. You had two points. I had two points as well but mine are mysteriously a "show". Are only people who will agree with you allowed to comment now? Not every time it needs to be a battle init
#84
Yes that was one of your points the other was to try to tie in the more recent allegations of fraud to a non fraud related issue from 8 years ago. You had two points. I had two points as well but mine are mysteriously a "show". Are only people who will agree with you allowed to comment now? Not every time it needs to be a battle init
Any further meaning you try to add to that is purely yours alone , and nothing but fiction ....
Last edited by init4fun; 09-23-2016 at 04:29 PM.