Reactor or U-CAN-DO
06-10-2011, 07:47 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (20)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Harlem,
GA
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reactor or U-CAN-DO
Looking at getting a plane for me Saito 82 after pancaking my Funtana 40 in.
looking at the Reactor or U-CAN-Do 3d 40 sze.
if you have experience with either or both,chime in witg pros and cons of both.
I know a lot of it is preference for each individual but I like either one and want to see
if their is preference after flying them.
Thanks
Roy
looking at the Reactor or U-CAN-Do 3d 40 sze.
if you have experience with either or both,chime in witg pros and cons of both.
I know a lot of it is preference for each individual but I like either one and want to see
if their is preference after flying them.
Thanks
Roy
06-10-2011, 09:04 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mumbai, INDIA
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reactor or U-CAN-DO
Reactor
Pros:
1) You can do sharp pattern or 3d. Its a very good docile pattern flier if you prop right
2) Its very light, low maintainence
3) Two piece wing is much sturdier and easy to carry
4) Sharp precision and 3d is possible
Cons:
1) The LG Block is hopeless. If you land hard it will break. The real reason is that it is no block, just ply on which the LG is mounted. The best fix is to reinforce with CF bars from the top meaning you need to take the canopy off and cut open the covering. GP would have done better with a single piece LG. Or you can buy a single piece LG seperately
2) The wings are thin, so it needs to go forward to fly. If you deadstick in the vertical or otherwise, you wont be able to control unless it has gained some airspeed which you can only get if you lose some height (if you have height)
3) Once you reinforce it, either before or after a crash, it gains weight
4) It can take max 14" prop, that too with larger 2.75" wheels. You need to replace the stock wheels
I dont have a UCD but I have a similar airplane called Topstar from Phoenix. That one is 60 size but I have readup enough on the 50 size as well. I guess thats the one you are looking at
Pros:
1) Easy flying airplane, great to fly to get your confidence back, especially after a break
2) Decently sturdily built but no beetter or worse than the reactor 46
3) Doesnt need forward speed to fly. Even after you completely stall it, it will be controllable
Cons:
1) Not as stable as the Reactor in winds
2) You cant fly it fast. The wing is thick, especially at the leading edge. If you do fly fast, the airflow will seperate behing the max camber and cause flutter
3) Prone to flutter. The large control surfaces and fat wing add to this problem
4) 3d capabilities are more mushy, not as sharp as the Reactor. Think of it as a lot of resistance to do 3d
5) Limited pattern capabilities since it cant handle speed
6) In any wind it will be a handful to land
I cant report on the setup issues in the UCD because I dont have that airplane but I have owned 3 Reactors (one I crashed when the engine cut at 15m high hover, there wasnt enough height to recover), one I fly now is scratch&dent and another scratch&dent is still in the box. The only reason I have had three is because I cant get any of the competing on Tower. I also have a Reactor Bipe though, its supposed to be much better but is still in box. It really depends on how you like to fly. I like to fly nice and slow, hence I lean more towards my Topstar (UCD60) with the 91 onboard. But for sunday flying-sports-pattern-hybrid-3d, its the Reactor
I will throw another in the fray- how about the H9 Showtime 50?
Ameyam
Pros:
1) You can do sharp pattern or 3d. Its a very good docile pattern flier if you prop right
2) Its very light, low maintainence
3) Two piece wing is much sturdier and easy to carry
4) Sharp precision and 3d is possible
Cons:
1) The LG Block is hopeless. If you land hard it will break. The real reason is that it is no block, just ply on which the LG is mounted. The best fix is to reinforce with CF bars from the top meaning you need to take the canopy off and cut open the covering. GP would have done better with a single piece LG. Or you can buy a single piece LG seperately
2) The wings are thin, so it needs to go forward to fly. If you deadstick in the vertical or otherwise, you wont be able to control unless it has gained some airspeed which you can only get if you lose some height (if you have height)
3) Once you reinforce it, either before or after a crash, it gains weight
4) It can take max 14" prop, that too with larger 2.75" wheels. You need to replace the stock wheels
I dont have a UCD but I have a similar airplane called Topstar from Phoenix. That one is 60 size but I have readup enough on the 50 size as well. I guess thats the one you are looking at
Pros:
1) Easy flying airplane, great to fly to get your confidence back, especially after a break
2) Decently sturdily built but no beetter or worse than the reactor 46
3) Doesnt need forward speed to fly. Even after you completely stall it, it will be controllable
Cons:
1) Not as stable as the Reactor in winds
2) You cant fly it fast. The wing is thick, especially at the leading edge. If you do fly fast, the airflow will seperate behing the max camber and cause flutter
3) Prone to flutter. The large control surfaces and fat wing add to this problem
4) 3d capabilities are more mushy, not as sharp as the Reactor. Think of it as a lot of resistance to do 3d
5) Limited pattern capabilities since it cant handle speed
6) In any wind it will be a handful to land
I cant report on the setup issues in the UCD because I dont have that airplane but I have owned 3 Reactors (one I crashed when the engine cut at 15m high hover, there wasnt enough height to recover), one I fly now is scratch&dent and another scratch&dent is still in the box. The only reason I have had three is because I cant get any of the competing on Tower. I also have a Reactor Bipe though, its supposed to be much better but is still in box. It really depends on how you like to fly. I like to fly nice and slow, hence I lean more towards my Topstar (UCD60) with the 91 onboard. But for sunday flying-sports-pattern-hybrid-3d, its the Reactor
I will throw another in the fray- how about the H9 Showtime 50?
Ameyam
06-12-2011, 05:56 AM
#4
RE: Reactor or U-CAN-DO
I've been flying the Reactor for about 3 years with a Saito .82 swinging an APC 14X4W prop. This plane 3D's very well and the pull out is not balistic with the .82. I bought some after market CF landing gear since at the time the stock gear was swept back to much causing the plane to nose over. FREE updated gear was being shipped to all customer that ask for it. Never had an issue with the landing gear blocks. The Reactor has very thin wings like a Pattern plane and it does very well at IMAC and Pattern flying. Landings are a breeze with this plane as you can fly it to the ground or cut the throttle and float it in. I had the smaller U-CAN-DO and it had very thick wings and the wind seem to bother it more than the Reactor. The Reactor has issues with the covering peeling off. Far the two that I had the Reactor is a much better flying plane. I'm looking at recovering my Reactor and going electric this time around.
06-12-2011, 06:45 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mumbai, INDIA
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reactor or U-CAN-DO
Tower has fixed the LG in the new kits. It doesnt nose over now. They have also replaced the cheap monokote most were talking about with Topflite monokote and its damn good. Wish they went for 1 piece LG though.
The Reactor will KE to your heart's content. After my hard landing (in which I broke my LG Block, it was deadstick, too close to the crowd, had to turn into the wind even though I had little airspeed or height) I reinforced everything- it gained weight and the 55 was no longer enough. I put in a 75ax and it flies very well now. If you have a 75, you should put that in and then religiously balance the airplane
Ameyam
The Reactor will KE to your heart's content. After my hard landing (in which I broke my LG Block, it was deadstick, too close to the crowd, had to turn into the wind even though I had little airspeed or height) I reinforced everything- it gained weight and the 55 was no longer enough. I put in a 75ax and it flies very well now. If you have a 75, you should put that in and then religiously balance the airplane
Ameyam
