Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Barrie, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    9
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    opinions on Seagull

    H Fellas,

    I am looking at some Seagull models and wanted to get some opinions from other owners on quality, likes, dislikes, quirks and downright failures, if there are any??

    Thank you in advance for any info.

    Dino

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Fayette, AL
    Posts
    272
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I have one Seagull plane. It's the Extra 260. It seems to be a well built ARF at a very reasonable price. Assembley went well with good instructions. Hard wear was of good quality, even had carbon fiber push rods and this was on a $159 90 sizes plane too. I have been flying it for 2 years now with no issues. I think I've more than got my money's worth out of it. The oly thing I can think of negative to say about it is they had the c/g listed at 100mm and that was tail heavy for my style of flying. I think I settled in on about 85mm.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Pisgah Forest, NC
    Posts
    47
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Am currently flying a Seagull Edge 540T fitted with a YS110S. Beautiful flying airplane; easy to assemble, clean lines. I find Seagull models to be great value for your dollar.
    Ken

  4. #4
    tailskid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Tolleson, AZ
    Posts
    7,937
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Two thumbs up from me!
    # 93 in Club Saito; Carl Goldberg Ultimate Brotherhood # 12; Pulse brother # 2;Hellcat Brotherhood #8;P-47 Thunderbolt Brotherhood #18

  5. #5
    Iflyglow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Clintonville, WI
    Posts
    3,791
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull


    ORIGINAL: tailskid

    Two thumbs up from me!

    Same Here.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Palestine, TX
    Posts
    518
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    i enjoy the seagull extra 300 75 i have.
    ST90 and 14x4w
    it flys better than i do
    AMA 908262
    Club Saito 622

    One Trick Pony

    "Yes, but can you do it upside down, backwards, and with your hair on fire"

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Rising Sun, MD
    Posts
    443
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I have two Seagull planes and like both of them. The 90size Yak was absolutely terrible when I first got it in the air. I balanced it to the manual but it was wrong, and the engine thrust was too low. So after getting the CG correct and shiming the engine to zero degrees, it flies very well. It has an OS 120 and has plenty of power to hover and what ever else I ask it to do. The other Seagull is the Extra 300s. I maidened it this weekend and it flew perfectly. Two clicks of up trim and that was it. If I were you, and maybe you already do this, epoxy in three sided stock on all fire wall and bulkhead areas and anywhere else up front you can put it. The vibration eats up fire walls and I have seen more than one come loose. I do this for every plane. It sure can't hurt. Enjoy your plane.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Eb86591.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	112.9 KB 
ID:	1293444   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Sq47629.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	127.5 KB 
ID:	1293445  

  8. #8
    Kostas1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    AthensAthens, GREECE
    Posts
    3,469
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Hi!

    Could you please take and post some pics of your Yak 54?

    It seems so nice!

    Konstantinos
    **Check my gallery for more pictures**
    http://www.rcuniverse.com/community/...y&memid=222042
    Club Saito member #706

  9. #9
    Jetdesign's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    6,939
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Great value. Slightly heavy, good covering, usable hardware, decent instructions...
    Joe Marri
    Enjoying all things aviation.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Concord Twp, OH
    Posts
    1,015
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Seagull from Horizon.....Phoenix from Tower....same company and they all are good flying planes..........[8D]
    John

  11. #11
    Woody218's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    750
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Seagull builds some good stuff! I just finished up the Spacewalker 120, I found it to be one of the best arfs I ever put together.
    AMA #21855
    Gravity always wins...

  12. #12
    Moderator daveopam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    ELK CITY, OK
    Posts
    6,999
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I had their Ultimate. It is agood plane for the money and looks great. Compared to the Goldberg it is heavy and the GB will out fly it.

    david
    I never want to see a crash. But I don't want to miss one either.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    54
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I have owned two Seagull ARFs. The Decathlon and the Ultimate. Both are good flying airplanes and solidly built. Excellent value for the money you pay, and they stand up to a bit of abuse. Components are easy to replace and cheap as well. I dead-sticked my Ultimate into a mature tobacco field and damaged the right wing set leading edges. New wings plugged in and no issues.

    The Decathlon is a bit squirrly on the ground, but they all are...

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Barrie, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    9
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Thank you all for your info and opinions, with your help I have decided and it looks like I will pick up the Seagull 260.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    galway-, IRELAND
    Posts
    62
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    seagull planes are of very good quality. hardware is as good as you will get ,and they don`t cost the earth. BUY ONE NOW!!!.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    335
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I have the "60-90" size Seagull Edge540 V2.. Great airplane.. worth every penny of the 179.00 that I paid for it.. Flies really nice with a Saito 125.. Have had no problems with build quality..

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Qo41201.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	244.3 KB 
ID:	1294355  

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lake Grove, NY
    Posts
    7
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I bought the Seagull Cap 232. Very impressed with the build quality and flew well except a nasty and quick snap out of a slightly tighter roll which would put it into a stall on its back.
    Unfortunately before I could work out how to correct it it happened close to the ground and totaled it.
    Just considering if to get another or switch to AeroWorks Extra??

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mumbai, INDIA
    Posts
    2,125
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Seagull, Black Horse and Phoenix are the same. Actually, they are sister concerns with Phoenix selling well in asian markets, Black Horse and Seagull in European and Americam markets. I have several Phoenix models and one Seagull Edge 46 that is still in the box. Seagull and Black Horse have recently found their way into the Indian market as well. Based on what I have seen, Seagull models are sturdily built but not as sturdy as Phoenix. Phoenix is more sturdily built as most of us fly them from rough fields as against of the the people abroad who fly from tarmac or dedicated fields. In Seagull, the normal reguirements of reinforcing the firewall, LG block apply. But you get a good price with 1st class hardware, usually monokote covering (Oracover), factory pinned nylon hinges (usually), very good hardware etc, some of these can even be obtained in expensive American brands. What you dont get is a lot of choice in models and sometimes manuals are badly written.

    If you are buying a well known model, you should get a lot of data on the net from those who have done it before

    Ameyam
    Preflight check is optional , picking up the pieces is consequential

  19. #19
    Kostas1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    AthensAthens, GREECE
    Posts
    3,469
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I had better success with BH....
    **Check my gallery for more pictures**
    http://www.rcuniverse.com/community/...y&memid=222042
    Club Saito member #706

  20. #20
    Kostas1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    AthensAthens, GREECE
    Posts
    3,469
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Have seen the new Seafire from them ;

    Seagull NEW Supermarine Spitfire AKA Seafire!
    **Check my gallery for more pictures**
    http://www.rcuniverse.com/community/...y&memid=222042
    Club Saito member #706

  21. #21

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lake Grove, NY
    Posts
    7
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    Has anyone flown the Seagull Cap 232 with success ?

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lacona, NY
    Posts
    1,840
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I like Seagull Models. Over all they are very good quality, and the stock hardware can be used. The only model that I didn't like that I built was the Discontinued Seagull Dual Ace, I couldn't figure out the nacelle assembly, I couldn't make anything fit- but I think that was just my lack of building skills more or less than just a bad model.

    Seagull Models uses good grade balsa and ply, and uses real Ultra for it's covering. The stickers are of good quality. With most ARF aircraft they are all a hit or miss kind of thing in the quality department. So if I were to buy one Dual Ace, it might be a horrible ARF kit. If I were to buy another one, the next one would most likely be better.

    Horizon Hobby has fantastic customer service reps to help you with any problems that you might run accross, and they are happy to answer any of your questions. I like them better than Tower, but that's only a opinion.

    The first picture was taken 3 years ago of my first Seagull .90 Extra 260. It had a O.S.91FX in it and I had a ball flying it. I'm sorry to say I did a low knife edge and a gust of wind and pilot error helped me crash it. But the plane was so nice, I bought another one.

    Now the second one has a Discontinued 1983 O.S. FS 1.20 (Before Surpass) in it. I haven't flown it yet, but I'm sure she'll fly nice and I'll have a little more power.

    So if your interested in Seagull Models I say go for it! The pictures and box art doesn't do Seagull models justice. All their models are very good looking and from what I hear, they all seem to fly nice.



    Pete
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Fw26764.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	80.4 KB 
ID:	1632512   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Yw69016.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	129.4 KB 
ID:	1632511  

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    kailua, HI
    Posts
    121
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    i got the .60 size spacwalker and .90 yak 54 good quality best but for the dollar. imo

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    1,038
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull


    ORIGINAL: Oberst

    I like Seagull Models. Over all they are very good quality, and the stock hardware can be used. The only model that I didn't like that I built was the Discontinued Seagull Dual Ace, I couldn't figure out the nacelle assembly, I couldn't make anything fit- but I think that was just my lack of building skills more or less than just a bad model.

    Seagull Models uses good grade balsa and ply, and uses real Ultra for it's covering. The stickers are of good quality. With most ARF aircraft they are all a hit or miss kind of thing in the quality department. So if I were to buy one Dual Ace, it might be a horrible ARF kit. If I were to buy another one, the next one would most likely be better.

    Horizon Hobby has fantastic customer service reps to help you with any problems that you might run accross, and they are happy to answer any of your questions. I like them better than Tower, but that's only a opinion.

    The first picture was taken 3 years ago of my first Seagull .90 Extra 260. It had a O.S.91FX in it and I had a ball flying it. I'm sorry to say I did a low knife edge and a gust of wind and pilot error helped me crash it. But the plane was so nice, I bought another one.

    Now the second one has a Discontinued 1983 O.S. FS 1.20 (Before Surpass) in it. I haven't flown it yet, but I'm sure she'll fly nice and I'll have a little more power.

    So if your interested in Seagull Models I say go for it! The pictures and box art doesn't do Seagull models justice. All their models are very good looking and from what I hear, they all seem to fly nice.



    Pete

    I had the Dual Ace and you are right..........the nacelles are a chore but I did manage to get them to look very good. I also have the Zero which they discontinued. I have to say that both models were very good.
    AMA 16066

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    lancaster, CA
    Posts
    729
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: opinions on Seagull

    I think Seagull arfs are at the high end of the scale, I have assembled a few of them, nice ships. I just can't help but wonder where in Vietnam they are being constructed and shipped from.


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.