Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
#201
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tampa,
FL
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: Tampaflyer
starting to feel this was a troll post.. got us all good... trying to help.. reaching out to a new flyer and trying to make a positive experiance ...
but in the end .. it is th OP's choice.....
etheir way good luck...
starting to feel this was a troll post.. got us all good... trying to help.. reaching out to a new flyer and trying to make a positive experiance ...
but in the end .. it is th OP's choice.....
etheir way good luck...
That damn Tampaflyer trying to be nice he hasn't learned yet ....
#203
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
Just checked his post in 2 other threads, all about not joining a Club, has sim time, foamy and trainer. Blah, Blah, Blah! same show just different thread.
#204
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
Combatpigg: It's silly to draw comparisons between this stuff and full scale flight.
Not at all, both relate to each other. I've been flying RC since '68 (that plane had no ailerons, so rudder was mandatory!), and full-scale instructor since '80 with over 15K hours. Like Hossfly and others have pointed out, those who use rudder minimally are drivers, not pilots.
The reason rudder use is minimal in many modern aircraft (full-size and models) is because many of the bad habits have been engineered out. There is less adverse yaw because the ailerons have higher aspect ratio (narrower chord), and differential is sometimes built in. Look at a 172 vs. a Cub as an example: The 172, being a newer design, has long, thin ailerons with some built-in differential, and produces less adverse yaw. The older Cub has wide, 'barn-door' ailerons with little differential and lots of adverse yaw which needs lots of rudder to coordinate the turn. The 172 still needs rudder to coordinate the turn, just less of it.
We have a chap in our club who has a 1/4-scale Cub. He's had several near-crashes on takeoff, once wound up in the pits narrowly missing two planes, because he's not proficient on rudder. Rudder use is important !
I don't believe you're a troll, but I would encourage you to join a club. It's not wise to fly alone unless it's a Vapor or other tiny aircraft, and the camaraderie is really great. My best buddies are RCers!
#205
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Eagle HeightsQueensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 130
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
I would encourage you to join a club. It's not wise to fly alone unless it's a Vapor or other tiny aircraft, and the camaraderie is really great. My best buddies are RCers!
I've visited many clubs in my area and the vibe of some clubs is different to others. Some are quite officious and love their rules. Others are full of cowboys and some dangerous stuff goes on. I prefer somewhere in the middle but even if either of the extremes was my only choice, I'd still go to a club. The camaraderie is second to none and I always learn things from others, even from the newbies.
#206
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: eddieC
Combatpigg: It's silly to draw comparisons between this stuff and full scale flight.
Not at all, both relate to each other. I've been flying RC since '68 (that plane had no ailerons, so rudder was mandatory!), and full-scale instructor since '80 with over 15K hours. Like Hossfly and others have pointed out, those who use rudder minimally are drivers, not pilots.
The reason rudder use is minimal in many modern aircraft (full-size and models) is because many of the bad habits have been engineered out. There is less adverse yaw because the ailerons have higher aspect ratio (narrower chord), and differential is sometimes built in. Look at a 172 vs. a Cub as an example: The 172, being a newer design, has long, thin ailerons with some built-in differential, and produces less adverse yaw. The older Cub has wide, 'barn-door' ailerons with little differential and lots of adverse yaw which needs lots of rudder to coordinate the turn. The 172 still needs rudder to coordinate the turn, just less of it.
We have a chap in our club who has a 1/4-scale Cub. He's had several near-crashes on takeoff, once wound up in the pits narrowly missing two planes, because he's not proficient on rudder. Rudder use is important !
I don't believe you're a troll, but I would encourage you to join a club. It's not wise to fly alone unless it's a Vapor or other tiny aircraft, and the camaraderie is really great. My best buddies are RCers!
We'll worry about the left stick later.
#207
My Feedback: (41)
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: YearningtoFly
i fly a 4 channel t-28 in the park.....I purposefully stayed out of 3 channel aslearned from the getgo with rudder on the sim
i tighten my turns with judiciousrudder...maybe im doing it wrong
never been up with himwasdirected to him from the field
in our conversation i mentioned coordinated flight, shallow bank angles and rudder usage
and that iswhen he advised me about not using or even touching the rudder with him
i wanted to join at this field due to the bisecting runways
but might look into the other club in tampa
i fly a 4 channel t-28 in the park.....I purposefully stayed out of 3 channel aslearned from the getgo with rudder on the sim
i tighten my turns with judiciousrudder...maybe im doing it wrong
never been up with himwasdirected to him from the field
in our conversation i mentioned coordinated flight, shallow bank angles and rudder usage
and that iswhen he advised me about not using or even touching the rudder with him
i wanted to join at this field due to the bisecting runways
but might look into the other club in tampa
#208
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stephenville, TX
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: 4*60
Well I initially thought he was off the mark but now that you describe your shallow banks and and tightening turns with judicious rudder...it appears you do need to relearn a bit and he was probably not far off. The rudder is there only to make coordinated turns. Ailerons and bank are what turn the aircraft and you tighten turns with bank/aileron. not rudder.
Well I initially thought he was off the mark but now that you describe your shallow banks and and tightening turns with judicious rudder...it appears you do need to relearn a bit and he was probably not far off. The rudder is there only to make coordinated turns. Ailerons and bank are what turn the aircraft and you tighten turns with bank/aileron. not rudder.
Oops. I know you did not mean ONLY, it just made me think of this subject. Got me on my soapbox for a second. Sorry.
#209
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham,
PA
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: YearningtoFly
my point is if i meet certification and posses the requiste ama insurance
why should i have to be a member of a private club to fly over public lands and facility
ORIGINAL: lopflyers
Hey Yearningtofly, not everything is lost. You still can belong to a club whether it is in public or private property.
Hey Yearningtofly, not everything is lost. You still can belong to a club whether it is in public or private property.
All you have to do is follow the rules, stay on the box until the instructor certifies you.
why should i have to be a member of a private club to fly over public lands and facility
#210
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stephenville, TX
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: YearningtoFly
my point is if i meetcertification and posses the requiste ama insurance
why should i have to be a member of a private club to fly over public lands and facility
ORIGINAL: lopflyers
Hey Yearningtofly, not everything is lost. You still can belong to a club whether it is in public or private property.
Hey Yearningtofly, not everything is lost. You still can belong to a club whether it is in public or private property.
All you have to do is follow the rules, stay on the box until the instructor certifies you.
why should i have to be a member of a private club to fly over public lands and facility
#211
My Feedback: (49)
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
Is this thread really a DUES thing? If so, I can kind of understand your position. We don't pay dues at our club, so I cannot even relate if this is the issue. If dues were expensive, I would probably feel the same way. Sometimes dues can be used as a tool to limit who can join a club (the undersirables), which I would not agree with. Dues can also be used to pay the necessary expenses that clubs have which I would agree with. I was told that our club used to have dues with all the official crap and procedures that goes along with a club. When the members finally got into a huge fight, they split into to two clubs, and that all changed. Now neither club charges dues and do not have officers. There are still safety rules, that should never change. I participate and enjoy both clubs. Even the AMA membership is recommended but not required. I guess we could be considered an outlaw field. Anybody can show up and fly or just visit. Personally, I hope that never changes.
If there are NO DUES who pays for the grass cutting field maintance and most important the Port-A-John? Just wondering. Last year it cost us $52,000 to put an inch and half of asphault on top of our 100' x 750' runway. With out dues and 6 for profit fling events per year we'd be flying off the desert dirt.
#212
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stephenville, TX
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: HoundDog
Is this thread really a DUES thing? If so, I can kind of understand your position. We don't pay dues at our club, so I cannot even relate if this is the issue. If dues were expensive, I would probably feel the same way. Sometimes dues can be used as a tool to limit who can join a club (the undersirables), which I would not agree with. Dues can also be used to pay the necessary expenses that clubs have which I would agree with. I was told that our club used to have dues with all the official crap and procedures that goes along with a club. When the members finally got into a huge fight, they split into to two clubs, and that all changed. Now neither club charges dues and do not have officers. There are still safety rules, that should never change. I participate and enjoy both clubs. Even the AMA membership is recommended but not required. I guess we could be considered an outlaw field. Anybody can show up and fly or just visit. Personally, I hope that never changes.
If there are NO DUES who pays for the grass cutting field maintance and most important the Port-A-John? Just wondering. Last year it cost us $52,000 to put an inch and half of asphault on top of our 100' x 750' runway. With out dues and 6 for profit fling events per year we'd be flying off the desert dirt.
Is this thread really a DUES thing? If so, I can kind of understand your position. We don't pay dues at our club, so I cannot even relate if this is the issue. If dues were expensive, I would probably feel the same way. Sometimes dues can be used as a tool to limit who can join a club (the undersirables), which I would not agree with. Dues can also be used to pay the necessary expenses that clubs have which I would agree with. I was told that our club used to have dues with all the official crap and procedures that goes along with a club. When the members finally got into a huge fight, they split into to two clubs, and that all changed. Now neither club charges dues and do not have officers. There are still safety rules, that should never change. I participate and enjoy both clubs. Even the AMA membership is recommended but not required. I guess we could be considered an outlaw field. Anybody can show up and fly or just visit. Personally, I hope that never changes.
If there are NO DUES who pays for the grass cutting field maintance and most important the Port-A-John? Just wondering. Last year it cost us $52,000 to put an inch and half of asphault on top of our 100' x 750' runway. With out dues and 6 for profit fling events per year we'd be flying off the desert dirt.
Listen, I understand the dues thing. Clubs have expenses and must be paid by the members. As I said, totally in agreement with that. When I said I understand, he may not can afford the dues which gives him no place to fly in a club. This may frustrate him, because as he mentions it is on public land that the taxpayers pay for, including him. Not realizing there are club expenses that are required just to keep it a decent flying field.
Oh, and your 100' x 750' runway, VERY NICE. Our asphault is only 10' by 600' (the part loaned to us) it is at the end of about 1/2 mile runway. It also has nice bermuda grass, cactus and thorns on both sides. You get what you pay for, huh? LOL
#214
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stephenville, TX
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
ORIGINAL: lopflyers
[X(]Ohhhhh, that should be awesome, a club w asphalt runway and no fees.
[X(]Ohhhhh, that should be awesome, a club w asphalt runway and no fees.
But personally, if it did not have asphault it would not bother me. I can take off and land all the planes I own from grass (well, except for my P-51 with retracts). And that is from my little electrics to my 28% Extra 260. I kinda prefer the grass. Easier on the equipment when you mess up. Also slows the big extra down quicker. You just need to check for holes occasionally. I was taxing my Extra slowly in the grass back to the pits when one side of the gear fell into a hole so big, the left wing hit the ground. You know that was a big hole for that size plane to bottom out. Glad I didn't hit it when I landed!! Darn animals.
#215
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Gas RC was a mistake !!!!
Rudder is also used to counter the P-factor on takeoff and crosswind takeoffs and landings. More than anything, I wish more people would learn to use the rudder to counteract the P-Factor on takeout and quit scaring the crap out of me. I have seen so many times the pilot give the plane full throttle on takeoff, plane shoots off to the left, off the runway, with no elevator (tail dragger to keep the tail down) to allow good positive steering until takeoff speed is reached. Luckily so far, when they did crash, it was into the fence and bushes. I think I am going to start offering training on this subject the next time it happens. In addition, I am going to include in this training to throttle back to idle when you see you are in trouble instead of crashing full speed into the fence and bushes to limit airframe damage.
Oops. I know you did not mean ONLY, it just made me think of this subject. Got me on my soapbox for a second. Sorry.
[/quote]
In one of the clubs I belong to there was an accident recently due to this, the pilot never applied rt rudder, the plane verged to the left big time and hitted another pilot that was flying peacefully. Common sence, either give rudder or kill the throthle and try again