how much harder would it be
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ripley,
MS
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how much harder would it be
recently crashed my big stick look at before and after pic made front of fuse with coroplast and and making it a tail dragger now how much harder will takeoffs and landing be never flew dragger before
#2
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbia,
SC
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
Landing isn't much different. Takeoff is a bit more challenging since it requires that you do a few more things. If you were comfortable taking it off as a trike, the taildragger should present an interesting, but manageable challenge.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sarnia, ON, CANADA
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
The biggest difference is the takeoff, with a tri most just go to full power and zoom down the runway.
With a Taildragger you have to apply the throttle slowly and build up you speed. Why? Thr torque from the engine will induce a ground loop, you have to have a decent speed built up before the rudder can hold the plane in place and taxi strait. Landings are easy with a dragger.
With a Taildragger you have to apply the throttle slowly and build up you speed. Why? Thr torque from the engine will induce a ground loop, you have to have a decent speed built up before the rudder can hold the plane in place and taxi strait. Landings are easy with a dragger.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
knightmagic,
I don't know if you have a thread about the rebuild, but make sure the CG is on. After every rebuild, the plane will weigh different, espeacially when changing materials entirely.
Hope it helps
Chad
I don't know if you have a thread about the rebuild, but make sure the CG is on. After every rebuild, the plane will weigh different, espeacially when changing materials entirely.
Hope it helps
Chad
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ripley,
MS
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
definately will be checking cg before takeoff was kinda wondring though normal big stick cg is 4" it should stay roughly about the same I'm guessing?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Spring Hill,
FL
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
CG doesn't change unless you change the size or location of a flying surface.
I think you're making a good decision to convert to tail-dragger. They weigh less, are easier to build (and maintain) and have less drag.
Good advice about throttling up slowly and also about taxiing around a bit to feel it out. Be sure to put an air-filter over the carb so you don't suck a lot of dirt into the engine. A piece of ladies hose rubber banded on will work.
I think you're making a good decision to convert to tail-dragger. They weigh less, are easier to build (and maintain) and have less drag.
Good advice about throttling up slowly and also about taxiing around a bit to feel it out. Be sure to put an air-filter over the carb so you don't suck a lot of dirt into the engine. A piece of ladies hose rubber banded on will work.
#8
RE: how much harder would it be
[quote]ORIGINAL: CafeenMan
CG doesn't change unless you change the size or location of a flying surface.
You may want to rethink that statement !!!! If I change the material I use to rebuild and it is heavier then the original it IS going to change the CG. That would be like adding or subtracting weight from some where. Besides, anytime you work on a plane it is a good idea to check the CG.
ENJOY !!! RED
If I rebuild the tail with OAK instead of balsa, it's sure going to be one heck of a take off !!!!
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Greenville,
WI
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
What CaffeenMan is saying is that the location of the CG doesn't change. You may need to rebalance, but the point you use to do so remains the same.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Springtown,
TX
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
That would be up elevator--to keep the tail pinned while taxiing (some use down elevator when taxiing away with the wind--to keep wind from getting underneath the horizontal stab). I don't do this, I just use the neutral elevator position when taxiing with the wind. Release this elevator, though, prior to the takeoff roll. With some tail draggers (especially some warbirds), a touch of up elevator is needed during the takeoff roll to keep the nose from powerdiving, but this won't be an issue on your stick, if you located the mains far enough forward. A good idea is to put the axles even with the leading edge of the wing, and your nose overs should be minimal, or non existent!
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camarillo,
CA
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: how much harder would it be
I don't do this, I just use the neutral elevator position when taxiing with the wind.