Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Pattern Universe - RC Pattern Flying > Classic RC Pattern Flying
Reload this Page >

Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

Notices
Classic RC Pattern Flying Discuss here all pre 1996 RC Pattern Flying in this forum.

Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

Old 08-01-2008, 08:56 AM
  #76  
captainv24
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: H\'sluis, NETHERLANDS
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III


ORIGINAL: rainedave

Sorry, I posted at 6:52am my time. I'm not completely awake. I meant to type vertical stab and fin.

I was looking at the grain direction in the plan deatails in post #65.

I like your aileron servo setup. I feel like these Kraft designs need to retain their barn door ailerons. Looks great!

David
Hmm, now I am lost at 3:55pm

For my understanding, could someone please clarify the differences between vertical stab and fin?


Old 08-01-2008, 09:00 AM
  #77  
Taurus Flyer
 
Taurus Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Almelo, NETHERLANDS
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

CaptainV24
There is no difference

You have horizontal stab and vertical stab
So you cannot use stab, only verical stab when you mean the fin.

I think David did mean horizontal stab and fin.
Even when he says he is awake he is still sleeping I think.

He also could have said tail planes, then you have all.

And so on, horizontal tail planes, vertical tail plane.



Cees
Old 08-01-2008, 09:38 AM
  #78  
rainedave
My Feedback: (1)
 
rainedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

I guess I still wasn't awake.[] I'll try one more time:

Vertical Stab and Rudder.

At any rate, my question wasn't concerned with terminology; I was asking about the grain direction. Sorry for the confusion I created.

David
Old 08-01-2008, 06:35 PM
  #79  
Taurus Flyer
 
Taurus Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Almelo, NETHERLANDS
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

Hello Rainedave,

You mean the grain direction "of the core", from the vertical stab and rudder.

"Sorry for the confusion I creat" is not the right phrase, I only was interested!
Do you know why?

Even the core of the rudder, elevator and ailerons of my planes have 2 directions.
I do use a "thin strip of triplex "plywood"", 1 mm x 10 mm in the backside of every rudder, elevator and aileron to keep them sharp.

Cees
Old 08-01-2008, 09:26 PM
  #80  
rainedave
My Feedback: (1)
 
rainedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

Hi Cees. No, my first question to captainv24 was if he had a vertical grain core in his vertical stab and rudder, since the outside sheeting is running horizontally. Then, I looked at the plan details he posted and saw that they show vertical grain outside sheeting. I should never have brought it up; it's just that I've never seen horizontal grain tail surfaces before. So, I assumed that there was vertical grain wood sandwiched inside (like balsa plywood).

Thanks,
David
Old 08-01-2008, 11:11 PM
  #81  
Taurus Flyer
 
Taurus Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Almelo, NETHERLANDS
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

Hello David,

We both know the way to do it is the way on the drawing, that's stronger.
I often do NOT make the tail planes massive, also the rudders
So hanging location massive, tips and roots masieve, 1 mm plywood in the backside, and some "strips" divided. for all rudders.

Cees
Old 05-20-2012, 02:31 PM
  #82  
madmodellerbamford
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wolverhampton, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Phil Kraft Kwik-Fli Mark III

H Boing727, that's a classy and excellent covering scheme you have produced there. I am impressed. May I ask whether you have used nylon or one of the covering films that are so popular these days. I have got one of these aircraft on the back burner and I was thinking of using nylon doped onto the airframe and then spray on a colour scheme.

Regards.....Tony.
Old 04-09-2018, 02:42 AM
  #83  
Nello73
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Maiden fly kwik fly mk3

Originally Posted by madmodellerbamford
H Boing727, that's a classy and excellent covering scheme you have produced there. I am impressed. May I ask whether you have used nylon or one of the covering films that are so popular these days. I have got one of these aircraft on the back burner and I was thinking of using nylon doped onto the airframe and then spray on a colour scheme.

Regards.....Tony.
hi All, I have built and flown my kwik fly mk3 yesterday. Beautiful model and almost impossible to stall it

Can I ask what deflection in degree for the aileron as I found mine too much responsive​​​​​​. I had more or less more than 20 deg!
I read in this forum 12 -13 deg would be suitable dor this plane.
can you please confirm it
many thanks in advance
Nello
Old 04-11-2018, 09:02 AM
  #84  
UStik
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Augsburg, GERMANY
Posts: 1,017
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I have the "German" plans from FMT and the accompanying article recommends even less throw. What they recommend in millimeters results in 11 degrees up and 10 degrees down (some differential).
Old 04-11-2018, 12:48 PM
  #85  
madmodellerbamford
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wolverhampton, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Nello73. The problem with your aileron movement is that you have got far too much movement, and if it is equal up and down, then you may well be getting drag from the down-going aileron. The accepted rule is that there should be more up aileron than down aileron. You can do this mechanically, by offsetting the control rods on the servo disc, ( I will have to refer to my bible in my shed for the full detail), or if you have a servo in each wing for the ailerons, then some transmitters allow you to adjust aileron differential electronically. It does make a difference, and I would certainly cut down the movement that you have now to half, test fly and increase the movements until you are happy with the flying!!!
Old 04-12-2018, 02:43 AM
  #86  
Nello73
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UStik
I have the "German" plans from FMT and the accompanying article recommends even less throw. What they recommend in millimeters results in 11 degrees up and 10 degrees down (some differential).
thanks Ustik that s what I thought
Nello
Old 04-12-2018, 02:47 AM
  #87  
Nello73
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmodellerbamford
Hi Nello73. The problem with your aileron movement is that you have got far too much movement, and if it is equal up and down, then you may well be getting drag from the down-going aileron. The accepted rule is that there should be more up aileron than down aileron. You can do this mechanically, by offsetting the control rods on the servo disc, ( I will have to refer to my bible in my shed for the full detail), or if you have a servo in each wing for the ailerons, then some transmitters allow you to adjust aileron differential electronically. It does make a difference, and I would certainly cut down the movement that you have now to half, test fly and increase the movements until you are happy with the flying!!!
Thank you madmodellerbamford,
I have two servos with a Y wire but you made me think and I have just discovered that my futaba 6EX allows aileron differential if you connect channel 1 and 6!
Will try that.
cheers
Old 04-12-2018, 12:27 PM
  #88  
madmodellerbamford
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wolverhampton, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi again Nello73. I am glad you found the info useful. You really only need large throws on aerobatic or 3D type of aircraft. Your rudder could be left at 20 degrees either side, It is often the most powerful control when you are getting near the stall, that is the time when the ailerons are next to useless. They require airspeed to do their job. Likewise the elevator, 10 or 15 degrees of movement is usually enough. Just a bit of useless information for you, I am currently building Phil Krafts Ugly Stik, a 62 inch span model.
I spent a very wet day in my shed today, in Bilston, West Midlands in the UK, cutting out and sanding up 17 main ribs and 14 sub-ribs ready to start building up the wing, over the weekend, unless my wife has other ideas???? Amongst my planes to build are the Kwik Fli 111 and the DHC Beaver Utility aircraft. Hope I get them all finished. After all, I am only 77 years old, so no sweat there then!! Enjoy your flying. Regards,,,Anthony

Last edited by madmodellerbamford; 04-12-2018 at 12:29 PM. Reason: Mis-spelt words
Old 04-12-2018, 02:58 PM
  #89  
Nello73
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmodellerbamford
Hi again Nello73. I am glad you found the info useful. You really only need large throws on aerobatic or 3D type of aircraft. Your rudder could be left at 20 degrees either side, It is often the most powerful control when you are getting near the stall, that is the time when the ailerons are next to useless. They require airspeed to do their job. Likewise the elevator, 10 or 15 degrees of movement is usually enough. Just a bit of useless information for you, I am currently building Phil Krafts Ugly Stik, a 62 inch span model.
I spent a very wet day in my shed today, in Bilston, West Midlands in the UK, cutting out and sanding up 17 main ribs and 14 sub-ribs ready to start building up the wing, over the weekend, unless my wife has other ideas???? Amongst my planes to build are the Kwik Fli 111 and the DHC Beaver Utility aircraft. Hope I get them all finished. After all, I am only 77 years old, so no sweat there then!! Enjoy your flying. Regards,,,Anthony
Kwik fly mk3 is my third scratch built.I maiden it last sunday but I had trouble with my OS55 and three engine failures which I found later due to bad fuel as I used old oxidized nitro! but I managed to bring back the model safe on ground. It has a ver good and gentle stall and fly so slow.

I love 70s pattern planes they just fly naturally and relatively easy and cheap to build. Next in the pipe is Curare by Hanno Prattner. I got plans from Kato Model it seems ok to build not too difficult and with enough details.

I spent 6 years working in the uk and left many good friends there. Somerset and Bristol. Beautiful countryside. Cant say that for the weather though 😂
Enjoy Happy flights
cheers
Nello
Old 04-04-2020, 01:44 PM
  #90  
rclbsimmo
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: , IN
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If I remember right, My Top Flight Kwik Fly III had fully sheeted wings?? But it looks like the original plans were open structure on the wings??
Lee

Last edited by rclbsimmo; 04-04-2020 at 05:55 PM.
Old 04-13-2020, 12:07 PM
  #91  
Nello73
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rclbsimmo
If I remember right, My Top Flight Kwik Fly III had fully sheeted wings?? But it looks like the original plans were open structure on the wings??
Lee
hi Lee, I have used MK plans for the build and it wings are open not fully sheeted. Fly beautifully the kwik. OS55 engine.
Nello
Old 04-13-2020, 04:07 PM
  #92  
rclbsimmo
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: , IN
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

OK, Thanks....I will use a OS 55 in it as well...
Lee
Old 04-14-2020, 12:03 AM
  #93  
Nello73
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rclbsimmo
OK, Thanks....I will use a OS 55 in it as well...
Lee
it is a perfect match. Mine weights 3,5 kg with fuel.
Here is the link to my build log:
https://www.baronerosso.it/forum/aer...ml#post5107560
happy flights!

Last edited by Nello73; 04-14-2020 at 12:08 AM.
Old 02-12-2022, 12:17 AM
  #94  
paulinfrance
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ales, QC, FRANCE
Posts: 96
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have just ordered my kit from Germany, I have a Rossi .40 and an OS .46AX, I will probably put the OS in it as it looks around the same power as when I first saw one fly in 1970 it had an OS .60 Gold Head, I will be covering it with silk and paper, then 2 pack Polyurethane paint.

But retracts or fixed undercarriage ?.
Old 09-09-2022, 04:43 AM
  #95  
rctoni0711
Junior Member
 
rctoni0711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks. Nice retro plane.
Old 09-09-2022, 07:28 AM
  #96  
paulinfrance
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ales, QC, FRANCE
Posts: 96
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rctoni0711
Thanks. Nice retro plane.
Opps I forgot, all finished with electric retracts a really nice easy plane to fly.https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...rman-kit-build

He is my 'build',,,

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.