Why is a pz vapor not ok over houses, with no cam? Chris you just posted without stating your take on three issues, this is called group trolling.
Matt is still on point, initially he said yes to toy planes now we're revising. Unless he strictly flies them at AMA sanctioned fields out of town. If you do it from your yard, you are a double standard, weight issue guy, but not against house flying
Matt, for the 50the time I think AMA compliant park flyers are double standard non thinkers, that's where I stand. For them to think their plane can't veer off sideways is stupid. I fly when nobody is out, zero, that's the difference its been well covered.
Three points for each poster to review before opining:
1 how does google earth factor in to privacy comparisons
2 how you justify park flying with people at the park
3 what size toy plane you'd allow on your block, over and around your house, with or without cam. Matt won't actually delve into this, just flip flop a little.Be specific, why no plantraco 2gm ultra lights, no cam?
Keep trolling by not discussing these recurring themes.
To say you wouldn't allow a kid to fly his vapor on a calm evening all over the block is evidence of saying anything to avoid revising a standard you thought you held, that can be embarrassing.
When someone sets a poll, or asks me to review three topics before posting I do. But when discussing anti urban fpv, basic post respect is out the window in favor of initially lies, then subtle peeling of the onion to reveal double standards.
Caption the three issues and reply, then insert opinion whoever posts next
Matt we know you are clear about the park flying part, its been proven safe to you, good. The only parts not explained was your reasoning on the vapor or where you actually fly