Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

View Poll Results: Should the AMA endorse and support FPV?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes They Should Support FPV

    9 42.86%
  • No They Should Not Support FPV

    12 57.14%
Results 1 to 11 of 11

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Posts
    925
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    AMA Supports FPV and Multi-Rotor

    Do you think the AMA should endorse and support FPV?

    Yes

    No
    RC Aircraft/ Three Laws Safe.

  2. #2
    MajorTomski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Posts
    2,389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Umm...they have. So what's your point/issue?

    http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/550.pdf
    Spitfire Brotherhood #6
    Kadet LT 40 Brotherhood #98

  3. #3
    I voted yes , and here's why ;

    The AMA already has in place , as Major Tom has said , guidelines for the safe use of not only FPV but of multirotor craft as well . To examine the suggested use for AMA condoned FPV you must have a spotter who has line of sight view of the craft at all times during the flight , with the presumption that the craft won't be flown further than the spotter can see it . This , by the LOS requirement for the spotter, is going to ensure that the craft remains pretty darned close to the flying field where it's being operated from . Now I darned right well know that these folks flying them over people's houses are not following ANY of the AMA guidelines and are not covered within the AMA's sanctioned description of such models . If your question was "unrestricted FPV" , as in the dolts who don't follow the AMA's guidelines and DO fly them miles away from their non existent LOS spotter's view , well then yea , that kind of behavior should be , and is I would hope , frowned upon by the AMA just as flying outside of any of the other guidelines would be as well ....
    Last edited by init4fun; 11-07-2013 at 10:24 AM.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Posts
    925
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by init4fun View Post
    I voted yes , and here's why ;

    The AMA already has in place , as Major Tom has said , guidelines for the safe use of not only FPV but of multirotor craft as well . To examine the suggested use for AMA condoned FPV you must have a spotter who has line of sight view of the craft at all times during the flight , with the presumption that the craft won't be flown further than the spotter can see it . This , by the LOS requirement for the spotter, is going to ensure that the craft remains pretty darned close to the flying field where it's being operated from . Now I darned right well know that these folks flying them over people's houses are not following ANY of the AMA guidelines and are not covered within the AMA's sanctioned description of such models . If your question was "unrestricted FPV" , as in the dolts who don't follow the AMA's guidelines and DO fly them miles away from their non existent LOS spotter's view , well then yea , that kind of behavior should be , and is I would hope , frowned upon by the AMA just as flying outside of any of the other guidelines would be as well ....
    I am well aware of the AMA's guidelines for FPV but that is not what prompted me to start this poll.

    As recently as last summer there were two camps and one was saying that the AMA was trying to distance themselves from FPV and Multi-rotor, not sure where that came from. My thoughts are that RC is RC no mater how it is packaged and as always common sense goes a long way in how it gets used.

    My neighbor and I built a fairly sophisticated FPV slow Stick with a moveable camera, .75 watt (input) 2.4 GHZ transmitter using MMICs and we even had GPS screen overlay. This was in early 2006 so it was not called FPV yet. We tried using only a video screen to fly it and found that it was difficult to fly without a direct line of sight to the airplane since the view through the camera didn't give enough information even with speed and altitude displayed. The problem was that we had no way to accuratley guage the attitude in a turn. The only reaon I mentioned this is so that other will know that I was among the first to do model FPV on a small scale electric plane so I'm not just blowing smoke here.
    We sort of gave up on FPV after the novelty wore off in favor of experimenting with high efficiency (extended flight) electrics and are still doing that now.

    I recall the AMA came out with FPV guidelines around 2008 and I think they have since ammended them.

    Which brings me to this: http://rcadvisor.com/relaxed-ama-fpv-rules-coming and this is why I started the poll.

    I would like to get the communities input of this given some recent flak from the FAA.
    Last edited by topspin; 11-07-2013 at 11:25 AM.
    RC Aircraft/ Three Laws Safe.

  5. #5
    MajorTomski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Posts
    2,389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    But your questions are right up there with: "Have you decied to stop beating your wife?" Yes or No?

    The AMA IS supporting the development of HOBBY RELATED FPV. They've done that. What more do you want?
    Spitfire Brotherhood #6
    Kadet LT 40 Brotherhood #98

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Posts
    925
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTomski View Post
    But your questions are right up there with: "Have you decied to stop beating your wife?" Yes or No?

    The AMA IS supporting the development of HOBBY RELATED FPV. They've done that. What more do you want?
    Just because the AMA supports it doesn't mean that everyone in the hobby does. The AMA has, on occasion, done some things that did not reflect the majority of the members. I just want to hear what others think, that's all.
    RC Aircraft/ Three Laws Safe.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTomski View Post
    The AMA IS supporting the development of HOBBY RELATED FPV.
    Well said Tom , as well it should .


    I think all too often these discussions loose sight of whether we are talkin AMA condoned FPV vs unrestricted FPV . I believe that what the AMA has set out for guidelines will result in FPV that is just as safe as anything else in our hobby . I also believe that unregulated dolts flying them through neighborhoods should be shunned as having no connection to the majority of folks who do follow the rules . We don't blame cars every time some drunk causes a wreck , we blame the rulebreaker who drank and drove while drunk . I see no reason to blame any kinds of model plane for the acts of the rulebreakers who get their hands on them , either .

  8. #8
    Moderator AMA 74894's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Spicer, MN
    Posts
    1,141
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    yes, the AMA should endorse and support FPV in the same way that they do Turbines.
    while following AMA safety guidelines. (which should also be reviewed, discussed and updated.)
    I completely agree with what Major Tomski and init4fun have described.
    it's the AMA setting the rules and members following them that sets us apart from your basic rogue FPV guy with a big wallet and not much knowledge.

    just my $0.02
    Jim Buzzeo AMA 74894
    P-51 Mustang Brotherhood #37
    Sig Brotherhood #95

  9. #9
    MajorTomski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Posts
    2,389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    But your question/poll doesn't ask the same question you've asked in post #6.

    Why not start a thread asking are the AMA member's who read this thread in favor or against FPV?

    By the way, watch the video:
    http://view.exacttarget.com/?j=fe591...027c771373&r=0
    Spitfire Brotherhood #6
    Kadet LT 40 Brotherhood #98

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Posts
    925
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTomski View Post
    But your question/poll doesn't ask the same question you've asked in post #6.
    Nor was it meant to, it simply asks the question of AMA members do you or do you not think the AMA should endorse and support FPV? I just read an article on the AMA website saying the president of the AMA SUPPORTS FPV. How clear do you wan me to make it for you Tom?
    RC Aircraft/ Three Laws Safe.

  11. #11
    combatpigg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    arlington, WA
    Posts
    17,835
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I was correct that the PPP would end up being a dismal failure [amongst a HUGE chorus of boos] and here I am once again predicting [to the same audience] that the benefits of "embracing" FPV will not out weigh the future liabilities.
    WHO GUNNA FEED MAW KEEEIDS..???


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.