old timers look here must be 50+ years only
#4752
My thoughts exactly.....just goes to show how little we sometimes know even at 76. I'm quite sure if I were to do it all over a again it would come out as I wanted it to in the first place. Guess we all live and hopefully learn.
#4754
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
Where did you get that hat at??? I wear a similar had that I really like. The hat I use now it like that one with the exception of it doesn't have the flap that you an roll down to protect your neck from sunburn. I would like to get a hat that is shown in the picture that has some weight to it, has a neck strap so that you can keep it on in the wind, and the neck flap to protect your neck from sunburn. The hat in the picture is just about perfect for me.
Thanks for any help you can give.
Ken
#4756
My Feedback: (6)
Walmart carries several different versions (first link), the second link is the one I saw in the flesh:
https://www.walmart.com/search/searc...%20neck%20flap
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Men-s-Pad...-Flap/55415089
https://www.walmart.com/search/searc...%20neck%20flap
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Men-s-Pad...-Flap/55415089
Last edited by FlyerInOKC; 06-14-2017 at 11:46 AM.
#4757
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Measnes, La Creuse, France.
Posts: 2,132
Received 146 Likes
on
123 Posts
What are they ? Just joking . There a bit too spendy for us common folk . A few at my club where a Arafat type hat . https://www.cancercouncilshop.org.au...ahari-hat.html
I like the broad brin hat with a flap at the back for covering the neck . Some of the worst sunburn Ive had at the club is on milder days where u dont think u need sunscreen . When I was young we used to cook ourselves down the beach all weekend , Oil used as well for the icing on the cake . Ive heard of skin cancer under finger nails . Wat tha
I like the broad brin hat with a flap at the back for covering the neck . Some of the worst sunburn Ive had at the club is on milder days where u dont think u need sunscreen . When I was young we used to cook ourselves down the beach all weekend , Oil used as well for the icing on the cake . Ive heard of skin cancer under finger nails . Wat tha
#4761
My Feedback: (6)
Just for the fun of it I thought I would mention something plane related. Once again I have succumb to temptation here is the latest acquisition. The kit is pretty complete all I need is covering, radio gear, battery, and ESC, the Motors, mounts, adapters, and props included. Granted it electric and not IC and the motors are brushed and not brushless but for the right price I make allowances. I'm cheap so I'll build it as designed with the bushed motors but substitute a 2 cell LiPo for the battery instead a brick heavy NiCAD battery.
#4764
Thread Starter
Well guys I am officially involved in the world of the 2.4 ghz, But I still don't have a clue as to what I am doing, but what is working is looking real nice. I have the radio installed in my eagle 2 trainer, I don't know how I actually accomplished it but The receiver is bound to the trans. quite to my surprise. I will use the trainer to get familiar with all the goodies so if I goof up it won't kill my budget. It appears this radio will be perfect for my more sophisticated planes as soon as my brain gets in gear.
I am distressed because I have a lot of radios on 72 mhz that work, but just don't have a need for. I am going to check with the local club to see if these units can be used by the newbies as a first radio set. I hate to waste them.
I am distressed because I have a lot of radios on 72 mhz that work, but just don't have a need for. I am going to check with the local club to see if these units can be used by the newbies as a first radio set. I hate to waste them.
#4766
Well guys I am officially involved in the world of the 2.4 ghz, But I still don't have a clue as to what I am doing, but what is working is looking real nice. I have the radio installed in my eagle 2 trainer, I don't know how I actually accomplished it but The receiver is bound to the trans. quite to my surprise. I will use the trainer to get familiar with all the goodies so if I goof up it won't kill my budget. It appears this radio will be perfect for my more sophisticated planes as soon as my brain gets in gear.
I am distressed because I have a lot of radios on 72 mhz that work, but just don't have a need for. I am going to check with the local club to see if these units can be used by the newbies as a first radio set. I hate to waste them.
I am distressed because I have a lot of radios on 72 mhz that work, but just don't have a need for. I am going to check with the local club to see if these units can be used by the newbies as a first radio set. I hate to waste them.
Like you I was distressed about the obsolescence factor with all my expensive 72mhz equipment when I migrated to spread spectrum radios but I bit the bullet and after due deliberation I trashed the old stuff. I don't know what the airwaves are like in your area but in my area 72mhz is not practical any longer. It has become 2.4 ghz or don't fly. I suspect that with every device imaginable emitting signals , anything that can crash or cause injury should be on discrete frequencies Also in the mix is the low cost of 2.4ghz equipment today. You can buy a system at half the cost of one of the old 72mhz radios with aftermarket add-ons that work fine and don't cost an arm and a leg.
#4767
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hudson Valley. New York. USA
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Like you I was distressed about the obsolescence factor with all my expensive 72mhz equipment when I migrated to spread spectrum radios but I bit the bullet and after due deliberation I trashed the old stuff. I don't know what the airwaves are like in your area but in my area 72mhz is not practical any longer. It has become 2.4 ghz or don't fly. I suspect that with every device imaginable emitting signals , anything that can crash or cause injury should be on discrete frequencies Also in the mix is the low cost of 2.4ghz equipment today. You can buy a system at half the cost of one of the old 72mhz radios with aftermarket add-ons that work fine and don't cost an arm and a leg.
That means I have learned to empty the back of my Ford Explorer before going out on the pickup, because I usually end up with way more than I originally showed interest in.
Well, I have ended up with many 72MHz transmitters and receivers, and don't want them cluttering up landfills.
There are places that salvage gold and other things from the electronics.
The latest word I have gotten, here in the US, is that Staples collects old electronics.
I haven't tried it yet, but hoping they do and are responsible with recycling the equip.
#4768
Consider the cost of the planes you are flying compared to replacing one transmitter and a bunch of RX. If you go the Futaba way, FrSky has the TFR6 receivers that are 7 channel FAAST and are under $30 each. If you went DSM2/DMSX(Spectrum) there are the orange RX for under $20 each for 6 channel. There are others out there too that are low cost and reliable. The TX is the main expense, so getting a good TX is a must.
Look at it this way, you wreck a $1000 airplane due to a radio hit, you are out a $1000 airplane, but if you buy a $400 radio and a few $30 RX, you are not really out anything, just upgrading and insuring that having a radio malfunction due to crowded airwaves is the least likely of your worries.
Look at it this way, you wreck a $1000 airplane due to a radio hit, you are out a $1000 airplane, but if you buy a $400 radio and a few $30 RX, you are not really out anything, just upgrading and insuring that having a radio malfunction due to crowded airwaves is the least likely of your worries.
#4769
Thread Starter
Yes so am I. my futaba 9c will be getting a conversion pack soon so it will be around for a while. and I have a few 72's dedicated to a specific model. with no reason to convert.
But with the 9c and the frsky horus I have no need for anything else, they will handle a lot more planes than whats in my hanger. so the rest of the stuff has to go.
But with the 9c and the frsky horus I have no need for anything else, they will handle a lot more planes than whats in my hanger. so the rest of the stuff has to go.
Last edited by donnyman; 06-20-2017 at 07:46 AM.
#4770
There is a positive to 72 MHz. It is reasonably immune to high voltage RF interference. If there are high voltage transmission lines near your flying field and your 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radios are experiencing glitches, using 72 MHz might be a way to mitigate.
#4771
I was having a very hard time deciding if going to 2.4 GHz was for me as all my 72 MHz stuff was working perfectly, but after experiencing a very long and frightening glitch which seemed to last forever while flying one of my gas models, my mind was made up the moment the plane was safely back on the ground. It was a bit difficult at first discarding all of this good 72 stuff but discretion proved to be the better part of valor and eventually I changed over all my models to 2.4. That was about 10 years ago and since that time I have never had a problem including even the tiniest of glitches with my Futaba 8UAF / FrSky 2.4 module system.
Last edited by karolh; 06-20-2017 at 03:05 PM.
#4772
Over time, electronic components age. Electrolytic capacitors break down, resistors age, etc. If it wasn't working reliably, then it would be time to repair or ditch. That goes for equipment on any frequency.
We had a problem in Clovis NM with the power company constructing a high voltage transmission line along the edge of the county road that the city owned field abutted against. Those with larger aircraft, like the quarter scale and those with fast flying smaller planes could possibly strike the wires or poles especially during the approach on landing or take off.
We have a new field provided by the city about a half mile from that location, away from any electrical power infrastructure. High voltage electromagnetic interference is no longer a concern at our new location.
We had a problem in Clovis NM with the power company constructing a high voltage transmission line along the edge of the county road that the city owned field abutted against. Those with larger aircraft, like the quarter scale and those with fast flying smaller planes could possibly strike the wires or poles especially during the approach on landing or take off.
We have a new field provided by the city about a half mile from that location, away from any electrical power infrastructure. High voltage electromagnetic interference is no longer a concern at our new location.
#4773
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ST LOUIS,
MO
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.4 radios
Donnyman & othere,
call orr electronics can convert 72mg's to 2.4. As can the editor of vintage rc society.
I am having a few medical problems... Again... But soon i will send one of my 7 kraft radio sets in to be converted.
As you may know kraft transmitters have the most power output to the max allowed by the fcc.850mw other sets are about half of that. Or less some as low as 300mw.
Also if you have any 72mc radios & still want to use them. Send them to cal for a tune up. As some of the capacitors age & may be the cause of unexplained glitches.
I still fly 3 of my kraft radios on 72mg i have not experienced any glitches at the 2 fields i fly in.
Also i have 4 futabas on 72 no problem there either. You have to weigh the age of your sets vs upgrade or buy new.
It's the ole six of those or a 1/2 dozen of the other routeen.
Anyway keep em flying.
Oh! If anyone who have read my post on my building a dynaflite super decathlon. Well the idiocyresies and bad engineering problem have all been redesigned & the wings. Tail feathers & fuse are just about ready to cover. At 88 years old i have become a slow builder but i am getting there building and flying as long as i can,'
trainer master 80 frankie g
call orr electronics can convert 72mg's to 2.4. As can the editor of vintage rc society.
I am having a few medical problems... Again... But soon i will send one of my 7 kraft radio sets in to be converted.
As you may know kraft transmitters have the most power output to the max allowed by the fcc.850mw other sets are about half of that. Or less some as low as 300mw.
Also if you have any 72mc radios & still want to use them. Send them to cal for a tune up. As some of the capacitors age & may be the cause of unexplained glitches.
I still fly 3 of my kraft radios on 72mg i have not experienced any glitches at the 2 fields i fly in.
Also i have 4 futabas on 72 no problem there either. You have to weigh the age of your sets vs upgrade or buy new.
It's the ole six of those or a 1/2 dozen of the other routeen.
Anyway keep em flying.
Oh! If anyone who have read my post on my building a dynaflite super decathlon. Well the idiocyresies and bad engineering problem have all been redesigned & the wings. Tail feathers & fuse are just about ready to cover. At 88 years old i have become a slow builder but i am getting there building and flying as long as i can,'
trainer master 80 frankie g
#4774
My Feedback: (6)
I was having a very hard time deciding if going to 2.4 GHz was for me as all my 72 MHz stuff was working perfectly, but after experiencing a very long and frightening glitch which seemed to last forever while flying one of my gas models, my mind was made up the moment the plane was safely back on the ground. It was a bit difficult at first discarding all of this good 72 stuff but discretion proved to be the better part of valor and eventually I changed over all my models to 2.4. That was about 10 years ago and since that time I have never had a problem including even the tiniest of glitches with my Futaba 8UAF / FrSky 2.4 module system.
But that is just my take on this
Cheers Bob T
#4775
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: goolwasa, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am usually a early adopter of most things . When 2.4 came along I jumped straight away . I didnt want to forget to pull up the antena ( been there ) so I sold of all my 36meg stuff straight away . I was able to get good $ for the receivers and I had a friend who could get stuff cheap so I basically didnt lose out . This approach has bitten me in the rear end as well . Remember the Mintor engines ? Ive got 2 of those