Go Back  RCU Forums > Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more > The Clubhouse
Reload this Page >

one single day we lose 1 Thunderbird and 1 Blue Angels plane...

Community
Search
Notices
The Clubhouse If it doesn't fit in any other category and is about general RC stuff then post it here at the Clubhouse.

one single day we lose 1 Thunderbird and 1 Blue Angels plane...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2016, 06:09 AM
  #1  
GSXR1000
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (7)
 
GSXR1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default one single day we lose 1 Thunderbird and 1 Blue Angels plane...

How eerie and random for that to happen within hours of each other, that our Military's 2 main flight demo teams would lose a aircraft on the same day.. Sadly the Blue Angels pilot didn't survive, but the Thunderbird pilot was able to eject after flying his plane out of civilians harms way.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/02/politi...ash/index.html

Last edited by GSXR1000; 06-03-2016 at 06:56 AM.
Old 06-03-2016, 09:09 AM
  #2  
init4fun
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,358
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Yes Sir , a tragedy when any life is lost and I offer a prayer to God for the lost Airman .

As to the aircraft themselves ; I've never been one to become so attached to mechanical contrivances as to actually mourn the loss of one . In spite of folk's seeming need to attach human attributes and names to their machinery , I guess being a lifelong mechanic has put the difference between living things VS inanimate objects into perfectly clear focus for me .

That being said , these are machines , deadly machines , and when used as toys , as literal "circus attractions" , and are being operated at the very edges of their design limits for nothing more than to put on a good show , incidents like this WILL happen ! I have always had a "Love/Hate" relationship with airshows , on the one hand I can understand how the public likes to see impressive aerial aerobatics performed by professionals , and on the other hand I can see the patently unsafe condition of , as I said earlier , operating any machine at the very edges of it's design limitations for show , usually right over the heads of the appreciating audience . The words "recipe for disaster" come to mind here .....
Old 06-03-2016, 11:14 AM
  #3  
GSXR1000
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (7)
 
GSXR1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes, the loss of a Pilots life is worse than the loss of the aircraft themselves.

The last time the Blues lost a plane was in 2007 and the Thunderbirds was in 2003. So these accidents are pretty rare and to have them happen on the same day is even rarer.
Old 06-03-2016, 01:48 PM
  #4  
Tape
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSXR1000
Yes, the loss of a Pilots life is worse than the loss of the aircraft themselves.
I would think so, a pilot lost is worth more than a squadron of planes lost
Old 06-04-2016, 06:34 AM
  #5  
Gizmo-RCU
My Feedback: (27)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Athol, ID
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The recent news stories about the condition of our military planes due to budget constraints makes me wonder if these crashes were due to having to use old worn out equipment? A recent crash of a Marine Harrier off the coast on N. Carolina
revealed the plane was about 47 years old as I recall (memory). Another news story was about how the services were having to remove spares from existing aircraft to keep the others flying, all due to the current administrations budget slashing
of the military. Our military deserves better than they are receiving right now!
Old 06-04-2016, 09:17 AM
  #6  
Tape
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I personally do not think that our Military especially our military teams that preform for the civilian public would use subpar parts due to budget cuts. I was a aircraft mechanic in both fighter and bomber AFSC's as they were in the early 80' all aircraft get the top of the line parts at no expense. Yes the planes are dated but upon inspection no one would without experience would know the difference, the B52 dates back to the mid 50's and are among the top bombers of today, they were considered to be replaced by the B1 but that was rejected because of it's excellent performance reports of todays standard that really eliminates the subject of age. The accidents were just coincidence that just happened the same day and could not have been foreseen.
Old 06-04-2016, 04:03 PM
  #7  
Gizmo-RCU
My Feedback: (27)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Athol, ID
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Time will tell? Seems like all they are receiving right now is old hand-me-downs.
Old 06-04-2016, 05:40 PM
  #8  
STUKA BARRY
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Summerfield, NC
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gizmo-RCU
Time will tell? Seems like all they are receiving right now is old hand-me-downs.
I can assure you that the Blues and the Tbirds get the best of the best equipment with the best of the best mechanics. There is nothing, I mean nothing subpar with these two Show Teams. They are right up there with AirForce One. These two teams might limit shows as far as cutbacks, but they do not compromise safety or integrity.
Old 06-05-2016, 03:54 AM
  #9  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STUKA BARRY
I can assure you that the Blues and the Tbirds get the best of the best equipment with the best of the best mechanics. There is nothing, I mean nothing subpar with these two Show Teams. They are right up there with AirForce One. These two teams might limit shows as far as cutbacks, but they do not compromise safety or integrity.

I'm inclined to agree.

Mike
Old 06-05-2016, 05:32 PM
  #10  
jcoop65
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San AntonioTX
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a conversation with a thunderbird pilot a few years back. I did ask if they flew newer aircraft.
He replied by telling me the best and newest were reserved for active military use and that they're planes were well used. He did mention that they we very well maintained. They do keep a few in reserve if there is a problem with one. The show must go on.
Old 06-05-2016, 06:34 PM
  #11  
Gizmo-RCU
My Feedback: (27)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Athol, ID
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jcoop I remember hearing the same a few years back!
Old 06-06-2016, 12:14 PM
  #12  
Tape
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcoop65
I had a conversation with a thunderbird pilot a few years back. I did ask if they flew newer aircraft.
He replied by telling me the best and newest were reserved for active military use and that they're planes were well used. He did mention that they we very well maintained. They do keep a few in reserve if there is a problem with one. The show must go on.
What he didn't want to broadcast is that the "newer" aircraft are not "proven". They would be fools to take out an F-22 or such, pack them up 3 meters apart at Mach .9. The T-Birds stayed with the T-38's so long is because of the 38's record and it's performance of course, it's the first aircraft in USAF history to vertically accelerate faster than the Apollo rockets, then came the F-15.
Old 06-09-2016, 12:21 PM
  #13  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This in today, geez!

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=187992

Good news was no loss of life.
Old 06-12-2016, 11:36 AM
  #14  
franklin_m
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

#6 was a Lemoore guy, where I still have friends that knew him well. We also have friends in Pensacola that are close to their family. So this hits close to home.

It never gets easy. I lost a member of my strike planning team in Desert Storm, a member of a sister squadron not long after that, another on my '98 deployment, and one of my groomsmen a few years later. In my first month at Lemoore some years ago, we lost a young pilot in a mid-air, and one of my peers was killed in a private plane crash just before I retired. It sucks. No way around it. You never get used to it.
Old 06-13-2016, 12:36 PM
  #15  
GSXR1000
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (7)
 
GSXR1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by franklin_m
#6 was a Lemoore guy, where I still have friends that knew him well. We also have friends in Pensacola that are close to their family. So this hits close to home.

It never gets easy. I lost a member of my strike planning team in Desert Storm, a member of a sister squadron not long after that, another on my '98 deployment, and one of my groomsmen a few years later. In my first month at Lemoore some years ago, we lost a young pilot in a mid-air, and one of my peers was killed in a private plane crash just before I retired. It sucks. No way around it. You never get used to it.
Yeah, I grew up a military brat; my dad retired after 20+ odd years in the Airforce. He was a 1st seargant or so when he retired.
I do remember him being a a aircraft mechanic for both the F-4's and F-16's I do remeber him being a part of the 418th AGS. I remember being able to sit in the cockpit of a F-16, F-4, OV-10 Bronco. I remeber us being stationed at Hill AFB Utah, Shaw AFB South Carolina, and Kadena AFB Okinawa.... Okinawa was cool, we were there when the SR-71 was based there, and I could see and hear when they took off, it was so cool to see them at night. I remember getting to see those up close and being able to go to recon map HQ' and take a look at all the cool non classified pictures...

Of course this was all pre 9/11 when rules and regulations were kinda of lax i guess...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.