Electric Aerobatic & Sport Planes Discuss rc electric aerobatics and rc sport flyers here.

Mini Ultra Stick Wing Incidence

Reply
Old 09-11-2012, 09:03 PM
  #1
badestdudeintown
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: surprise, AZ
Posts: 3
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default Mini Ultra Stick Wing Incidence

Hi! I joined this site a long time ago but am just recently getting back into the hobby. Here's the question: I recently purchased an E-Flight Mini Ultra Stick, and me being me, I promptly stripped the stock covering off and re-covered it in Monokote. I thoroughly checked the plane before and after and the covering doesn't appear to have warped anything any different from how it was before I re-covered it. BUT, the wings seem to have a negative angle of incidence to them... meaning the front is lower than the back. I'm no aeronautical engineer, but I am very familiar with aviation in general and the basic principles of flight. With the wings level, this results in the horizontal stab drooping, which I would assume resuld in the same effect as a down elevator.

Are other's MUS's or similar Stik type aircraft layed out in the same way?

Here's a pic of what i'm talkin' bout:



And, just to show off the finished product I made the sharkmouth from scratch using Monokote trim:

badestdudeintown is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2012, 08:31 PM
  #2
Bozarth
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,283
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: Mini Ultra Stick Wing Incidence

Nice!

Kurt
Bozarth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 11:25 AM
  #3
roxyndav
 
roxyndav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Youngsville, LA
Posts: 32
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

I have the same issue. I guess most of the folks that are flying this airplane have the elevator trimmed up 1/8" or more to compensate for this.
That said, I am not to happy with the position of the horizontal stab in relation to the wing.
I think the CG is incorrect in the manual, since I have used the recommended E-Flight 450 motor, ESC, and battery and found the airplane to be very nose heavy.
Between these two issues I am forced to land the airplane extremely hot.
I am planning on adding weight to the tail to move the CG back so it will land at a reasonable speed and not like a flying brick.
roxyndav is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 PM.