Throttle-Tech - New product from Tech-Aero Designs LLC
#51
If it's legal to be able to adjust the Mixture (Needle Valve) on a glow engine in flight too get consistent engine performance ... That's what I'd Equate the Throttle-Tech to.
Sorry boys but I'm still not completely agreed to you , this thing makes adjustment that depending from input/info it got from the plane (battery voltage)
#52
Rune,
Consider how a servo works. It goes to the position commanded by the signal from the transmitter. The position is based on the voltage of the pot in the transmitter and voltage of the pot in the servo. If you push on the servo, or the control surface, the servo has a response that is not initiated from the transmitter. Neither the servo or Throttle Tech have the ability to know the outcome of the adjustments they are making.....they simply measure voltage and respond.
Regards,
Consider how a servo works. It goes to the position commanded by the signal from the transmitter. The position is based on the voltage of the pot in the transmitter and voltage of the pot in the servo. If you push on the servo, or the control surface, the servo has a response that is not initiated from the transmitter. Neither the servo or Throttle Tech have the ability to know the outcome of the adjustments they are making.....they simply measure voltage and respond.
Regards,
#53
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ft. Wayne,
IN
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The throttle tech also will help with passing the noise test. This is performed prior to the flight at full throttle when batteries are freshly charged - this device doesn't permit the full use of the battery voltage/amps, therefore rpm is limited and noise lower.
#54
My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, this helps make a certain throttle position deliver similar rpm for the whole flight, start to finish? i.e. - On maneuver X, I normally use half stick...later in the flight, that same maneuver needs maybe 5/8th stick. This techno-gizmo takes care of that so I would use 5/8ths throttle at the EARLY part of the flight, just like later.... Do I understand the concept correctly?
#55
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ft. Wayne,
IN
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the way I understand it, however for the noise test, the throttle stick is supposed to be at full throttle. With fresh batteries, without the device rpm would be much higher (and louder) than once the batteries have depleted some of the charge. As long as there is no way to shut the device off to get additional power, it should be legal.
#56
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, this helps make a certain throttle position deliver similar rpm for the whole flight, start to finish? i.e. - On maneuver X, I normally use half stick...later in the flight, that same maneuver needs maybe 5/8th stick. This techno-gizmo takes care of that so I would use 5/8ths throttle at the EARLY part of the flight, just like later.... Do I understand the concept correctly?
#57
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the way I understand it, however for the noise test, the throttle stick is supposed to be at full throttle. With fresh batteries, without the device rpm would be much higher (and louder) than once the batteries have depleted some of the charge. As long as there is no way to shut the device off to get additional power, it should be legal.
#59
Senior Member
Electric motors can't be lean or rich anywhere in their power curve as can wet set-ups.
A simplified explanation if you insist on comparing wet to E power is that a wet set-up has the same amount of energy available throughout a tankful. The specific energy of glow fuel or gas entering the engine doesn't change. Throttle Tech does practically the same thing in an E set-up by having the motor behave the same for a given stick position, regardless of battery voltage, until the bat voltage drops below the practical minimum. It sorta
fixes (as in makes constant) the specific energy entering the motor throughout a run. It's a really serious device for the discerning E pilot.
#60
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ToowoombaQLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
15 Posts
Seriously though, it's principle of operation has been explained fairly clearly in the previous posts and it's no magic bullet for maintaining a "constant speed", but it will certainly help for achieving some consistancy with mixes associated with the throttle position similair to what IC pilots enjoy.
#61
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NETHERLANDS
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#62
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hans, my understanding of the Schulze feature is that it was a sensor based RPM governor, intended for the heli market. If I'm not understanding that exactly right, please correct me. However assuming that this is an accurate description, it is not the same as what Throttle-Tech does. It is not a device to govern RPM. If you were to perform static tests, you would see very good RPM consistency for a given throttle setting as the pack discharged. However the dynamic conditions of flight factor into this and do not result in a fixed RPM for a given throttle setting. This is what should be expected from a system that does not perform a closed loop response to motor performance. Prop loading conditions will affect the RPM of an electric powered setup with or without Throttle-Tech, as they will affect RPM with a 2C or 4C propulsion setup. This is about achieving consistent throttle response for the useful, practical range of the battery discharge curve, i.e. throughout a normal flight.
#63
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NETHERLANDS
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See the doc page 16e dil switch #3 to on
http://matthias-schulze-elektronik.c...-ENG-black.pdf
The disadvantage I found is that every adaptation cycle could be felt by the pilot as a little jump in power. Especially in uplines.
Perhaps newer sowftware version could have solved this but this is all history now.
The L controller is a bit to heavy for F3A purposes. The M-line with this this feature never reached marked.
http://matthias-schulze-elektronik.c...-ENG-black.pdf
The disadvantage I found is that every adaptation cycle could be felt by the pilot as a little jump in power. Especially in uplines.
Perhaps newer sowftware version could have solved this but this is all history now.
The L controller is a bit to heavy for F3A purposes. The M-line with this this feature never reached marked.
#64
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info Hans. The same switch is for governor mode for Heli's. Is it the same function for aircraft with a different name or does being set up for a heli change its behavior? My other question is, how long was it between adaptation cycles? Sampling needs to be rapid enough to make smoothly integrated changes. The fact that a jump in power occurred with the Shulze suggests that it was attempting to hold a constant RPM, and when the prop load increased in an up line, that represents an un-commanded increase in power. If so, that's not really what you want to have happen. I suppose its moot since they are no longer around, just curious about what they had.
#65
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NETHERLANDS
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did only few test with this controller and have not been active the last one and a half year so I can not be clear on your second part of the question.
#66
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ToowoombaQLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
15 Posts
... The fact that a jump in power occurred with the Shulze suggests that it was attempting to hold a constant RPM, and when the prop load increased in an up line, that represents an un-commanded increase in power. If so, that's not really what you want to have happen....
#67
A little late to the discussion but I have been using one all year as well.
Love it.
If you are really good at throttle management then it will not help. For the other 90% of us it will
In non scientific comparisons (not comparing the same days) With it I used less mah and had a higher voltage at the end of the flight. Newer batteries were still higher than older batteries but I could not tell as much of a difference between the older and newer packs in flight. I am also running the contra which I think is more efficient and allows older batteries to still fly well.
Stuart C.
Love it.
If you are really good at throttle management then it will not help. For the other 90% of us it will
In non scientific comparisons (not comparing the same days) With it I used less mah and had a higher voltage at the end of the flight. Newer batteries were still higher than older batteries but I could not tell as much of a difference between the older and newer packs in flight. I am also running the contra which I think is more efficient and allows older batteries to still fly well.
Stuart C.
#68
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramat Hashrone, ISRAEL
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
32 Posts
Here is a question for those how are familiar with the Throttle-Tech:
In the User's Guide page 9 it is written: "The transmitter throttle channel must be set to normal travel direction, i.e. higher throttle settings are achieved with a wide (longer) throttle pulse width. Even if the ESC in use allows the reversal of the throttle channel, you must assure that longer throttle pulse widths result in higher throttle output from the ESC for Throttle-Tech to work properly."
I use Futaba transmitter and Jeti Spin 99 ESC.
As you can see in the picture 1,2; the throttle channel is in reverse position but I still have a longer pulse (2.0 ms) in high throttle position and sorter pulse (1.1 ms) in idle position.
Will the Throttle-Tech work properly with current throttle curve setup, or I have to change my throttle curve?
Best regards,
Isaac Najary
In the User's Guide page 9 it is written: "The transmitter throttle channel must be set to normal travel direction, i.e. higher throttle settings are achieved with a wide (longer) throttle pulse width. Even if the ESC in use allows the reversal of the throttle channel, you must assure that longer throttle pulse widths result in higher throttle output from the ESC for Throttle-Tech to work properly."
I use Futaba transmitter and Jeti Spin 99 ESC.
As you can see in the picture 1,2; the throttle channel is in reverse position but I still have a longer pulse (2.0 ms) in high throttle position and sorter pulse (1.1 ms) in idle position.
Will the Throttle-Tech work properly with current throttle curve setup, or I have to change my throttle curve?
Best regards,
Isaac Najary
#69
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a question for those how are familiar with the Throttle-Tech:
In the User's Guide page 9 it is written: "The transmitter throttle channel must be set to normal travel direction, i.e. higher throttle settings are achieved with a wide (longer) throttle pulse width. Even if the ESC in use allows the reversal of the throttle channel, you must assure that longer throttle pulse widths result in higher throttle output from the ESC for Throttle-Tech to work properly."
I use Futaba transmitter and Jeti Spin 99 ESC.
As you can see in the picture 1,2; the throttle channel is in reverse position but I still have a longer pulse (2.0 ms) in high throttle position and sorter pulse (1.1 ms) in idle position.
Will the Throttle-Tech work properly with current throttle curve setup, or I have to change my throttle curve?
Best regards,
Isaac Najary
In the User's Guide page 9 it is written: "The transmitter throttle channel must be set to normal travel direction, i.e. higher throttle settings are achieved with a wide (longer) throttle pulse width. Even if the ESC in use allows the reversal of the throttle channel, you must assure that longer throttle pulse widths result in higher throttle output from the ESC for Throttle-Tech to work properly."
I use Futaba transmitter and Jeti Spin 99 ESC.
As you can see in the picture 1,2; the throttle channel is in reverse position but I still have a longer pulse (2.0 ms) in high throttle position and sorter pulse (1.1 ms) in idle position.
Will the Throttle-Tech work properly with current throttle curve setup, or I have to change my throttle curve?
Best regards,
Isaac Najary
#71
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#73
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Randolph,
NJ
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Isaac, a simple full throttle tachometer test before and after the flight is the easiest way to make an adjustment. You would typically want the static RPM test to show the same reading.