SIG Rascal Electric ARF w/ speed 400
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arcadia,
CA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SIG Rascal Electric ARF w/ speed 400
Hello all!
A few years ago, I purchased and built the SIG Rascal ARF w/ speed 400. On first launch, I had somewhat of an uncontrolled flight, but managed to bring the plane down. I should have stopped there, but I wouldn’t have known what to look for. Soon after a subsequent launch, I lost control, and the plane sustained enough damage such that I shelved it until last week.
After re-building the plane, I realized CG was probably to far back the first time with what I recall about battery placement. So I positioned the battery all the way up front this time resulting in slightly nose down attitude (same battery weight). A few things different this time; a 9 X 7 prop for slower flight, and a tiny wheel in the rear for ROG, no more hand launches. After double-checking everything, as I was practicing take off rolls, I didn’t intend on getting airborne; it just happened. The plane was veering too much to the right, so I had to turn sharper to land based on limited field size, and it nosed into the grass field. I’m guessing my speed was too low to negotiate a turn and stalled. When I looked at rudder position, it was trimmed to turn right. Ok, this one must have been my fault, but I probably trimmed the rudder that way based on previous takeoff roll attempts.
Rebuild should take all but 15 minutes.
Why is this model so hard to fly? I’m sure there is something basic I am missing. I have a feeling this bird was intended flown in “still” air.
Please keep in mind I have successfully built and flown foam wings, various electric and non-powered gliders, done sloping, field flying, parking lots etc. I am by no means an “expert”, and there is always a lot to learn, but this one is getting to me. I can’t be the only one to have experienced this.
Thanks!
A few years ago, I purchased and built the SIG Rascal ARF w/ speed 400. On first launch, I had somewhat of an uncontrolled flight, but managed to bring the plane down. I should have stopped there, but I wouldn’t have known what to look for. Soon after a subsequent launch, I lost control, and the plane sustained enough damage such that I shelved it until last week.
After re-building the plane, I realized CG was probably to far back the first time with what I recall about battery placement. So I positioned the battery all the way up front this time resulting in slightly nose down attitude (same battery weight). A few things different this time; a 9 X 7 prop for slower flight, and a tiny wheel in the rear for ROG, no more hand launches. After double-checking everything, as I was practicing take off rolls, I didn’t intend on getting airborne; it just happened. The plane was veering too much to the right, so I had to turn sharper to land based on limited field size, and it nosed into the grass field. I’m guessing my speed was too low to negotiate a turn and stalled. When I looked at rudder position, it was trimmed to turn right. Ok, this one must have been my fault, but I probably trimmed the rudder that way based on previous takeoff roll attempts.
Rebuild should take all but 15 minutes.
Why is this model so hard to fly? I’m sure there is something basic I am missing. I have a feeling this bird was intended flown in “still” air.
Please keep in mind I have successfully built and flown foam wings, various electric and non-powered gliders, done sloping, field flying, parking lots etc. I am by no means an “expert”, and there is always a lot to learn, but this one is getting to me. I can’t be the only one to have experienced this.
Thanks!
#2
RE: SIG Rascal Electric ARF w/ speed 400
sounds like your motor may be badly alligned, a few degrees of right/down/up/or down thrust can impair flying. or re balence the plane. also check for warped parts, that is a major cause of impaired flight post some pics of all the angles of the plane. i need to see the motor, wings, and fuse up close.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arcadia,
CA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: SIG Rascal Electric ARF w/ speed 400
I think you hit it on the head, the loss of control on the very first flight was probably due to incorrect CG "ie. Battery balance", but the model was somewhat flyable. Then it never quite flew the same after the accident.... Looking at the engine, it dosen't appear to align symmetrically.
I'll try to post a few pics after the re-build.
Was thinking there should be a quick and easy way to determine a plane "will" be airworthy, before the real event.
Thanks for the reply!
I'll try to post a few pics after the re-build.
Was thinking there should be a quick and easy way to determine a plane "will" be airworthy, before the real event.
Thanks for the reply!
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arcadia,
CA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: SIG Rascal Electric ARF w/ speed 400
yep, there was velcro there the whole time. I got the model rebuilt. I am going to consult with some other modelers in person to get their opinion before any flying attempt.