swept wing scat cat 500
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Syracuse, IN
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
swept wing scat cat 500
I currently have a scat cat with a YS 45 rear exhaust and tuned pipe. I cut 3 inches off each wing tip and removed the landing gear, turned it into a hand launcher. Sucker is fast but as you all know, always looking to go faster. I am debating building another one with the same setup but sweeping the wings. Anyone tried this? Thought about taking a standard wing and essentially just cutting the center joint at an angle. Then matching the wing tips and adding winglets. Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
The guys who look for every edge possible are the Control Line Speed flyers and the RC Pylon Racers.
These events have been going longer than most people have been alive. Swept wings have been tried, but for models it's more about "SHOW" than it is "GO".
One of the most popular .049 powered models was a swept design, called The GLH. I scaled the GLH up a little bit for a hot .12 engine and without doing a side by side comparison with a more conventional winged plane, having a swept wing on a model this small doesn't seem to be a handicap.
A fairly popular mid-sized RC swept wing model called The Weston Magnum has done 196 mph with the same engine / prop that RC pylon racers with more conventional wings are doing about the same speed.
It's easier to build the conventional wings lighter and stronger, so the advantage of un-swept wings will show up at some point as the models get larger.
Choosing a thinner airfoil, like what they use in Q40 racing will help. Within certain limits, shedding wing area doesn't pay off as well as using the best airfoil. Real thin wings are trickier to build, but there are a few really good threads in the racing forum that take you through it step by step.
These events have been going longer than most people have been alive. Swept wings have been tried, but for models it's more about "SHOW" than it is "GO".
One of the most popular .049 powered models was a swept design, called The GLH. I scaled the GLH up a little bit for a hot .12 engine and without doing a side by side comparison with a more conventional winged plane, having a swept wing on a model this small doesn't seem to be a handicap.
A fairly popular mid-sized RC swept wing model called The Weston Magnum has done 196 mph with the same engine / prop that RC pylon racers with more conventional wings are doing about the same speed.
It's easier to build the conventional wings lighter and stronger, so the advantage of un-swept wings will show up at some point as the models get larger.
Choosing a thinner airfoil, like what they use in Q40 racing will help. Within certain limits, shedding wing area doesn't pay off as well as using the best airfoil. Real thin wings are trickier to build, but there are a few really good threads in the racing forum that take you through it step by step.
#3
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Syracuse, IN
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting information. I never thought about thinning the wing. I do have to consider though that what I do with it will still allow to be hand launched. Its not anything I am doing for competition so its a strictly for fun deal. The wing sweep idea I like if for nothing more than the cosmetic aspect. I have to believe however that sweeping the wing will give it some more speed if if only slight at best. I guess my question should be restated then. Thoughts on sweeping the wing from a technical/stability stand point with a fringe benefit of maybe a bit more speed?XD
#4
My Feedback: (29)
Odds are that your Scat Cat if built otherwise stock with that YS is slightly nose heavy. That in its self is costing you speed. If you do nothing else but sweep the wings then you will be even more nose heavy and the result will be even more lost speed. When I was Q500 racing with Scat Cats the standard mods were to take 3/4" off the nose, reduce the vertical area by 20% and reduce the horizontal area by 10%. That brought the CG to where it needed to be and reduced drag of the enormous tail section. The next option for you would be a new wing with a tapering cord, thickness and slightly increased span. I would do a tip airfoil with a cord of 7.5" and thickness of 3/4" and increase the span to 55" this would give you more speed and great turning ability. Keep fairly close to the same wing area as reducing wing area too much will actually hurt speed as the wing has to be flown at an increased AOA to support the models weight and any AOA is massive drag.
#5
Odds are that your Scat Cat if built otherwise stock with that YS is slightly nose heavy. That in its self is costing you speed. If you do nothing else but sweep the wings then you will be even more nose heavy and the result will be even more lost speed. When I was Q500 racing with Scat Cats the standard mods were to take 3/4" off the nose, reduce the vertical area by 20% and reduce the horizontal area by 10%. That brought the CG to where it needed to be and reduced drag of the enormous tail section. The next option for you would be a new wing with a tapering cord, thickness and slightly increased span. I would do a tip airfoil with a cord of 7.5" and thickness of 3/4" and increase the span to 55" this would give you more speed and great turning ability. Keep fairly close to the same wing area as reducing wing area too much will actually hurt speed as the wing has to be flown at an increased AOA to support the models weight and any AOA is massive drag.
#7
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Syracuse, IN
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm. Very helpful information guys. I appreciate it. I may look into that chord and tail reduction this winter. I am likely to change the trim scheme so that would be a good time to do it. I don't think it's tail heavy though right now. I moved all of the servos and battery plus the header tank to the tail and it seems to balance well enough.
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
You would need to mount the wing further forward if you went with any sort of a "jet fighter" amount of sweep.
I'll bet the most noticeable improvement comes from a thinner airfoil and finding the prop that marries the engine to the new wing.
A good plane to look at for design ideas is The Rifle by Angel RC. Angel uses simple construction to create a design that looks more complex / exotic than it actually is.
If you stick with the basic Q500 layout, [except make it thinner everywhere you can] they are hard to beat in general.
I'll bet the most noticeable improvement comes from a thinner airfoil and finding the prop that marries the engine to the new wing.
A good plane to look at for design ideas is The Rifle by Angel RC. Angel uses simple construction to create a design that looks more complex / exotic than it actually is.
If you stick with the basic Q500 layout, [except make it thinner everywhere you can] they are hard to beat in general.
#10
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Westwind - long and short is, sweep won't buy you speed. Sweep is of great benefit as you approach m=1. If you get close to that, please let us know how you did it!
Remember a Q500 is designed to be within reach for the average flier interested in racing, so they have a few design restrictions with the specific purpose of limiting speed, not increasing it. Drag reduction is key - and as already suggested, Q500 wings are limited by the percentage thickness in the rulebook, so thinning the airfoil is a major step. Tapering the wing and lengthening span as suggested improves lift distribution and increases aspect ratio - good things. Fillet those wings and stab, do a good job on the tail surface cross sections, tight hinge lines, etc etc.
There are faster airframes overall, but it is always fun to mod something up to your tastes.
Remember a Q500 is designed to be within reach for the average flier interested in racing, so they have a few design restrictions with the specific purpose of limiting speed, not increasing it. Drag reduction is key - and as already suggested, Q500 wings are limited by the percentage thickness in the rulebook, so thinning the airfoil is a major step. Tapering the wing and lengthening span as suggested improves lift distribution and increases aspect ratio - good things. Fillet those wings and stab, do a good job on the tail surface cross sections, tight hinge lines, etc etc.
There are faster airframes overall, but it is always fun to mod something up to your tastes.
#12
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I have a Doddger fuselage downstairs, it has been in stasis for several years now. It was intended as exactly this sort of thing, a warmed over Q500 for fun. It has an old ST X-45 FIRE engine on it, because it needs a home, and with a pipe they are known to spin a 9-8 prop pretty well. Now it needs a thinner wing just as described. I already extended the tail moment a bit. Yet another project in the 35%-65% complete stage, waiting in the wings. I'm great at starting stuff but not so gr
#13
Senior Member
If you ask me the scat cat is a absolute blast to fly with the stock setup. Pretty fast and actually flies "sport" pretty dang well. The new Q500's go fast but are not nearly as fun to sport fly.
#21
My Feedback: (540)
MJD.
send me an Email at [email protected]
Just need to be able to box it up
PM and everything else here does no go thru
I get more invoice returned by the mailer deamon thna go thru :-(
send me an Email at [email protected]
Just need to be able to box it up
PM and everything else here does no go thru
I get more invoice returned by the mailer deamon thna go thru :-(