Woo Hoo!
#51
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Yes, electric starters are allowed for 1/2 A. Although I can get the Profi to start right up cold, I have not figured out what they want when hot. I will have my handy old Norvel electric starter handy.
If you look at the combat rules at the AMA website, it also show a low power 1/2 A class. Sort of a reedy class. still on 35' lines.
#53
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Jeff Rein is the fastest 1/2 A Flipper I've ever seen and he uses an empty syringe to blow out the engine if it died rich.
Those props are so light and tiny that you really need to supply all the cranking momentum. There is a local guy who hosts 35 foot TD combat, but truthfully a lot of the old contests we held in the wet and cold came down to who could get his engine started and rack up the most solo air time points.
http://www.clcombat.info/doubletrouble.html
Those props are so light and tiny that you really need to supply all the cranking momentum. There is a local guy who hosts 35 foot TD combat, but truthfully a lot of the old contests we held in the wet and cold came down to who could get his engine started and rack up the most solo air time points.
http://www.clcombat.info/doubletrouble.html
Last edited by combatpigg; 09-05-2015 at 04:28 PM.
#54
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Well, I got the maiden flights in today. They fly great. Turn super tight. The ready to fly weight is 8 0z., and the area is 320 sq. in. That should tell some of the story! I do not think I have ever flown a tighter turning combat model. THey are a touch tail heavy, so on future builds, I may cut the boom down a bit. I can slide the engines forward as well. Just in time for the 1/2 A world championships in KC next weekend! The speed of these 1/2 A's on 42' lines is 80 mph (they call it this because 1/2 A is an American event) Will be flying speed limit as well, 75 mph.
#56
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
One thing I've experimented with is using just 1 bolt to secure the engine mount to the plane. The idea is to create a Crumple Zone. It's just an idea that's never been tested in a match but I've tried it at home [it happened by accident].
I wouldn't dream of trying it with .36s..........
I wouldn't dream of trying it with .36s..........
#58
One thing I've experimented with is using just 1 bolt to secure the engine mount to the plane. The idea is to create a Crumple Zone. It's just an idea that's never been tested in a match but I've tried it at home [it happened by accident].
I wouldn't dream of trying it with .36s..........
I wouldn't dream of trying it with .36s..........
#61
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Well, I got to KC alright. It was an amazingly fun time. Top pilots there. I flew against the now USA team race team, and also the CD is on the F2D (CL combat) world team. I got my butt kicked in 1/2 A, as my planes were not thoroughly tested. Still too tail heavy. But nothing could turn with them! I have had several requests for kits now as well, which is pretty cool. I came in middle of the pack in speed limit combat. The engines of choice for speed limit combat now are the ASP .25, as they can be had cheaply from Hobby King. Plenty of power for a 500 sq. In. foamy. A modern .25 has no problem competing with a .36 of old.
#64
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Some of the guys were telling me the .21 was just on the edge of not having enough power. Of course this would depend on the size/weight of the plane. They recommended the .25 as you can add a screw to fine tune your speed by restricting the venture size, which is what I have been doing with my .36 foxes.
The red whit e and blue planes are the Minor's Bud lite design. They won with them, and of course they fly very good. Most prefer their own design for 1/2 A, as the Russian stuff tends to hunt a bit. Making them uncomfortable in a match. That is why the long tail moment is preferred. My design will be great after I cut about an inch off of the booms. I also cut down the area of my stabilator.
The red whit e and blue planes are the Minor's Bud lite design. They won with them, and of course they fly very good. Most prefer their own design for 1/2 A, as the Russian stuff tends to hunt a bit. Making them uncomfortable in a match. That is why the long tail moment is preferred. My design will be great after I cut about an inch off of the booms. I also cut down the area of my stabilator.
#66
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Thanks Iron.
1/2 A was interesting. The planes get beat up really bad. Lots of line tangles and fly aways. I am of the opinion that .012" lines may not be quite strong enough. I am going to use small perfect metal bellcranks from now on (as I had a sig 1/2A nylon shatter), and I am thinking of adding lead outs instead of running the flying lines right up to the bellcrank. Maybe .018". This may take some stress off of the lines at the plane.
as far as external controls, it is all I use on 1/2 A and all of my larger planes. Never experienced a downside, and they are way easy to install and maintain.
1/2 A was interesting. The planes get beat up really bad. Lots of line tangles and fly aways. I am of the opinion that .012" lines may not be quite strong enough. I am going to use small perfect metal bellcranks from now on (as I had a sig 1/2A nylon shatter), and I am thinking of adding lead outs instead of running the flying lines right up to the bellcrank. Maybe .018". This may take some stress off of the lines at the plane.
as far as external controls, it is all I use on 1/2 A and all of my larger planes. Never experienced a downside, and they are way easy to install and maintain.
#67
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
I don't recall ANY flyaways with Cox .049s on .012 line, but LOTS of single line breaks / match over.
It was always the most disappointing thing about 1/2 A [besides being hard to flip start].
I think the planes with lots of side thrust will come out on top more often in line tangles, because the plane with the weaker pull will wrap it's lines around the plane that pulls harder. He'll hit the ground first.
It was always the most disappointing thing about 1/2 A [besides being hard to flip start].
I think the planes with lots of side thrust will come out on top more often in line tangles, because the plane with the weaker pull will wrap it's lines around the plane that pulls harder. He'll hit the ground first.
#70
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
There would have to be consensus on the line size, as it is not allowed to use different lines at a contest. I will have to cut a set of .015 to see if it is even possible. One thing is for sure, I will toughen up my planes, as I learned some weak spots. They need to be stronger than they had been in the past. They fly really well though, with all of that power.
There seems to be some search still for props. The glass props that are sold by the russians, are very fragile. And the good ole Grish Tornado props are hard to fit because the hubs are too thick. The Tornado props would work good though. I may end up playing with APC props, to find a good size. They might be cheaper, and still be more durable than the glass props.
Of note, even though electric starters are allowed, they were highly frowned upon at the event. Starters were not allowed until the other guy got airborne, otherwise you would lose airtime points. Starters can be very hard on connecting rods if used improperly, such as when flooded. This happens to be the time when they are needed though. This little starter rule did not sit well with some as it was a change from the rule book. But it is interesting that there is a strong feeling of the old times that combat is an engine starting event. If you are not good with engines, you are at a disadvantage. I agree with this old opinion. It makes you a more rounded modeler, and will force you to get over your fear of the prop.
There seems to be some search still for props. The glass props that are sold by the russians, are very fragile. And the good ole Grish Tornado props are hard to fit because the hubs are too thick. The Tornado props would work good though. I may end up playing with APC props, to find a good size. They might be cheaper, and still be more durable than the glass props.
Of note, even though electric starters are allowed, they were highly frowned upon at the event. Starters were not allowed until the other guy got airborne, otherwise you would lose airtime points. Starters can be very hard on connecting rods if used improperly, such as when flooded. This happens to be the time when they are needed though. This little starter rule did not sit well with some as it was a change from the rule book. But it is interesting that there is a strong feeling of the old times that combat is an engine starting event. If you are not good with engines, you are at a disadvantage. I agree with this old opinion. It makes you a more rounded modeler, and will force you to get over your fear of the prop.
#71
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
I think it's OK to go up in line size. I'm pretty sure [but getting old] I've heard of Nelson .36 flyers moving up to .021" while the rule book called out .018"...?
I've tried the Cox black rubber 5 x 3's cut down to a diameter that the engine / plane seemed happy with. They work in a pinch.
I've tried the Cox black rubber 5 x 3's cut down to a diameter that the engine / plane seemed happy with. They work in a pinch.
Last edited by combatpigg; 09-23-2015 at 09:20 PM.
#72
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
I will have to find out, but I am not sure it is legal to have one line size bigger than the other, as it might make it easier to cut away the lighter line. But, I had heard of some speed limit guys using FAI .15 powered models on .015" against the larger .25 and .36 engines using .018. The may be local rules for particular contests. I will check into it.
From what I found out, the Fora is happy with a 4 pitch. And what worked for some is to take a 5 1/2 -4 cut down to around 5 or maybe a little less. I will be doing some prop experimenting over the winter. APC has so many small sizes now, I may be able to find one that works.
From what I found out, the Fora is happy with a 4 pitch. And what worked for some is to take a 5 1/2 -4 cut down to around 5 or maybe a little less. I will be doing some prop experimenting over the winter. APC has so many small sizes now, I may be able to find one that works.
#73
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
It looks like APC has a 4.75"x4, and it has a good shape. I ordered some of those and also some 5-3's. They have a couple of others in a shorter diameter, but I think they may be too small. a 4.5" and a 4.2". At $2 a pop, that is not too bad. Even though the APC will not flex and survive the ground like the Grish props, I am hoping they are better than the glass props. Certainly cheaper, by about half.
#74
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
I would be surprised to hear that any 4 pitch prop does better than the 3 pitch.
Be sure to look for signs of bogging down during tight consecutive maneuvers. You know for sure that destructive heat is building up. The model might look impressive [or not], but monitor the engine's temperature.
This is where audio / video is handy to review what you think you just saw.
Be sure to look for signs of bogging down during tight consecutive maneuvers. You know for sure that destructive heat is building up. The model might look impressive [or not], but monitor the engine's temperature.
This is where audio / video is handy to review what you think you just saw.
#75
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Here is a speed limit match I was in. I have the beige shorts on. Ended up sticking it in the ground after about 4 min. Andy is a member of the world team. Great pilot.
https://www.facebook.com/cary.minor....7706419107937/
https://www.facebook.com/cary.minor....7706419107937/