Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Extreme Speed Prop Planes
Reload this Page >

CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Community
Search
Notices
Extreme Speed Prop Planes Discuss the need for speed with fast prop planes (Screamin Demon, Diamond Dust, Shrikes or any REAL sound breakin'''' plane)

CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2008, 07:12 AM
  #251  
Sniper.308
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

I am going to be selling my F-16 and my F-18 do to I am going all Electric. Pics upon request.

My F-16 $350 + shipping to lower 48 states only.
Would make great for a beater.
w/servos O.S. 91 FX about a gallon, No receiver or battery.
small cracks on belly off of the landing gear holes about 1 inch each, crack in top spine and needs new front retract. Not from a crash or anything just bad landing. All glassing is really easy fix, just have no time to do it.

F-18 $750 +shipping to lower 48 states only.
w/servos no receiver or battery. Sport Jett 90 less than a gallon.
no major damage that I am aware of other than front wire LG has been replaced. OEM one snap on an easy fast landing.

I will take best offers on both planes combined. Will seperate planes, not parts, yet. May part out if I can't sell them. Keep in mind shipping will not be cheap so local pickup is preferred. Shipping to lower 48 states Con US. ONLY!!!!
Old 06-19-2008, 09:09 AM
  #252  
Blade47
Senior Member
 
Blade47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Whitehorse, YT, CANADA
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Has anyone tried a OS 55AX with a Jett muffler? I have one in a AKM F-16 weight at 7.8 pounds and it gets up and goes ...it sure would be a lot lighter and a lot less cost.

cheers
Old 06-19-2008, 09:44 AM
  #253  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!



mmmmmmm.........
the Hornet is a bit big and heavy. And no way to get it much lighter.
Flys great, good wing loading..... but it needs to HP up front.

That 55 approach on the Juno F-18 might be worth an experiment though....
Old 06-19-2008, 09:53 AM
  #254  
Blade47
Senior Member
 
Blade47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Whitehorse, YT, CANADA
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

mmmmm you may be right .... may be a winter project coming up gees almost the longest day and I am already think about sliding back to winter.....crap.....
Old 08-02-2008, 05:22 PM
  #255  
Sniper.308
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Has anyone tried to make their jet electric yet? If I can't sell mine I need to know how to get an inrunner or outrunner in the nose and at what KV?
Jason
Old 08-04-2008, 03:50 PM
  #256  
stevenchao
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Alex, member of Cermark, had flown with Power 60 with 10s battery (around +6000mah and 3800mah). Power plant is okay with either NEO-60 or Power 60. However the battery kills. At 10s, it is a pretty expensive pack. The 7000-7600mah is a bit heavy for the airplane - increase wingload. The 3800 and 4000 is much better for wingload, but short flying time (3+ to 4.3 min). We flew with the same glow setup (no weight reduction) and without spinner.

Peace,
Steven Chao,
Cermark
Old 08-04-2008, 11:39 PM
  #257  
Sniper.308
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Battery is not a problem I'm going A123 anyway. I just need to see how he mounted the motor, wing loading I can deal with.
Thanks,
Jason
Old 08-29-2008, 10:04 PM
  #258  
jetpilotrich
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jetpilotrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , FL
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Hey guys,

Been gone a while since I started the thread... I always seem to finish these planes a year or so after I plan to. Anyway, thanks to "XPHSTOS" and the truly graphic "in-flight breakup" pics he provided. This plane does seem to have a structural flaw in the underside due to the holes that are cut in the underside for the main gear. The pics show where the underside skin buckled and caused the whole fuselage to bend and ultimately fail. I slightly Tested/flexed my fuselage during the assembly process to see what would happen..... and the skin did begin to buckle right between the main wheel well holes.

This weak area between the main wheel wells does seem to be a major flaw and probably should be corrected at the manufacturer with something to make the bottom of the plane more rigid!

Here is the fix I used to hopefully prevent such a failure....

I added 2 carbon fiber rods (to keep it light) between the forward main gear bulkhead and the aft nosegear bulkhead. They are braced in tightly and glued down with a mixture of epoxy and millfiber. I used some small strips of balsa to act as a dam to create a triangular "tub" to fill with epoxy and secure the Rods to both the bulkheads and floor of the plane at the same time. I ran the epoxy the full length of the rods and secured them to the inside/bottom of the fuselage. The lower skin of the fuselage is super rigid now!

The rods are intentionally A-symetrical to allow for the offset nose wheel well.

Here are a few pics of the fix!

Also, I added some pics of the servo arrangement thus far and the retract table I made to cut down on weight and improve the planes balance! As usual, all servos are in the tail except for the Aileron servos.... this should allow for a not so massive battery and lighter weight!

Note the hardwood doubler for the nosegear blocks and the throttle/NWS (NOSE WHEEL STEERING) tubes.

Anyway... plan to finish and fly the plane in a few weeks.... more pics of improvements to come!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Jg14278.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	39.2 KB
ID:	1021985   Click image for larger version

Name:	Mk26234.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	41.3 KB
ID:	1021986   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ni25091.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	40.9 KB
ID:	1021987   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv63610.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	46.5 KB
ID:	1021988   Click image for larger version

Name:	Rp43631.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	66.1 KB
ID:	1021989   Click image for larger version

Name:	Wr53591.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	41.3 KB
ID:	1021990   Click image for larger version

Name:	Bz79587.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	44.2 KB
ID:	1021991   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hc91791.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	32.2 KB
ID:	1021992  

Click image for larger version

Name:	Ec88504.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	27.1 KB
ID:	1021993   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ur52068.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	44.2 KB
ID:	1021994   Click image for larger version

Name:	Jh15056.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	38.2 KB
ID:	1021995   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv63117.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	41.8 KB
ID:	1021996  
Old 08-30-2008, 02:25 PM
  #259  
jetpilotrich
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jetpilotrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , FL
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Here are pics of the weak area from the outside. The underside of the plane between the main wheel wells is thin and weak! It needs to be stiffened up! I should have taken the pics before I added the carbon rods .... it was pretty thin!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv65571.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	33.0 KB
ID:	1022324   Click image for larger version

Name:	Id95899.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	1022325  
Old 09-03-2008, 02:25 AM
  #260  
SpeedBoy
Senior Member
 
SpeedBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Monterrey, MEXICO
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

The new and the old age , both with the same power plant OS 91 FX and 12x10 .
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw67948.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	180.6 KB
ID:	1025186   Click image for larger version

Name:	Wr54598.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	170.3 KB
ID:	1025187  
Old 09-03-2008, 08:52 AM
  #261  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Does that F-4E have inlet condoms on it or something ? [&:]
Old 09-03-2008, 09:14 AM
  #262  
mk1spitfire
Senior Member
 
mk1spitfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

, Ha I saw that too. didn't think it was a phantom at first!!!!!!!
Old 09-03-2008, 09:52 AM
  #263  
envallm
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

SpeedBoy,

Who makes the F4 Phantom you have pictured here with the F/A 18?
Old 09-03-2008, 01:11 PM
  #264  
SpeedBoy
Senior Member
 
SpeedBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Monterrey, MEXICO
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!


ORIGINAL: bob27s

Does that F-4E have inlet condoms on it or something ? [&:]
Hehe yes just a pieces of plastic ..... you know to reduce some drag , once in the air they're invisibles and the difference between with and without is very notable = more speed .
Old 09-03-2008, 01:16 PM
  #265  
SpeedBoy
Senior Member
 
SpeedBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Monterrey, MEXICO
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!


ORIGINAL: morganew

SpeedBoy,

Who makes the F4 Phantom you have pictured here with the F/A 18?
It was Great Planes but some years ago , unfortunately now is discontinued [>:] .
Old 09-03-2008, 01:19 PM
  #266  
envallm
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Thanks Speedboy,

I know its a bit off topic, but can anyone out there recommend a good F4 Phantom prop ARF? Pickings are slim as far as I can tell. I figured this is the crowd to ask. I cant find the Cermark F/A 18 in stock ANYWHERE.

Thanks guys.
Old 09-03-2008, 02:22 PM
  #267  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Cermark should have planes in stock again shortly. And with any luck their F-15 will show up this winter too.


Vmar (richmond) and NitroPlanes both have an F-4 Phantom available as an ARF....

But based on feedback, Id be hard pressed to really recommend either as a "good phantom prop arf".

The Royal F-4E and the GP F-4 both fly very well. Often enough kits for both show up for sale now and then.

There was an excellent Phantom build thread about a year ago (scratch) ... MustangFever ? Cant seem to find the thread...
Old 09-03-2008, 04:34 PM
  #268  
envallm
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Bob,

Inquired with the sales rep at Cermark about Hornet availability...the response..."Its going to be about 3-6 months before we get them back in stock.." Its a sad day for me. Guess I will just outfit my Sundowner 50 with a Jett 60 to get my speed fix until then. Hmm...wonder if a Jett 90LX would fit in my sundowner....

Thanks
Old 09-05-2008, 10:00 AM
  #269  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!


ORIGINAL: morganew

Bob,

Inquired with the sales rep at Cermark about Hornet availability...the response..."Its going to be about 3-6 months before we get them back in stock.." Its a sad day for me. Guess I will just outfit my Sundowner 50 with a Jett 60 to get my speed fix until then. Hmm...wonder if a Jett 90LX would fit in my sundowner....

Thanks
I do not recommend the 90LX in the sundowner. Just not a very clean installation when you are done, and its heavy. And from reports of a couple of people who have tried it.... Dub's 60LX powered sundowner is still faster.
Old 09-18-2008, 08:53 AM
  #270  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Anyone else get their summer project F-18 in the air yet?

Bob
Old 09-19-2008, 10:49 AM
  #271  
xphstos
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hicksville, NY
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

well...im back my second cermark f18 is flying well with 50 flights ........will post pics soon
the plane was clocked at 151 mph.. sooooo every time i take offfffffff i give it its last rightssssssssss lol
Old 10-13-2008, 11:50 PM
  #272  
jetpilotrich
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jetpilotrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , FL
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

I am getting ready to fly mine... what kind of Stab throws are you using? Also.... does the 7" CG in the instruction manual work ok?

Thanks

Rich
Old 10-14-2008, 10:27 AM
  #273  
nazzop
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

the raptor behind the f-18 and the f-4, it got plastic covering the "jet intakes"?
can you put a pic showing it, please?

thanks
Old 10-14-2008, 01:19 PM
  #274  
SpeedBoy
Senior Member
 
SpeedBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Monterrey, MEXICO
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

ORIGINAL: nazzop

the raptor behind the f-18 and the f-4, it got plastic covering the "jet intakes"?
can you put a pic showing it, please?

thanks

Yep , no problem .

These things really help to reduce some drag .

The airplane is of a friend of mine.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ax72811.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	168.6 KB
ID:	1051797   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ql33990.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	163.7 KB
ID:	1051798  
Old 12-26-2008, 02:15 AM
  #275  
P 51 MAN
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TUSCALOOSA, AL
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: CERMARK F-18 HORNET, BUILT IT BETTER, STRONGER, AND FASTER!

Thinking about getting the Cermark F-18. I have an OS 91 on the bench that wants to play.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.